WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Jun 23, 2007
North Korea: Did anyone say 'enriched uranium'?
By Donald Kirk

JEJU, South Korea –Mystery hung over US envoy Christopher Hill's overnight foray to Pyongyang, even as he let it be known that his talks with his North Korean counterpart, Kim Kye-gwan, were "very detailed" and "substantive".

The questions as Hill discussed the meetings after getting to Seoul on Friday were about the nature of the details - and how substantive did they get.

If Hill raised the ticklish issue of North Korea's highly enriched uranium (HEU) program in any detail, he was not letting on. And if



he came up with a proposal for the US simply to buy up North Korea's nuclear inventory, as widely reported in South Korea, he was not about to confirm or deny anything to that effect.

Hill did, however, appear anxious to convey the impression of having talked about highly enriched uranium without actually using the term. It was, after all, the HEU issue that torpedoed the Geneva agreement of 1994 when his predecessor, James Kelly, alleged after visiting Pyongyang nearly five years ago that a top North Korean had indeed acknowledged the existence of a secret HEU program.

"We did discuss the need to have a comprehensive list of all nuclear programs," said Hill. For good measure, he added, "And, of course, all means all."

It was North Korea's supposed acknowledgement to Kelly of the HEU program that set off the chain reaction that resulted in North Korea expelling inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at the end of 2002.

The IAEA inspectors had been posted at the North Korean complex at Yongbyon, under terms of the 1994 agreement, making sure the padlock was firmly fixed on the five-megawatt nuclear reactor that North Korea had been using before 1994 to produce one or two warheads with plutonium at their core. North Korea soon after their departure said it had resumed making plutonium while steadfastly denying anything to do with highly enriched uranium.

In a sense, Hill's flight to Pyongyang - the first visit there by a senior US official since Kelly's disastrous sortie in October 2002 - appeared as an effort to make amends. If Kelly and his entourage had returned to Seoul in a mood of impending crisis, Hill came out of Pyongyang with an air of having made amends for the unpleasantness of the past.

It was as though he and Kim Kye-gwan were in sync on just about everything, at least to judge from his remark that "both of us confirmed the commitment" to the six-nation agreement of February 13 outlining a series of steps for North Korea's complete dismantlement of its nuclear program.

They had discussed, said Hill, the "momentum and dynamism that will take us to the end game" of the whole difficult process and the need for renewal of the six-party talks to get things going again after what Hill said had been "a bump in the road". Moreover, said Hill, he had paid a courtesy call on Pak Ui-chun, North Korea's new foreign minister, on a schedule arranged solely by Kim, and they had talked about ministerial-level talks that might involve a meeting between Pak and Hill's boss, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The "bump" was the protracted refusal of North Korea to invite in IAEA inspectors again and shut down that five-megawatt facility as agreed on February 13. North Korea was to have done so within 60 days but balked as long as it was unable to withdraw US$25 million from Banco Delta Asia in Macau, blacklisted by the Treasury Department for serving as a conduit for counterfeit $100 bills printed on a Swiss press in Pyongyang.

Having worked out the complex arrangement under which the money was finally transferred to the Russian central bank through the Federal Reserve Bank in New York after no other bank anywhere would touch the stuff, Hill left no doubt that North Korea would now abide by the deal.

"The DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea ] indicated they're prepared promptly to shut down the Yongbyon facility," he said, and they're also "prepared to disable the Yongbyon facility", meaning the place will quite soon be relegated into the history of crisis on the Korean Peninsula.

But when? That was a question that Hill was not going to answer as he stood beside his host, South Korea's nuclear envoy, Chun Yung-woo. Nor did Chun have any response - other than to say his government would provide 50,000 tonnes of heavy fuel oil simultaneously with the shutdown of the Yongbyon facility and 950,000 tonnes whenever North Korea did away with the whole program.

Whatever else happened, said Chun, he could not envision any scenario whereby "the agreement would fail to be implemented" because the five other parties (South Korea, China, Russia, the US and Japan) "failed to provide assistance" to the North, the sixth signatory.

Just when the IAEA team will go to Pyongyang, though, is still not certain after the North Korean Embassy in Vienna said the trip had had to be postponed while North Korea still waited to receive the $25 million. The money apparently lingered in the Russian central bank, a glitch that South Korean officials preferred to view as a mere technicality.

The mood in Jeju at a lavish government-sponsored "peace forum" was irrepressibly optimistic as Hill was visiting Pyongyang. President Roh Moo-hyun, opening the forum, said confidently the initial steps of the February 13 agreement "are now being implemented" and "six-party talks are also likely to resume soon".

His remarks showed his anger over what had been the confrontational policy of the US during President George W Bush's first term.

"At that time, even talk of a possible military strike by the United States percolated," said Roh, and fears rose again last July and October when North Korea "first test-fired missiles and then conducted as nuclear test". Now, he said, "The North Korean nuclear issue is moving onto the path to peaceful resolution."

Hill, however, warned that the saga was far from finished. "Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula will be a very difficult process," he cautioned. Yes, he was "buoyed by the sense we are able to achieve our full objective of complete denuclearization" but also "burdened by the sense we will have to go to a great deal of effort".

Foreign Minister Song Min-soon, hosting a gala luncheon before flying to Seoul to meet Hill, hinted at the difficulties. "We cannot concede or compromise over the task of ensuring that North Korea gives up all nuclear weapons and other programs," he said. "It is imperative that this goal must be achieved."

Like Hill, Song did not want to get into just what those weapons and programs were - the dirty words, "highly enriched uranium", as if by common agreement, remained unspoken.

Journalist Donald Kirk has been covering Korea - and the confrontation of forces in Northeast Asia - for more than 30 years.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Roh hopes for a miracle (Jun 19, '07)

North Korea's Dear Film Buff (Jun 15, '07)

Kim Jong-il's vanishing act (Jun 15, '07)


1. Careful what you wish for, China may grant it

2. Iran: Conflicting claims reveal US rift

3. Olympic flame a burning issue for China

4. Tony Blair as Middle East czar 

5. Taliban losing the will to talk

6. Japan goes prospecting for rare metals

7. 'Unfounded, exaggerated and ill-intentioned'

(24 hours to 11.59pm ET, June 21, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110