WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Apr 14, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Down to the wire in Korea
By Donald Kirk

SEOUL - The sense of optimism among Americans about the prospects for North Korea giving up its nuclear program was almost infectious.

First there was the chief US envoy, Christopher Hill, saying the question of North Korea's funds in Macau's Banco Delta Asia (BDA) was "really resolved", and then there was New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson saying the North Koreans could shut



down their nuclear reactor "in a few days".

As this weekend's "deadline" for shutting down the nuclear reactor edged near, however, confidence faded into questions of when or whether the North Koreans would do it - and whether the deadline had any real meaning.

Hill seemed less than enthusiastic about fudging, saying, "I don't want to get into extending the deadline," but the Americans held out the distinct hope that North Korea would at least accept inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as a start on living up to their word.

While the North Koreans showed no sign of hitting the off switch on the reactor by Saturday, Richardson gave the impression the IAEA inspectors could go in quickly, revisiting the site from which they were expelled at the end of 2002 after the breakdown of the 1994 agreement.

"We are looking for the IAEA officials to start drafting documents to shut down the reactor," he said, claiming North Korea's chief negotiator, Kim Kye-gwan, had said his government "upon resolution of the bank transfer issue the next day would invite IAEA officials".

Then "hopefully", said Richardson, who has been to North Korea half a dozen times in recent years, slightly qualifying this optimistic view, "that will happen".

Just what will really happen next, though, is far from clear. South Korea's Yonhap news agency described the deal as "on the verge of being crippled" after the North responded with stony silence to declarations by Hill and Richardson that its agents were free to draw their funds from the bank.

North Korea did not appear to be in any rush. A Foreign Ministry spokesman, breaking the silence on Friday, said that a "financial institution would confirm soon whether the measure" de-freezing the funds was "valid", after which the government would live up to the agreement. There was no clue, though, as to when to expect confirmation.

South Korean Foreign Minister Song Min-soon was anxious to play down the significance of the North's meeting the deadline set by the six-party agreement of February 13 under which it was supposed to complete "the first phase" - the shutdown of the reactor - within 60 days.

What counted, he said, was "whether we can firmly implement the measures and move on to the next phase".

Song was even more emphatic during a breakfast with Korean journalists. "All the parties have an intention to carry out the agreement," he was quoted as saying. "It's important not to be bound by to the date but to carry out the steps in a stable way."

The trouble, as Yonhap noted, was that "a missed deadline would inevitably lead to a delay" in the second phase of the February agreement. That's the period in which North Korea is supposed to list - and then disable - all its nuclear facilities. North Korea under the agreement is to receive 50,000 tonnes of heavy fuel from South Korea just for shutting down the reactor and then 950,000 tonnes as it does away with its whole program.

Analysts here believed North Korea would go on bargaining. "There are many pitfalls," said Park Joong-song, research fellow at the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security. "They will make sure they receive everything before they shut down their facility."

Both Hill and Richardson shrugged off a report that North Korea might again play its usual delaying tactics by suggesting that it would take another 30 days to switch off the 5-megawatt reactor at its nuclear complex at Yongbyon, 90 kilometers north of Pyongyang.

No way should it take that long, said Richardson, putting on a show of solemn determination after four days meeting with senior officials in Pyongyang. "I believe that is too much time," he said, recounting one of several meetings with North Koreans. "You don't need 30 days to shut down a reactor."

Richardson insisted the US Treasury Department had removed all possible barriers to the recovery by North Korea of the $25 million frozen since September 2005. It was then that the Treasury Department said North Korea had been using the bank as a conduit for US$100 "supernotes" counterfeited in Pyongyang and 

Continued 1 2 


North Koreans hungry for a deal (Mar 24, '07)

North Korea hawks down but not out (Mar 14, '07)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110