WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Jul 17, 2007
Pyongyang shuts reactor, opens mouth
By Donald Kirk

WASHINGTON - North Korea opened a prolonged campaign for a long list of concessions after shutting down its 5-megawatt experimental reactor at its nuclear complex at Yongbyon, about 100 kilometers north of Pyongyang.

Senior North Korean diplomats signaled their strategy at the outset of what is likely to be an unsuccessful drive to get the country to abandon its entire nuclear program in accordance with



the six-nation agreement reached in Beijing in February. Well before inspectors from the International Atomic Energy (IAEA) arrived in Pyongyang to monitor and verify the shutdown of the reactor, Han Song-ryol, head of the North Korean Disarmament-Peace Institute, said "denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula is possible" only if the US suspends its "hostile policy" and withdraws its troops from South Korea.

Han, who previously served as North Korea's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, issued this warning in a talk at Chatham House in London after Pyongyang had called for military talks with the United States. Washington, however, refused to accept Pyongyang's suggestion, which diplomats viewed as an attempt to bypass South Korea.

North Korea's call for withdrawal of the 29,000 US troops still in South Korea leads a long list of demands that Pyongyang plans to make at every stage of the bargaining process. North Korea's rationale is that it can only meet conditions of the February agreement "in tandem" with reciprocal responses and gestures by the US.

Pyongyang followed this strategy in finally deciding to shut down the reactor after Washington had given up an attempt to isolate North Korea from the international financial community by blacklisting Banco Delta Asia in Macau as a conduit for North Korean counterfeit money.

Pyongyang was to have turned off the reactor within 60 days of the signing of the February agreement but waited another three months while the US got Banco Delta Asia to transmit US$25 million in North Korean accounts to the US Federal Reserve Bank in New York, which relayed the money to the Russian Central Bank, which in turn placed it in a North Korean account.

The transfer of the funds represented a reversal of a US Treasury Department effort to isolate North Korea financially by banning any institution dealing with Banco Delta Asia from doing business in the US or with any US institution. Treasury officials charged North Korea with using the bank as a conduit for counterfeit funds and also for dealing in arms and drugs.

Even after getting the $25 million, North Korea held off on shutting down the reactor until receiving 6,200 tonnes in heavy fuel oil from South Korea - the initial portion of 50,000 tonnes in heavy fuel that the North is getting as a reward for living up, finally, to the first stage of the February agreement.

While the shipment was on the way, however, Kim Myong-gil, North Korea's current deputy ambassador to the UN, listed more demands, including the lifting of all economic sanctions and removal of the nation from the US State Department's list of "terrorist countries".

North Korea is sure, however, to demand far more, including talks on a "peace treaty" for the Korean Peninsula and an enormous infusion of energy aid.

"North Korea will try every attempt to maximize confrontation," said Kim Tae-woo, senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Defense Analyses. "Sooner or later they will talk about peace talks" - with withdrawal of US troops sure to be a condition for a peace treaty to replace the armistice that ended the Korean War in July 1953.

Both those topics are certain to worry South Korean leaders even though the South has promoted reconciliation with North Korea. South Korean officials will oppose peace talks that exclude the South and also want US troops to remain in the country despite leftist pressure for all of them to leave.

While promoting these demands, North Korea will try to pressure the US and South Korea into providing vast quantities of energy aid in addition to the 50,000 tonnes the South is now sending.

The February agreement calls for North Korea to receive another 950,000 tonnes after acknowledging all its nuclear activities and then abandoning the entire program. North Korea, however, wants continual shipments of heavy fuel oil - and also is expected to call for resumption of construction of twin light-water nuclear reactors on its northeast coast.

The 1994 Geneva Framework Agreement called for North Korea to get the light-water energy reactors at a cost of more than $5 billion, most of it provided by South Korea, while the US was to send heavy fuel to North Korea until the reactors were completed. North Korea, under terms of the 1994 agreement, shut down its 5-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon while inspectors from the IAEA were on permanent duty there making sure the reactor was sealed and locked.

The 1994 agreement broke down, however, after a senior North Korean official in October 2002 acknowledged to a visiting US team led by James Kelly, then the US chief envoy on North Korea, the existence of a program for developing nuclear warheads with highly enriched uranium. North Korea repeatedly denied having made such an admission and expelled the IAEA inspectors at the end of 2002 after the US suspended shipments of heavy fuel oil as called for in the 1994 agreement.

The shutdown, again, of the Yongbyon reactor completes a circular pattern that leaves North Korea about where it was five years ago. The difference, however, is that North Korea, after restarting the reactor, built several nuclear warheads with plutonium at their core in addition to two such warheads that it had had in its stockpile before the signing of the 1994 agreement.

While the IAEA inspectors are back in North Korea this week, negotiators will again converge on Beijing for resumption of the six-party talks at which Pyongyang is expected to suggest specific demands in return for listing all its nuclear activities, as stipulated in the next stage of the agreement, and dismantling everything it has at the Yongbyon complex.

South Korean analysts complain that a major problem is that the February agreement does not specify exactly what programs the North must give up. The agreement does not mention highly enriched uranium, for instance, although the chief US envoy, Christopher Hill, has said North Korea must come clean about highly enriched uranium. Nor does the agreement say anything about North Korea's nuclear stockpile, which may amount to as many as a dozen warheads.

Analysts believe North Korean leader Kim Jong-il views those warheads as his main bargaining chip even though he's not likely to want to produce more of them. North Korea conducted its first and only underground nuclear test last October 6, three months after test-firing seven missiles that presumably could be designed to carry a warhead to a target.

"Christopher Hill has in mind the disablement of the nuclear facilities within this year," said Kim Sung-han, professor at the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, "but I'm not sure North Korea is ready to do that."

Even after the nuclear facilities are disabled, analysts noted, North Korea would still have nuclear warheads and missiles.

The North's timing appeared to reflect the desire to influence the South Korean presidential election in December. North Korea has castigated possible conservative candidates who have promised to reverse many of the left-of-center policies of South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun and his predecessor, Kim Dae-jung, who formed the Sunshine Policy of reconciliation with the North.

North Korea may also want to wrest more concessions from the US before that country's next presidential election in November 2008. President George W Bush has softened his previous hardline policy on North Korea, listening to the advice of the State Department rather than that of Vice President Richard Cheney and other opponents of reconciliation.

Journalist Donald Kirk has been covering Korea - and the confrontation of forces in Northeast Asia - for more than 30 years.
(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


North Korea accord: Now for the hard part (Feb 14, '07)

North Korea: Yes, we have no uranium (Feb 24, '07)


1. Ready, aim, fire and rain

2. The robbery of the century

3. A new front opens in Pakistan 

4. War games, mind games or the real deal?    

5. India pushes people power in Africa

6. Planet Pentagon: The Earth, seas and skies

7. US hysteria hikes China trade tensions

8. Pakistan heading for a crackdown


9. The Chinese dollar hoard thunders forward


(July 13 - 15, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110