|
|
|
 |
|
Please provide your name or a
pen name, and your country of residence.
Lengthy letters run the risk of being cut.
Please note: This Letters page is intended primarily for
readers to comment on ATol articles or related issues. It should not be used as
a forum for readers to debate with each other.
The Edge is the place for that. The editors do not mind publishing one
or two responses to a reader's letter, but will, at their
discretion, direct debaters away from the Letters page.
APRIL 2008
[Re
Doubting Obama, Apr 29] The double standard being applied to
Obama for the remarks made by another human being whom he does not control or
own must emphasize once again how deeply racist the United States still is.
Whereas lily-white man McCain can enjoy a relatively hassle-free campaign,
bereft of any lasting criticism of the Reverend Haggee's offensive remarks
about the sins of New Orleans (whose real transgression is being mostly black),
Obama finds every aspect of his patriotism, philosophy and even faith
questioned and scrutinized. But it is the fact that he is born of an immigrant
father and that he schooled with Muslims overseas while using a non-WASP name
that rhymes with Osama that condemns him more vehemently than any
guilt-by-association. How can Americans entrust their country to someone who is
so obviously foreign? America's Jesus is blonde with blue eyes, our superheroes
are always Caucasian, and our presidents' ancestors come from some European
country we can never find on a map. Imagine how relieved all the racist whites
in America are that their naked racism now has a bona fide, legitimate cover;
ie, the America-bashing pronouncements of someone that Obama knows. Heavens!
What if tawny Obama's grandmother had complimented Fidel Castro on his beard or
an aunt of his had shown courtesy to Ahmadinejad? Unquestionably, Obama would
be branded a closet communist or clandestine al-Qaeda operative. White-haired,
white-skinned McCain (with a rich blonde wife to boot), on the other hand,
served his country well by bombing poor Third World peasants to kingdom come,
which is, for most Americans, the only thing Third Worlders are good for. My,
now THAT's an American we can trust and love!
Hardy Campbell
Houston Texas, USA (Apr 30, '08)
Regarding Willy Lam's
China intensifies war against splittism [Apr 30], this one
article doesn't seem to belong to the careful intellectual tradition of ATol.
Too much muddled abuse. Too much Cold War rhetoric. Too many unverifiable
speculations. And the trillion dollar key question, "Who is winning the war?",
isn't addressed at all. Surely when talking of war, one most of all wants to
know who is winning, or who will win. I hope one of your writers will write
about that. An intelligent person please, someone like Bhadrakumar or Chan
Akya. Why can't Chinese (excepting Henry CK Liu) write like Indians?
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 30, '08)
With Asia Times Online on my daily list of must reads, I'd like to thank you
for the excellent articles by Kaveh Afrasiabi on Iran and India. I am amazed at
how prolific Afrasiabi can be without ever losing any spark of his brilliance.
Eat your heart out, New York Times!
Tim
Toronto (Apr 30, '08)
Regarding the article
Oil in 2012: $200 or $50?, April 30, by Mr
Martin Hutchinson has omitted a couple of crucial points that would have
changed the content of the article. Mr Hutchinson fails to mention that the US
has vast untapped reserves of oil. There is plenty along the Gulf Coast, West
Coast, the state of Alaska which is 500,000 square miles ... Nor does he
mention that deep-water drilling around the US coast would yield even more
untapped oil. There is the "oil triangle" that include the states of Nevada,
Wyoming and Utah which by itself is predicted to have reserves in shale oil
that equals the entire oil discoveries of the Middle East. In addition, in the
North American continent that includes Mexico, the US and Canada, there are
vast areas, especially in Canada that are untapped. This does not include other
sources of energy that the US and the North American continent has in abundance
such as coal, uranium, and hydroelectricity, to name a few. In addition, the US
has great potential in alternative energy, which has also largely gone
untapped. The question then is why isn't the US utilizing its potential to be
independent of Middle East oil? The answer is the US environmentalists, who
have a strong voice in the government and have stood in the way of energy
companies in tapping this oil. The US can easily become oil independent and
even be an exporter, if the environmentalists did not stand in the way. The
other issue Mr Hutchinson did not deal with is pure economics. Any commodity
can price itself off the market. If oil was to hit $200 by 2012, economies
around the world will either seek alternative energy or we will use the
technology of 2012 to discover other energy sources and even make alternative
fuel easily competitive to a $200 barrel of oil. To sum it up, a $200 barrel of
oil will be totally unsustainable by the world economies and the price will
have to drop or the Middle East will start losing customers.
Chrysantha Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 30, '08)
[Re North
Korea stoic in the face of famine, Apr 30] Faced with
famine, how stoic is North Korea? Stoic doesn't mean that Pyongyang is resigned
to its fate. The vagaries of nature have visited unprecedented floods which
have wiped out crops. Andrei Lankov points out the antiquated farming system
which impedes better crop yields. Yet, after its own fashion, since the first
Arduous March and possibly before, reform has come to the countryside. But, as
Lankov rightly points out, the outside world knows little of the changes in
North Korea's command economy since the death of Kim Il-sung. Glaring food
shortages come at a time when world food prices are skyrocketing, and the new
situation which has caused food riots elsewhere, means less potential
non-governmental food shipments. Added to this is South Korea's new president
Lee Myung-bak who has reversed Seoul's Sunshine Policy which since 2000 has
given partly unconditional food aid. Now President Lee says that he will not
withhold such deliveries but Kim Jong-il will have to ask for them. This is a
breech of traditional Korean Confucianist behavior whereby the younger brother
[Lee] refuses to willingly help his old brother [Kim]. Pyongyang, however,
expects help from China. North Korea is the only country where no protests met
the Olympic Torch, and was greeted with high ceremony and much fanfare. Beijing
shouldn't stint in opening its granaries to alleviate North Korea's impending
famine. No one should rule out the aid a diminution of foreign food donations
will bring.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 30, '08)
[Re
Oil in 2012: $200 or $50?, April 30] Since oil is now $120 a
barrel, CIBC [Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce] simply took the high end of
the A range for oil as $200 a barrel for 2012 that OPEC projected. It mightn't
have to wait that long since OPEC's president, Algerian energy minister Chakib
Khelil, thought that target would be reached in 2009. American lawmakers are
pinning the tail of blame on this cartel of oil-producing states for either
holding or cutting production levels of oil for historic oil prices [by]
putting pressure on world economies and causing disruptions in the marketplace.
Yet, big oil companies are registering record profits. At his press conference
today in the Rose Garden, President Bush called for drilling in wildlife
preserves and for building more refineries. Oil industry watchers point out
that America's refineries are operating at 85% of capacity, which may account
for the higher prices at the pump. But the last word remains with Chakib
Khelil. He simply stated that "high prices are due to the recession in the US"
and the weakness in the American dollar. Moreover, he noted that "each time the
dollar falls a percent, the price of a barrel rises by $4", and if the value
rises, the reverse happens. Conclusion: the weak dollar has to go. But no one
should count on that in the short term.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 30, '08)
[Re
Doubting Obama, Apr 29] Logic may be on Muhammed Cohen's
side, but it won't wash away growing doubts about the junior senator from
Illinois. The release on April 25 of the cheeky comedy Harold & Kumar Escape
from Guantanamo Bay sends up President George W Bush, yet it has him
saying to these potheads, "You don't have to like the nation, you have to love
the country". Individualistic as Americans think they are, they are also
fiercely patriotic, and the words that the film has the satirized president say
ring true for the majority of Americans. The heteroclite collection of people
who make up America [have few] symbols in common, [but] they do respond,
especially after 9/11, to the the flag, to a transcendent God, and to the idea
of the United States as a country of hope and liberty. This is the dark cloud
tracking Barack Obama's campaign. As a news producer Cohen should know the
value of symbols. Mr Obama has handed Mrs Clinton and Mr McCain and the
Republicans the means to hammer into the public's mind questions about his
loyalties to flag, God, and country. One, there's the matter of the flag lapel
pin. Two, his remarks that the American people are so demoralized that they
find aid and succor in guns and religion. True as these words may be, they are
a slap in the public's face. His pastor the Reverend Jeremiah Wright has taken
to the airwaves to have his say. But no amount explanation will erase the
public's imagine of God damning America; Mr Wright is Obama's Willy Horton and
Michael Dukakis riding in a tank, rolled into one. The good minister of the
Church of God is ingenuous when he says that he's a religious leader not a
politician which is senator Obama's domain. He is not in the least convincing,
especially since his sermons are a savvy mixture of politics enveloped in
religious imagery. Mrs Clinton has gone on the offensive with material which Mr
Obama has fashioned for her. She can play on those very symbols of the flag,
God, and the country to rally a working class which has long gone over to the
Republicans, for her own cause. Senator Obama has much fence mending to do to
clinch his party's nomination for the presidency, and time is running out for
him.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 29, '08)
Regarding the article
Iran steps into the enemy's territory, Apr
29, by Kaveh L Afrasiabi. The author writes "This is basically a subset of an
ambitious global strategy that prioritizes ties with various countries, for
example in Asia, Africa, Central and Latin America, that are visibly
anti-America, such as Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela." I wonder, has he ever
described the United States as "anti-Iraq" or "anti-Afghanistan"? Why is a
leader who is "pro" his or her country automatically "anti-American"? Other
than that, Asia Times Online has by far the most intelligent analysis of the
Middle and Far East.
Patrick Barr (Apr 29, '08)
I read Mr Bajpaee's piece
The Indian elephant returns to Africa [Apr
25] with interest. As a Kenyan of Asian origin, I would care to make the
following points. It is a fact that the Chinese and Indian expansion has been a
key driver in the African renaissance. Before their emergence, Africa faced an
egregiously one-sided demand structure. The continent had only one real
customer and that was the West. The continent was unable to enter into
long-term contracts for their products and this created a "hand-to-mouth"
cycle. China and India used this opportunity to establish their bona fides to
good effect, whilst simultaneously securing long-term supplies to fuel their
expansion. Their arrival tipped the demand equation in Africa's favor. And for
this, we are all grateful. If you care to correlate China and India trade flows
with Africa, you will note that the acceleration in SSA [Sub-Saharan Africa]
GDP [gross domestic product] growth is nearly perfectly correlated to the
surge. I would also say that clearly it is in India's national interest (as it
is China's) that this relationship is nurtured. It would be an enormous
abdication of their respective interests, if we are not seeing a more concerted
effort on both their parts. Africa has crossed its inflexion point. The problem
was our people were not plugged in. This is happening now. It is the equivalent
of flicking on a switch. And with the landing of various undersea cables, we
are going to see Africa undertake a one-off catch up compressed into a few
short years. Carpe diem.
Aly-Khan Satchu
Kenya (Apr 29, '08)
China must fight back - why not? Since the International Olympic Committee and
Olympic Games are "properties" controlled by the West, it is high time that
China should go on the "offensive". I may sound too harsh. China should just
throw the Olympic Games back to the feet of the IOC and let them handle the
trouble themselves. I am very disappointed with the IOC who did little or
nothing to curb their member countries from screwing up the Olympic Torch. Such
interruption is not only to embarrass China but also the IOC. They should just
warn their members that they [may] be suspended or expelled from the IOC or the
Olympic Games and that will reduce, or total cut off, those boycott talks and
interruptions. The IOC must issue a statement that those countries which do not
turn up for the Opening Ceremony shall be dropped or suspended from future
Olympic Games. China, just throw the Olympic Games back to the IOC. Organize
your own "China games" to welcome ... friendly countries. Leave out the US,
Britain, France, Germany, Canada and those Western countries ... Do something
and fight back, China! The Chinese of the world are behind our Motherland.
David Lim
Malaysia (Apr 29, '08)
I would like to congratulate Chan Akya for his latest piece,
Western excess is the Earth killer [Apr
26], which I found very interesting for two reasons. The first is the fact that
the author seems to have changed his mind regarding the environment. Not a very
long time ago, he likened environmentalists to terrorists. Never mind; one
should always welcome such developments. The second reason is the solution he
put forward for solving the environmental problems: reducing consumption in the
West. That's an excellent proposition and an even more surprising one coming
from Chan, the staunch advocate of free markets, unlimited growth and unlimited
consumption as the panacea for everything economic. Keep going, Chan, you are
on the right path to salvation. What happened to Spengler's soap opera on
Barack Obama? We had the episodes on the mother, the wife, the reverend ... we
can't wait for the one about the cousin Dick Cheney.
Daniel Mazir
Perth, Australia (Apr 29, '08)
Spengler is on vacation. He'll be back next Monday. But next up on ATol's
anticampaign trail is Pepe Escobar on John McCain (to prove we are without bias
and hate all the candidates equally). Hold on tight! - ATol
[Re
Doubting Obama, Apr 29] The great female breakthrough of
Hillary Clinton is not over, and her [goal] of reaching the highest office in
the United States is still a distant dream. She is still unbowed after the last
win and slugging away; encouraged with Pennsylvania's working class voters'
endorsement. It is yet to be seen if she will maintain her credibility in the
coming primaries after this convincing win - but the pundits give her a big
nod. Pennsylvania has the highest number of white voters over the age of 65
[except in Florida] and a substantial majority have diehard, deeply buried
prejudices against blacks. It is inconceivable for them to vote for a black
person ... who is running for the presidency of the US. Barack Obama won 92% of
the black votes in Pennsylvania, but 62% of over-65 whites, including many of
their young grandchildren, voted for Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama has to win
the hearts and minds of pensioners and he must appear to them to be a kinder
person, luring them with some incentives. [For example] by giving them winter
fuel allowances to keep warm, free prescriptions, increased pensions above the
rate of inflation, discounts on fuel bills (as in the UK) - whatever would be
fiscally possible. [If so] they will come running in hordes to back him in the
general election. It is the taboo nature of racism of old and young white
working class [voters] and rednecks that Obama must break to defeat McCain. He
has to very careful in the remaining months to not make disastrously misjudged
comments on smalltown working-class Americans to alienate himself from the
diehard ... "Reagan Democrats" who have backed Mrs Clinton so far. It is
interesting that a lot of white Americans say about him, "Here is a new guy
named Barack Obama, an African-American who wants to be our president and
commander-in-chief." That is a hell of a change for their old-age mentality to
accept. Finally, I am immensely delighted to read that so many ATol readers
find my letters interesting and pleasing to read. I offer my sincere gratitude
to them, and to ATol for publishing me. I am a very humble and ordinary writer
who always tries his best with the pen; an art, I learned from my wonderful
father.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 29, '08)
I have just read some of your readers' letters, and I want to add my own letter
of appreciation for your online newspaper. I have gotten very weary of the many
websites that have only opinion, and not much information. As an American, who
cannot rely on information in the American journals and newspapers anymore
(since they have all become "corporate controlled"), I treasure your more
international voice. I learn a great deal about world affairs when reading
ATol, and your online journal gives me a much wider perspective about what is
going on in the world. Thank you, and keep up the good work. You have some
really good journalists writing for you right now.
Katherine Halton
USA (Apr 29, '08)
The attack on [Afghanistan's President Hamid] Karzai's life is a clear
indication that his grip on power is slipping away. He is not even secure when
he is surrounded by his armed forces on an auspicious day to celebrate the
overthrow of the Soviet Union's illegal occupation 16 years ago. It was the
global Muslim freedom fighters, including the Taliban, who defeated the Soviet
empire in Afghanistan and not America’s puppets and poodles like Karzai and his
cabinet. It is such a shame and disgrace that Karzai has sold his conscience to
enslave his country once again to a different master, the Unites States of
America. It is not only the Taliban who want the US and NATO to leave their
country but also a majority of Afghanis, who prefer to live as free men
[rather] than become slaves of infidels with decadent morality. The Taliban are
gaining ground as the illegal occupation of their country is prolonged and the
West uses them as a means to their end to stay as long as possible in
Afghanistan. The country is in ruin with little progress under this Western
stooge government of Hamid Karzai.
Jalal Ahmed Rumi
Pakistan (Apr 28, '08)
[Re
Abdullah's second-chance reform drive, Apr 26] Politics the
second time around is never satisfying. [Malaysian] Prime Minister Abdullah
Badawi's plans for reforms will at best not remold the UMNO [United Malays
National Organization]. His own party's movers and shakers have [no]
confidence; the UMNO, figuratively speaking, is like Humpty Dumpty, once broken
you can never put him back together again. The initiative lies elsewhere unless
Abdullah steals Anwar Ibrahim by adopting his program of reform which puts a
brake on bumiputra favoritism and overcomes the alienation that has
spurred Indian and Chinese opposition to the UMNO.
Nakamura Junzo
Guam (Apr 28, '08)
Re
Western excess is the Earth killer, Apr 26. The carbon
credits scheme is pure, unadulterated bunk. Applying the same underlying logic,
could we then allow drug traffickers to pursue their pernicious trade if they
agreed to build rehab centers and hospitals? Steeped in elitism and highly
susceptible to political gaming, this harebrained idea actually shows that the
major environmental offenders are more interested in skirting the issue than in
honestly confronting and addressing it.
John Chen
USA (Apr 28, '08)
I’d like to take issue with Chan Akya’s dark humor in
Western excess is the Earth killer, Apr
26. There should have been no car. Western attempts to transfer the blame for
world-destroying consumption patterns to the people who make the products for
them are on par with the centuries old practice of blaming the Jewish people as
a whole for the Rothschilds and the Zionists in contemporary Israel. That said,
more and more China and other Asian nations are coming to resemble the
cigarette makers who provide people too addicted to stop with the products to
satisfy their habits. Worse, they are apparently becoming addicted themselves.
Western nations, under the sway of the "suicidal statecraft" practiced by
financial capitalism, have provided Asia with an unparalleled historical
opportunity to industrialize that old-fashioned imperialism would never have
permitted. But this whole pattern of wasteful consumption has to change. It
should have changed 100 years ago. There are simply too many of us to tolerate
any more "conspicuous consumption". Chan Akya seems to imply that, with a few
energy technology fixes, it can continue. After energy shortages, comes water
and then ... Please! Give us some hope! Preserve our stereotype that Asians are
smarter than the West, that they have been able to learn something from what we
have done to the world.
Steven Lesh (Apr 28, '08)
[Re Back
to the hard line on North Korea, Apr 26] No one can accuse
the Bush administration of subtlety in its betwixt and between policy towards
towards North Korea. Shifting gears, Mr Bush has now marshaled proof of Kim
Jong il's nefarious hand in Syria's nuclear designs. Yet, administration
officials [claim] that the latest CIA dog and pony show, in camera, with proof
of North Korea's long hand as a purveyor of nuclear reactors before a US
congressional committee, will in no way affect on-going discussions with
Pyongyang at the six-power talks, is difficult to believe. Washington's policy
towards North Korea since the 1990s is a record of giving with one hand and
taking with another so that for reasons of internal and external consumption it
needs to keep the North Korea bugaboo alive in order to fuel its
military-industrial complex at home and maintain the role of tripwire mediator
in east Asia. Mr Bush knows that any slight to North Korea will harden
Pyongyang's resolve in further delaying a meeting of the minds on the nuclear
question. Since no one remembers Washington's torpedoing of an Israeli offer of
several billions of dollars almost twenty years ago to North Korea with the
express purpose of stopping North Korea's export of advanced military rocketry,
it is time to bring that offer up again, the more especially since Washington
put its veto on the deal. It does not take much to draw conclusions as to the
whys and wherefores of such Cold War thinking. If Mr Bush's CIA sideshow is a
warning to Iran, it appears amateurish since its immediate effect is to derail
any deal with North Korea. As Donald Kirk reports, Kim Dae Jung's words will
prevail: one way or the other Mr Bush or his successor will have to compose
with Kim Jong il.
Mel Cooper Singapore (Apr 28, '08)
I have been for a long time a keen reader of ATol and find it amazingly
intellectual reading. It is one of the best online magazines that should be
read by every graduate and post-graduate of politics, history, economics and
world affairs. I say without any hesitation that the majority of the authors of
articles are exceptionally knowledgeable, well read, well versed, but a few are
very prejudiced on race and religion. Some of the letter writers are highly
scholarly, witty and express themselves extremely well and are worth
mentioning: Saqib Khan, Jakob Cambria, Vincent Maadi and too many more to
mention them all. I find Saqib Khan from the UK often very assertive in his
expression and opinion but also full of humor on occasions. I wish that I could
once again read one of his letters, on "fecundity”, that he wrote few years
ago. Has he written any thing of humor recently? Please oblige.
G Ever Best (Apr 28, '08)
Saqib Khan's letter on fecundity can be found
on this page (scroll down to letters of
May 10, 2006). Here is an excerpt from another of his letters, dated May 26,
2006: ... This reminds me about a story of a poor Indian farmer
who could only afford to buy one loaf of bread every week to feed his family.
On the other hand his master could afford to buy many loaves plus meat,
vegetables, rice and cake. Things [got] worse; the farmer was mad at his master
for sleeping with his daughter and refused to plant the wheat crop to punish
his master, causing the price of bread to double, [then] treble. The poor man
could not afford a loaf and his children died of hunger. The master [was] still
rich, complained about the inflationary price but bought a loaf of bread every
day. The farmer's wife got mad at her husband for not making any money from
selling the crop, so she went to see his master and asked for a loan. He agreed
but on the condition that she would have to go to bed with him. So the wife
bought two loaves of bread, vegetables and rice and a cake with the money. At
the dinner table, the farmer told his wife that his decision not to grow wheat
was wise, after all. The wife smiled and told him to enjoy his dinner because
often decisions have unintended consequences. - ATol
Wu Zhong's
Time to outgrow boycott calls [Apr 23] gives a good review
of the Chinese public's reaction to the unfriendly actions of some
irresponsible Western media and politicians. It might be true that a boycott of
foreign goods, say, French ones, will be a double-bladed sword and harm Chinese
themselves while delivering impact on targets. Nevertheless, we should also
come to understand that the boycott campaign does reflect a kind of
"democracy", as it comes from the bottom of the Chinese people's hearts. The
public has their own "rights" to express their social and political demands. In
all, what concerns me most is that some self-important people such as CNN
commentator Jack Cafferty and German Chancellor Angela Merkel should be aware
of the price of offending a population of 1.3 billion. The boycott just
reflects the surface of the ocean of anger ... below it there might be wounds
and hatred. Come on, those who are promoting the boycott of Carrefour are not
as stupid a group as expected. They are well-educated. They are the future of
China. Comments on
Olympic paranoia causes visa hurdles, Apr 25, by Kent Ewing:
See, Mr Ewing, some innocent people are suffering from the so-called "peaceful
demonstration" now. When the US took measures to control the flow of visitors
after the 2001 terrorist attack, did you come out to utter your complaint on
behalf of innocent travellers? Now China is trying to check the terrorists for
the good the Games. Who is to blame? We can anyhow accuse Beijing of making
trouble and showing sympathy/support to the troublemakers behind the scene -
the Dalai Lamas and their Western bosses?
Careful Cat
Lhasa, China (Apr 28, '08)
Gareth Porter is right about Cheney's evil influence in
Petraeus' rise lets Cheney loose on Iran,
April 25. This evidence-free charge of "special groups" controlled by Iran was
made up by Petraeus in February, 2007, in order to divide the Mahdi Army and
blame all problems on Iran. It was made up, period. In fact, the number two
commander of all US forces in Iraq, Lieutenant General Lloyd J Austin III, when
pressed hard by reporters on April 23 admitted that "they [so-called "special
groups"], are so amorphous. They go back and forth between each other. It is
not like we have the Dallas Cowboys versus the Houston Oilers. It's just not as
clear." And, if you ask the experts on the ground in Iraq, they will tell you
that all Shi'ite fighters in Sadr City and Basra are members of the Mahdi Army.
Vice President Cheney has a long history of making things up to fit his agenda.
The mantra for this bunch is "if things are not going right in Iraq, blame
Iran". As this occupation of Iraq continues to spiral out of control, who can
forget Cheney's role as chief architect telling us that the US would be
"greeted as liberators"? And, who can forget his support for Saddam during the
Iran-Iraq war? One thing is certain about Cheney and his cohorts. They have no
shame; lies and half truths are recycled and repeated over and over again with
a straight face. Cheney's main objective is not just to threaten Iran, but it
is to use the hammer of fear to frighten the American public once again so that
they would vote for his party in November. By his thinking, a bungled
occupation, an economy in distress, a president with the lowest approval rating
in history, and mountains of debt for the foreseeable future can all be trumped
by fear. But, this time, after having played that card once too often, they're
in for a rude awakening.
Fariborz S Fatemi
Former Professional Staff Member
House Foreign Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
McLean, Virginia, USA (Apr 25, '08)
[Re
Petraeus' rise lets Cheney loose on Iran, Apr 25] This
article was poorly researched and missed many key points. First, Admiral
William Fallon was promoted over many others under president Bill Clinton as a
protege. Second, a president is commander in chief, [therefore] the president
is his commander. The commander sets over all policy, not an underling. Third,
Fallon represents traditional military thought that doesn't work so well with
asymmetric warfare. Petraeus is more of a Special Operations kind of soldier;
one who knows how to fight asymmetric warfare better than a traditional
military man. Iran and Afghanistan and, for that matter, the ["war on terror"]
are asymmetric battles. Having Fallon run CENTCOM [Central Command] is like
having a buggy whip manufacturer run the early Ford Motor Company.
Jim Miro (Apr 25, '08)
Asia Times is usually a trusted source of information that is not necessarily
available elsewhere. Richard M Bennett's blatant propaganda piece
Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr
23] is an unfortunate exception to the rule. It's a shameful piece of
non-journalism that would no doubt be welcomed by any Murdoch newspaper. Even a
casual check of his anecdotes by a good editor would make this obvious. I hope
it's not repeated, as there are precious few media resources left in the world
that can actually be trusted.
Julian Welch (Apr 25, '08)
The article
A Maoist in Nepal's Palace [Apr 19] by Mr Dhruba Adhikary
seems to be useful in finding the real happenings [and] challenges and [for]
foreseeing the future crisis most likely to occur in Nepal out of [the] many
games being playing by visible and invisible actors in [Nepal] and abroad. The
conclusion finally drawn by the well-known political commentator Mr Adhikary is
... quite realistic when saying "the Maoists won't stop their journey until
they reached their final destination". However, the ... former rebel forces ...
are one of the main parties ... responsible for the mercilessly killing of
thousands of innocent lives ... There needs to be a realization of reality, of
the real aspiration of the people and current democratic trends in the world as
well. The current national and international environments are not very positive
and favorable to for the Maoists to fully implement their goal, that is why the
sooner they realize reality, the better ... Currently, Nepal is seeking
statesman to deal [with] this very fragile and liquid situation, but there seem
[to be] none so far [besides] the exceptional late B P Koirala. ... It was the
a great and visionary national policy which B P Koirala named "National
Reconciliation". This policy was framed by the late great leader based on his
long painful life and experiences. [Its] relevancy has been much increased in
[present-day] Nepal where some external forces are trying to cultivate their
tactics ... through the dangerous design of dividing people and political
powers in Nepal.
Dibakar Pant
St Paul, USA (Apr 25, '08)
Is President Bush reversing gears on Secretary of State Rice's engaging North
Korea? It certainly seems so judging by Asia Times Online posting Agence France
Presse's "US to detail N Korea Syria nuclear cooperation". Can one rely on the
leak "citing unnamed senior US officials"? One has to raise a skeptical eyebrow
at this breaking story reported in the New York Times and the Washington Post.
The Israelis bombed Syria's construction site alleged to be the home of its
infant nuclear industry on September 6, 2007. So, is it not natural to ask why,
after seven months, a video showing North Koreans inside a Syrian reactor has
surfaced? It is not the first time the Bush administration has floated false
clues. The US relied, much to its embarrassment, on the testimony of a North
Korean defector who swore that the Kim dynasty was on the verge of collapse. It
wasn't and the defector's proof, based on rumor, evaporated in the fresh wind
of verification. We could mention the name of Ahmed Chalabi and his false
information which gave much grist to Bush's windmills for a pre-emptive strike
against Saddam Hussein. Bush has a pronounced distaste for dealing with North
Korea. He has tried to isolate it totally so that its collapse would bring
about the regime change that he so wanted [ever] since labeling Pyongyang an
"axis of evil state". Absent from new US charges of North Korea's hand in
Syria's hardly nascent nuclear industry is the Israeli hand. It won't be the
first nor the last time, [the US] is willing to share false data for its own
regional and hegemonic designs.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 25, '08)
If things don't "work out" for Obama and the Democrats, is it too early to
start considering an Obama and, perhaps, Colin Powell independent ticket?
T Sullivan
USA (Apr 25, '08)
Recently the Pentagon revised its threshold for recruiting men and women with
criminal backgrounds. People who would have been rejected before because of
their criminal histories are now welcomed with open arms to a military whose
ranks are being depleted by death and demoralization. Bottomless pit wars will
tend to do that to you. Boundless praise and hosannas are routinely heaped on
the troops serving in the twin failures of Iraq and Afghanistan, those Middle
East [conflicts] that have merged into one all-consuming blob of imperialist
fantasies. No one in the US wants to hear about the daily atrocities and
revenge killings that these embittered and angry young Americans perpetrate on
the ... people they supposedly want to "liberate" (new Pentagon definition:
indigenous [people's] death by rifle, artillery or air-delivered ordinance
constitutes "life liberation".) When the odd event does manage to sneak past
the rose-colored filters of the corporate-controlled media, it is instantly
dismissed as an "aberration" or "the bad apple" instead of the truth (so
unpalatable these days in America), that these are mere tips of vast, submerged
desert icebergs. Thus, what can be more apropos and ironic than having real
criminals living up to the criminal standards that a criminal president has set
for a criminal war (conducted with criminal negligence and incompetence) that
has made criminals of all who sink deeper and deeper into the [problem]. Alas,
that criminality includes the members of the pseudo-democracy that spawned it
with so much collective enthusiasm not so long ago.
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas (Apr 25, '08)
Regarding
Clinton chalks up key meaningless victory [Apr 24], by
Muhammad Cohen: If the Democrats do not win [the 2008 US presidential
election], it would most certainly be claimed that Hillary Clinton lost them
the election ... This very chilly white woman, whom 40% Americans view with
hysterical dislike, [is also] the wife of former president Bill Clinton [which]
carries a certain stigma of nepotism and dynastic oligarchy. The crucial enigma
about Hillary is what she stands for, her domestic and foreign policies and
what kind of president she would become - and if she would be good enough. She
is a very calculating stage-management perfectionist and, with a chillingly
cool demeanor, appears to frighten many men ... But despite all her flaws,
anything will be worth seeing the ... hawk G W Bush kicked out of the White
House and replaced by someone who can inspire and unite the American people ...
In Clairton, Pennsylvania, the steel town’s white residents have shown open
hostility to Barack Obama. Hillary is dividing Democrats and her divisive
campaign is gaining many votes for John McCain ... Barack Obama has the certain
charm and attraction that was once the monopoly of the Kennedy brothers and he
was supported by Bobby Kennedy’s wife when she said in her endorsement speech,
"Barack is so much like Bobby with courage, caring and charisma and leading us
toward a kinder and gentle world." The fact is that Obama has the ability to
pull crowds from across all divides of Americans irrespective of their skin
color. This is so sadly missing in Hillary. Has this woman warm blood or cold?
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 24, '08)
[Re
US media the last hurdle for China buyouts, Apr 24] The US
found no trouble in the sale of an IBM division to a Chinese company with ties
to the Chinese government. Today we recognize the PC manufacturer by its brand
Lenovo. When it comes to selling American media outlets to a Chinese SOE
[state-owned enterprise] that's another kettle of fish. Mr Wilkins may bring up
the example of the media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who recently bought the
influential Wall Street Journal. A citizen of Australia, he traded citizenship
for a US passport to snap up American media companies. It is doubtful a Chinese
SOE would become completely Americanized, and even if it did, questions would
remain about its loyalty. A recent sentencing of a China-born man who was
sentenced to prison for selling secrets to China is a case in point. His
attachment to the land of his birth overrode his loyalty to his adopted
country. Murdoch could buy what he wanted because he's a dyed-in-the-wool
capitalist. No country would sell the media companies to a country which,
although friendly as China is with the US, has its record of long distrust and
questionable practices. [This] cannot be washed away.
Nakamura Junzo
Guam (Apr 24, '08)
This sounds like a joke question, but it's not: Why is your paper so good?
There are lots of others which should be as good or better, yet they're not.
Again, how does your paper manage to be so good?
Mike Booth
Granada, Spain (Apr 24, '08)
The fact that the word "corporate" is not in our dictionary is probably a great
boon. - ATol
It is OK to have ads to offset the cost of the server. But it will be good if
they are decent ones not half-naked bodies. I read ATol at home and I don't
want these kind of ads when my children are playing around me.
Masood Allawala (Apr 24, '08)
[Re
Muqtada's biggest battle already won, Apr 23] This article
goes against the unrelenting tide of propaganda coming out of the American mass
media. Just as Condoleezza Rice is calling Muqtada al-Sadr a coward, [Sreeram]
Chaulia makes her look silly. But Rice isn't the only personage to strike a
note of desperation: for instance, cabinet members now feel free to blame the
Air Force for American failures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Conversely, a former
military chief has just said that the civilian leadership in Washington was
responsible for encouraging torture. As the presidential election looms, we'll
be seeing more and more individual efforts to protect reputations that have
already been lost. The tactic of kicking the problem down the road seemed to
make sense, but it didn't allow for human frailty.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (Apr 23, '08)
[Re
Just staying alive, Apr 22] Thanks, Doug Wakefield, for
corroborating one of my investment strategies going forward - shorting the
stock markets. Watching the Dow blithely charge upward despite a nimiety of
ominous signs pointing to a financial-market meltdown helps one better
understand why and how the Bush-Cheney gang was given a second term in the
White House. Separately, Wu Zhong’s call for calm and reason amid the current
firestorm of Chinese nationalism [Time
to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] is understandable, perhaps
even admirable. However, an unwavering adherence to rationality runs the risk
of breeding predictability. Inaction at this time by China may actually help
spawn new incidents down the road, say, shortly before the commencement of the
Olympics. Lastly, ATol’s new front-page layout - with the News Video, Business
Headlines and Breaking News features - looks rather ... cool.
John Chen
USA (Apr 23, '08)
[Re
Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23] It must have been a
slow news week. Hamas has offered numerous times since it was elected the
governing party of the Occupied Territories a 10-year truce with Israel. It
seems you are blinded by US and Israeli propaganda - Hamas is the elected
government and not Fatah. Fatah, in fact, did exactly what many African leaders
do when voted out of office - they staged a coup to hang on. Abbas, Fatah, the
PLO were not in power, Hamas was, much to the dismay and horror of Israel and
the US who have done everything possible since to assist the quisling Abbas in
his power grab to the point of jailing without charge enough elected Hamas MPs
to render the government without a quorum. Imagine if the Palestinians had
interfered in the elections and government of Israel or the US what a circus
would have ensued. Take off your Israeli-US colored glasses.
Vivien Martin (Apr 23, '08)
[Re
Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23] Jimmy Carter's put
his finger squarely in the eye of the Bush administration's road map to peace.
Mr Bush is fully consistent in his policy of isolating politically,
economically, and militarily Hamas. Mr Carter is a realist who [does not]
suffer fools gladly. His meeting with Hamas' Khaled Mashel in Damascus has
blown sky high Israel's and America's futile policy to quarantine and crush
Hamas. Mr Carter is not fool either; he knows full well that the Bush
administration and the pro-Israel forces in the US will [hamper] his efforts.
He has broken taboos, and suddenly the ground in Palestinian and Israeli has
shifted, and as today's Financial Times of London editorial tersely put it, he
has saved Israel from itself. It is not nothing that he was awarded the Nobel
Peace Prize [in 2002].
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 23, '08)
Many thanks to Sami Moubayed for his informative article
Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23.
Both Al Gore and Jimmy Carter are contributing to peace of this world. People
will remember them. Unfortunately, these days the world still has some media
and analysts who ... fear that the world can enjoy peace and then they will not
be able to profit from the pain of other peoples and [the] wars and riots in
other countries. Engagement, not isolation nor value-based misunderstanding,
can make the god smile.
Careful Cat
Lhasa, China (Apr 23, '08)
This morning's ATol included two letters that attest to both the purview and
wide-ranging readership of your website. Both Mr Vincent Maadi in Cape Town,
South Africa, and Mr Hardy Campbell in Houston, Texas, confirm an appreciation
[and provide] voices of moderation and understanding rather than ones of
vilification and violence. Both need to be congratulated for their views and
for sharing them with ATol's readers.
Armand De Laurell (Apr 23, '08)
[Re Time
to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] Wu Zhong is simply wrong
in his criticism of Chinese people boycotting French goods. Diplomatic protests
mean nothing and will accomplish nothing. Other countries are closely watching
what China is doing. If China doesn't do anything, I'm afraid there'll be more
funny business cooked up by the West in the future. Past boycotts in Chinese
history didn't work because at those times the Chinese market was small. A lot
of people believe that France was not the main country in cooking up the
Tibetan riots. Has Wu Zhong ever heard the Chinese saying "Kill the chicken to
warn the monkey"?
Tang (Apr 23, '08)
[Re Time
to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] The cry to boycott French
products did not come from [the] Chinese government. It was sounded by the
anger of millions of Chinese people frustrated with the way Western media
distort every bit of news to put down China. Using their wide network of news
agencies, these news media such as CNN, BBC [and] Fox News have consistently
put out negative news on China. To blame China for the news distortion is
unfounded as they clearly cut out the pictures to fit their intended message.
Also, even if there was a blackout of news coming out from Xizang [Tibet], that
does not entitle the media to publish news that they could not verify. In fact,
they use data coming out of the pro-Tibet group more than those coming from
Chinese sources. Whenever there are protests from China, Western media always
claim these are orchestrated by Chinese government. The demonstrations in
Paris, London and Berlin supporting China and the Olympics clearly indicate
that these are spontaneous reactions of overseas Chinese and students. It is
evident that some of these news agencies have become tools of Western hegemony
and they cannot be trusted for their fair reporting. Boycotts are not good for
anybody but this is the only way common Chinese people know that is within
their power of expression. CNN does not bother with the third call for apology
from the Chinese government regarding Jack Cafferty's lewd statement against,
he claimed, the Chinese government. Maybe it's time for Chinese government to
think if CNN's purpose of doing business in China is justified.
Wendy Cai
USA (Apr 23, '08)
The article
Time to outgrow boycott calls by Wu Zhong on April 23 makes
sense until the last sentence: "why ... still resorting to irrational and
fruitless boycotts of foreign products?" It is the foreign dignitaries who
started the boycott of the Olympics' opening ceremony, the governments which
[didn't post] guards to protect the Torch Relay in an effort to humiliate
China, the Western media who highlighted the disruption and not the happy
crowds welcoming the torch, all of [those who] followed the biased reporting on
the Tibet disturbance. Beating and burning are justified by "lack of religious
freedom" and the lawful policing work as "brutal suppression". Now it is all
right for CNN to publicly humiliate the Chinese government, but not for the
Chinese people to express their anger. In case the few Western media outlets do
not know, including Mr Wu Zhong, over a hundred [world] governments have
expressed their support of the way China has handled the Tibetan riots. I think
it is perfectly natural and justified for the Chinese people to feel angry just
because Mr Wu Zhong does not feel angry. However, the Chinese government has
been more tempered and has called for calm. Now that the ridiculous sideshows
have been staged and instigated, the glorious main events will come to pass in
August.
Seung Li (Apr 23, '08)
ATol, I wish all my girlfriends were like you. To my pleasant surprise today
you added videos, and not some dog in a tutu. You're getting better with age,
and I love you. Please don't be afraid to put stuff from al-Jazeera on there,
and [other] articles that we can't get anywhere else. I know that it's not
easy, but I look forward to this. Also, your ads are getting mainstream, a long
way from when the page was pretty empty. I guess that lots of important folks
are turning on to you [and] I don't mind taking a little credit for that. Even
though I often wanted to keep the knowledge to myself to seem smarter because
your info is ahead of the curve and [is] real on-the-ground stuff, But, alas, I
always told people to go to atimes.com and check it out; That's where the truth
is (except for Spengler) so keep it up - you're doing great. I am very
impressed with your commercial growth and the strength of your articles is
still there if not [even] more quality, good stuff. Love for you, keep it up.
Jubin Ajdari (Apr 23, '08)
Al-Jazeera, unfortunately but understandably, has not offered us their content
free of charge. Our new video and breaking news content comes to you courtesy
of an arrangement with the wire services, eg, Reuters and AFP, and it's all we
can afford. Thanks for the kind words. - ATol
[Re Bush
and Lee talk T-bones and bombs, Apr 23] No 10-ton gorilla
sprang out the bush to disturb the Bush-Lee meeting at Camp David. The two
conservative presidents simply passed lightly over North Korea. What the
meeting of the presidents of the United States and South Korea did highlight
was that Mr Bush does control the pace and direction of South Korean issues.
Seoul's economic policies are moderated by America's concerns: read opening
South Korea to US beef imports and widening access of its goods and capital. As
for the continued stationing of American troops in South Korea at a high level,
Mr Lee's pleas fell on deaf ears for its military policy is circumscribed by
Pentagon needs. Since Mr Lee campaigned for tighter ties with the US during the
recent South Korean presidential elections, he has had no choice but to mould
his public statements to mimic American demands. Mel Cooper
(Apr 23, '08)
Singapore
If you don't stop displaying pop-up ads, I will visit your site less often, and
will install the ad blocking software. Idiots.
Lew Glendenning (Apr 23, '08)
Idiots that we are, we pay for our content with the help of pop-up ads. All ATol
costs you, Lew, is a little annoyance. One alternative to pop-up ads is making
the website available only to subscribers. Or you could just send us US$5,000
per month. - ATol
Reading
Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23], by Richard M
Bennett, reminded me how effortlessly Israeli agents produce and disseminate
their disinformation. Iran is a signatory to the NPT [nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty], what they are doing is perfectly acceptable under the NPT. I'd like to
see Mr Bennett do a similar innuendo-filled piece on Israel, which is not a
signatory to the NPT and which has, unlike the Iranians, actually built and is
prepared to deploy nuclear weapons. If the US had dealt with the Israeli
nuclear weapons program with the same vigor that it appears to deal with the
Iranian nuclear power program, Iran, and many other countries near Israel would
likely be more open to cooperation. We are beginning to see the long-term costs
of US and Israeli "exceptionalist" policies. H Annen (Apr
23, '08)
Regarding
Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23], by Richard M
Bennett. Speaking of dud intelligence, is this the same flawed and largely
discredited Richard M Bennett who, prior to the 2003 attack on Iraq, held the
considered opinion that al-Qaeda had 200 trained operatives in Iraq capable of
carrying out CBW attacks? Did Asia Times Online pay Richard M Bennett, or did
he pay you? Does Richard M Bennett have some intrinsic virtue that gives him
access to your pages? Or was this article a professional courtesy between
purveyors of mushrooms (feed them manure and keep them in the dark)? In the
recent exchange of threats between Israel and Iran, while Iranian leaders
threaten destruction of the Israel/Palestine governing regime, Israeli leaders
threaten the destruction of the Iranian nation - as in "people". Given the
example of the ongoing destruction of the Palestinian nation by the
nuclear-armed Israeli regime, it seems logical that the Iranian regime would
seek a nuclear deterrent if it seriously aims to change the behavior of the
Israeli regime.
David George (Apr 23, '08)
Richard Bennett's
Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23] presents timely
and cogent points about a top-tier international security
problem/issue/situation. A useful reference, reinforcing Bennett's main points,
with very long historical perspective, is Legacy of Ashes, A History of the CIA,
by Tim Weiner, a thoroughly researched and abundantly sourced work which
documents scores of intelligence failures. In recent decades, the billions of
dollars spent on "national technical means (NTMs)" has apparently not closed an
abiding "accuracy and timeliness" gap regarding high priority US intelligence
topics/targets. Regarding the lead-in to the Iraq War, to my knowledge, there
has not been an adequate explanation regarding two central factors: Did these
NTMs produce the required imagery and other data regarding Iraq's WMD
activities during the years leading up to the decision to invade? And, if the
NTMs functioned as designed and described, why were the analysts not able to
properly interpret and analyze the data? If the NTMs did not function as
designed, the US Government should have recouped billions of dollars from the
contractors who designed and built them. If they did function properly, scores
of analysts and their superiors should have been fired, or even brought up on
criminal malfeasance charges. As in so many endeavors, the Bush Administration
has achieved yet another nadir in governance and ethics through the
manipulation, selectivity, and prevarications it has perpetrated regarding
national intelligence processes and products. Now, Douglas Feith, one of the
neo-con "idiotlogue" ringleaders in the Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz dysfunctional
Department of Defense, has continued his ego-paroxysm by having his book, War
and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at The Dawn of the War on Terrorism,
newly published. Feith was the chief operator of Rumsfeld's shadow intelligence
operation which tried to justify the neo-cons' parallel universe of
geopolitical and WMD fantasies. The best uses for his book are (1) material for
charges in a bill of indictment for criminal malfeasance while in office; and
(2) lining for bird cages.
Sagacity Seeker
USA (Apr 23, '08)
Dear Mr Spengler, I loved your article just out [Rice,
death and dollar, Apr 21] but, um, if the monk was wearing a saffron
robe, he was Thai; Tibetan monks hang out in burgundy and sunshine yellow garb
only.
Arthur Borges (Apr 22, '08)
Regarding Rice,
death and dollar [Apr 21], by Spengler: I enjoyed reading it and offer
my comments. The solution to global economic crisis would be to stop China
saving so much and to re-inject demand back into the world. But persuading
[China] to do that was a task beyond central bankers. It is still a global
challenge facing global economies and political leaders. The main trouble now
is the US housing market decline engulfing the world, losses by banks in the
UK, US and around the world because of uncontrolled and crooked lending which
have brought subprime mortgage paper, the liquidity crisis and pessimism about
equities. Low-interest rates have their origin in China as lending was made
cheaper and demand became rampant, resulting in the impending global recession,
high food and fuel prices. China has been hogging all the world brass, copper,
zinc, steel and now rice, wheat and carrots to save for rainy days and lean
years. China may not be America's equal yet, but of all other contenders it
will win the race in the not-too-distant future. The Iraq war and mishandling
of the economy by US President George W Bush has jeopardized not only its own
economy but also the global one. "If you sink, you all sink with me," has been
[Bush's] economic policy. The Chinese economy is growing at a rate nearly three
times the US's and is prudently projected to catch up in terms of GDP by 2041.
The fact is that the US is currently running a trade deficit of approximately
8% of GDP, and a large part of that deficit is financed by China in the form of
purchases of American bonds, so both sides have become interdependent. It is a
weird situation: economic rivals, political adversaries and increasingly
competing as No 1 and No 2 consumers of the world's energy resources. The
average American earns US$40,000 per annum, but has savings of 0%, whereas a
Chinese earns hardly $1,500 per year but has savings of 23% of his income, and
a large part of it his bankers are lending to the Americans. There is also this
matter of consumption. The US consumes fully 25% of world oil supplies. China
and India are growing rapidly and their economies consume more and more oil.
China currently consumes 8.2% of the world's oil production. Soon it will
increase to 10% or even 14%. Where is that oil going to come from? Is the US
willing to reduce its share for China? No. So, it must invade Iran to capture
its oil reserves.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 22, '08)
I refer to Rice,
death and the dollar, by Spengler on April 21. The greatest threat to
mankind is coming from warmongers in the US, their powers can be clipped by
implementing following program in this order:
1. End the war in Iraq and Afghanistan: instant saving of 3 trillion
dollars.
2. End financial and military support of Israel: instant savings of
hundreds of billions of dollars.
3. Remove all neo-cons and Israel-firsters from American federal, state and
local governments and all political parties: instant liberation of
America from foreign influence.
4. Close down all commodity exchanges: instant end of commodity
speculation and end of hunger and saving of hundreds of millions human lives.
5. Tear up the GATT agreement: instant end of neo-colonialism over Third
World countries.
6. Bring back the gold standard: end of inflation and finance
capitalism.
7. Shut down the United Nations:: instant saving of billions of dollars
and human lives.
8. Stop subsidizing [the] weapons industry: instant boost to industries
producing for the needs of civil societies and end of wars.
9. Destroy all nuclear weapons: societies can start living without fear.
Vincent Maadi
Cape Town, South Africa (Apr 22, '08)
[Re Room for two:
US, Iran in the Middle East, Apr 21] Trita Parsi always brings a breath
of fresh air to discussions on Iran and the United States in the Middle East.
He once again states the obvious that the next American president will have to
work out a solution to restore stability in Iraq with the Islamic Republic of
Iran. A solution which will encompass American concerns and fears, but one
which will dampen the US's expansionist designs on the region, thereby
recognizing the political role of Shi'ites in Iraq. Yet it is necessary to
point out that Shi'ite Iran and Shi'ite-dominated Iraq do not share completely
identical views and will necessarily not see eye-to-eye when it comes down to
each country's national interests. Should Washington and Tehran work out a modus
vivendi, the big loser will be Israel; and as an American client, it
will accept the new reality, but with its usual bad grace.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 22, '08)
In Trita Parsi's article
Room for two: US, Iran in the Middle East [Apr 21], Parsi stresses that
the US must accommodate Iranian desires even though he writes that Iran is
reluctant to clarify what it wants. He talks as if the US and Iran are equal
powers, however, the US could lay waste to Iran from the air in a matter of
hours, completely destroying Iran's air force and navy. Iran is responsible for
the death of hundreds of US servicemen dating back to the 1980s in Lebanon;
they correctly assume the US is too frightened or stupid to do anything to stop
their reign of terror. The US cannot take action against Iran while 160,000 US
soldiers are in danger of Iranian terror attacks. It is time for the US to
withdraw and consolidate its troops in Iraq so the US can balance the ledger
with Iran. The US will not need to worry about Iranian desires when their power
to achieve their aims will have been greatly reduced. The Iranian mullah
government will always be an enemy of the US and take measures to injure the US
and its interests. In the end, regime change is the only effective plan towards
Iran and the US has never made a serious effort in that direction.
Dennis O'Connell USA (Apr 22, '08)
All the moral indignation coming from Westerners about China and Tibet and
human-rights violations [China
bunkers down behind its great wall Apr 16] made me wonder: How would
Western countries have fared in the good ol' days of wanton imperialism? So I
imagine some of the headlines in the 19th century: "Chinese Emperor Denounces
Slaughter of Red Indians by US Army"; "Siamese King Decries Manufactured Excuse
for US War with Mexico." How about "Lynching of Blacks in American South
Criticized by Ethiopian Emperor Menelik?" And the list could go on and on. The
point is, what country has not had its period of turmoil, created by ethnic
conflicts, economic disparities and religious antagonisms? I dare say if we
compared how many indigenous North and South Americans were exterminated by
European-descended peoples, the numbers would far exceed those of any non-white
nation. And it appears the Westerners concerned about these rights
transgressions have selective tastes and memories; the Sudanese conflict has
been around for more than 20 years before this sudden outburst of George
Clooney-inspired activism, and the Buddhist majority's repression of Tamil
rights in Sri Lanka has been assiduously avoided by these so-called human
rights activists for the 30 years that civil war has been going on. Perhaps the
latter is because the typical Western liberal has been brainwashed into
equating Buddhism with peace and love and social equality (the myth that has
got them so juiced up about Tibet.) That China's possessions of Tibet and
Xinjiang have been recognized for decades by all nations and is totally within
its rights to suppress civil disturbances seems not to matter a whit to the
Western white who still has images of Mongol hordes and Yellow Perils lurking
in their collective zeitgeist. But since China is the latest substitute for the
Soviet Union (al-Qaeda just can't quite cut the mustard in this regard), any
excuse to pillory them and deflect attention from Western violations of
international law and humanity comes in quite handy. China is successful
internationally precisely because it has chosen a different path than the
militaristic pseudo-diplomacy of the West, yet Westerners want them to violate
that success strategy and engage in Western-style interference in the Sudan
conflict. This level of hypocrisy staggers the imagination. Perhaps the West
should be more like the East, not vice versa. But that philosophy will never
fly in the Western know-it-all mindset that all good things originate in their
hemisphere. The bottom line is the Western modality of thinking is
fundamentally racist and two-faced; Asians will always be perceived as slightly
less than human, with only the thin veneer of civilization cloaking their
barbarism, and that any analogous behavior on the part of whites is merely
their way of spreading Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman values, which everyone
knows is the guiding light of the universe. ...
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas, USA (Apr 22, '08)
This letter refers to Dhruba Adhikary's article
A Maoist in Nepal's palace [Apr 19]. After reading the article one can
easily envision the possible political trajectory that Nepal is likely to
follow. As the author has rightly pointed out, the country is undoubtedly
poised for drifting from ... a monarchical feudalism to a communist republic
driven by totalitarian ambition in the Stalinist model. The most significant
part of the article is the writer's reference to the signature campaign
launched by Baburam Bhattarai, the second in command in Nepal's Maoist
hierarchy, in the early 1990s denouncing [former] president Alberto Fujimori of
Peru and demanding the release of the Shining Path guerilla leader Gonzalo. In
fact, the Shining Path movement formed the role model for Nepal's Maoist
insurgency. Adhikary has somewhat obliquely pointed out that India was the sole
savior of the Maoist leaders during the insurgency period and the 12-point
agreement, signed in the Indian capital with the covert assistance from the
Indian establishment, is its irrefutable proof. For all practical purposes,
India was behind the entire Maoist operation against the monarchy and the
democratic institution established in the aftermath of the people's movement of
1990. However, the author has wittingly or unwittingly failed to point out that
the just-concluded polls in Nepal were not for forming a parliament or
assembling a government with radical political agendas. The electoral exercise
was meant for electing representatives for drafting a statute that would shape
the destiny of the nation. But the Maoists, having felt the pulse of the
power-hungry Prime Minister [Girija Prasad] Koirala, have misused the popular
mandate and are heading for implementing their radical agendas. Koirala cannot
shy away from shouldering responsibility for such a political debacle. His
insatiable lust for power and parochial hangover are the major contributing
factors.
Ratna Bahadur Rai
Kathmandu (Apr 21, '08)
[Re Afghanistan
moves to center stage, Apr 19] another slam bang home run of an article
by MKB [M K Bhadrakumar] that had at least two semesters of political science
work concisely woven together with brilliant prose and analysis into one
article. I feel educated and indebted. Thank you ATol.
Jubin Ajdari (Apr 21, '08)
[Re Petraeus hid
Maliki's resistance to US troops, Apr 19] Gareth Porter either misleads
your readers or just doesn't want to acknowledge his compatriots' incompetence.
What gives it away is that Porter fails to mention [Supreme Iraqi Islamic
Council head Abdul Aziz] al-Hakim's closeness to Iran's leaders, a closeness
far tighter than that of his rival [Muqtada] al-Sadr. Maybe Porter doesn't want
to besmirch the reputation of the American vice president [Dick Cheney], who
heaps praise on Hakim while continuing to cast Iran as the villain responsible
for American failure. Or maybe Porter wants to boost the American military
chief in Iraq so that he can keep building walls dividing the Iraqi people. It
was only after the fiasco became apparent that Americans started hearing how
their leaders were surprised when the Iraqi puppet government ignored American
advice in carrying out the Basra attack, as if American air support hadn't been
readily available to cause the deaths of women and children, thus swelling the
body count that American leaders still cherish despite its fruitlessness in
Vietnam. As long as commentators like Porter insist on getting their facts from
those who wield power in Washington, the American people won't learn how the
death and destruction their nation is visiting on Iraq will come back to haunt
them. Instead, the latest American controversy centers on whether Iraq is
costing American taxpayers too much, which shows that the only way to get past
American hypocrisy and apathy is to pick Americans' pockets.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (Apr 21, '08)
I wish to comment on the article
Petraeus hid Maliki's resistance to US troops [Apr 19] by Gareth
Porter. President [George W] Bush, his generals and real Iraqis tell two
different stories about the war in Iraq. Most Iraqis say that the US's illegal
invasion and occupation have fueled violence. [The] White House's parrot-like
repetitive story is that US forces are curbing sectarian violence and making
things better and friendly for the Iraqis. This misleading narration and
perception is severely hindering progress and understanding of the ordinary
Iraqi point of view. [The] majority of Iraqis are of the opinion that the US
presence in Iraq is fueling sectarian violence and has been a recruiting ground
for al-Qaeda and other foreign fighters who want to defeat the Americans and
liberate their land for them. It is the indignity and humiliation of illegal
occupation that the Iraqis want to end and they want the US to announce a
timetable for its troops' withdrawal and departure. I believe that the violence
will only decrease when the US leaves. The fact of the matter is that the US
will continue to stay in Iraq to justify building permanent military bases and
to ensure access to Iraqi oil for US oil moguls and business for arms
manufacturers and security firms. The US wants a "soft partition" of Iraq that
would allow greater influence by US and corporate interests. This month, a new
ABC/BBC poll showed that over 70% of Iraqis want the US to leave Iraq. Most
believe the US troop "surge" has increased rather than decreased violence in
Iraq. General [David] Petraeus cautioned more than a year ago that in Iraq
"there is no military solution, the solution is economic and political". The US
economy is in rapid decline and facing recession, and with oil prices
increasing daily and in short supply, the US wells will not only remain in
control of Iraqi oil but Bush will attack Iran to seize its oil fields.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 21, '08)
I find it very interesting and a bit disappointing that Asia Times Online, a
website on which I rely more and more for unbiased views of the world, has not
reviewed any books exposing the numerous lies, distortions and manipulations
associated with the alleged 9/11 "attacks". Like most people, I was initially
shocked by the brutality and suddenness of that tragedy. But soon I started
asking myself questions about the emerging "party line" on the whos and whys.
The closer I looked and listened, the murkier and more suspicious things
became. Being a structural engineer, the reasons given for the collapsed towers
did not ring true. Then I discovered others were skeptical also, including
journalists (many of them non-American), who started doing some investigations
outside controlled government sources. Then I read important books, several of
them by respected academics, and the floodgates opened. Now I have no doubt
that the official US government position is a complete fabrication and utterly
devoid of truth about who and why these "attacks" took place. That does not
mean I know who ... perpetrated the crime, only that what we have been told is
a lie, now elevated to the status of indisputable American myth. That is why no
one in the US media dares disturb this scared cow, because to do so is to put
your career, if not life, at risk. Which brings me back to Asia Times Online. I
respect your position as an independent voice in a Western imperialist world,
so this naturally makes me curious why your site is so reticent to review these
books. The label of "conspiracy theory" is used in this country to instantly
dismiss as lunacy brave efforts to discern the truth, even though many such
labeled theories, denounced at the time, have proven correct with the passage
of time. I have no doubt that one day the true criminals will be exposed, but
only after even more blood and treasure are expended. I urge Asia Times Online
to provide its readers around the world the opportunity to see the 9/11 lie
shorn of its rather thin veneer of credibility and learn just how sinister
America's wars really are.
Hardy Campbell (Apr 21, '08)
Over the years, ATol has published reviews and articles touching on the various
conspiracy theories. And for a different take on the attacks, see
September 11 was a third-rate operation Asia Times Online, March 28,
2008.
[Re Asia pushes, West
resists, Apr 19] I was deeply concerned by the use of the words in
Sreeram Chaulia's sentence "Had [author Kishore Mahbubani] picked Bangladesh,
where religious fundamentalism is at an all-time-high". This is completely
wrong. India instead should be the candidate for the Gujarat riots where close
to 10, 000 (mostly women and children) were burned to death because they were
Muslims. Such things do not happen in Muslim countries. The so-called problem
of religious extremism of Bangladesh that this author wishes to pitch is simply
because most likely he/she is [an] Indian who has a vested interested in
labeling all other countries as belonging to the dark ages, except for India.
There are many problems with India which never reach the media because it is
not considered a Western ally. I don't see India cooperating with rest of Asia
- I see it in complete isolation from Asia and working in complete cooperation
with an awful American government.
Shotta (Apr 21, '08)
The article Asia pushes,
West resists [Apr 19] by Sreeram Chaulia reminds me that time has
rhymed again. When the West went through the Renaissance, which led to the age
of Enlightenment and finally to the Industrial Age, many Asian countries
resisted Western incursions into their cultures. This could be said about
India, China and even Japan. But history has proved that the West, using either
coercion, diplomacy or warfare, was able to enter into trade and finally create
the world's largest Christian empire ruled by the British. This East/West
relationship spawned both positive and negative results. Asia absorbed from the
West its government systems, economic systems, its innovations and artistic
heritage, but Asia had to pay a heavy price for these Western instruments to
... culture. Through the rule of colonialism, Asia experienced some of her
worst famines, a loss of her dominance in the world economy and in some cases a
blow to her various cultures. Now the table has turned. Asia, using a large
part of her Western inheritance, is on the economic rise ... In addition,
Asia's various cultures have reawakened. In the case of Islam, it has taken the
form of [a] violent jihad. But Asia's other religions have taken flight across
the world too. This could be said about Hinduism, Sikhism, etc ... but the most
profound rebirth goes to Buddhism. Since the early 20th century, Buddhism
started reblossoming in India. India now is home to a growing Buddhist
population with enormous Buddhist monuments in the pipeline or already built.
Due to the cruel mishandling of Tibet by Beijing, even the cloistered form of
Vajrayana Buddhism of Tibet is now a worldwide phenomenon. Cultural practices
like Zen and yoga are common in the West. To add to this, unlike the West
during the 19th century, far more Asians are emigrating to the West [and]
taking along with them the cultural baggage of their homelands. Like bygone
Asia, the West will resist and will experience the "pains" of Asia's rebirth,
but will eventually adjust. Just like the Western cultures, Asia has her own
spark of the divine quality in her multitudes of cultures. Like Hinduism's
famous Jagganath procession (or the English adaptation of this Indian word:
juggernaut) [this change] is unstoppable and irresistible. As was the case with
Asia, the West is now on the receiving end of Asia's high civilizations and
will experience both the good and bad qualities that go with this shift.
Chrysantha Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 21, '08)
The manner in which you adhere to classical rules of English grammar, syntax
and hyphenation (as opposed to the US ones) is most commendable, and, as far as
I am concerned, is an important reason I use ATol as a web-hub for information
and analyses. These rules where developed by the British to make writing
clearer and thus quicker to read and understand; they are a testimony to
practicality and elegance. However, I have noticed lately that you are allowing
the noun "State" to be written as "state". In the classical English tradition,
the use of an uppercase S in the noun "State" is not meant to make sacred the
body which forcefully enforces its monopoly on racketeering and killing, but
simply as a practical way of unequivocal identification within a text.
G Bittar, PhD (Apr 21, '08)
Jakob Cambria [letters, Apr 18] should read an article "The hypocrisy and
danger of anti-China demonstrations" by Professor Floyd Rudmin of the
University of Troms. Rudmin wrote: "China's treatment of its minorities has
been exemplary compared to what the Western world has done to its minorities,"
and "China's recent history has good reasons why social order is a higher
priority than individual rights." It was only about 20 years ago China really
started to develop economically. Now the majority of Han people are living
poorly, not just the minorities. Recent riots definitely told the Chinese
government that it needs to quickly integrate the minorities in the distant
provinces and improve the economic conditions in those places, because the
Palestinians have show us that when people's hope is taken away, they will use
any method to express their anger. In her article
China confronts its Uyghur threat, [Apr 18], Elizabeth Van Wie Davis
said: "While there is no uniform Uyghur agenda, the desired outcome by groups
that use violence is broadly a separate Uyghur state, called either East
Turkestan or Uyghuristan, which lays claim to a large part of western China and
some territory in neighboring Central Asian republics." I have a question for
Jakob Cambria - if Hawaii wants independence now, how do you think the US
government will react? Everyone can be a five-star armchair general when
reality is ignored.
Tang (Apr 21, '08)
[Re Ehud Olmert on
the Damascus road, Apr 15] Wow, how can a respectable journal such as
ATol publish such drivel is beyond me. Your paper hasn't been bought by the
neo-cons or AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] yet, or has it?
What a shameful display of journalistic lack of professionalism and lack of
editorship.
Ali B (Apr 18, '08)
[Re China confronts its
Uyghur threat, Apr 18] China's recent repression of Tibetans has
brought to the world's attention the plight of another minority group, the
Uyghurs in Xinjiang, who are suffering the same heavy hand of Beijing.
Elizabeth Van Wie Davis looks at China's Uyghur troubles through a military
lens. Yet they do have heavy political content which fuels the call to arms of
a small percentage of militant Uyghurs. Davis mentions that Uyghurs had had
military training in Pakistan since the 1980s. But she forgets to mention that
such training was [sanctioned by] the administration of the then US president
Ronald Reagan ... since it was a response to the Soviet Union's invasion of
Afghanistan. Thus, under the guise of combating godless communism, arms and
instruction more likely than not had ... American origin and the good seal of
Washington's approval. Saying this, it is important to emphasize [that] China
is pursuing the same goal among the Uyghurs that it has been doing in Tibet. It
is trying to turn its Turkmen Uyghurs into ersatz Chinese with second-class
status. Also by encouraging massive Han emigration to Xinjiang, the one
majority ethnic group is liable to become a minority in its own historical
land. Since Uyghurs have their own language and many do not speak Mandarin at
all ... they are at an economic and social disadvantage, the more [so] since
Beijing's policies favor Chinese. The central government is doing everything to
marginalize the Uyghur language, customs and national pride - not to speak of
the strong attachment these Turkemenic peoples [have] to Islam. Unlike the
Tibetans, some Uyghurs have taken up arms against Beijing; others use the
weapons of the oppressed through peaceful demonstrations for civil rights or
simply by passive resistance to Beijing's attempt to foist Han values on them.
Armed struggle rises out of Beijing's internal colonial policies ... which
ignited stifled and repressed Uyghur yearnings for dignity and autonomy, if not
independence. And therein lies the problem [because] the troubles in Xinjiang
can be laid fair and square at Beijing's door.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 18, '08)
[Re Man
at work: Rudd walks Asian tightrope, Apr 17] Australia's
prime minister Kevin Rudd is a man hard at work. Tanja Vestergaard's long
article says as much. A Mandarin speaker, Rudd is aware that Australia's
economic prosperity is found in the deep pockets of cash-rich China. He can
speak China's language in its own idiom, and in this sense, he has recognized
that Australia has fallen under the long shadow of China. Canberra is an
exporter of raw material to China, and as such, this industrialized nation, has
assumed the role normally assigned to Third World countries. The Chinese
leadership will not demand of Mr Rudd that he perform nine times the
traditional kowtow, for it is obvious that former prime minister John Howard
and now Rudd have turned Australia into an economic vassals of Beijing. They
both steered Australia, willy nilly, into China's sphere of influence.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 17, '08)
The articles you post are as interesting as ever but the accompanying
advertising has gone downhill. Formerly, on bringing up your website, I'd find
smiling Asian women inviting me to meet them. Now, it's just a list of
dry-as-dust items like real estate, how to work at home or whether
Scientology's a religion or a cult. Color me disappointed.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, USA (Apr 17, '08)
Michael T Klare gets is mostly right in
The rise of the new energy world order [Apr
17]. However, he's completely mistaken about one important thing: uranium.
Uranium is one of the most plentiful elements on Earth and, even with existing
technology, it can be extracted economically, and practically indefinitely,
from seawater at a price merely 50% above the current market price. Energy
capture from uranium is also free of CO2 emissions. There is no need to panic,
much less start pre-emptive wars and kill millions of innocent people, over
energy. Given proper leadership, we have energy options that are both abundant
and readily utilizable.
Francis
Quebec, Canada (Apr 17, '08)
At the conclusion of Mr Noland's article
The Greenspan Episode [Apr 17], I was left
wondering if, in the interest of all concerned, it would be better if we just
pretend that Alan Greenspan is totally innocent of all charges so that he can
just leave us alone, once and for all, and stop writing all the op-eds.
Sir Rogers
USA (Apr 17, '08)
Regarding Kent Ewing's
China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16], it's
really very naive to believe China would "cave in". China is much more
vulnerable to the charm weapon. Remember the saying, "Chinese fear the soft,
not the hard"? But where in the West can you find charm? It will take decades,
if not centuries, to develop. Charm is as alien to the West as slippers to a
snake (a pun I copied from of one of your readers; no offense meant). But
perhaps [Barack] Obama will help. After all, he was raised in Africa and Asia.
The West should strengthen its weak points, not keep on adding fat to its
strong points. Honestly.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 17, '08)
After reading all the letters reacting to Kent Ewing's article
China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr
16], I find that the letter from Professor William Cooper shows that he should
go back to teaching instead of being retired, as he sounded so "academic". How
on earth [could] the international community decide on the choice of the two
sites for permanent stadiums? Simply put, the disturbance on the Olympic torch
relay has been organized by an unruly segment of the Dalai Lama group and aided
by outside forces and propagandized by many Western media outlets. This
ridiculous chain of events has gone so far that the positions of the Chinese
people and government have only hardened. The latest outburst by a CNN employee
on TV is an insult not only to China but also to America as well.
Seung Li (Apr 17, '08)
Re "Crisis?
What Crisis?" [Apr 16], in effect, Mr Delasantellis is saying that the
American republic is doomed. Why? The short American history presented
indicates the failed memory of the electorate, and his parting shot squarely
puts the blame on the supposed inattention of the people. So soon after America
allowed the taxpayer bailout of the S&Ls and permitted no retribution for
most of the benefiting criminals, we are immersed in another fiasco. We allowed
it to happen by sitting idly by while the rich fleeced us with the help of an
administration that proved its corruption over its first term, but was given
another by unenlightened voters (relatively given, anyway, even if you believe
stolen elections in Ohio). Not only are we forgetful of the S&L bailout,
but we are even lauding the probably-in-the-early-stages-of-dementia president
who was on the S&L watch. An informed public is needed to preserve
democratic rule. Well, judging from the last three decades, Americans had
better start investing in other currencies: the euro, the yen, the yuan, etc.
Jim
Southern California, USA (Apr 16, '08)
I hope there is a web connection in whatever computer heaven is now the home
address of my not-so-long-dead mother and sister, so they too have access to
Asia Times Online and Rebecca Solnit's
Men explain things to me [Apr 16]. There were times when we, a trinity
of women, fumed, laughed at the absurdities by some men ... husbands, brothers,
casual acquaintances. And, yes, make that both genders; none exempt. Small
parable: It's a church basement in the 1950s, somewhere on the plains
of North Dakota. Minister CJ calls on the ladies' aid society to volunteer a
willing spouse to build a safe box for the church records. No one raises their
hand among the corseted, biblically reserved faces. My mother raises her hand.
"Thanks for volunteering your husband," the minister responds. "No I will build
it." "Heretic" shone like fool's gold in the disdainful eyes of old CJ. But he
had no other offers. Mother built a fine cabinet, for her father, a Norwegian
carpenter, had taught his girl child a few skills some years before. Amazement
and a reluctant, grumpy acknowledgement was old CJ's response when mom
delivered the cabinet. We never knew what later filled that fine piece of
craftsmanship with its locked cover, but we often wondered at the contents ...
church records or dog-eared Playboys?
Beryl K
Gullsgate, Minnesota, USA (Apr 16, '08)
[Re Nepal triggers
Himalayan avalanche, Apr 15] Maoist communists in Nepal, who derive
their name and inspiration from the Chinese communists, have shown their gurus
the way to political power through democratic means. By contrast, the Chinese
Maoists have never won an election and rule only by virtue of an armed
insurgency that was funded and controlled by foreigners. If they are as
convinced as they want us to be that the Chinese people love them and want them
to rule then, why do they fear dissent and what have they to lose in
multi-party elections? They gained international legitimacy by way of a deal
they made with former US president Richard Nixon in 1972, but in their hearts
they surely know that they were put in Beijing not by the people of China but
by Stalin and the Comintern. It is time for Maoist gurus in China to learn from
their students in South Asia.
Cha-am Jamal
Thailand (Apr 16, '08)
Regarding China bunkers
down behind its great wall [Apr 16] by Kent Ewing. It's as obvious as
the sun in the daytime sky that the whole Olympic torch circus is orchestrated
by the US, a country that is currently occupying Iraq after killing at least 1
million civilians and displacing another 5 million as refugees. So, why is the
pot calling the kettle black? M K Bhadrakumar in his ATol article of January
23, 2008, US woos a
partner over Iran, correctly explained the diplomatic dance whereby the
US, by way of [US Deputy Secretary of State John] Negroponte, offered China
support for its "core interests" on Taiwan, in exchange for China's support of
the United States' "core interests" on Iran (actually a core interest of
Israel, which in the end amounts to the same thing). Well, after anteing up on
Iran, resulting in an election result favorable to China, the US waited for
it's quid pro quo on Iran - but this never came. So to prevent China from
having its cake and eating it too, the US is now going to spite China on the
Olympics using Tibet as a lever. The torch protests are unlikely to achieve
much for the Tibetans. But disrupting the Olympics and embarrassing China after
all its preparations for the games will, in the minds of the US leaders, teach
China a deserved lesson for breaking its half of the "bargain" - a bargain
which probably only ever existed in the imaginations of the leaders of the
United States. Tibet and the torch relay are but Act One for the US - the wrath
of the lover scorned. Acts Two, Three and Four will assuredly follow.
Francis Chow
Quebec, Canada (Apr 16, '08)
[Re China bunkers down
behind its great wall, Apr 16] China will and can admit no wrong in
ruling its vast territory. It is fighting back to maintain a modicum of
dignity. It is employing the sophisticated techniques of advertising ... It may
not be working since the throbbing sore of its brutal occupation of Tibet has
rendered its Beijing Summer Olympic slogan "one world, one dream" [to ring]
hollow. If world opinion has turned its plans for staging the Games into a
nightmare, China has ripped off its cheerful face and shown us its true,
authoritarian visage. It has reverted to the wooden language so reminiscent of
the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and has reserved in English and
other languages the gutter language it usually reserves for its opponents at
home and abroad in the national and local press. China has dug in its heels,
but the Games will go on if anyone nurtured illusions it wouldn't. Yet the
Olympic International Committee [OIC] is not forcing Beijing to live up to its
signed and sworn agreement for a loosening of authoritarian restraints when it
came to the Games. It isn't the first time the OIC has suffered such a blow.
One only has to think of the Berlin Games of 1936 which Hitler used to glorify
his 1,000-year Reich. Beijing's hold on Tibet won't weaken, but the rise of
Tibetan nationalism is a warning to China that its authority is not universal,
nor will it last a thousand years.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 16, '08)
Kent Ewing's China
bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16] joins a chorus of
commentators who wish to excuse China for its actions. It is true that
protesters are naive in believing their protests will cause China to change
suddenly. But to warn that, "Their rising tide of angry nationalism will last
well beyond the Olympics" is absolving China of responsibility. The argument
might be similar to a husband who abuses his wife: "don't make me angry because
I can't control myself, therefore, it is your fault that I have to beat you"
(ie I am not responsible, you made me angry). By warning that protests will
only fan the flames of nationalism, isn't Ewing saying the same thing? Why must
protests inevitably lead to nationalistic fervor? Why is this a bad thing
(unless people are worried that China will do something rash)? Rational
thinking argues that individuals are responsible for their actions and can
choose how to respond. Why is a nation not held to the same standards? If China
is a responsible nation, then it will find an appropriate way to harness its
nationalism (leading the medal count in the Olympics, sending more people into
space, cashing in some present political capital to explore long-term peaceful
solutions to the problems in Tibet and Xinjiang, etc) rather than channeling it
towards some sinister end. If, however, China chooses to use the nationalism in
a destructive fashion (crushing dissenters with the army, withdrawing into
itself and shunning foreigners, stamping out democracy and political reforms),
then the fears of the protesters and activists will have been justified and
China's rise will be viewed as extremely dangerous. The Chinese Communist Party
should not be let off the hook so easily. Creative, enlightened leaders will
find a way to respond that strengthens their nation and assuages the fear of
foreigners. Great nations are used to being flogged publicly. China has shined
a spotlight on itself, hoping that its dirty laundry can be kept in the
shadows. The problem is people can still see it, and as humans, once we are
told it is forbidden, we immediately desire to know more. I hope Mr Hu [Jintao]
will try to show the world it has nothing to fear.
Ken Arok
Vermont, USA (Apr 16, '08)
In reference to Kent Ewing's
China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16]: Mr Ewing couldn't
hide his joy that the torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco was
violently interrupted by followers of a CIA-backed religious cult mixed with
dirty politics. However, Mr Ewing, like CNN anchors, was obviously devastated
that the torch relay in Buenos Aires showed people all over the world what the
Olympic torch relay should be. Mr Ewing did not know, or pretended not to know,
that even in Paris the majority of the people lining the streets were there for
the torch, for the Olympic Games. Mr Ewing did not see how the media in these
places loved the professional protesters and their handlers while ignoring the
crowd cheering for the torch. Mr Ewing did not see how ridiculously CNN anchors
guided the reporters on the scene in San Francisco. Anchors: "There is some
disturbance. These are anti-Chinese demonstrators." Reporter: "Unfortunately
... As a matter of fact ... these are not protesters ..." The camera
immediately moved away from the crowd in search of "peaceful" demonstrators. Mr
Ewing cannot understand that China, its government, and more than 1.3 billion
Chinese at home and abroad, should have turned out to be the winner and that
those like him are actually the pathetic losers. For from now on, you, Mr
Ewing, just like CNN, do not have any credibility left in China and among the
Chinese people.
JM
Newport, Rhode Island, USA (Apr 16, '08)
[Re China bunkers down
behind its great wall, Apr 16] Now that in-your-face Olympic torch
bearing has been met with in-your-face protesting, perhaps those who call for
future Olympics to be held at fixed neutral sites have a point. By selecting,
let's say Seychelles for the Summer Games and Liechtenstein for the Winter
Games, nationalistic fervor that so often attends the jockeying for host
privileges among competing nations would be dashed. Gone, too, would be bribes
of Olympic officials of the sort that accompanied the Salt Lake City Games and
strident appeals to nationalistic fervor. While it is not surprising that the
Chinese have only hardened in the aftermath of these protests, we might be
better able to focus on the substance of improving international cooperation
without the distraction of torch bearing gauntlets and their critics. As for
the Olympic sponsors, they could perhaps lavish the new host sites with
permanent stadiums, Olympic villages, and the like in pristine climates that
would welcome star athletes and guests in a celebration of sport with minimal
political overtones.
William E Cooper
Professor and president emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 16, '08)
[Re China bunkers down
behind its great wall, Apr 16] In an effort to improve its human rights
image, China should nullify all of the commercial contracts it signed with
French companies during President Nicolas Sarkozy's recent visit. At a time
when China is being branded as a human rights violator, the country can ill
afford to be further seen as encouraging foreign firms to work with a "rogue"
government. Simultaneously, such a decision would also signal to the world that
China is now ready to accept and play by the rules of conduct currently
governing the international community.
John Chen
USA (Apr 16, '08)
I have always found ATol very informative and of academic significance.
However, I feel very sad to see Mr Kent Ewing's
China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16] published here. This
piece provides the author's subjective, rather than academic and objective,
understanding of a country that he proclaims to understand. According the
piece, readers will come to the point that it is unfortunate that, Mr Kent
Ewing, who claims to be based in China (be it in Hong Kong), have such poor
knowledge about China and what is happening in this country. Some words that
Ewing uses in his piece like "nightmare", "repressive", "crackdown", and so
forth, prove nothing but his subjective views. How can Ewing come to the
conclusion that a handful of pro-Dalai Lama supporters are anyhow right, while
1.3 billion Chinese people are wrong? Is this your understanding of democracy?
Freedom of speech is a good thing. But it does not mean that one can say
anything disregarding the facts, let alone taking the basic responsibility of
wishing a peaceful world. Let's not forget that there are so many people living
a desperate life in many corners of the world, while [the] situation in China,
including Tibet, seems hopeful.
Careful cat (Apr 16, '08)
I wish to thank M K Bhadrakumar for another interesting article,
Nepal triggers Himalayan avalanche [Apr 15]. Every article he writes is
interesting, informative, and - I think - pretty objective. I hope you're
paying him enough ...
Francis
Quebec, Canada (Apr 15, '08)
Regarding your article
Nepal triggers Himalayan avalanche [Apr 15], often you know something
important is happening when nobody writes about it. Take Nepal, for instance.
Hardly any news in the mainstream media, then a flurry of indignant reactions
worldwide, following the photographs of brutal Chinese - oops, Nepalese police
beating Tibetan monks, then all quiet again. Now I know why, thanks to MK
Bhadrakumar. In his deceptively inoffensive way, Mr Bhadrakumar again lays his
finger on the sore spot. But I wonder: Why is it all right for Nepalese to beat
Tibetan monks? Nobody seems bothered about that. Perhaps China should hire some
Ghurkas.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 15, '08)
Spengler argues in
Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15] that the only way for Israel
to defend itself against Hezbollah and Hamas is to attack their benefactor
Syria. However, Spengler fails to mention that Israel could have stopped Syrian
support for Hezbollah, and broken the Syrian-Iranian alliance any time it
wanted The price for this political windfall is the Golan Heights, or, more
precisely, the last 10 feet of the Golan that would give Syria access to the
Sea of Galilee. This I do not believe is too high of a price to pay for a great
strategic victory. Yet Israel cannot bring itself to make this decision, thus
you will get more wars like the one in 2006 where thousands of missiles will
rain down on Israel. One reason might be who in Israel owns land in the Golan
Heights. Billions of dollars of land probably went to the economic and
political elite in Israel or their children and friends. Israel needs to
realize that its present policies do not secure the long-term future of Israel.
An Israeli attack on Syria will destroy the last shreds on international
credibility that the state of Israel possesses, not to mention the billions of
dollars such a war will cost. Time for Israel to bite the bullet, and give back
the Golan for a comprehensive peace treaty.
Dennis O'Connell
USA (Apr 15, '08)
[Re Ehud Olmert on
the Damascus road, Apr 15] Spengler writes, "The only practical way to
defeat irregular forces embedded in a civilian population is to destroy the
states that back them. That is why America overthrew Saddam Hussein." Who
exactly was the irregular force embedded in Iraq's population prior to March
2003?
Shawn O'Neill
USA (Apr 15, '08)
[Re Ehud Olmert on
the Damascus road, Apr 15] Why on earth do you keep printing Spengler?
He has neither taste nor skill. Your website is one of the best around, only
flawed by his presence!
James First (Apr 15, '08)
Hit the road
[Apr 15] by Spengler was an interesting atrocity to read, while Spengler also
wrote another of his odious articles,
Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15].
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 15, '08)
Re Ehud Olmert on
the Damascus road [Apr 15] by Spengler. He has come up with one of his
sinister, mad and ominous imaginations, "The only practical way to defeat
irregular forces embedded in a civilian population is to destroy the states
that back them. That is why America overthrew Saddam Hussein, and also why
Israel is considering a pre-emptive war on Syria on the model of 1967. America
overthrew Saddam to rob Iraq of its oil wealth and destroy its infrastructure
[back] to [the] Medieval ages so that it [could be] occupied ... for another
100 years. The ignominy surrounding Israel is that it has not learned from its
tragic Biblical and recent history, and goes on committing even worse crimes
and atrocities on the innocent and helpless Palestinians. Israel is a violent
state that belittles its neighbors and has created the worst of all worlds for
them in the Middle East. It has lost its high moral ground by building high
walls, barriers, cutting water, electricity and medical supplies of the
Palestinians; its Apache helicopters and bombers fire missiles on innocent
Palestinians houses and [people] walking on the roads or in the streets, and
yet it is portrayed as the victim of aggression. Israel has defied world
opinion and [is] a proxy state of US. The irony is that the Zionists believe
that they are immune [to] criticism because it [is] their Biblical right
promised by their God. The fact of the matter is that the Zionist Israelis do
not want peace because if permanent peace is established the Zionist state of
Israel will disappear as the Palestinians will outnumbers the Jews in 10 to 15
years. Israel has to talk and negotiate with Hamas and not only to [the]
Palestinian Authority to bring some sense to the peace talks. But Israel does
not want peace, instead its Zionist leaders want to defeat Islam in Iran and
Syria, and [with the] help of [US President] George W Bush to invade Iran.
Jalal Ahmed Rumi
Pakistan (Apr 15, '08)
Spengler's latest tirade
Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15], shows once again, how close
Spengler is to his favorite perpetrator of false-flag ops, the Israeli Mossad.
Spengler proclaims that "Hamas and Hezbollah would represent no threat to
Israel without the backing of Syria and Iran". Maybe Spengler should look at
both sides of this equation and add that Israel would be no threat to [the
Middle East], if not world peace, without the blind loyalty and unconditional
backing of the US. Take away that component and Israel might have to actually
look at a prospect that they shun: a word that begins with the letter "P". What
is the 'P" word that sends Zionists and Likudnuts everywhere into a hysterical
rage? The "P" word is peace.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Missouri, USA (Apr 15, '08)
The comments from DC [letters, Apr 14] who criticizes ATol as another outlet of
Chinese propaganda illustrates the frustration many Chinese people, especially
those in Western countries, feel when expressing opinions contrary to
sympathizers of the Free Tibet movement, many of whom are Westerners. There is
a general perception in the Western world that any such comments are
interpreted as "pro-Chinese" and therefore directives from the CCP [Chinese
Communist Party]. The divisive and Bushistic zero-sum mentality inevitably
destroys any goodwill for continual constructive discussions. They overlook the
fact that the Chinese people, though repressed as they are, have genuine
opinions of their own and see the unfolding complicated issues from
perspectives that are equally, if not more, credible than those held by the
pro-Tibet camps. Many Chinese people confess to "love the country, but not the
party". They realize, behind the facade of economic development, the multitude
of problems affecting their country and the limitations of the present
political system. Overseas Chinese have the advantage of having lived in China,
have first-hand understanding of the workings of the Chinese government and
society, and are informed of the country's history. Most Westerners have never
been to China, consumed news purely from Western media outlets, and tended to
dismiss, as a general rule, any information coming out of the Chinese press and
blogsites. Though justly proud of their freedom, Westerners need to realize
that differing opinions are bound to exist in this world as they are formed by
people living under varying sets of circumstances. Though Chinese views may be
biased to some degree, but so are Western views, and just as certainly, those
from the Tibetans. The Chinese would appreciate if their views and opinions are
equally respected. To dismiss us as mindless people who merely "follow the
party line" is simply a gross insult to us all.
Tom
Australia (Apr 15, '08)
[Re Deadly
struggle for migrants in Thailand, Apr 15] There was an incident in
Ranong, Thailand, in which a human trafficking event went horribly wrong and
resulted in the death of 54 migrants from [Myanmar]. Thereafter, a Myanmar
official from Bangkok traveled to Ranong to commiserate with the survivors.
This outward show of sympathy comes from a government that is not willing to
repatriate its citizens who have been arrested for illegal entry into Thailand
and a government whose misrule and mismanagement has so devastated what used to
be the richest country in Southeast Asia that its citizens are now forced to
flee their home at great risk to life and limb to find work in countries where
[the] government is competent. Whatever the proximate causes for the misery of
Burmese migrant workers in Thailand, ultimately it is the junta that must be
held liable and accountable. Their misrule is a crime against humanity.
Cha-am Jamal
Thailand (Apr 15, '08)
[Re Bush, Lee and that
North Korea problem, Apr 15] Dr Song-Yong Lee has written a thoughtful
article with recommendations. He may very well learn, if he has not already,
that the US's chief negotiator, Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill,
has announced conditions in dealing with North Korea that soften Washington's
demands on Pyongyang's giving a full accounting for its nuclear arsenal and
stockpile of enriched uranium. South Korea's president Lee Myung-bak might be
bewildered by Mr Hill's announcement as he prepares his journey to meet
President George W Bush at Camp David. But it is too early to tell. One thing
is sure: Washington is anxious to get a deal with Pyongyang before Mr Bush
finishes his last year in office. Call it face saving, if you will. Mr Lee has
taken a hard tack with Kim Jong-il. Will he again find that he has embarked on
a lonely road, as he did when as a student activist he opposed Seoul's
accommodation with its former colonial ruler Japan, "a move strongly endorsed
by the US"? If Mr Bush is now endorsing further accommodation with Kim Jong-il
as a junior partner of the US, Mr Lee has a very circumscribed field of action.
Mr Bush has not-so-gently pulled the welcoming rug from under Mr Lee as he
arrives in Washington.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 15, '08)
Thanks to Pepe Escobar for debunking the pronouncements of Senators Lindsey
Graham and Joe Lieberman, [Evil
Iran, the new al-Qaeda, Apr 10]. If they were not influential US
senators, their comments would be laughable. Any observer of the Middle East
knows it was only a matter of time before the George W Bush administration, its
neo-con cronies and other hangers-on (like the good senators) would further
demonize Iran by blaming it for all of America's ills in Iraq. They are hoping
the American people have forgotten the sorry spectacle of the last five years:
an occupation of massive folly aided and abetted by the two senators; more than
4,000 brave American service personnel killed; countless Iraqi civilians and
military dead; Iraq on the verge of being a failed state and an occupation
costing over $2 trillion and counting ($12 billion a month) contributing to
America's economic malaise. Iran has not been responsible for any of that as
the Bush/Dick Cheney, neo-con, Graham/Lieberman axis would like us to believe.
Iran showed how it can play a positive role in calming Iraqi violence by
brokering the recent ceasefire in Basra. The question Senators Graham/Lieberman
should have asked US ambassador Crocker and General David Petraeus is why the
US did not, or could not, do that. Everyone knows the Bush administration and
its apologists are further and further divorced from the truth. The irrefutable
facts are that Iran not only has a relationship of cooperation with the
government of Iraq, but it also enjoys close relationships with all so-called
Shi'ite factions. These are relationships, developed over hundreds of years. No
amount of Pollyannaish statements by Bush and his cohorts about Iraq which
deify belief and insult our common sense will change reality on the ground, nor
will evidence-free charges that Iran's backing of "special groups" is the
reason for US difficulties. If the occupation is to end, the Bush
administration and its allies must get real and start talking with Iran.
Fariborz S Fatemi
Former staff member
House Foreign Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
McLean, Virginia, USA (Apr 14, '08)
[Re US edges
closer to engaging Iran, Apr 12] M K Bhadrakumar never misses a trick.
He is a close reader of events in Western and Central Asia. The US, however,
has been edging closer to engaging Iran indirectly and now perhaps directly for
the past 29 years. At times through surrogates like Saddam Hussein during the
murderous Iran-Iraq war, or through backdoor dealings as former president
Ronald Reagan did during the Iran Contra scandal or through veiled threats of
former president [George H W] Bush. On the other hand, Iran is cautious in
dealing with the US; it has foiled President [George W] Bush's plans by playing
America's European allies against the US in how best to deal with Iran's
nuclear development; it has steadied the hand of its Shi'ite allies in Lebanon
and Iraq. Iran has been able to bell the American cat not so much out of
cleverness but by its ability to profit from Bush's sorry record of war and
attempted imperial peace in Iraq and Palestine, and its complete misreading of
western Asia history.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 14, '08)
The article ... China Hand [Euro
mantra undermines sanctions, Apr 12] made fascinating reading. ... Most
useful information for those trying to understand what exactly the warmongers
and cheats of Washington have in their sleeves. It's fundamental essays like
these that make ATol such a valuable analyses hub. In Switzerland, financiers
have known pretty well that the last decades have been an incessant war of
imperial dominance by the US, with the favorite tool being financial
domination. It is cheap, and very efficient. What is most worrying is that this
war becomes more and more intense by the year, and that this new mammoth entity
that is the European Union is more and more copying the imperial bad manners of
the US. It will be harder and harder to be a small and free country.
Dr G Bittar
Switzerland (Apr 14, '08)
China Hand [Euro
mantra undermines sanctions, Apr 12] refers to "unanimous desire of
American political parties and candidates to be tough on Iran" as though he
understands what is happening in the US. The Republicrats and Demicans are not
the only parties in the US. Please do not ascribe their long-term foreign
relations stupidity to the rest of us. There are political parties and
candidates that have not bought into the empire-building nonsense and
economy-ruining activities.
Tom Gerber (Apr 14, '08)
Normally, I am a compassionate Christian, however, after [Spengler's] recent
article [Horror and
humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] that said Union General Sherman should
have finished his job burning the South, which equates to killing all
Southerners. Wouldn't that be akin to Asian war crimes like the Baatan Death
March, starving, beating and beheading of allied POWs during World War II, etc.
Yet the same US military that crushed Asian forces was made up by a large
percentage of Southern men. Perhaps, it is we who should be saying Douglas
McArthur and General LeMay should have finished their job of turning the Far
East into a nuclear cinder since you wished total death and destruction upon
the people of the old Confederate states. If you want some more of what we gave
you last time just keep maintaining that arrogant, ignorant and ... smart
mouth.
Billy E Price (Apr 14, '08)
The article on the destruction of the [South] by the war criminal [Union
General William Tecumseh] Sherman [Horror
and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] is like saying the Japanese should
have completed their China policy during World War II.
Farrell Dutton (Apr 14, '08)
[Re Horror and
humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] Ignoring Spengler's comic-book
understanding of the US war between the States, I have questions about the
following: Americans need a higher threshold for horror. Tragedies
sometimes must play themselves out, and the losers must be allowed to lose.
Whole peoples can go bad, and sometimes it is necessary to prevent them from
doing evil by winnowing their ranks. As a self-confessed
advocate of state-sponsored collective punishment, ethnic cleansing and
genocide, what positive aspects does Spengler attribute to Hitler's "winnowing"
of gypsies, trade unionists and Jews? Does Spengler see any difference between
Hitler's lebensraum and Israel's approach to the Palestinians?
Jeb
Norway (Apr 14, '08)
Given the recent media hype on India-Africa summit, it is very easy to forget
the relative positions of India and China in the area of FDI [Foreign Direct
Investment] as Siddharth Srivastava seems to have done in
India loads up presents for African safari [Apr 11]. According to a
report from UNCTAD, the relative sizes of the stock of FDI to Africa, from
China and India in 2004 were $49.2 million and $1.9 billion respectively. Also,
it seems that relative to the Chinese, the India FDI is more focused towards
manufacturing and tertiary sector [development] as opposed to the primary
(extractive) sector.
TutuG
Scotland (Apr 14, '08)
Tibet a defining issue
for China by Francesco Sisci [Apr 10] truly defines the grudge of some
Western countries against the justification of "territory". One wonders why so
many countries in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and South America do not join in
the chorus as these are mostly the countries which suffered under Western
imperialism and know their true motive in promoting Tibetan independence.
Government policy aside, many Western media outlets have shown how biased they
have become while championing freedom of the press. An unintended result is
that they have successfully rallied the Chinese - and also overseas Chinese -
to support Beijing. It is better for China not to have unfriendly guests at the
Olympics when these guests naively think their presence is important ...
Seung Li (Apr 14, '08)
Sorry if I'm late in commenting on this, but I finally managed to struggle
through the bizarre and convoluted arguments of Francesco Sisci's
Tibet a defining issue for China [Apr 10] - and this man is [the Asia]
editor of La Stampa! Did any reader actually understand what he was trying to
say? Let me see: first, he tried to give a history of China and Tibet,
something even he considered extremely murky (Mr Sisci, you are definitely not
cut out to be a historian); then he tried to explain why China was trying to
rationalize or had to justify its control over Tibet before the world (Mr
Sisci, do you think you succeeded in your explanations?); and then went around
some bizarre comparison of China with "Europe the Wonderful" and "America the
Good" (Mr Sisci, are you delusional?). And somewhere in there was a rather
abstract discussion of religion that we should pass by our friends in the
Spengler collective. In contrast to Mr Sisci's bit of nuttiness, I've really
appreciated the many fine articles on the global financial problems recently
published in Asia Times Online. Keep up the good work.
Jonathan
UK (Apr 14, '08)
A question to the author of
Tibet a defining issue for China [Apr 10] ", Francesco Sisci. As the
author said: These stories about Rome's enemies and its shortcomings
did not belittle Rome. Instead, they made it even bigger: it was an empire that
managed to overcome and triumph over great difficulties and setbacks. In a way,
the same tradition is preserved in present American journalism and contemporary
history, where writers go to great lengths to detail American problems and to
ultimately show the triumph of the "good American empire". This history is more
convincing, especially in a culturally permeable world, because it does not
rule out competing visions, and therefore it sounds real. Furthermore, with the
final Roman victory, it proves the ultimate greatness of Rome because it was
able to overcome all its troubles. The same did not happen in China, where the
official history covers all but convinces few ... I want to
know, in the author's mind, how convincing are those Western historians'
research on China history? Remember, they are all using the unconvincing
Chinese emperors' history to do their research!
Min Du (Apr 14, '08)
Until recent centuries, China has been the hegemon of Asia. Since World War II,
China has been speaking out against alleged US hegemony and alleged US attempts
to "contain" China. How could the US possibly "contain" China unless China were
intent on expanding its territory? In
China's Pacific strategy unfurls [Apr 10], Zhang Guihong all but admits
to China's expansionist plans, as expressed by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao.
Although the Pentagon complains about a lack of a legitimate articulated reason
for China's aggressive military buildup, it is clear to all who wish to see
that China is attempting to make preparations to be the hegemon of Asia, and in
the process reducing Japan, Korea and Southeast Asia to vassal states. Or at
least that is what the Chinese government is hoping will happen.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (Apr 14, '08)
As an overseas Taiwanese I praise Stephen A Nelson's article
Devils and angels in Taiwan. Ma Ying-jeou's KMT [Kuomintang party] with
big help [from] the People's Republic of China, and perhaps many short-sighted
Taiwanese and America's George W Bush administration as well, have defeated
[the Democratic Progressive Party] overwhelmingly in Taiwan. Taiwan's political
troubles are comparable with those of Ukraine and Estonia, which have to deal
with a big "race" problem. While in Taiwan last March during the presidential
election, I encountered a China-born "Taiwanese" citizen who proclaimed, "China
has so many people, what's wrong [with] killing some Tibetans?"
Tan Lim
Canada (Apr 14, '08)
It is obvious your news agency is just another propaganda machine for the
Chinese government. What your agency is conducting is brainwashing via proxy.
Your news agency will never pass as a legitimate news organization when you
continue to categorize Taiwan as Greater China. Educated readers will see
through the ulterior motives. Stick with what you guys know and go back and
print the little red pamphlets.
DC (Apr 14, '08)
Wouldn't it be cool to compare the lies [and] promises about Vietnam that came
out of president [Lyndon] Johnson's and General [William] Westmoreland's mouths
in the 1960s with the current parallel falsehoods from [George W] Bush and
[General David] Petraeus? From the manufactured Gulf of Tonkin incident (now
Saddam's WMDs) to the multiple massive 1960s troop buildups (now the Iraq
"surge"), Vietnam seems to have provided this idiot Bush with a blueprint for
eventual American defeat. He and his stooge general parrot almost verbatim the
Vietnam lies, so that for people of my generation, it's like deja vu all over
again. But I hold no hope that the compromised American media can undertake
such an exercise in historical comparison. Nowadays, that sort of news coverage
seems to be the exclusive bailiwick of the only real journalists left in this
corporate-controlled country, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert on Comedy
Central.
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas (Apr 11, '08)
In US sanctions
send Iran into Asia's arms [Apr11], China Hand writes a very accurate
and informative article on how the UN Security Council's newest sanctions
regime against Iran "backfires" against the long range economic interests of
the US. He left out perhaps the most important factor that motivated Iran's
allies, China and Russia, to go along with the latest round of sanctions: the
sanctions put the George W Bush administration in a much more compromised
position vis-a-vis carrying out a bombing attack against Iran before the end of
President Bush's term in office. Had the Security Council -plus-one not agreed
to this escalation in sanctions (and no doubt Iran's former number one trading
partner Germany considered it to be a bitter pill to swallow) there would have
been a much higher probability of US attack on Iran. The last two days of
testimony from General Petreaus and US ambassador Crocker to US congressional
committees in which they devoted much time to demonizing Iran and their
"unhelpful" role in Iraq, may be based on the administration's belated
recognition that the additional UN sanctions make it harder to make the case
for war against Iran. The Security Council-plus-one, like everyone else, are
just trying to get to the end of Bush's disastrous presidency without another
disastrous war.
David Sheegog
Paoli, Oklahoma, USA (Apr 11, '08)
First of all, I want to confirm the observation of your reader, Orace River: "I
believe it [Asia Times Online] represents a standard of journalism which
Western media and press were once capable of but which has long since
disappeared ..." ATol indeed is often peevish, petty, sulky, truculent,
bigot[ed], and a lot more of the like, but it at least still has some respect
for its readers, even in the writings of your favored court jester, Spengler.
Regarding Tibet and the Olympic Games, what strikes me most is the placid
attitude of the United States, as compared with the revanchist ravings of
Sarkozy. I would have expected the opposite. Can any of your writers shed some
light on this? Thank you.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 11, '08)
A minor point of order regarding Spengler's latest,
Horror and Humiliation in Chicago [Apr 8]. Folks in the 'hood have
moved on! 50 [Cent] is "ol' skool", check out T-Pain and Lil Wayne!
Sir Rogers
USA (Apr 11, '08)
With reference to the article
Horror and humiliation in Chicago [Apr 8], by our infamous Spengler, I
would like to offer a different perspective and perhaps the point Spengler was
making. Not that I am a fan of Spengler, mind you, but he does provide for some
entertainment particularly when readers jump up and down. I do remember a
similar article somewhere else about war in general. While noting Clauswitz's
contention about war being an extension of politics, we need to look at a very
familiar scenario in the form of WWII. There was no attempt to seek a political
solution but instead the objective was to annihilate the enemy, pound it to
dust and totally destroy all will to resist. This was carried through "carpet"
bombing of cities in Germany for example. There was no attempt to disguise the
wholesale killing of citizens and the Allies took great casualties to carry out
this strategy. Japan would have suffered the same fate if US didn't have the
Atomic bomb. The result was that in the end when Germany fell, there was no
more will to resist. I think that perhaps the point is that war is a very
serious thing. You go in to win and to destroy the enemy completely. Half
measures such as human rights, reducing collateral damage will end up with a
situation like Iraq now. Not that I am advocating doing that to Iraq. What I am
saying is you cant be naive and have a "noble" or "clean" war. Bush tried to
sell that to the American public and found himself in a trap of his own making.
Scarlet Pimple
Malaysia (Apr 11, '08)
I have read nothing but biased views in Mr Francesco Sisci's seemingly
"comprehensive" overview of Tibet in
Tibet a defining issue for China, Apr 11. Nothing fresh, indeed. You
can read a lot of this kind from the Western media, in particular in these
days. According to Mr Sisci's theory, whites should return North America to the
Indians, and Australia to the old tribes. Come on, the violence happened in
Tibet can be called an "uprising", and rioters in Los Angles and Paris only
deserve batons and bullets. Be quiet, let's forget about Iraq and Afghanistan.
People there deserve ignorance, or nothing. What is history? The unearthed
bones tell us that history means that human beings all come from East Africa;
all the other places should have belonged to animals and insects. Fortunately,
at the end of the article, the danger seems to have been acknowledged: we don't
need too many small states! My question for the author is: how can you judge
that China's governance is totally worthless? Do you know when the Dalai Lama
was in Tibet, he and his deputies kept slaves, which violated the basics of
human rights?
Andrew Yong
Lhasa, China (Apr 11, '08)
[Re Tibet a defining
issue for China, Apr 11.] Thanks should go to Francesco Sisci for
offering a more common-sensical analysis of the Tibet issue. On the other hand,
I’m not so convinced that the recent turmoil is as fateful and defining as the
author makes it out to be, not when only a tiny group of people, whose motives
behind the uprising may not be all that noble and irreproachable, is involved.
The well-orchestrated riots, while arousing much hue and cry at the moment,
likely will be a distant memory after the Olympics. Anyone who thinks the
protests will cause Beijing consternation is sadly mistaken. If anything, I
believe Chinese President Hu Jintao owes the schemers of the riots much
gratitude for creating a godsent opportunity to rally the 1.3 billion Chinese
people behind the country’s leadership. As for those who harbor illusion in the
high ideal of equal representation for all, they just might want to wake up
from their woolgathering and smell the roses. The American Indians and the
Australian Aborigines have been screaming bloody murder for well over a
century; somehow I don’t think they’re going to get their land back anytime
soon, or ever. Yet history marches on.
John Chen
USA (Apr 11, '08)
[Re Tibet a defining
issue for China, Apr 11] Gaining independence per se is neither
necessary nor sufficient to providing good government, whether in Tibet or
Zimbabwe. In whatever form, good government for Tibet should encourage rather
than bridle the freedoms of religion and speech, demonstrating respect for
Tibetan and Han citizens alike. Only if the Chinese government celebrates and
fosters its minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang will it avoid more protests, more
unrest, more calls for independence.
William E Cooper
Professor and President Emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 11, '08)
Stephen A Nelson's article,
Devils and angels in Taiwan [Apr 11] reeks of one-sided bias in the
guise of a balanced article. To say that Ma Ying-jeou is a "chameleon on a
weather vane" is to dismiss the 58% of Taiwan voters who support Ma's message
of reconciliation and peace. Perhaps Nelson would like to continue to support
the DPP's pattern of corruption, intimidation, and race-baiting for the past
eight years? And to say that Taiwan "saved" Chiang? If that is not the most
biased comment I've ever heard, even for a deep-green DPP that is pretty
ignorant. Taiwan saved Chiang as much as Chiang saved Taiwan. Would the US 7th
Fleet have even arrived if Chiang wasn't on Taiwan? You would be a fool to
believe that the US would have defended Taiwan if Chiang had decided to flee to
Hainan Island instead. Chiang defended the island against the inevitable
communist invasion, that is a fact no one can dispute. Chiang has many faults,
and no one can deny that he was effectively a dictator. But please, let's get
some perspective and balance in your articles.
Garrett Lu (Apr 11, '08)
[Re Devils and angels in
Taiwan, Apr 11] Although bruited as "informal", President Lee Myung-bak
will be welcomed next week in Washington by President George W Bush with much
fanfare. It is not everyday that Bush, who is in the last year of his
presidency, finds a soul mate in foreign policy, especially when it comes to
dealing with North Korea. Relations between Bush and the last two presidents of
South Korea have not been as friendly and relaxed as the US had wanted; with
Lee, chances are very good that the old spirit of camaraderie between South
Korea and the US will be rekindled with the old warmth. Discussions, however,
will not be circumscribed to issues with Pyongyang, they will encompass
loosening the central government's hold on the economy which corporate America
feels are too state-directed and out of step with globalization. Lee is a
believer in privatization and freer trade, but that might prove difficult since
Lee's party - the GNP - has a fragile hold on parliament. And Lee is a man that
Bush can do business with, it goes without saying. Even though South Korean
voters put Roh Moo-hyung's party in the minority, anyone surfing the website of
today's New York Times will find an interesting article. It seems that
ex-president Roh's home has become a star for South Koreans who flock to his
home for a glimpse of the man. This should tell us something about the
ambivalent behavior of the South Korea electorate and might be a warning to Lee
that he has to go softly in carrying out bold economic reforms which might earn
him popular ill will.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 11, '08)
Kudos to Chan Akya [
Asia must rally behind China, Apr 10] for calling for Asia
to flex its muscles and throw off modern US/European imperialism. Sadly, Mr
Akya's ideas about economics are the same as those dominant in the US and
Europe, and a shift of power to Asia as he imagines would keep these same ideas
in power. Such a power shift from neo-liberal West to neo-liberal East would be
one merely of bodies, not minds. Unless, of course, what Asia does with the
world's economic reins in its hands is markedly different from what Western
capitalists have been doing. Otherwise, if the cat catches mice the same way,
what does its color matter?
Josephus P Franks (Apr 10, '08)
I do not understand why Asia Times Online continues to provide a forum for the
bigoted rubbish produced by Spengler. His April 8 anti-Southern diatribe
Horror and humiliation in Chicago is
nothing less than a regurgitation of the vilest Yankee propaganda. The victors
of any conflict have an opportunity to rewrite history, justify their actions
however heinous, and force their version of events upon those they've
conquered. What continues to rile individuals like Spengler is that the people
of Dixie refuse to accept the lies and falsehoods about our people and history.
The War for Southern Liberation was not about slavery, or "keeping the black
man down". My ancestors and 70 to 80% of the families in the South were not
slave holders. They chose to secede and resisted the invading armies of the
North because they knew what freedom was. Secession is America's oldest
tradition, and liberty from English tyrants was won in the South. When
oppressed by the new tyrants in Washington DC, they exercised their rights to
secede. It would be nice if pious propagandists like Spengler would open their
eyes and see where racial bigotry originated. No slave ship ever flew a
Confederate flag, but countless ships sailed under the "stars and stripes" out
of Northern ports. One could spend weeks refuting the nonsense Spengler has
written with facts, but it will be simpler if Asia Times Online cut ties with
this so-called columnist.
Richard Thomas
California (Apr 10, '08)
[Re
The Black Death of financial collapse, Apr 10] Well, at
least there is one man who understands that any commodities-based economy which
manages to end up with the world's fifth largest current account deficit right
on top (or close to it) of the commodities pricing cycle, has got to be a
basket case of monumental proportions. If Australia is unable to balance its
external ledger in the most favorable conditions, what's going to happen to its
currency and its standard of living when prices for most [of] its exports start
heading down under (pun intended). One has to wonder if [the] Australian
government considers wishful thinking a viable substitute for hard competence,
or if it simply assumes that since this "Titanic" has no lifeboats, it might as
well sink to the bottom playing a piano.
Oleg Beliakovich
Seattle (Apr 10, '08)
I wish to compliment you on the quality of reporting and excellent articles in
your paper. I believe it represents a standard of journalism which Western
media and press were once capable of but which has long since disappeared in
political timidity and economic greed. Keep up the good work.
Orace River (Apr 10, '08)
Regarding the article
Why Beijing just can't grasp Tibet there is symbolism in all
these protests against China for wherever the Olympic torch is brought. The
torch which once represented a democratic culture (the ancient Greeks) now has
taken on an avatar of worldwide protests towards China's handling of Tibet.
This should have taken place back when China annexed Tibet, destroying six
thousand monasteries, butchering monks and civilians, raping Buddhist nuns,
etc, along with a lot of Tibet's written religious culture. What did the UN do
roughly at the time China annexed Tibet? The UN gave China the coveted Security
Council seat. The form of Buddhism that Tibet follows is unique to Tibet. The
Vajrayana school of Buddhism that the Tibetans practice is a very "heady" form
of Buddhism where the Hindu Tantric system is incorporated into the school of
Vajrayana. These protests may not change any ground realities regarding China
and Tibet but it is gratifying that the (Olympic) torch flame is blazing the
trail of world protests right to Beijing. Better late than never. Chrysantha
Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 10, '08)
Mr [Sami] Moubayed 's latest [War
and peace, Israeli style, Apr 10] is a taunting and possibly
unintended participant in sending untruthful signals to all the intelligence
agencies in the Middle East long accustomed to a danse macabre which the
actors in that part of the world have been engaged in for several millennia.
What with reports in the media that the AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs
Committee] is splintering [into] offshoots in Washington DC, the need to
de-accentuate the disastrous cakewalk into Iraq and the reported impending
visit to Syria within the next two weeks by former president Jimmy Carter with
the promised intent to meet with a member of the Hamas leadership, and the
reported publication by the Israeli Defense Forces that the Israeli airstrikes
in Syria were intended to destroy WMDs that Saddam Hussein had sent to Syria
before the neo-cons' shock and awe that is over five years old and still has no
success. It's becoming clear that dancing in the Middle East is heating up
again due to the emergence of conflicting and parallel styles. Mr Moubayed does
know his Middle East well.
Armand De Laurell (Apr 10, '08)
I refer to the
Evil Iran, the new al-Qaeda by Pepe Escobar on April 10.
Despite massive opposition within America against the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, [Senator Joe] Lieberman and his co-religionists are pushing for
wars in the Middle East to be fought on behalf of Israel by Americans and
Europeans. The degree of hatred shown by Lieberman and the neo-cons against the
Muslims has no historical precedence. All kinds of propaganda tools are being
used to demonize Muslims and Islam and to cover up Israeli crimes against
Muslims. This hatred and the lies against Muslims and Islam are becoming
apparent to all the people around the world and the world is tiring of the
Zionist lies ... The economic and financial problems in America and Europe are
making people aware that they have been used as cannon fodder for Zionist
self-interest ... Many Jews have themselves realized that the ... Israel lobby
is breeding anti-semitism. Should [Senator John] McCain get elected as US
president, it will be the best thing that can happen, as this will convince
even the doubters that the wars indeed are being fought for Israel. Conspiracy
theories will no longer be theories but will become visible for all to see.
Vincent Maadi
Cape Town, South Africa (Apr 10, '08)
Thankfully, there are sites like ATol and journalists like Pepe Escobar who
gives us the real "straight talk" in his article
Evil Iran, the new al-Qaeda [Apr 10].
Truth, these days, is a vital commodity, which must be why those "fair and
balanced" and "best in the business" news sites use so little of that precious
stuff. This whole month will be one long "dog and pony" show, to show those
uniformed masses around the world that the "surge" is working, Iraq is a
success and hey, by the way, since we're already in the neighborhood, let's
turn Iran into another American success story. The last time General Petraeus
did his best PT Barnum imitation was last September. Back then, [Petraeus]
warned us of the dreaded "Lebanese Hezbollah Department 2800", which according
to the general, was responsible for damned near every evil in the Middle East.
Good story, except that it was a concoction of the Bush/Cheney Junta to try and
gin-up another war fought against another of Israel's "existential" enemies,
Iran. There wasn't then, and there isn't now, any Deptartment 2800, unless one
goes to the mall and shops at a large box store. Watching part of the current
hearings damned near made me nauseous. The amount of gushing and fulsome praise
heaped on Petraeus by the craven and immoral cowards in the US Congress must
make the rest of the world wonder if not only McCain has dementia, but if the
whole country doesn't belong in some padded room, restrained to prevent us
Americans from harming ourselves.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Missouri, USA (Apr 10, '08)
What’s up with the 600-plus points that the Dow has gained since Bear Stearns'
demise? Are investors oblivious to the string of bad news emanating from global
financial markets and to the rickety underpinnings of the US economy? The
answer, alarmingly, may be found in R M Cutler’s latest report
The East, no the West, is (in the) red [Apr
5], in which he observed, "Market sentiment interpreted the Swiss bank UBS's
writedown of US$19 billion, connected with the unfolding subprime debacle, as a
sign of the beginning of the end rather than as a glimpse of the iceberg beyond
the tip." Yikes! This when the end of the subprime mess, not to mention that of
the much larger credit crisis, is nowhere in sight? Double yikes!! Makes you
rather feel like watching a fantasy thriller titled "Irrational Exuberance:
Episode II - the Ignoramus Menace," except the outcome will be all too real and
none too thrilling. But I suppose when investors behold every economic report
put out by the Fed as though it were the Book of Truth, fools rush in.
John Chen
USA (Apr 9, '08)
Regarding
Horror and humiliation in Chicago, Apr 8, by Spengler, I
have never read as much rubbish as regards to the people of Dixie in my life.
Does this person ... not realize that, like many people throughout this world,
they fought for hearth and home? There were very few slave owners among the
ordinary people, their fight was with those who invaded their homeland. This, I
would suggest, is what many other people have done for centuries. If [Union
General William Tecumseh] Sherman was alive today, he would be hauled in front
of the courts of human rights. He would be condemned as a war criminal. His
actions were more akin to Attila than a general of an army. Consider the
behavior of men like [Confederate General Robert E] Lee and [General Stonewall]
Jackson, beside this butcher. The Ulster-Scots/Scotch-Irish people have always
had to fight their corner, and still are to this
dhttp://huahinmetalblending.com/ay. We will continue to do so wherever the
flame of freedom is threatened. We will never surrender to tyranny. And that's
what Sherman was - a tyrant.
Rab (Apr 9, '08)
I wish to thank writer Wu Zhong for the article
Courts withdraw verdict on ATM bandit and
for the insight that public opinion in China can influence [the] outcomes of
cases. What Wu Zhong does not point out to us, however, is that dishonesty
seems to be the rule rather than the exception in today's China, as a
consequence of the Cultural Revolution destroying the integrity and moral
character which existed in pre-Cultural Revolution Chinese society. Today,
dishonesty, corruption and scams are more common in China than even in Africa.
The recent case of Chinese businessmen selling brown cows painted black and
white with silicone injected into their udders in order to obtain a higher sale
price from prospective dairy farmers in inner Mongolia is just one of many
thousands of examples of the cancer metastasizing across the Chinese moral
character.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (Apr 9, '08)
In regards to your anti-Confederate article
Horror and humiliation and Chicago [Apr
8], the author Spengler says "the only thing to regret is that Sherman didn't
finish the job". OK ... The only regret I have is that the Japanese Imperial
Army didn't "finish the job" in mainland China and Hong Kong! How do you like
that?
William Potter
ScotWatch International (Apr 8, '08)
Re
Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8] Spengler asserts
that 80-90% of Confederate soldiers that did not own slaves had aspirations of
so doing - [and] therefore that was their prime motivation for fighting.
Ludicrous. Most of the soldiers were of Scotch-Irish ancestry from Appalachia,
an area hardly conducive to slave labor agriculture. Is Spengler absent the
feelings of most people concerning the love of a land and its people? He must
be a true cosmopolitan without roots of any kind.
Rick Johnson
Re
Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8] Thank you,
Spengler, with your sharp insights and wit that is totally based on reality and
a keen, sharp, eye which refuses to be as delusional as everyone else on the
Asia Times Online staff. Your writings are never flavored, spiced, or
overcooked - just the truth! Thank you,again!
Joseph Giramma (Apr 8, '08)
From Spengler's essay
Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8: "Southerners
thought of themselves as an oppressed people, the descendants of Scots-Irish
immigrants driven out of their Celtic homelands by the English, flying the
X-shaped cross of Scotland's patron saint in the Confederate battle flag,
redolent of Scotland's "Lost Cause". The self-pity of the South pervades
American popular culture, from Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind,
to The Band's bathetic song, The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down. It is
best known in the cover version by Joan Baez, an old civil rights campaigner.
Such is the pull of identity politics." With good reason, the
descendants of Scots villagers expelled from the Highlands after the rebellion
of 1746 may have thought themselves oppressed. Spengler seems to be under the
false impression that the Scots-Irish had some connection to the Highland
clearances. In fact the Scots-Irish are better known today as northern Irish
protestants. In their ancestral country far from being victims of disposition
they were beneficiaries from the disposition of the O'Neill clan from its
lands. They have a history of ascendency over the Gaelic Catholics enforced by
violence. The alleged penchant of their hillbilly (hill-Billy originally
referred to their immigrant forbears' hero veneration of King Billy [William]
of Orange) American progeny for aspiring to own slaves as well as plantation
land may have more to do with that than the fictional victimhood Spengler
alleges their immigrant ancestors suffered.
PygmyPossum (Apr 8, '08)
[In]
Liquidation is only solution to crisis [Apr 8], Doug Noland
hit the nail right on the head - the Federal Reserve is essentially trying to
cover up the simmering flames of a financial disaster with paper.
Unfortunately, as The Mogambo Guru pointed out [A
crude source of welfare, Apr 8], the more paper money Fed
chairman Ben Bernanke throws into the fire, the more calamitous the ensuing
conflagration will be. To be fair, Mr Bernanke is really faced with a Hobson’s
choice. His fervent belief in fighting fire with fire notwithstanding (or
excessive liquidity with even more liquidity), his boss in the White House
simply would not allow him to voluntarily let a gut-wrenching market correction
set in even if the Fed chief so desired, not in the crepuscular hours of the
president’s expiring term. In accepting broader power and latitude from
President Bush to combat the economic crisis, however, Mr Bernanke is giving
himself every opportunity to shoulder the large amount of blame and
vituperation sure to be directed his way when the financial-market house of
cards does eventually collapse.
John Chen
USA (Apr 8, '08)
With reference to Mr Zinn's excellent article
What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr
4], I find myself not only in total agreement with his truth which few
Americans can handle (witness the reactionary responses) but heartened by his
patriotism. It is true Americans like Mr Zinn that offer hope to a country
betrayed by its militaristic, imperialist warmongering "patriots". Yes, the
O'Connells will foam at the mouth and call him nasty names but at the end of
the day they have nothing else to argue with except the same tired lies and
distortions. They will accuse him of "hating" America in the same way Jesus was
accused of "hating" Judaism. The modern Pharisees in America are many, and they
all defend the bloodthirsty status quo with the flag wrapped around their
hypocrisy. These same pseudo-Americans believe fervently in the myths of
conservative compassion, Islamic Terror, the 9-11 "attacks" and those abundant
WMDs. I believe in America because of people like Mr Zinn. I pray for America
when I read letters from the likes of O'Connell.
Hardy Campbell (Apr 8, '08)
Criticism of Howard Zinn's article
What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr
4], is fair when it addresses the simple black and white way he goes about
framing his arguments, but not on the substance. The Roman Empire is the
foundation of Western civilization, and they did bring law and order and
prosperity to a wide swath of the ancient world, but they were still an empire
that got things done by bopping people over the head. It is strange how it's
the wacky leftist conspiracy nut jobs who say that the same things have always
motivated people to go to war since the beginning of recorded history, while
the rationalists and "rightheaded" ones are those who say the US is an anomaly,
a strange blip on the radar screen of everything we know about human behavior.
The US as benevolent caregiver of the world is the wacky conspiracy theory. The
reason things look a little different this time around is that the US has
perfected the methodology of empire the British started with India, where a few
thousand troops held a country of hundreds of millions - by setting up a system
where people basically oppress themselves. We don't need to seize the oil wells
in Kuwait because we get everything we want from them. We don't need to
militarily conquer Western Europe as the Soviets did in the east for the same
reason. The American Empire is a bit more carrot than stick. We let them do as
they please as long as they do what we please. But we do see the results of
what happens when we are denied quite clearly in Iraq, Vietnam, Panama, etc.
The other side of it that might cloud the US as an empire is the sheer
ineptitude of how we go about it, which is plainly on display in Iraq. You hear
every day about bank robbers who write their ransom note on the back of their
tax form or drop their wallet on the way out, or their get-away car is out of
gas. That doesn't mean they aren't trying to rob the bank.
Dan Sullivan (Apr 8, '08)
Renewed
urgency to rein in North Korea [Apr 5] raises an interesting
point. The American ambassador to South Korea in his remarks betrays a sudden
qualm whether the US has acted wisely in engaging North Korea through
negotiations. His hesitation far transcends any minor scruples of a
professional diplomat. His uneasiness and yet his hopefulness that dealing with
North Korea will lesson tensions and resolve the nuclear question calls upon
the Bush administration to render accounts of a policy of engagement with
Pyongyang. It also concerns Mr Bush's misreading of North Korea at the time he
called it an axis of evil state. Without rehashing the history of the past five
years, it is worthy of note that the US has painted itself into a corner
without little choice but to continue talking to North Korea.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 8, '08)
Rarely have I enjoyed an article such as Ira Chernus'
The general and the trap in your [April 8]
edition. Please keep up the good work. Thank you.
Angela Crisp (Apr 8, '08)
[Re
Demythologizing central bankers, Apr 8] Oh that Thomas I
Palley would have demythologized central banks. The actual turmoil in worthy
financial markets thrusts central bankers into the spotlight. The subprime
meltdown and the ubiquity of such ambiguous complicated financial instruments
such as CDOs, CMOs, SIVs bring to the fore the seismic shift in the capitalism
and the rise of finance capital as a spur to mask the inherent stagnation that
this system nurtures and spawns. The burst of the dot.com bubble in 2000 and
the housing bubble in 2007 simply draw attention to the central role of
investment banks which have even less ability to smooth the business cycle. The
central bankers faced with a crisis they know neither the extent of nor have
the ability to tame ... , are running faster in place until the ballooning
recession the world is fast slipping into, rides out its crest. The will have a
long wait. The have to bring discipline back into the market place which their
lax oversight and the greed of investment banking houses are to blame. The full
story is waiting to be told.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 8, '08)
This is simply to observe that [Saleem Shahzad's] April 3 piece on an "old
friend" [Taliban
welcome back an old friend] is one of the most unbalanced,
inaccurate reports on the Afghan conflict I have seen in over three years.
Apart from being one-sided and sycophantic, it is plainly wrong - lacking any
genuine sense of proportion about the trends in the Afghan insurgency as they
really are on the ground today. To cite only the most minor point, it does not
even mention al-Qaeda or the "friend's" other allies and enablers - without
whom he would be a "broken reed". Why have you descended to the level of a
common propagandist? As someone who read many of your earlier pieces with
interest, an answer to this question would be most appreciated.
Christopher Alexander (Apr 7, '08)
Christopher, the story was about a particular event: the release of the Haqqani
video, and it was not the occasion to write each and every thing about
Haqqani's network as this would require a book to be written. If somebody needs
to read everything [about] Haqqani, he need only Google my name or Haqqani's
name. However, I don't expect that a senior official from an organization like
the United Nation could descend to the level of calling a writer a
"propagandist" and a "sycophant". My straight question to you is: who enabled
you today to mention Haqqani's alliance with al-Qaeda, etc? My past writings in
Asia Times Online elaborated on Haqqani's alliance with Punjabi fighters and
Arabs and even with the Pakistani establishment. My interview with [Sirajuddin]
Haqqani is unanimously considered the only interview done by any correspondent.
Otherwise, what else do you or your international organization know about the
Haqqani network, or for that matter about the dynamics of today's Afghan
resistance? You simply cannot move out of the urban centers of Afghanistan and
[now] you are challenging me and my knowledge on the dynamics of the Afghan
insurgency? [I] spend every second or third month in the mountains [as well as]
the urban centers of Afghanistan interacting with both sides ...
Saleem Shahzad (Apr 7, '08)
Saleem Shahzad in subtle routine tarnishes the liberation struggle of Afghans
against Bush-NATO in his article
Taliban welcome back an old friend [Apr
3]. His words, "a relatively new string in the Taliban's bow is the reliance on
thousands of Pakistani and other jihadis put out of 'work' since the struggle
in Kashmir de-escalated”, are parroting the styles of Bush and India. Nothing
could be farther from the ground truth. It is 1000% indigenous and Afghani. The
mouthpieces of the West - Bush, Musharraf, Karzai - keep confusing the freedom
[and] liberation struggle as being foreign inspired while it is [in fact]
fought by [the] great Afghani nation. [Regarding] Haqqani's re-induction: he
will only perform his duty to liberate his sacred land from foreign occupiers.
The freedom struggle will continue until every occupier leaves Afghanistan.
Noorudin Zangis
Kabul, Afghanistan (Apr 7, '08)
Mr James Glassman wrote irritatedly and stridently [letters, Mar 31] against
what Richard Bennett wrote in
Tibet, the 'great game' and the CIA [Mar
26]. In defense of the Radio Free Asia [RFA], he wrote: "They have been won the
hard way - mainly by cultivating reliable sources in Tibet to bring accurate,
unbiased news to the people of the region." Is this not evidence, if not proof,
of bias? If you cultivate any source solely, then it is not "accurate" or
"unbiased" by definition.
Frank Yeo
United Kingdom (Apr 7, '08)
[Re Pyongyang
shoots itself in the foot, Apr 5] Sung-Yoon Lee derives a
grim satisfaction in parsing North Korea's Korean Central News Agency [KCNA]'s
press releases' and official statements' wooden language. He's not the first
nor the last person to do this exercise. Others have mocked KCNA's house style
with humor, still others with a deadpan seriousness of mockery. Mr Lee's
earnest foreign intelligence agencies, however, do take these eye-dulling and
mind-numbing statements very seriously for the obvious reason that, like
Kremlinologists of the past, they do here and there offer up shifts in the wind
of North Korea's policy. Pyongyang cares ostensibly not one iota what Mr Lee
thinks of its style, it will continue to say what it does in its own inimitable
style. Mr Lee's audience is elsewhere. Nonetheless he does nurture the aching
hope of imminent collapse of the Kim regime, which many have been predicting
for the last 15 years but has not happened. It is not in the interests of
either South Korea or China to allow North Korea to fail as a state.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 7, '08)
Macau’s rotten basket of riches [Apr 3] shows once again
that gaming is no substitute for the kind of constructive effort that adds
value rather than merely redistributing it. No wonder gaming is the cousin of
corruption, indolence, and crime. We can continue to hold out hope that the big
winners who own the casinos will plow back a sizable fraction of their profits
into worthy causes like education, but doing so would go against their need for
both cheap labor and irrational consumers who too seldom realize that Adam
Smith was right all along when he noted that the only way to be sure of winning
the lottery is the buy all the tickets, whereupon you lose.
William E Cooper
Professor and President Emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 7, '08)
For those incensed by Spengler's raves and rants, please stop patronizing
[him]. Stop reading ... and stop writing letters about his columns. By
responding to his columns you are giving him more reason to keep up his
hatred-filled columns. Once you stop, he will be reduced to praising himself
using a dummy name but even that will stop after hits to his columns go down.
ATol will have no choice to but to cut ties with this person, and ATol will be
better for it.
Jayant Patel (Apr 7, '08)
In Asia Times, you never speak about the environment. I know that this matter
can be very politically incorrect, but it is a question of morale. How about a
new rubric about it in Asia Times? I would be very interested about it.
Guy Courtois (Apr 7, '08)
Hooray for Dennis O' Connell! On his commentary [letters, Apr 4] regarding
What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr
3] by Howard Zinn, I heartily applaud. When I first read Mr Zinn's article, my
reaction was one of revulsion - I wanted to write such a letter as Mr
O'Connell's, but thought - why bother? Mr Zinn seems to be one of those bogus
leftists caught up in their own absurd condition - I call them radicals with
assets! The US did not lose the war in Vietnam - the war was never meant to be
won; it was meant to be sustained, just like the war in Iraq - ask the
Vietnamese after 25 years of an embargo. The liberal imagination fostered by
the likes of Mr Zinn [is] wreaking havoc on possibilities for change [and]
making a better world better for everyone. Mr Zinn hates himself and America
because he refuses to confront reality - he has no control over the situation,
we are part of nature, we do what we can with what we are given. Everyone is an
imperialist, everyone is a Nazi, everyone is a fascist - fight it in yourself
first and it is amazing what you will find. Marx and Engels said it best when
they stated that "reality is the recognition of necessity". Mr Zinn should be
grounded in a little more reality and realize that we are all part of history;
we have very little control of anything - actually, no control. But no, Mr Zinn
wants it only his way. He wants to keep his blinders on and not give up the
good life, the good job, the few cars, the nice house, etc - all the things
that come with the Imperialist Mind. Unless Mr Zinn can give up his narrow
thinking about what it means to be alive, what it means to eat well while the
rest of the world starves, what it means to be "number 1" while other countries
are waiting in line, he will always remain to me a bogus leftist - a man who
calls himself an anarchist but really belongs to that strange, bitter,
ingenuous world of people who are perpetually on the fringe of society,
cultivating their own eccentricity, not to say their absurdity - a world which
seems to me peculiarly Spanish, the patron saint of which is Don Quixote. I
call them ideological throwbacks who are unable to love this fierce and
beautiful world over which we have very little control with all its
ambiguities, anxieties, ambivalence. Once upon a time, when I was [a] simple
thinker, I truly admired Howard Zinn, but he is on the wrong track. George Bush
is not the problem, we are! George Bush is simply another man who cannot live
without contradictions, who is incomplete without enough information. Onwards
with the journey - the truth is nowhere to be found - except maybe in
ourselves! Hats off to you, Mr O'Connell!
Joseph Giramma (Apr 7,
'08)
In taking on Howard Zinn's excellent commentary,
What schools didn't teach about empire,
[Apr 3] one of the letters [letters, Apr 4] asks why didn't the US take over
Western Europe after WWII? Well, buddy, we did. Since the US came out of WWII
as the top dog, we were able to set financial conditions for the entire world
in a little document called the Bretton Woods Agreement, in July 1944. Bretton
Woods set up the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)
that established the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. In other words,
if you want to play, you gotta pay ... in USD. With that document in hand, the
US Federal Reserve shifted their printing presses into high gear, giving the
Pentagon the monetary means to build the most gigantic military in the world,
with bases numbering around 800 in about 125 countries around the world. So we
did establish a global empire on the ashes of WWII. An empire that is now
coming apart at the seams, due to our tendency to "shock and awe" countries
that no longer want to play with USD. By the way, the IBRD morphed into the
World Bank [which] is controlled by the US and the International Monetary fund,
funded by the US. Yes, life is good, when you're the King.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Montana, USA (Apr 7, '08)
Regarding M K Bhadrakumar's article
Iran torpedoes US plans for Iraqi oil [Apr
3], it is encouraging to learn that Kissinger and Baker are amongst others
reaching a "culmination" point as a counter force vis-a-vis US-Iran relations.
After Vietnam and over 30 years of "attrition" policy versus Iran, perhaps the
old wise (white) men are reaching the "MacNamara" capitulation moment. The
recent Chinese revelations, true or not, about their own complicity in teaching
the Islamic "republicans" in how to shape uranium warheads, while outrageous
(but let's not mince words, Iran is very close to weaponizing, regardless of
the 2007 US National Intelligence Estimate) are in the end calculated to be
deflationary and decelerating, forcing the VIP attack dogs back home for the
imminent moment (but not out), and the US to work through the IAEA and the UN.
Perhaps the realpolitik establishment has come to understand "can't we all get
along?" and finally realizes that there is so much more to be gained through
real Iranian engagement, especially if the US ever hopes to outplay the Bear
and the Dragon.
Jubin Ajdari
Los Angeles (Apr 4, '08)
The article
Local pride buffets Bangalore business" is biased and
derogatory to Kannada culture. I am a simple citizen born and brought up in the
city of Bangalore, India, and have seen the story from very near. First of all,
for god's sake, KRV [Karnataka Rakshana Vedike or Karnataka Protection Forum]
is not a militant outfit. It is not like the LTTE [Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam] created by Sri Lankan Tamils. Militancy is not in Kannada culture. [The
KRV] is an association to protect the interests of local people which is
supposed to use democratic means of protest against injustice. Tamils want all
the water, land, jobs, etc, from Karantaka state and want to impose their rule
here. This has led to protests. I am amazed at the vindictiveness of this
article ...
Sathya (Apr 4, '08)
Howard Zinn has his hatred of the United States on full display in
What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr
4]. Like all good leftists Mr Zinn savages the US for its many failing both
real and imagined but nowhere does he have a bad thing to say about the
communists or their actions over the last 90 years. Hopefully in one of his
books the 100 million people killed by the communists in the last century might
have merited a footnote, but if they did it was probably to blame the US for
something. Lets look at what Mr Zinn has to say about the Korean War: "It
seemed clear to me then that it was not the invasion of South Korea by the
North that prompted US intervention, but the desire of the US to have a firm
foothold on the continent of Asia." So it was not the communist North Korean
invasion that started the war but evil US intentions. Just for the record the
US was already in South Korea before the invasion. So after the death of 53,000
soldiers and billions of dollars defending Korea the US is now hated by the
majority of South Koreans under forty thanks to the leftists that control the
education system in South Korea. What does Mr Zinn have to say about the
millions of North Koreans who have died under their brutal communist
governments actions, or does he consider them acceptable casualties on the road
to perfecting socialism? Mr Zinn further attacks the US for its actions of
overthrowing the communists of Grenada, who in 1979 came to power in a revolt
and quickly banned all other parties. Mr Zinn also attacks the US for the 1991
Gulf War; evidently no one has a right to oppose a savage dictator as long as
he hates the United States. If the US is the imperialist power he makes them
out to be, why didn't the US seize the Kuwaiti oil fields? Why didn't the US
seize all of Western Europe like the Soviet Union seized all of Eastern Europe?
I don't look for any answers to these questions, because Mr Zinn's world view
is quite simple: the US is evil thus anyone opposed to the US is good.
Dennis O'Connell
USA (Apr 4, '08)
There is nothing to fault in Ken Ewing's
Macau's rotten basket of riches [Apr 4].
It is a sober rendering of what's happening in today's Macau, and another
bird's eye view of the unrest which is sweeping the People's Republic of China.
On the other hand, the tiny island is a vestige of the [former] Portuguese
empire, [and] a microcosm of the accelerating and dramatic pace of
globalization. Macau is a world Mecca of casino gambling, which at ... the same
time brings in fabulous wealth to the coffers of China and produces asymmetric
and unbalanced growth, corruption, and social inequality to the island's
inhabitants. It also serves as a safety valve for the pent-up emotions of an
ever rich China by catering to the Chinese penchant, if not passion, for
gambling and for making a quick fortune. Thus discontent on the mainland
suddenly turns to avid devotion to winning the favors of dame fortune. As Ewing
reports, any demonstration against this rage for riches will meet the brutal
force of not only the island's police, but the quick arrival of [China's] armed
forces in order to safeguard and maintain Macau as a gilded, golden cage.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 4, '08)
[Re The
age of the immigrant spy, Apr 3] Spying is as old as the
hills. Caleb in the bible comes to mind. Josef von Sternberg turned Marlene
Dietrich into a beguiling temptress a la Mata Hari in film. Richard Sorge
labored quietly in setting up a Soviet network during militarist Japan's
expansion and war in Asia. And in a spate of books on America's CIA of recent
vintage, we have endless tales of the US's spy power. Countries use any means
available to spy on other countries. Is it any easier for China or India to do
so in the US with a patch-work quilt of immigrants from all corners of the
world? Maybe. Take the Chinese diaspora. Is Singapore more in danger of
harboring recent immigrants from China who might act as moles? Or Indians in
Malaysia? Vietnam expelled a large percentage of its Chinese when China brought
war to its borders after the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1979. It didn't
trust its own citizens of Chinese ancestry even though they may have been pure
dyed-in-the-wool, loyal Vietnamese communists. Immigrants usually act out of
greed, though a smaller number do out of nostalgia or a tug for the old mother
country. And that is true for any and all.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 3, '08)
Speaking of spies, there is also the legendary Chanakya: "Incidents of espionage
are well documented throughout history. The ancient writings of Chinese and
Indian military strategists such as Sun-Tzu and Chanakya contain information on
deception and subversion. Chanakya's student Chandragupta Maurya, founder of
the Maurya Empire, made use of assassinations, spies and secret agents, which
are described in Chanakya's Arthasastra." (Wikipedia) - ATol
A very informative article
The other Iraqi civil war [Apr 3] by Pepe
Escobar, I enjoyed reading it and would like to comment. The latest round in
Iraq's Shi'ite versus Shi'ite civil war was hoped by President Bush to be the
defining moment for free Iraq but it turned out to be another utter humiliation
and a ceasefire brokered by an Iranian group. That leaves Muqtada al-Sadr, a
hellraiser, political thug and a conspirator who collided with the Shi'ite
political leaderships and clerics in inviting the USA and Europe to invade Iraq
[and] topple Saddam Hussein now demands an end to the US occupation of Iraq
because the job was well done for the Iranians. He has grown increasingly close
to Iran as he was always an “Iranian Iron Man”, doing their dirty and filthy
job of killing hundreds of thousands of Sunnis and making another one million
homeless. In Basra, he's the boss. His murderous, criminal and cruel Mahdi Army
fighters control most of the city and remain in charge. The real winner in the
latest round of Shi'ite versus Shi'ite civil war is Mahmud Ahmedinejad who is
making George W Bush ... look like a clown without an audience. For the past
five years, Iran has built up enormous political, economic and military
influence in Iraq right under the noses of 170,000 helpless American occupying
troops.
Jalal Rumi
Karachi (Apr 3, '08)
It appears that Law Siu-lan has correctly pointed out a separate Tibetan group,
the TYC (Tibetan Youth Congress) in
Cracks emerge in 'Dalai Lama clique' [Apr
2] that in fact has been responsible for the violent demonstrations in Lhasa
and elsewhere. Is this a mistake on Beijing's part? One would guess Beijing has
more intelligence on this subject but has deliberately lumped the Dalai Lama
and the TYC together. There is no guarantee that a degree of self autonomy will
lead to lasting peace. In fact, people always want more and the Tibetans are
likely to continue receiving outside help toward that goal. Take for example
the Kurds in southern Turkey and northern Iraq in perpetual struggle. The
Chinese have not used tactics like those on the American Indians or the
Australian Aborigines. Therefore it will take much longer to achieve
assimilation. In Chinese history, millions of invaders like the Mongols and
Manchu were absorbed readily and almost quietly. This time the "absorbents"
have to be transported to Tibet. It is expected that economic development,
cultural transformation, and support of local religion can eventually succeed,
albeit more slowly due to outside interference. For once one region becomes
autonomous, others want to follow in a domino manner, which is intolerable.
Seung Li (Apr 2, '08)
Regarding
Cracks emerge in 'Dalai Lama clique' [Apr 2] by Law Siu-lan,
my experience with Tibetans and Uighurs alike is that they tell you different
stories depending on the size of your nose and the color of your skin. I don't
blame them: Minorities always do, to protect themselves, as all minorities know
(including myself). You can be sure that the Dalai Lama is telling different
stories to the Chinese authorities and his Western patrons, and perhaps even to
his own "clique". Considering all the conflicting messages of the Dalai Lama in
the past few weeks, I wouldn't be surprised if he is pondering now [whether] to
switch sides. Of course he has to prepare for his next incarnation, and he
needs China's cooperation. The Westernized young Tibetans in exile have quite a
different problem. Why should Tibetans in Tibet, educated quite differently, or
not educated at all, accept them as their new leaders? It's begging the
question.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 2, '08)
Regarding Mr McGlynn's article
The day the US declared war on Iran [Apr
1]. The recent financially motivated US moves against the Islamic "republic"
are simply another late-out-of-the-gate counter move on the board. As reported
in ATol by Pepe Escobar, the February 17, 2008, formation of the IIPE [Iranian
International Petroleum Exchange] was a direct challenge to IPE/NYMEX interests
(ie, Goldman Sachs, including the fact that the dollar is excluded from the
basket) and can be considered the "preceding" move to the US's recent counters
(and in fact was it not the same type of move that got Mr Hussein deposed?). As
stated here in the past, the US is very much out-classed and outplayed where
direct force is not the primary impetus for change. As such, an actual military
strike on Iran is absolutely imminent. This would be a disaster. Iran is
playing well in the new tri-polar world. Straddling the Sino-Russo card in
riposte to the US. The recent Qom ceasefire is another move in this game. A
display from the "republic" of its control of the "faucet". It remains to be
seen if the only US counter will be: "Cleared hot!, rapid release!".
Jubin Ajdari
Los Angeles (Apr 2, '08)
Re Spengler's
Turn it into a theme park ... [Apr 1], where is the Spengler
we love to hate? Maybe as the attendant photo suggests, he had a hair cut, his
ears lowered; or brain surgery?
beryl k
Minnesota, USA (Apr 2, '08)
In fact, he merely donned an Ann Landers wig. - ATol
Regarding Muhammed Cohen’s
Black and white and barely read at all,
Mar 26. I assume Cohen mentioned Obama’s “nuanced perspective on race” because
he appreciates it. Yet Cohen’s comment that “It might be that Americans can’t
handle complexities” is about as nuanced as a Reverend Jeremiah Wright rant.
Cohen has Obama saying “progress on racial issues has stagnated". What Obama
actually said is that there is a racial stalemate in the sense that race-based
resentment has not diminished at all in recent years; white resentment of
affirmative action, and black resentment of whites’ failure to appreciate that
the toll exacted by centuries of racism partly explains blacks’ relative lack
of economic and social progress (Unfortunately, Obama only briefly,
elliptically mentions blacks’ share of the responsibility for getting their own
families and communities in order.) Obama is not making a broad brush statement
about all racial issues. Cohen’s comments about Americans would receive the
same withering treatment from Obama that Wright’s disgusting comments received:
“ ... in [Wright’s] offending sermons about America - to simplify and
stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality,"
said Obama. How stagnant is progress on racial issues in America when one of
the front-running presidential candidates is black, and wins primaries in
states like Iowa, which is 95% white? Obama says “what we know, what we have
seen, is that America can change.” This is a view that is diametrically opposed
to Cohen’s stereotyping. Lastly, Cohen is hardly qualified to comment on Don
Imus. If he is not a regular listener of Imus’ radio show (I can guarantee you
he isn’t), he cannot possibly comprehend that Imus does not have a racist bone
in his body. Imus’ problem is that he is too honest. Like all painfully honest
people, he sometimes says stupid, careless things. Of Don Imus, Vivian Stringer
(coach of the Rutgers University women’s basketball team), and those who called
for Imus’ firing, only Imus’ critics came out sounding like buffoons. Imus and
Stringer handled it all with incredible grace and dignity, and left folks like
Cohen sputtering and stupefied.
Geoffrey Sherwood
New Jersey, USA (Apr 2, '08)
[Re
The new Brahmins, Mar 29] Chan Akya writes, "[T]hus,
people's natural tendency to grow and become richer was sacrificed at the altar
of this demon called market socialism. The net result is that Scandinavia
boasts the highest incidence of suicides in the Western world." I can only
imagine that perhaps Mr Akya is seeking to unseat Spengler as Asia Times
Online's best comedic writer? People's natural tendency to grow has certainly
not been sacrificed in Scandinavia; people are quite a bit taller on average
there than in just about any other region in the world. What remains is Mr
Akya's assertion that the Satanic ritual sacrifice of "people's natural
tendency to ... become richer," in the name of the demon market socialism, led
to Scandinavia's high suicide rate. (The plus side of this Faustian bargain
must have been happiness; Scandinavians report the highest well-being of any
people in the world.) I would have to ask demonologist Akya precisely which
evil spirit has led to Belgium, Russia, China, Japan and Korea's (among many
others) higher suicide rates? Is is it the trampling of market socialism's
hoofed feet that has awarded the honor of "highest suicide rate in the world"
(148 per 100,000) upon downtrodden young southern Indian women? Preposterous!
Displaying a sort of collective Stockholm Syndrome, many residents of formerly
colonized countries idealize and glorify their former colonizers. I would
advise Mr Akya to give up his crush on Anglo-Saxon economics.
Josephus P Franks
New York City (Apr 2, '08)
Chan Akya is correct to point out in
The new Brahmins [Mar 29] that the US has
now followed Japan, and the Europeans in the past few months, in socializing
the costs of financial institution failure. David Wessel's rift in the Wall
Street Journal yesterday was on the same theme. I have no complaints with Chan
Akya's being a member of the "moral hazard" crowd and his indictment of G7
central bankers as "utterly corrupt". Most of us on the Left are of the same
opinion. My position is, perhaps, more extreme as I see systemic, ongoing
criminal enterprise where he sees corruption. I see the capitalist system as
more a less a pyramid scheme in as much as it cannot exist without exponential
growth, and is supported by a large base of working "peasants" whose generated
wealth rises to the apex of financial "kings". Mine is not an irrational
notion; it is supported by the rush of central bankers to prop up "money
changers" in deregulated free-market capitalist systems around the world. For
the moral hazard crowd, this propping up goes against their fundamentalist
faith in neoclassical liberal economics. Too bad. Central bankers know how the
system works; they know it is fundamentally "corrupt"; they know the
free-market is a myth carefully nurtured by its beneficiaries and their
paid-for politicians and media spokesmen; they know from the experience of the
Great Depression that neo-liberalism, left unregulated, will itself collapse -
and the whole world with it if they have run "the pyramid" deep, wide, and long
enough. As for Europe's "fractured" economy, there is no doubt that there are
structural problems, particularly around labor issues and the ongoing
integration issues that are being addressed within countries, and in the EU
parliament, in a slow and "mind-numbing" way. That said, the efficiencies in
transportation and health care, both largely socialized, are alone enough to
give the EU important competitive advantage over the US. Not to be ignored in
the petro-scarce future is the fact that Europe's per-capita carbon footprint
is one-fifth that of the US; France's is one-tenth; even Germany's is nearly a
third of ours. And how does Chan Akya explain Europe's higher worker
productivity (on an hour basis) than the US? Chan Akya laments Europe's high
tax rates without mentioning what people get for their money. My daughter and
son-in-law, who have lived and worked in Europe more than me, explained it to
me this way when I expressed shock at how much the government took from their
paychecks: "Daddy, we felt the same way our first year or so, but when we began
to see how much we get back in benefits, not to mention almost no poverty, and
low-crime, we calmed down. And so should you." How forward-looking was it of
France to recently put in place a carbon tax on cars at point of purchase that
progressively taxes cars that emit more than 160kg/km of carbons up to [$4,555]
on the worst guzzlers, and rebates to purchasers up to [$594] for cars that
emit less than 160kg/km? As James Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, said at the Economic
Club of Washington last week, " ... look at France; they have a long term, well
thought through, non partisan energy policy ... , where we have none. The US,
since 1974, has a policy of default." In many important ways trying to compare
the economies of Europe and the US is "apples and oranges". Not to say that
they can't learn something from the US (although I would like for someone to
point out what), it is certain that we could learn from Europe. One last
comment: Chan Akya's cheap shot about suicide in Scandinavia ignores the
centuries long high suicide rate in that part of the world, ignores the same
phenomenon in Seattle/Puget Sound, and ignores the decades of research on
seasonal affective disorders that has shown that dark, cold winters produce
depression in humans and higher suicide rates than the rest of the world. Maybe
researchers failed to figure in the socialized market system of Seattle? And my
offer of a bet on Europe to emerge less scathed from this financial crisis than
the US still goes. I will put up to 10,000 pounds [$19,805] in escrow if he
wants to wager, and we'll let his pals at the Financial Times or The Economist
judge the winner.
David Sheegog
Paoli, Oklahoma, USA (Apr 2, '08)
[Re
The day the US declared war on Iran, Apr 1] March 20 will
not go down in US history as the day it declared war on Iran. John McGlynn's
thesis is interesting but doubtful yet not completely spurious. Some can argue
that President Bush shot the first first salvo over the yardarm when he
declared Iran an "axis of evil". Washington is in no position to impose its
will on Tehran as its failure in Iraq demonstrates. President Bush's push to
impose sanctions on Iran has not achieved his stated aims nor has he achieved
an identity of view with America's European allies who prefer negotiations to
the iron fist of threats. McGlynn's draws a false analogy in using the pressure
brought on North Korea in turning off its access to hard currency it had on
deposit in a Macau bank. In the end, Bush had to back down to jump start
face-to-face negotiations with Pyongyang by having the US Treasury to sanction
the unblocking of some $25 million in funds. Iran is another case. It is not as
isolated as North Korea is; it has oil which is selling at top dollar on world
markets, and it has access to European financial houses which by that very fact
challenges or ever checks any move by Hank Paulson at the Treasury may try.
Washington is in a cold war mood to engage Iran, but here's the rub: Iran is
and has proven very able to hold the US at bay. Bush has not learned this
lesson yet: [the US] has not the means nor the strength to impose its will on
Iran. And for that simple but obvious reason it reveals McGlynn's argument as
anachronistic.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 1, '08)
[Re
Turn it into a theme park, Apr 1] I will totally disagree
with your profanity: Spengler dispenses, "Pearls of wisdom, too, for an
American presidential hopeful ducking and weaving over religion and race, and a
burned-out banker charged with bailing out a faltering financial system.” I
should rather say that Spengler could only dispense perilous advice to the
peril of a desperate seeker leading to nothing but catastrophe. Because, wisdom
is as alien to him as ... slippers to a snake. He is [a] messiah of death and
destruction, and an advocate and preacher of devil’s wisdom. I should imagine
that even President Bush would be more happy asking his dog, Barney, for an
advice than ringing Spengler.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 1, '08)
[Re
Shi'ite fight shows other side of the COIN, Apr 1] It
appears that Mr Ahari wants to give the impression that the problems in Basra
have nothing to do with Iran-supported Muqtada al-Sadr and other elements. That
follows the US line of blaming troubles on the Mahdi Army - a big mistake. Like
the intervention of US and UK forces in the Basra confrontation, Ahrari's
attitude will reinforce the impression that Maliki is nothing more than a
puppet of the US. That can be a catastrophe.
Tom Gerber (Apr 1, '08)
[Re
Pakistan in tug of war over terror, Apr 1] I have enjoyed
and learned from Syed Saleem Shahzad's articles in Asia Times Online. In this
particular article today you refer repeatedly to the Pakistani "establishment"
without defining it. It seems to exclude the parliament and the community of
lawyers, but includes the president and apparently the army. But I get the
impression the term is meant to include still some other individuals and
institutions. Could you elaborate? Thanks.
Yen-Ling Chang (Apr 1, '08)
The Pakistani establishment is the military oligarchy comprising the Pakistani
army, intelligence agencies and retired General Pervez Musharraf, the incumbent
president of Pakistan. - Syed Saleem Shahzad
(Apr 1, '08)
Pity Darfur is not in Asia. Nobody seems interested anymore, but I would love
to see M K Bhadrakumar reporting on that [issue]. How about changing ATol into
AATol, Asia Africa Times Online?
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 1, '08)
[Re
Turkey seeks a more modern Islam, Mar 27] Asia Times
Online's weak spot has always been history. Too often historical information is
limited to cliches or to facts long since discredited by serious historians. In
the case of the above article, the problem is compounded by a typically Turkish
unilateral (not to say pan-Turkish) view, in which accomplishments by non-Turks
are too often appropriated ahistorically in the name of the Turks. While recent
Turkish efforts to modernize Islam and cleanse the mass of Hadith from a
plethora of nonsensical material added over time is to be applauded. Turkey can
hardly take credit for much of what Ms Zahir attributes to her nation. Most
conspicuous is the disputed figure of Rumi, the great poet, who was of Iranian
stock from Balkh (Bactria), now in Afghanistan and moved with his family to
Anatolia to escape the Mongols. All his poetry is in Persian, as one can see
even on the walls of his mausoleum in Konya where I was distressed to see that
no Turk can read it. But Rumi came from a long line of Sufi traditions which
began in 8th-century Baghdad among the not too harmoniously converted Iranian
converts (remember, the capital of the last of three great Persian empires,
that of the Sasanians, was at Ctesiphon near present-day Baghdad), the most
notable of whom in that period was Mansur al-Hallaj, who was executed by order
of the Caliphs for saying "I am the Truth" , meaning that he too, like all
else, was an offshoot of the one universal truth. The tradition did not die
with him, it grew into a highly sophisticated Gnostic philosophy, one of the
main proponents of which was Sohravardi who, summoned to Damascus by Saladdin's
son, was eventually sacrificed to the more urgent cause of ensuring the
suppport orthodox clergy to the fight against the Crusaders. These well-wrought
traditions then spread far and wide, including through Sufis who converted the
Turks, and indeed, most of whom were of Iranian stock and Persian language and
culture. True, the shamanistic background of the Turks soon attracted many of
them to esoteric Sufism, but the first Sufi sheikh of Turkic stock was the
12th-century Sheikh Ahmad Yasawi, whose mausoleum is extant today in southern
Kazakhstan. The Sultans, however, who, as self-proclaimed caliphs of the
Islamic world, embraced Sunni orthodoxy, did not look too kindly upon
esotericism. Why else would they have expelled the Qizilbash tribes who joined
the very young Ismail Safavi in Tabriz to help him proclaim himself Shah and
declare Shi'ism as the state religion of Iran in 1501? The Alavis of Turkey are
the remnants of those Shiite heretics who left Turkey for Iran. Shi'ism, at its
best and not in the politically motivated hardline interpretation of the
populist regime in Tehran, allows for an interpretation of the hidden meaning
of the words of the Koran (in other words, any adjustments can be made), an
arch-heresy in Sunni orthodox eyes. Much earlier, at the end of the 12th
century, Iranian Ismailis had declared the end of all prophecies on the basis
that religion had progressed enough to be internalized ... without any need for
the imposition of canonic laws. The world was not ready for such a progressive
view and the Ismailis, finding themselves isolated from the mainstream,
moderated their stance and became powerful in the wake of the decline of the
Turkic Saljuqid dynasty. It was not to last long. The Mongol viceroy, Hulagu
Khan, destroyed them after the sack of Baghdad in 1258. His troops, similar to
that of his forefather, Genghis Khan, were largely composed of Turkic tribal
units. So much for the Turkic precedent of "modernized Islam". And so much for
Spengler's view that Islam can never be reformed. It was reformed more than
once by Iranians, but their reforms were foiled every time by the Arabs or the
Turks. I believe that the Ismailis example will revive once again and inspire
Iranians who have always had a schizophrenic attitude towards their adopted
religion.
Fatema Soudavar Farmanfarmaian (Apr 1, '08)
March Letters
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
All material on this
website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written
permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online
(Holdings), Ltd.
|
|
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
|
|
|
|