Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Japan

Japan postal reform: Koizumi's check is in the mail
By Richard Hanson

TOKYO - Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's check is in the mail, so to speak. He just succeeded in winning, and not by a landslide, his own cabinet's approval of the long-term privatization of the creaking historical relic, the Japanese postal system. In keeping with the spirit of the slow-moving postal system, its breakup and reform will take at least 10 years.

After more than three years of hot-and-cold campaigning, Koizumi has more or less won a key victory - a basic plan to privatize the post office - in a battle that some once feared could have become his political Waterloo within his own ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

Yes, we are talking about Japan Post, a venerable 19th-century institution that has been part of the focus of a 21st-century political struggle within the LDP, since before Koizumi was elected to the Diet (parliament) in the early 1970s.

The skirmishing has been going full-tilt within the powerful factions of the ruling party ever since the brash, reform-minded prime minister defeated his most conservative opponents for control of the LDP.

But right down to the last cabinet vote, the split within the LDP was evident. What the cabinet has done is adopt a basic plan for the privatization of "Japan Post", the name given the old Postal Service after the first round of "structural reform" was passed two years ago. The plan envisages a breakup of the public corporation that was formed at the time; it will start in April 2007 and involve a 10-year process.

The factional divides were obvious.

First, the cabinet adopted the plan without gaining the official approval from the ruling party bloc consisting of the LDP and its coalition partner, New Komeito. They, however, withheld a decision in the face of fierce opposition to the plan. The "basic plan" calls for Japan Post to be divided into four companies - mail, postal savings, insurance, and counter operations. A holding organization will own the four companies.

One sign of how shaky this plan may be is that Koizumi plans to set up a new government task force comprising all cabinet ministers to supervise the privatization. The actual blueprint came out of another Koizumi creation, the Japan Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy, which approved it earlier. This group is appointed and chaired by Koizumi himself.

In a broad sense, all this is symbolic of the change that swept the once-seamless world of political power-brokering that in the post-World War II era galvanized politics, big (often government-linked) business, and the permanent bureaucracy. What Koizumi has initiated is not at all revolutionary. What he has done is win office and hold on to it long enough - since April 2001, when he won an LDP primary contest - to begin to see results.

The biggest result has been to slash the power of the traditional factions that grew influential as the LDP, through mergers of mainstream parties, minus the communists and socialists, consolidated its control over the government from 1955 onward. The LDP has been out of power only once since then for a brief period in the early 1990s.

Koizumi saw an opportunity in essence to force the major factions to accept his rule. As a result, the prime minister can take credit for credible if not brilliant performance in a general election last November and an Upper House contest in July, when the LDP failed to win a big victory, but lost little.

What was not anticipated in the political world was the sudden emergence of a credible opposition party in the past year, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). The party has just re-elected a still-young and promising leadership under its president, Katsuya Okada, a former bureaucrat who left the LDP in the early 1990s to help form a new opposition party.

The LDP can probably count on Koizumi to remain its leader for the next two years of his final term as party president. The question is whether he will be able to navigate a number of thorny problems - and a possible change of presidents in the United States. Koizumi and President George W Bush have proved themselves staunch allies, having entered office within three months of each other. They were natural allies after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks in New York and on the Pentagon.

Indeed, Prime Minister Koizumi has pushed the bilateral relationship to a new level of cooperation on security matters, commitments to warships to the Indian Ocean and troops to Iraq. Koizumi has flown off to official visits to Brazil, Mexico and the US, where he attended the United Nations General Assembly and met Bush.

All of this warlike behavior has been swallowed by much of the Japanese public that is still giving him support rates in the polls of about 40%. These numbers fell sharply after a spate of scandals involving pension-fund fraud among a wide swath of politicians, including Koizumi himself many years ago and an ex-DPJ leader. Koizumi is also under fire for the way he sent troops to Iraq and committed to the "postwar" coalition.

On the political plus side, most Japanese support his handling of volatile relations with a menacing North Korea. Koizumi was the first Japanese leader to visit that country, where officials stunned the nation by revelations of long-suspected kidnappings of Japanese.

According to one senior Japanese government official, most people are supporting Koizumi across various issues simply because there are not many alternatives. Supporters of the old post office are not very strong or numerous and this is not a concern for most people.

"Even if Koizumi faces some opposition inside the LDP, I don’t think that it will actually reach the level which can actually destroy his power," said one official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "The importance of the issue is to emphasize the fact that this is a very pure political message being issued by Mr Koizumi to both the Japanese public and also the members of the LDP."

Until now such issues as reforming the postal service have been long-standing political taboos.

"Just touching on this issue is a very clear message to the Japanese people to the effect that 'I think we have to change.' The prime minister himself has touched upon this issue," the official said. "So it can be compared probably to the United States if the president [were] advocating the banning of guns - it's an issue of that kind."

Thirty years ago politicians of all stripes, including the young Koizumi, would have agreed. But not anymore.

Richard Hanson, based in Tokyo, is the author of Money Lords: The Pride and Folly of Japan's Finance Ministry Elites.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Sep 16, 2004



Koizumi legacy could be strong economy
(Jun 3, '04)

Reforms can't please everyone all the time
(May 4, '04)
 


   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong