Korean 'well-being' slogan
for some, not others By David
Scofield
SEOUL - Is South Korea set to exit the
economic doldrums? That's the optimistic slant some
domestic analysts are putting on data released recently
by South Korea's National Statistical Office, showing
consumer sentiment on the up in September. With a score
over 100 indicating more people than not planning to
increase spending on goods and services over the coming
month, September scored 88.9, the first move up in five
months. Hardly time to uncork the champagne for sure,
but is this the beginning of a recovery?
Stable
growth, the obvious precursor to President Roh
Moo-hyun's oft-stated goal of US$20,000 per capita
income level - non-adjusted per capita income has
hovered around $10,000 for much of the last decade -
hinges not only on strong export growth to China (the
45% increase in exports to China in 2003 helped keep
Korea on track and out of recession), but the
willingness of South Koreans to open their wallets again
and spend, something most are reluctant, or unable, to
do.
Indeed, given the almost $400 billion in
household debt hanging over the economy, a return to the
heydays of consumerism in South Korea may be wishful
thinking. But while extravagant consumption by those
least able to repay may not return, there is a class of
people in South Korea with tremendous wealth at their
disposal - funds that need to be circulated throughout
the economy if a recovery is to take hold.
Capital flight has been a concern for South
Korean governments, perhaps most acutely decades ago
when the movement of capital out of the country could
have derailed Korea's meteoric rise in global economic
stature. Previous administrations imposed tight
regulations on the movement of capital out of the
country. The family-owned corporate behemoths were
legislated through import/export credits to reinvest in
the nation.
But Korea's latest economic setbacks
have been a product, not just of funds flowing out of
the nation, but of dwindling savings rates, an unstable
job market and a flawed policy by the central government
that encouraged unsustainable debt spending. The results
are today's tremendous debt hangover and an average
savings rate only half the 8-10% rate many foreign
analysts believe is necessary to prompt strong domestic
spending. Those Koreans not deeply in hock are concerned
about their job prospects as the country's corporate
stalwarts are being increasingly driven to the more
reasonable (read: cheap) wages of China, right next
door.
Of course, Korea is still a wealthy
country. Its gross household debt levels, while
alarming, pale in comparison to those found in the
United Kingdom of the United States. The richest, those
whose investments have driven the high growth rates that
Koreans have enjoyed for many years, have to be lead
back into the domestic market. The question is how.
Looser controls on capital, a product of Korea's 1998
International Monetary Fund bailout, have made it hard
to impossible for the Roh administration to stem the
hemorrhage of badly needed investment capital. It's also
made it very difficult to precisely determine just how
much is flowing out.
The National Statistical
Office indicates that $13.6 billion was moved out of
Korea in the first eight months of the year, much,
ostensibly, through emigration and for overseas
education. But that is hardly the complete picture. It
doesn't capture the monies that have flowed into
international commodities and gold over the last few
months, nor does it reflect the corporate funds flowing
to more stable, profitable climes - not just from the
nation's giants, but now from thousands of small- and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) whose own debts are
pushing them to look beyond Korea for cheaper labor and
increased profits. SMEs are estimated to hold between
$190-200 billion in loans due to mature this year.
There is little the government can do through
legislation alone. To attempt to plug the holes will be
counterproductive as investors view unfettered profit
repatriation as a minimum prerequisite to investment.
The key to reversing the tide is not through crackdowns
or new cumbersome regulations, but by creation of a
domestic environment that Koreans want to invest in.
It seems like Roh's government has accepted this
point, at least in theory, evidenced in Roh's new
"well-being" mantra. Well-being, a phrase brimming with
marketing value, is everywhere in Korea these days.
Restaurants, pharmacies, health clubs - virtually every
service available in the country is prefacing the
service on offer with "well-being". But while the term
resonates with some people, exactly how all this
wellness is to be achieved is less apparent.
The
well-being slogan seems to be interpreted differently
depending on age and social situation. For Korea's
well-heeled elite, the accumulation of greater profits
seems to be the focus of well-being. Their acquisition
of commodities, gold and offshore real estate may be the
path to their personal well-being, but it's not what Roh
had in mind when he first began using the term a couple
of months ago.
For the younger generation,
well-being, at least for some, seems to be increasingly
hinged on emigration - well-being through escape.
According to a Canadian embassy official who attended a
two-day immigration fair in Seoul in October, the
profile of prospective Korean immigrants is changing
fast. During the fair last year, the vast majority of
those seeking information on moving to Canada were in
their 30s and 40s, many citing their children's
education as the primary reason behind their wish to
emigrate. This year, almost 70% of the 19,000 Koreans
who visited the fair were in their 20s or 30s. No longer
citing education as the primary motivator for moving,
many said they wanted to go to Canada for a more
comfortable lifestyle: well-being, at least for many of
Korea's young and well-educated, is best found outside
Korea.
It's the same story one hears from an
employee at the global headquarters of Korea's second
largest conglomerate, LG Group, in Seoul. Far from being
afraid of hard work, the 20-something with a foreign
master's degree in business administration decried the
inefficiencies of the system he and his peers must work
under. "The top bosses are concerned only with
maximizing their power," he fumed, "while the rest live
in fear of being made redundant," a fear that increases
exponentially as the workers' age increases. The system
prompts fearful middle-managers to push the young talent
beneath to perform superhuman feats, all in the hope of
impressing those above them and keeping their jobs for
another year.
The system isn't new, the long
hours expected of Korea's corporate workers are the
stuff of legend, but unlike the past when the company
reciprocated with job guarantees, no such guarantees
exist today and the fear has never been so pronounced.
Overtime is rarely logged. Those who've worked within
the Korean corporate world know of another long
tradition, that of assigning work at the end of the day
- a strategy designed to ensure all workers are still at
their desks long after the official workday is over.
This is designed not to increase worker output per se
but to ensure an office of diligent workers bound to
their desks when the top executives leave for the day.
Given the realities of life within Korea's largest
firms, slogans of "well-being" thus only serve to
demonstrate to many of Korea's younger professionals
just how far removed they are from Roh's new lifestyle
ideal.
But this may also be a pointer to the
fact that Roh's claims of the pursuit of well-being will
propel the nation forward are right on the mark. A
happier, less fearful workforce with time for family and
weekends - and spending the income in the process -
could be just the growth engine the domestic economy
needs. A vibrant domestic economy ensures expansion,
which in turn will attract the funds that are presently
drifting abroad. But "well-being" will have to become
more than just another feel-good slogan and address the
issues of discontent that plague the domestic economy.
David Scofield, former lecturer at the
Graduate Institute of Peace Studies, Kyung Hee
University, is currently conducting post-graduate
research at the School of East Asian Studies, University
of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
(Copyright
2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please
contact content@atimes.com for
information on our sales and syndication
policies.) |