|
|
|
 |
Pyongyang reveals its
hand By Selig Harrison
(Republished with permission from Japan
Focus)
During the next three
months, North Korea will unload its nuclear
reactor at Yongbyon, removing fuel rods that can
be reprocessed into plutonium for more nuclear
weapons. Once again, Pyongyang is offering to
negotiate a freeze that would prevent further
reprocessing, as it did in June, 1994, leading to
the Agreed Framework, and as it has repeatedly
offered to do in the six-party talks.
This
is the good news emerging from my ninth visit to
North Korea from April 5 to April 9. The bad news
is that Pyongyang is no longer prepared to discuss
the dismantlement of its existing nuclear weapons
as part of the six-party process in Beijing. First
Deputy Foreign Minister Kang Sok-ju told this
writer categorically that North Korea would no
longer engage in discussions on dismantlement
until the United States normalized its economic
and political relations with Pyongyang and made a
credible commitment not to continue promoting
"regime change".
What this posture means
is that Pyongyang intends to keep the nuclear
weapons it already claims to possess, but is
prepared to rule out the enlargement of its
arsenal by negotiating a freeze.
My
meetings in Pyongyang included Kim Yong Name-nam,
president of the Supreme People's Assembly (one
hour), Kang Sok-ju (two hours), Deputy Foreign
Minister Kim Gye-gwan, who has represented
Pyongyang until now in the Beijing talks (five
hours) and General Ri Chan-bok, the North Korean
representative at Panmunjom (two hours).
All of them emphasized that North Korea
now considered itself to be on a par with the US
as a nuclear weapons state and that the
denuclearization of the Korean peninsula must now
embrace "the US nuclear threat in the peninsula
and its vicinity" as well as the dismantling of
North Korea's nuclear weapons.
This
position was spelled out at length in a March 31
Foreign Ministry pronouncement calling for the
removal of the US nuclear weapons allegedly stored
in secret at Kunsan and other US bases in the
South. However, it was clear that these are not
serious immediate demands. North Korean
inspections of US bases in the South, I was told,
would logically have to be accompanied by some
form of inspection of North Korean nuclear
facilities involving the US, but such reciprocal
inspection arrangements could only occur, as a
practical matter, after the US and North Korea had
established normalized relations and had greater
mutual trust.
What North Korea wants now
is a start toward normalization with the US in the
form of direct bilateral talks with the US. A
direct bilateral dialogue is regarded as an
essential first gesture of a willingness to
recognize and legitimize the North Korean regime.
Six-party talks could also be held, but
Pyongyang's emphasis is on direct talks.
Kim Gye-gwan emphasized that North Korea
was not seeking to impose preconditions for its
participation in the six-party talks relating to
the agenda, such as a US willingness to discuss
its March 31 demands. However, North Korea would
not attend, he said, unless the US "improves the
atmosphere for the talks by making clear that it
is not seeking regime change".
The formal
North Korean position is that Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice should apologize for calling
North Korea "an outpost of tyranny". But Kim
Yong-nam said, "If they are not prepared to do
that, there should be some other way to provide us
with a justification to attend. It's up to them to
find a way. The ball is in their court."
Similarly, Kang Sok-ju said that it was
not enough for Rice to have said: "No one denies
that North Korea is a sovereign state." I asked
whether it would be satisfactory if she said that
"the United States will respect the sovereignty
and territorial integrity of the DPRK and is
prepared for peaceful coexistence despite the
differences in our social systems". "That's
something we can accept," he said, "But we want to
hear it directly in open or secret discussions
with the US."
"We need a springboard to be
at the six-party talks," Kang added, "some signal
that the United States treats us with respect. We
have to convince our army and our people that we
are acting in a way consistent with the dignity of
a sovereign state that is respected as a strong
military state. It's not a difficult thing to be
at the six-party talks, but we can't do so if we
are going there under pressure."
Although
Kang Sok-ju and Li Gun, director of the American
Affairs Bureau in the Foreign Ministry, told me
flatly that the periodic unloading of the Yongbyon
reactor would begin this month, I could not get
them to say whether the unloading had already
started, or to specify precisely when it would
start. Similarly, all of those I met were vague
about whether a nuclear test explosion was being
planned, or whether one was even necessary.
When I asked Kim Yong-nam how he knew
North Korea's nuclear weapons would work in the
absence of a test, he replied, "The agencies
concerned are convinced that they have all the
preparations made properly, and that our nuclear
weapons are operational." General Ri Chan-bok
said, "There's no need for a test, and we don't
want to have one, even one underground, because of
the fallout. Without a test, our nuclear deterrent
will be functional. We are ready to put warheads
on our missiles whenever we want."
This
statement suggested that the warheads were not yet
on the missiles. It also prompted me to ask
whether the North Korean deterrent consisted only
of missiles, or also included air-deliverable
nuclear bombs. "In the 21st century," he replied,
"it's hard for me to believe that any country
would use air deliverable nuclear weapons."
Selig S Harrison is director of
the Asia program at the Center for International
Policy. Harrison is the author of numerous books
including Korea Endgame: A Strategy for Korean
Unification and US Disengagement. He has
visited North Korea nine times.
(Republished with permission from Japan Focus) |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
All material on this
website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written
permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times
Online Ltd.
|
|
Head
Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong
Kong
Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
|
|
|
|