Advertise with ATimes!

Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Japan

Cheap takeover faces troubled Japanese bank
By Richard Hanson

TOKYO - Late in 1933, during a severe banking crisis, three local Osaka financial institutions joined forces to create a "people's" Sanwa Bank, whose written characters mean "three harmonies" - with a three-leaf green clover symbol. This week its luck ran out.

Under its latest name, UFJ Holdings Inc, now Japan's fourth-largest bank, surprised just about everyone by seeking to be taken over by a larger rival, Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group Inc (MTFG). On the face of it, such a match could create the largest bank in the world measured in combined assets. Reports suggested a basic agreement might be announced on Friday.

What is likely to emerge from this agreement to be taken over is a blueprint that will compel UFJ to use its remaining capital to write off the large amounts of outstanding bad loans, some of which have been on its books for more than a decade. According to one source close to the regulators, this will reduce the cost to MTFG.

"It will be a cheap takeover," the source observed. That means the amount of capital to purchase shrinks.

Moreover, UFJ's larger domestic retail business can fill some important gaps in MTFG's domestic business, especially in the western parts of the main island of Honshu, such as the industrial region around Nagoya and the commercial hub of Osaka. MTFG is itself the product of an early merger in 1996, of Mitsubishi Bank (the financial pillar of the Mitsubishi Group) and the Bank of Tokyo (once Japan's designated foreign-exchange specialist).

The public relations boast would be creation of the world's largest banking group in terms of assets. On paper, Mitsubishi Tokyo and UFJ have 140 trillion yen (US$1.2 trillion) Mizuho Financial Group and 100 trillion yen at Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group. In any case the Big Four will become the Big Three. (The US-based Citicorp now is considered the largest in the world. It is also far more profitable.)

In the case of UFJ the question profitability is overshadowed by the more stark prospect of survivability. The bank's relations with the Financial Services Agency (FSA), which regulates financial institutions and markets, have been rocky.

Probes turned up UFJ regulatory problems
FSA investigations last autumn turned up problems. UFJ Holdings was ordered to make much larger provisions for bad loans than it earlier had anticipated. The move was prompted by the discovery that UFJ's bad loans were much higher than it had said. This is a delicate area. UFJ is exposed to a number of large companies that are deeply in debt.

Things got worse. At the end of March, UFJ's bad-loan (to good loan) ratio was 8.5%. That is about twice as high as other banks. MTFG's ratio is less than 3%. UFJ is also still holding large loans from the government, extended during a bank crisis in which Japan actually nationalized some banks. UFJ would have to cut its bad loans sharply to meet FSA goals, which were set by Economy Minister Heizo Takenaka.

In the meantime, UFJ reported losses for three years in a row. In the fiscal year ended March 2004, the FSA ordered the bank to increase its loan loss capital reserves. The result was a consolidated net loss of about 400 billion yen.

Senior management heads rolled. The FSA has pressured the bank on other issues as well involving how the bank is run. Last month, the FSA ordered what are called "administrative business improvements".

As part of efforts to revive its finances, UFJ has set itself a goal of reducing its bad-loans ratio by half. The bank aims to do this mainly by helping its large borrowers return to profitability during the first half of fiscal 2004 (ending September). It is reported, however, that there were doubts inside the bank that this could be achieved.

There are also reports of allegations that UFJ tried to conceal from the FSA the financial condition of a debtor, an act that carries possible criminal action. A takeover by Mitsubishi Tokyo might clear the air over just what kind debt problems exist.

On the one hand, UFJ might be able to expedite efforts to help some of its large debt-ridden customers. The most frequently named companies are a trading company named Sojitz Corp, the big supermarket operator Daiei Inc and condominium builder Daikyo Inc. On the other hand, there are no details provided anywhere about the outstanding debts linked to others, including people who may be involved in illegal activities.

Concerns about criminal liability
That too is a problem in bailing UFJ out of trouble and putting it on track for a takeover. As one Japanese newspaper put it: "Lingering concerns over whether UFJ will be held criminally accountable have hindered its efforts to raise additional funds to substantially reduce its bad loans."

As the story began to slip out on Wednesday, other complications became apparent. Among them, UFJ abruptly called off plans that were being discussed to merge its trust division, UFJ Trust Bank, with Sumitomo Trust & Banking this year.

That could cause complications. Sumitomo Trust & Banking Co has said it considering filing a lawsuit against UFJ. The deal was to sell UFJ Trust Bank to Sumitomo Trust for about 300 billion yen, with a signing expected next Thursday, July 22.

If all goes well, UFJ is planning a "comprehensive integration" with MTFG, including the groups' two trust banking units - Mitsubishi Trust and Banking Corp and UFJ Trust Bank. A top official of Mitsubishi Tokyo Financial Group said his group would consider any merger proposal from UFJ "in a positive light".

If a new holding company is created, there would be four banks belonging to the two groups, according to one report: Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Mitsubishi Trust and Banking Corp, UFJ Bank, and UFJ Trust Bank.

There is considerable speculation over other possibilities of a takeover by MTFG. Among them is whether Mitsubishi would get more favorable consideration for government-linked financing for the Mitsubishi Group's troubled Mitsubishi Motors Corp, which will require a larger infusion of capital to make up for the withdrawal of DaimlerChrysler.

That may be far-fetched. The Mitsubishi Group has said it will back its group-mate. As for the fate of the old Sanwa Bank in the takeover? "UFJ is certainly the loser - they will be the only one left behind," said one source. The luck of the green clover is over.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)



Jul 16, 2004



Koizumi's legacy could be strong economy
(Jun 3, '04)

Ripples from Japanese bank collapse
(Dec 5, '03)
 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong