WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Japan
     Jun 7, 2007
Page 1 of 3
Okinawa and the 'beautiful country'
By Gavan McCormack

Last July, three months before he became prime minister of Japan, Shinzo Abe published his political manifesto under the title Utsukushii kuni e ("Toward a Beautiful Country"). It is well known that Abe's sense of beauty involves a denial of the darkest aspects of wartime history and insistence on compulsory love of country, and that he is committed to revision of the country's basic institutions accordingly.

But the fundamental changes in the country's military posture, and especially in its relationship with the United States, have



received less attention. Here we consider evidence of a new domestic role for the Self Defense Forces (SDF) as enforcer of unpopular policies, and the implications of a new law to facilitate US military reorganization. Okinawa is at the center of both.

On May 11, the Japanese Maritime SDF's Bungo minesweeper set sail from the naval base at Yokosuka, near Tokyo, for Okinawa, under orders from Abe to assist in a "preliminary" survey of the ocean floor of Oura Bay, where his government plans to construct a state-of-the-art base for American marines.

Under cover of darkness, divers from the Bungo carried out their seabed survey and the ship then withdrew. The operation took only a few days, and neither the media nor the local and national groups opposing the base caught sight of the Bungo or its divers.

Insignificant, one might say, yet it would be a mistake to dismiss it as such, for the event reveals much about the character of Abe's Japan.

In 2005 and 2006, the US and Japanese governments drew up a major agreement on the reorganization of US forces in Japan. [1] It was a complex deal, but the bottom line was integrating the forces of the two countries, especially their intelligence and command functions, and transforming Japan's "Self-Defense Forces" into a junior partner of the United States in the "global war on terror", as the "Great Britain of East Asia". The SDF's justification had hitherto rested on its role in the defense of Japan "against direct or indirect aggression".

Japan was to meet the cost of the reorganization, including US$6.5 billion just for relocating 8,000 marines and their families to Guam (even building houses and recreational facilities there for them) and an unspecified sum for the construction of the new base in Okinawa (for which estimates range in the $10 billion-plus range). This is quite apart from the institutionally entrenched subsidies that have been going on for more than 30 years, and will continue.

Despite Japan's "pacifist" constitution, which Prime Minister Abe is moving aggressively to consign to the dustbin of history, Japan is the world's No 3 or 4 military power. In naval terms it is probably No 2, its Maritime SDF having 45,842 sailors, 152 major vessels including four Aegis destroyers (cost about $3 billion to $4 billion each), 54 convoy ships (conventional destroyers), 16 submarines, and multiple anti-submarine, reconnaissance, supply, rescue and minesweeping vessels (such as the Bungo) - pretty much everything but aircraft carriers.

For more than a decade, the Japanese government has worked to soften Japanese public opinion about its steady military-expansion program by stretching the constitution to the limits, sending the SDF to participate, first in United Nations peacekeeping operations, and then in US-led "coalition of the willing" operations in the Indian Ocean and Iraq. But that has not been enough to satisfy the Pentagon, which now clearly wants Japan to remove the remaining constitutional and legal shackles from this formidable force so that it can be fully incorporated under US command throughout the "arc of instability".

A raft of legislation - ultimately intended to include revision of the constitution - became necessary to implement the various new Japanese commitments. As the Bungo sailed, the Diet (parliament) was considering a bill "to facilitate the implementation of plans to realign US forces in Japan", which it passed a few days later, on May 23. [2]

The May 23 law is designed to step up the pressure on local governments by financially rewarding those who submit to the paramount will of the national government and accept the primacy of defense and US considerations over civil and democratic ones, while punishing those who give priority to local democratic opinion and processes.

Cooperative local governments are to be given substantial sums, in tranches at the various stages of specific projects - consent, survey, construction, completion. It was designed with Okinawa particularly in mind, but other localities too now face a panoply of financial and other interventions.

The Oura Bay/Cape Henoko base, whose construction the Abe government is so anxious to advance that it sent in the SDF, has long been a running sore in the US-Japan relationship. [3] In 1996 such a base, at first called a "heliport", was proposed as part of the deal between the administrations of Japanese prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto and US president Bill Clinton to allow the return to Japan of the Futenma US Marine Corps base in central Okinawa. Futenma sits incongruously and threateningly in the middle of the bustling town of Ginowan. Henoko, the chosen replacement site, was a sleepy fishing hamlet, long coveted by the Pentagon as part of its plan to rationalize and concentrate its forces in the north of the island.

In 1997, however, the people of Nago city (the administrative unit that included the base site) intervened. In a historic referendum held under great political and financial pressure from Tokyo, the majority withheld consent from any base construction plan. Tokyo, refusing to consider any alternative, tried everything to break the city's will: refusal of cooperation with the then prefectural governor (who in 1998 decided to abide by the will of the Nago people rather than do the wishes of Tokyo), political arm-twisting, lavish handouts (bribery), and psychological warfare (a campaign to persuade Okinawans that their role in the defense of the rest of Japan should be something to be proud of).

It achieved some success in cultivating an obedient, base-oriented mentality on the part of local government officials, and managed to sway the outcomes of a string of local elections, but the resistance remained strong. For much of 2004 and 2005 all attempts to conduct the necessary preliminary environmental survey of the base site (a few hundred meters from the current one) were defeated by a coalition of local and national environmental and anti-base groups, which camped around the clock at the site and surrounded and blocked the survey workers in canoes and small craft.

In September 2005, then-prime minister Junichiro Koizumi withdrew the plan. The new site was chosen in part because it would allow construction to be done from within an existing US base, Camp Schwab, a few hundred meters away from the one that Koizumi had abandoned. It consisted of a much-expanded, dual-runway, V-shaped structure that would span Cape Henoko and extend into the sea at both ends. Centering it on the base would make the site virtually inaccessible to protesters.

Nobody in Okinawa was consulted, and the decision sparked outrage across Okinawan society, from the governor on down. Surveys recorded unprecedented (85%) levels of opposition to the project. [4] By sending in the Bungo to help conduct the survey, Abe signaled his contempt for such Okinawan sentiment and his readiness to use force if necessary to deliver what the Pentagon (and Abe) wanted.

There was an especially bitter irony in the fact of the first dispatch of the forces of the newly (2006) upgraded Ministry of Defense against Okinawans. Okinawan understanding of "national defense" is forever marked by the experience of 1945, when tens of thousands died as the Imperial Japanese Army prolonged a futile resistance to the Allied forces in the attempt to stave off as long as possible the attack on mainland Japan.

Having been major victims of Japanese militarism, Okinawans since then have had foisted on them the militarism that mainland Japan on the whole avoided, first from 1945 to 1972 as a direct US military colony and then, from 1972, as a part of Japan but one that was uniquely war-oriented and militarized.

By covertly deploying Japan's military to Oura Bay, Abe was signaling a shift in the postwar state, something he is determined to consolidate by major constitutional revision, drastically diminishing local powers and extending the central authority of the

Continued 1 2


Base fatigue in Okinawa (Nov 22, '06)

Japan, US closer in step (Oct 29, '05)


1. Yes, Rambo, you get to win this time 

2. Turkish threat echoes across Iraq

3India caught in a ring of fire

4. Outdated status quo in the Taiwan Strait

5. Iran's practical nationalism

6. Anger builds in besieged Fallujah

7. The new Great Wall - in the Pacific

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, June 5)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110