WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese




    Letters
    



Please provide your name or a pen name, and your country of residence. Lengthy letters run the risk of being cut.

Please note: This Letters page is intended primarily for readers to comment on ATol articles or related issues. It should not be used as a forum for readers to debate with each other. The Edge is the place for that. The editors do not mind publishing one or two responses to a reader's letter, but will, at their discretion, direct debaters away from the Letters page.


APRIL 2008

[Re Doubting Obama, Apr 29] The double standard being applied to Obama for the remarks made by another human being whom he does not control or own must emphasize once again how deeply racist the United States still is. Whereas lily-white man McCain can enjoy a relatively hassle-free campaign, bereft of any lasting criticism of the Reverend Haggee's offensive remarks about the sins of New Orleans (whose real transgression is being mostly black), Obama finds every aspect of his patriotism, philosophy and even faith questioned and scrutinized. But it is the fact that he is born of an immigrant father and that he schooled with Muslims overseas while using a non-WASP name that rhymes with Osama that condemns him more vehemently than any guilt-by-association. How can Americans entrust their country to someone who is so obviously foreign? America's Jesus is blonde with blue eyes, our superheroes are always Caucasian, and our presidents' ancestors come from some European country we can never find on a map. Imagine how relieved all the racist whites in America are that their naked racism now has a bona fide, legitimate cover; ie, the America-bashing pronouncements of someone that Obama knows. Heavens! What if tawny Obama's grandmother had complimented Fidel Castro on his beard or an aunt of his had shown courtesy to Ahmadinejad? Unquestionably, Obama would be branded a closet communist or clandestine al-Qaeda operative. White-haired, white-skinned McCain (with a rich blonde wife to boot), on the other hand, served his country well by bombing poor Third World peasants to kingdom come, which is, for most Americans, the only thing Third Worlders are good for. My, now THAT's an American we can trust and love!
Hardy Campbell
Houston Texas, USA (Apr 30, '08)


Regarding Willy Lam's China intensifies war against splittism [Apr 30], this one article doesn't seem to belong to the careful intellectual tradition of ATol. Too much muddled abuse. Too much Cold War rhetoric. Too many unverifiable speculations. And the trillion dollar key question, "Who is winning the war?", isn't addressed at all. Surely when talking of war, one most of all wants to know who is winning, or who will win. I hope one of your writers will write about that. An intelligent person please, someone like Bhadrakumar or Chan Akya. Why can't Chinese (excepting Henry CK Liu) write like Indians?
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 30, '08)


With Asia Times Online on my daily list of must reads, I'd like to thank you for the excellent articles by Kaveh Afrasiabi on Iran and India. I am amazed at how prolific Afrasiabi can be without ever losing any spark of his brilliance. Eat your heart out, New York Times!
Tim
Toronto (Apr 30, '08)


Regarding the article Oil in 2012: $200 or $50?, April 30, by Mr Martin Hutchinson has omitted a couple of crucial points that would have changed the content of the article. Mr Hutchinson fails to mention that the US has vast untapped reserves of oil. There is plenty along the Gulf Coast, West Coast, the state of Alaska which is 500,000 square miles ... Nor does he mention that deep-water drilling around the US coast would yield even more untapped oil. There is the "oil triangle" that include the states of Nevada, Wyoming and Utah which by itself is predicted to have reserves in shale oil that equals the entire oil discoveries of the Middle East. In addition, in the North American continent that includes Mexico, the US and Canada, there are vast areas, especially in Canada that are untapped. This does not include other sources of energy that the US and the North American continent has in abundance such as coal, uranium, and hydroelectricity, to name a few. In addition, the US has great potential in alternative energy, which has also largely gone untapped. The question then is why isn't the US utilizing its potential to be independent of Middle East oil? The answer is the US environmentalists, who have a strong voice in the government and have stood in the way of energy companies in tapping this oil. The US can easily become oil independent and even be an exporter, if the environmentalists did not stand in the way. The other issue Mr Hutchinson did not deal with is pure economics. Any commodity can price itself off the market. If oil was to hit $200 by 2012, economies around the world will either seek alternative energy or we will use the technology of 2012 to discover other energy sources and even make alternative fuel easily competitive to a $200 barrel of oil. To sum it up, a $200 barrel of oil will be totally unsustainable by the world economies and the price will have to drop or the Middle East will start losing customers.
Chrysantha Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 30, '08)


[Re North Korea stoic in the face of famine, Apr 30] Faced with famine, how stoic is North Korea? Stoic doesn't mean that Pyongyang is resigned to its fate. The vagaries of nature have visited unprecedented floods which have wiped out crops. Andrei Lankov points out the antiquated farming system which impedes better crop yields. Yet, after its own fashion, since the first Arduous March and possibly before, reform has come to the countryside. But, as Lankov rightly points out, the outside world knows little of the changes in North Korea's command economy since the death of Kim Il-sung. Glaring food shortages come at a time when world food prices are skyrocketing, and the new situation which has caused food riots elsewhere, means less potential non-governmental food shipments. Added to this is South Korea's new president Lee Myung-bak who has reversed Seoul's Sunshine Policy which since 2000 has given partly unconditional food aid. Now President Lee says that he will not withhold such deliveries but Kim Jong-il will have to ask for them. This is a breech of traditional Korean Confucianist behavior whereby the younger brother [Lee] refuses to willingly help his old brother [Kim]. Pyongyang, however, expects help from China. North Korea is the only country where no protests met the Olympic Torch, and was greeted with high ceremony and much fanfare. Beijing shouldn't stint in opening its granaries to alleviate North Korea's impending famine. No one should rule out the aid a diminution of foreign food donations will bring.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 30, '08)


[Re Oil in 2012: $200 or $50?, April 30] Since oil is now $120 a barrel, CIBC [Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce] simply took the high end of the A range for oil as $200 a barrel for 2012 that OPEC projected. It mightn't have to wait that long since OPEC's president, Algerian energy minister Chakib Khelil, thought that target would be reached in 2009. American lawmakers are pinning the tail of blame on this cartel of oil-producing states for either holding or cutting production levels of oil for historic oil prices [by] putting pressure on world economies and causing disruptions in the marketplace. Yet, big oil companies are registering record profits. At his press conference today in the Rose Garden, President Bush called for drilling in wildlife preserves and for building more refineries. Oil industry watchers point out that America's refineries are operating at 85% of capacity, which may account for the higher prices at the pump. But the last word remains with Chakib Khelil. He simply stated that "high prices are due to the recession in the US" and the weakness in the American dollar. Moreover, he noted that "each time the dollar falls a percent, the price of a barrel rises by $4", and if the value rises, the reverse happens. Conclusion: the weak dollar has to go. But no one should count on that in the short term.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 30, '08)


[Re Doubting Obama, Apr 29] Logic may be on Muhammed Cohen's side, but it won't wash away growing doubts about the junior senator from Illinois. The release on April 25 of the cheeky comedy Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay sends up President George W Bush, yet it has him saying to these potheads, "You don't have to like the nation, you have to love the country". Individualistic as Americans think they are, they are also fiercely patriotic, and the words that the film has the satirized president say ring true for the majority of Americans. The heteroclite collection of people who make up America [have few] symbols in common, [but] they do respond, especially after 9/11, to the the flag, to a transcendent God, and to the idea of the United States as a country of hope and liberty. This is the dark cloud tracking Barack Obama's campaign. As a news producer Cohen should know the value of symbols. Mr Obama has handed Mrs Clinton and Mr McCain and the Republicans the means to hammer into the public's mind questions about his loyalties to flag, God, and country. One, there's the matter of the flag lapel pin. Two, his remarks that the American people are so demoralized that they find aid and succor in guns and religion. True as these words may be, they are a slap in the public's face. His pastor the Reverend Jeremiah Wright has taken to the airwaves to have his say. But no amount explanation will erase the public's imagine of God damning America; Mr Wright is Obama's Willy Horton and Michael Dukakis riding in a tank, rolled into one. The good minister of the Church of God is ingenuous when he says that he's a religious leader not a politician which is senator Obama's domain. He is not in the least convincing, especially since his sermons are a savvy mixture of politics enveloped in religious imagery. Mrs Clinton has gone on the offensive with material which Mr Obama has fashioned for her. She can play on those very symbols of the flag, God, and the country to rally a working class which has long gone over to the Republicans, for her own cause. Senator Obama has much fence mending to do to clinch his party's nomination for the presidency, and time is running out for him.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 29, '08)


Regarding the article Iran steps into the enemy's territory, Apr 29, by Kaveh L Afrasiabi. The author writes "This is basically a subset of an ambitious global strategy that prioritizes ties with various countries, for example in Asia, Africa, Central and Latin America, that are visibly anti-America, such as Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela." I wonder, has he ever described the United States as "anti-Iraq" or "anti-Afghanistan"? Why is a leader who is "pro" his or her country automatically "anti-American"? Other than that, Asia Times Online has by far the most intelligent analysis of the Middle and Far East.
Patrick Barr (Apr 29, '08)


I read Mr Bajpaee's piece The Indian elephant returns to Africa [Apr 25] with interest. As a Kenyan of Asian origin, I would care to make the following points. It is a fact that the Chinese and Indian expansion has been a key driver in the African renaissance. Before their emergence, Africa faced an egregiously one-sided demand structure. The continent had only one real customer and that was the West. The continent was unable to enter into long-term contracts for their products and this created a "hand-to-mouth" cycle. China and India used this opportunity to establish their bona fides to good effect, whilst simultaneously securing long-term supplies to fuel their expansion. Their arrival tipped the demand equation in Africa's favor. And for this, we are all grateful. If you care to correlate China and India trade flows with Africa, you will note that the acceleration in SSA [Sub-Saharan Africa] GDP [gross domestic product] growth is nearly perfectly correlated to the surge. I would also say that clearly it is in India's national interest (as it is China's) that this relationship is nurtured. It would be an enormous abdication of their respective interests, if we are not seeing a more concerted effort on both their parts. Africa has crossed its inflexion point. The problem was our people were not plugged in. This is happening now. It is the equivalent of flicking on a switch. And with the landing of various undersea cables, we are going to see Africa undertake a one-off catch up compressed into a few short years. Carpe diem.
Aly-Khan Satchu
Kenya (Apr 29, '08)


China must fight back - why not? Since the International Olympic Committee and Olympic Games are "properties" controlled by the West, it is high time that China should go on the "offensive". I may sound too harsh. China should just throw the Olympic Games back to the feet of the IOC and let them handle the trouble themselves. I am very disappointed with the IOC who did little or nothing to curb their member countries from screwing up the Olympic Torch. Such interruption is not only to embarrass China but also the IOC. They should just warn their members that they [may] be suspended or expelled from the IOC or the Olympic Games and that will reduce, or total cut off, those boycott talks and interruptions. The IOC must issue a statement that those countries which do not turn up for the Opening Ceremony shall be dropped or suspended from future Olympic Games. China, just throw the Olympic Games back to the IOC. Organize your own "China games" to welcome ... friendly countries. Leave out the US, Britain, France, Germany, Canada and those Western countries ... Do something and fight back, China! The Chinese of the world are behind our Motherland.
David Lim
Malaysia (Apr 29, '08)


I would like to congratulate Chan Akya for his latest piece, Western excess is the Earth killer [Apr 26], which I found very interesting for two reasons. The first is the fact that the author seems to have changed his mind regarding the environment. Not a very long time ago, he likened environmentalists to terrorists. Never mind; one should always welcome such developments. The second reason is the solution he put forward for solving the environmental problems: reducing consumption in the West. That's an excellent proposition and an even more surprising one coming from Chan, the staunch advocate of free markets, unlimited growth and unlimited consumption as the panacea for everything economic. Keep going, Chan, you are on the right path to salvation. What happened to Spengler's soap opera on Barack Obama? We had the episodes on the mother, the wife, the reverend ... we can't wait for the one about the cousin Dick Cheney.
Daniel Mazir
Perth, Australia (Apr 29, '08)

Spengler is on vacation. He'll be back next Monday. But next up on ATol's anticampaign trail is Pepe Escobar on John McCain (to prove we are without bias and hate all the candidates equally). Hold on tight! - ATol



[Re Doubting Obama, Apr 29] The great female breakthrough of Hillary Clinton is not over, and her [goal] of reaching the highest office in the United States is still a distant dream. She is still unbowed after the last win and slugging away; encouraged with Pennsylvania's working class voters' endorsement. It is yet to be seen if she will maintain her credibility in the coming primaries after this convincing win - but the pundits give her a big nod. Pennsylvania has the highest number of white voters over the age of 65 [except in Florida] and a substantial majority have diehard, deeply buried prejudices against blacks. It is inconceivable for them to vote for a black person ... who is running for the presidency of the US. Barack Obama won 92% of the black votes in Pennsylvania, but 62% of over-65 whites, including many of their young grandchildren, voted for Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama has to win the hearts and minds of pensioners and he must appear to them to be a kinder person, luring them with some incentives. [For example] by giving them winter fuel allowances to keep warm, free prescriptions, increased pensions above the rate of inflation, discounts on fuel bills (as in the UK) - whatever would be fiscally possible. [If so] they will come running in hordes to back him in the general election. It is the taboo nature of racism of old and young white working class [voters] and rednecks that Obama must break to defeat McCain. He has to very careful in the remaining months to not make disastrously misjudged comments on smalltown working-class Americans to alienate himself from the diehard ... "Reagan Democrats" who have backed Mrs Clinton so far. It is interesting that a lot of white Americans say about him, "Here is a new guy named Barack Obama, an African-American who wants to be our president and commander-in-chief." That is a hell of a change for their old-age mentality to accept. Finally, I am immensely delighted to read that so many ATol readers find my letters interesting and pleasing to read. I offer my sincere gratitude to them, and to ATol for publishing me. I am a very humble and ordinary writer who always tries his best with the pen; an art, I learned from my wonderful father.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 29, '08)


I have just read some of your readers' letters, and I want to add my own letter of appreciation for your online newspaper. I have gotten very weary of the many websites that have only opinion, and not much information. As an American, who cannot rely on information in the American journals and newspapers anymore (since they have all become "corporate controlled"), I treasure your more international voice. I learn a great deal about world affairs when reading ATol, and your online journal gives me a much wider perspective about what is going on in the world. Thank you, and keep up the good work. You have some really good journalists writing for you right now.
Katherine Halton
USA (Apr 29, '08)


The attack on [Afghanistan's President Hamid] Karzai's life is a clear indication that his grip on power is slipping away. He is not even secure when he is surrounded by his armed forces on an auspicious day to celebrate the overthrow of the Soviet Union's illegal occupation 16 years ago. It was the global Muslim freedom fighters, including the Taliban, who defeated the Soviet empire in Afghanistan and not America’s puppets and poodles like Karzai and his cabinet. It is such a shame and disgrace that Karzai has sold his conscience to enslave his country once again to a different master, the Unites States of America. It is not only the Taliban who want the US and NATO to leave their country but also a majority of Afghanis, who prefer to live as free men [rather] than become slaves of infidels with decadent morality. The Taliban are gaining ground as the illegal occupation of their country is prolonged and the West uses them as a means to their end to stay as long as possible in Afghanistan. The country is in ruin with little progress under this Western stooge government of Hamid Karzai.
Jalal Ahmed Rumi
Pakistan (Apr 28, '08)


[Re Abdullah's second-chance reform drive, Apr 26] Politics the second time around is never satisfying. [Malaysian] Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi's plans for reforms will at best not remold the UMNO [United Malays National Organization]. His own party's movers and shakers have [no] confidence; the UMNO, figuratively speaking, is like Humpty Dumpty, once broken you can never put him back together again. The initiative lies elsewhere unless Abdullah steals Anwar Ibrahim by adopting his program of reform which puts a brake on bumiputra favoritism and overcomes the alienation that has spurred Indian and Chinese opposition to the UMNO.
Nakamura Junzo
Guam (Apr 28, '08)


Re Western excess is the Earth killer, Apr 26. The carbon credits scheme is pure, unadulterated bunk. Applying the same underlying logic, could we then allow drug traffickers to pursue their pernicious trade if they agreed to build rehab centers and hospitals? Steeped in elitism and highly susceptible to political gaming, this harebrained idea actually shows that the major environmental offenders are more interested in skirting the issue than in honestly confronting and addressing it.
John Chen
USA (Apr 28, '08)


I’d like to take issue with Chan Akya’s dark humor in Western excess is the Earth killer, Apr 26. There should have been no car. Western attempts to transfer the blame for world-destroying consumption patterns to the people who make the products for them are on par with the centuries old practice of blaming the Jewish people as a whole for the Rothschilds and the Zionists in contemporary Israel. That said, more and more China and other Asian nations are coming to resemble the cigarette makers who provide people too addicted to stop with the products to satisfy their habits. Worse, they are apparently becoming addicted themselves. Western nations, under the sway of the "suicidal statecraft" practiced by financial capitalism, have provided Asia with an unparalleled historical opportunity to industrialize that old-fashioned imperialism would never have permitted. But this whole pattern of wasteful consumption has to change. It should have changed 100 years ago. There are simply too many of us to tolerate any more "conspicuous consumption". Chan Akya seems to imply that, with a few energy technology fixes, it can continue. After energy shortages, comes water and then ... Please! Give us some hope! Preserve our stereotype that Asians are smarter than the West, that they have been able to learn something from what we have done to the world.
Steven Lesh (Apr 28, '08)


[Re Back to the hard line on North Korea, Apr 26] No one can accuse the Bush administration of subtlety in its betwixt and between policy towards towards North Korea. Shifting gears, Mr Bush has now marshaled proof of Kim Jong il's nefarious hand in Syria's nuclear designs. Yet, administration officials [claim] that the latest CIA dog and pony show, in camera, with proof of North Korea's long hand as a purveyor of nuclear reactors before a US congressional committee, will in no way affect on-going discussions with Pyongyang at the six-power talks, is difficult to believe. Washington's policy towards North Korea since the 1990s is a record of giving with one hand and taking with another so that for reasons of internal and external consumption it needs to keep the North Korea bugaboo alive in order to fuel its military-industrial complex at home and maintain the role of tripwire mediator in east Asia. Mr Bush knows that any slight to North Korea will harden Pyongyang's resolve in further delaying a meeting of the minds on the nuclear question. Since no one remembers Washington's torpedoing of an Israeli offer of several billions of dollars almost twenty years ago to North Korea with the express purpose of stopping North Korea's export of advanced military rocketry, it is time to bring that offer up again, the more especially since Washington put its veto on the deal. It does not take much to draw conclusions as to the whys and wherefores of such Cold War thinking. If Mr Bush's CIA sideshow is a warning to Iran, it appears amateurish since its immediate effect is to derail any deal with North Korea. As Donald Kirk reports, Kim Dae Jung's words will prevail: one way or the other Mr Bush or his successor will have to compose with Kim Jong il.
Mel Cooper Singapore (Apr 28, '08)


I have been for a long time a keen reader of ATol and find it amazingly intellectual reading. It is one of the best online magazines that should be read by every graduate and post-graduate of politics, history, economics and world affairs. I say without any hesitation that the majority of the authors of articles are exceptionally knowledgeable, well read, well versed, but a few are very prejudiced on race and religion. Some of the letter writers are highly scholarly, witty and express themselves extremely well and are worth mentioning: Saqib Khan, Jakob Cambria, Vincent Maadi and too many more to mention them all. I find Saqib Khan from the UK often very assertive in his expression and opinion but also full of humor on occasions. I wish that I could once again read one of his letters, on "fecundity”, that he wrote few years ago. Has he written any thing of humor recently? Please oblige.
G Ever Best (Apr 28, '08)

Saqib Khan's letter on fecundity can be found on this page (scroll down to letters of May 10, 2006). Here is an excerpt from another of his letters, dated May 26, 2006:
... This reminds me about a story of a poor Indian farmer who could only afford to buy one loaf of bread every week to feed his family. On the other hand his master could afford to buy many loaves plus meat, vegetables, rice and cake. Things [got] worse; the farmer was mad at his master for sleeping with his daughter and refused to plant the wheat crop to punish his master, causing the price of bread to double, [then] treble. The poor man could not afford a loaf and his children died of hunger. The master [was] still rich, complained about the inflationary price but bought a loaf of bread every day. The farmer's wife got mad at her husband for not making any money from selling the crop, so she went to see his master and asked for a loan. He agreed but on the condition that she would have to go to bed with him. So the wife bought two loaves of bread, vegetables and rice and a cake with the money. At the dinner table, the farmer told his wife that his decision not to grow wheat was wise, after all. The wife smiled and told him to enjoy his dinner because often decisions have unintended consequences.
- ATol


Wu Zhong's Time to outgrow boycott calls [Apr 23] gives a good review of the Chinese public's reaction to the unfriendly actions of some irresponsible Western media and politicians. It might be true that a boycott of foreign goods, say, French ones, will be a double-bladed sword and harm Chinese themselves while delivering impact on targets. Nevertheless, we should also come to understand that the boycott campaign does reflect a kind of "democracy", as it comes from the bottom of the Chinese people's hearts. The public has their own "rights" to express their social and political demands. In all, what concerns me most is that some self-important people such as CNN commentator Jack Cafferty and German Chancellor Angela Merkel should be aware of the price of offending a population of 1.3 billion. The boycott just reflects the surface of the ocean of anger ... below it there might be wounds and hatred. Come on, those who are promoting the boycott of Carrefour are not as stupid a group as expected. They are well-educated. They are the future of China. Comments on Olympic paranoia causes visa hurdles, Apr 25, by Kent Ewing: See, Mr Ewing, some innocent people are suffering from the so-called "peaceful demonstration" now. When the US took measures to control the flow of visitors after the 2001 terrorist attack, did you come out to utter your complaint on behalf of innocent travellers? Now China is trying to check the terrorists for the good the Games. Who is to blame? We can anyhow accuse Beijing of making trouble and showing sympathy/support to the troublemakers behind the scene - the Dalai Lamas and their Western bosses?
Careful Cat
Lhasa, China (Apr 28, '08)


Gareth Porter is right about Cheney's evil influence in Petraeus' rise lets Cheney loose on Iran, April 25. This evidence-free charge of "special groups" controlled by Iran was made up by Petraeus in February, 2007, in order to divide the Mahdi Army and blame all problems on Iran. It was made up, period. In fact, the number two commander of all US forces in Iraq, Lieutenant General Lloyd J Austin III, when pressed hard by reporters on April 23 admitted that "they [so-called "special groups"], are so amorphous. They go back and forth between each other. It is not like we have the Dallas Cowboys versus the Houston Oilers. It's just not as clear." And, if you ask the experts on the ground in Iraq, they will tell you that all Shi'ite fighters in Sadr City and Basra are members of the Mahdi Army. Vice President Cheney has a long history of making things up to fit his agenda. The mantra for this bunch is "if things are not going right in Iraq, blame Iran". As this occupation of Iraq continues to spiral out of control, who can forget Cheney's role as chief architect telling us that the US would be "greeted as liberators"? And, who can forget his support for Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war? One thing is certain about Cheney and his cohorts. They have no shame; lies and half truths are recycled and repeated over and over again with a straight face. Cheney's main objective is not just to threaten Iran, but it is to use the hammer of fear to frighten the American public once again so that they would vote for his party in November. By his thinking, a bungled occupation, an economy in distress, a president with the lowest approval rating in history, and mountains of debt for the foreseeable future can all be trumped by fear. But, this time, after having played that card once too often, they're in for a rude awakening.
Fariborz S Fatemi
Former Professional Staff Member
House Foreign Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
McLean, Virginia, USA (Apr 25, '08)


[Re Petraeus' rise lets Cheney loose on Iran, Apr 25] This article was poorly researched and missed many key points. First, Admiral William Fallon was promoted over many others under president Bill Clinton as a protege. Second, a president is commander in chief, [therefore] the president is his commander. The commander sets over all policy, not an underling. Third, Fallon represents traditional military thought that doesn't work so well with asymmetric warfare. Petraeus is more of a Special Operations kind of soldier; one who knows how to fight asymmetric warfare better than a traditional military man. Iran and Afghanistan and, for that matter, the ["war on terror"] are asymmetric battles. Having Fallon run CENTCOM [Central Command] is like having a buggy whip manufacturer run the early Ford Motor Company.
Jim Miro (Apr 25, '08)


Asia Times is usually a trusted source of information that is not necessarily available elsewhere. Richard M Bennett's blatant propaganda piece Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23] is an unfortunate exception to the rule. It's a shameful piece of non-journalism that would no doubt be welcomed by any Murdoch newspaper. Even a casual check of his anecdotes by a good editor would make this obvious. I hope it's not repeated, as there are precious few media resources left in the world that can actually be trusted.
Julian Welch (Apr 25, '08)


The article A Maoist in Nepal's Palace [Apr 19] by Mr Dhruba Adhikary seems to be useful in finding the real happenings [and] challenges and [for] foreseeing the future crisis most likely to occur in Nepal out of [the] many games being playing by visible and invisible actors in [Nepal] and abroad. The conclusion finally drawn by the well-known political commentator Mr Adhikary is ... quite realistic when saying "the Maoists won't stop their journey until they reached their final destination". However, the ... former rebel forces ... are one of the main parties ... responsible for the mercilessly killing of thousands of innocent lives ... There needs to be a realization of reality, of the real aspiration of the people and current democratic trends in the world as well. The current national and international environments are not very positive and favorable to for the Maoists to fully implement their goal, that is why the sooner they realize reality, the better ... Currently, Nepal is seeking statesman to deal [with] this very fragile and liquid situation, but there seem [to be] none so far [besides] the exceptional late B P Koirala. ... It was the a great and visionary national policy which B P Koirala named "National Reconciliation". This policy was framed by the late great leader based on his long painful life and experiences. [Its] relevancy has been much increased in [present-day] Nepal where some external forces are trying to cultivate their tactics ... through the dangerous design of dividing people and political powers in Nepal.
Dibakar Pant
St Paul, USA (Apr 25, '08)


Is President Bush reversing gears on Secretary of State Rice's engaging North Korea? It certainly seems so judging by Asia Times Online posting Agence France Presse's "US to detail N Korea Syria nuclear cooperation". Can one rely on the leak "citing unnamed senior US officials"? One has to raise a skeptical eyebrow at this breaking story reported in the New York Times and the Washington Post. The Israelis bombed Syria's construction site alleged to be the home of its infant nuclear industry on September 6, 2007. So, is it not natural to ask why, after seven months, a video showing North Koreans inside a Syrian reactor has surfaced? It is not the first time the Bush administration has floated false clues. The US relied, much to its embarrassment, on the testimony of a North Korean defector who swore that the Kim dynasty was on the verge of collapse. It wasn't and the defector's proof, based on rumor, evaporated in the fresh wind of verification. We could mention the name of Ahmed Chalabi and his false information which gave much grist to Bush's windmills for a pre-emptive strike against Saddam Hussein. Bush has a pronounced distaste for dealing with North Korea. He has tried to isolate it totally so that its collapse would bring about the regime change that he so wanted [ever] since labeling Pyongyang an "axis of evil state". Absent from new US charges of North Korea's hand in Syria's hardly nascent nuclear industry is the Israeli hand. It won't be the first nor the last time, [the US] is willing to share false data for its own regional and hegemonic designs.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 25, '08)


If things don't "work out" for Obama and the Democrats, is it too early to start considering an Obama and, perhaps, Colin Powell independent ticket?
T Sullivan
USA (Apr 25, '08)


Recently the Pentagon revised its threshold for recruiting men and women with criminal backgrounds. People who would have been rejected before because of their criminal histories are now welcomed with open arms to a military whose ranks are being depleted by death and demoralization. Bottomless pit wars will tend to do that to you. Boundless praise and hosannas are routinely heaped on the troops serving in the twin failures of Iraq and Afghanistan, those Middle East [conflicts] that have merged into one all-consuming blob of imperialist fantasies. No one in the US wants to hear about the daily atrocities and revenge killings that these embittered and angry young Americans perpetrate on the ... people they supposedly want to "liberate" (new Pentagon definition: indigenous [people's] death by rifle, artillery or air-delivered ordinance constitutes "life liberation".) When the odd event does manage to sneak past the rose-colored filters of the corporate-controlled media, it is instantly dismissed as an "aberration" or "the bad apple" instead of the truth (so unpalatable these days in America), that these are mere tips of vast, submerged desert icebergs. Thus, what can be more apropos and ironic than having real criminals living up to the criminal standards that a criminal president has set for a criminal war (conducted with criminal negligence and incompetence) that has made criminals of all who sink deeper and deeper into the [problem]. Alas, that criminality includes the members of the pseudo-democracy that spawned it with so much collective enthusiasm not so long ago.
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas (Apr 25, '08)


Regarding Clinton chalks up key meaningless victory [Apr 24], by Muhammad Cohen: If the Democrats do not win [the 2008 US presidential election], it would most certainly be claimed that Hillary Clinton lost them the election ... This very chilly white woman, whom 40% Americans view with hysterical dislike, [is also] the wife of former president Bill Clinton [which] carries a certain stigma of nepotism and dynastic oligarchy. The crucial enigma about Hillary is what she stands for, her domestic and foreign policies and what kind of president she would become - and if she would be good enough. She is a very calculating stage-management perfectionist and, with a chillingly cool demeanor, appears to frighten many men ... But despite all her flaws, anything will be worth seeing the ... hawk G W Bush kicked out of the White House and replaced by someone who can inspire and unite the American people ... In Clairton, Pennsylvania, the steel town’s white residents have shown open hostility to Barack Obama. Hillary is dividing Democrats and her divisive campaign is gaining many votes for John McCain ... Barack Obama has the certain charm and attraction that was once the monopoly of the Kennedy brothers and he was supported by Bobby Kennedy’s wife when she said in her endorsement speech, "Barack is so much like Bobby with courage, caring and charisma and leading us toward a kinder and gentle world." The fact is that Obama has the ability to pull crowds from across all divides of Americans irrespective of their skin color. This is so sadly missing in Hillary. Has this woman warm blood or cold?
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 24, '08)


[Re US media the last hurdle for China buyouts, Apr 24] The US found no trouble in the sale of an IBM division to a Chinese company with ties to the Chinese government. Today we recognize the PC manufacturer by its brand Lenovo. When it comes to selling American media outlets to a Chinese SOE [state-owned enterprise] that's another kettle of fish. Mr Wilkins may bring up the example of the media mogul Rupert Murdoch, who recently bought the influential Wall Street Journal. A citizen of Australia, he traded citizenship for a US passport to snap up American media companies. It is doubtful a Chinese SOE would become completely Americanized, and even if it did, questions would remain about its loyalty. A recent sentencing of a China-born man who was sentenced to prison for selling secrets to China is a case in point. His attachment to the land of his birth overrode his loyalty to his adopted country. Murdoch could buy what he wanted because he's a dyed-in-the-wool capitalist. No country would sell the media companies to a country which, although friendly as China is with the US, has its record of long distrust and questionable practices. [This] cannot be washed away.
Nakamura Junzo
Guam (Apr 24, '08)


This sounds like a joke question, but it's not: Why is your paper so good? There are lots of others which should be as good or better, yet they're not. Again, how does your paper manage to be so good?
Mike Booth
Granada, Spain (Apr 24, '08)

The fact that the word "corporate" is not in our dictionary is probably a great boon. - ATol


It is OK to have ads to offset the cost of the server. But it will be good if they are decent ones not half-naked bodies. I read ATol at home and I don't want these kind of ads when my children are playing around me.
Masood Allawala (Apr 24, '08)


[Re Muqtada's biggest battle already won, Apr 23] This article goes against the unrelenting tide of propaganda coming out of the American mass media. Just as Condoleezza Rice is calling Muqtada al-Sadr a coward, [Sreeram] Chaulia makes her look silly. But Rice isn't the only personage to strike a note of desperation: for instance, cabinet members now feel free to blame the Air Force for American failures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Conversely, a former military chief has just said that the civilian leadership in Washington was responsible for encouraging torture. As the presidential election looms, we'll be seeing more and more individual efforts to protect reputations that have already been lost. The tactic of kicking the problem down the road seemed to make sense, but it didn't allow for human frailty.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (Apr 23, '08)


[Re Just staying alive, Apr 22] Thanks, Doug Wakefield, for corroborating one of my investment strategies going forward - shorting the stock markets. Watching the Dow blithely charge upward despite a nimiety of ominous signs pointing to a financial-market meltdown helps one better understand why and how the Bush-Cheney gang was given a second term in the White House. Separately, Wu Zhong’s call for calm and reason amid the current firestorm of Chinese nationalism [Time to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] is understandable, perhaps even admirable. However, an unwavering adherence to rationality runs the risk of breeding predictability. Inaction at this time by China may actually help spawn new incidents down the road, say, shortly before the commencement of the Olympics. Lastly, ATol’s new front-page layout - with the News Video, Business Headlines and Breaking News features - looks rather ... cool.
John Chen
USA (Apr 23, '08)


[Re Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23] It must have been a slow news week. Hamas has offered numerous times since it was elected the governing party of the Occupied Territories a 10-year truce with Israel. It seems you are blinded by US and Israeli propaganda - Hamas is the elected government and not Fatah. Fatah, in fact, did exactly what many African leaders do when voted out of office - they staged a coup to hang on. Abbas, Fatah, the PLO were not in power, Hamas was, much to the dismay and horror of Israel and the US who have done everything possible since to assist the quisling Abbas in his power grab to the point of jailing without charge enough elected Hamas MPs to render the government without a quorum. Imagine if the Palestinians had interfered in the elections and government of Israel or the US what a circus would have ensued. Take off your Israeli-US colored glasses.
Vivien Martin (Apr 23, '08)


[Re Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23] Jimmy Carter's put his finger squarely in the eye of the Bush administration's road map to peace. Mr Bush is fully consistent in his policy of isolating politically, economically, and militarily Hamas. Mr Carter is a realist who [does not] suffer fools gladly. His meeting with Hamas' Khaled Mashel in Damascus has blown sky high Israel's and America's futile policy to quarantine and crush Hamas. Mr Carter is not fool either; he knows full well that the Bush administration and the pro-Israel forces in the US will [hamper] his efforts. He has broken taboos, and suddenly the ground in Palestinian and Israeli has shifted, and as today's Financial Times of London editorial tersely put it, he has saved Israel from itself. It is not nothing that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize [in 2002].
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 23, '08)


Many thanks to Sami Moubayed for his informative article Carter spreads a new doctrine, Apr 23. Both Al Gore and Jimmy Carter are contributing to peace of this world. People will remember them. Unfortunately, these days the world still has some media and analysts who ... fear that the world can enjoy peace and then they will not be able to profit from the pain of other peoples and [the] wars and riots in other countries. Engagement, not isolation nor value-based misunderstanding, can make the god smile.
Careful Cat
Lhasa, China (Apr 23, '08)


This morning's ATol included two letters that attest to both the purview and wide-ranging readership of your website. Both Mr Vincent Maadi in Cape Town, South Africa, and Mr Hardy Campbell in Houston, Texas, confirm an appreciation [and provide] voices of moderation and understanding rather than ones of vilification and violence. Both need to be congratulated for their views and for sharing them with ATol's readers.
Armand De Laurell (Apr 23, '08)


[Re Time to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] Wu Zhong is simply wrong in his criticism of Chinese people boycotting French goods. Diplomatic protests mean nothing and will accomplish nothing. Other countries are closely watching what China is doing. If China doesn't do anything, I'm afraid there'll be more funny business cooked up by the West in the future. Past boycotts in Chinese history didn't work because at those times the Chinese market was small. A lot of people believe that France was not the main country in cooking up the Tibetan riots. Has Wu Zhong ever heard the Chinese saying "Kill the chicken to warn the monkey"?
Tang (Apr 23, '08)


[Re Time to outgrow boycott calls, Apr 23] The cry to boycott French products did not come from [the] Chinese government. It was sounded by the anger of millions of Chinese people frustrated with the way Western media distort every bit of news to put down China. Using their wide network of news agencies, these news media such as CNN, BBC [and] Fox News have consistently put out negative news on China. To blame China for the news distortion is unfounded as they clearly cut out the pictures to fit their intended message. Also, even if there was a blackout of news coming out from Xizang [Tibet], that does not entitle the media to publish news that they could not verify. In fact, they use data coming out of the pro-Tibet group more than those coming from Chinese sources. Whenever there are protests from China, Western media always claim these are orchestrated by Chinese government. The demonstrations in Paris, London and Berlin supporting China and the Olympics clearly indicate that these are spontaneous reactions of overseas Chinese and students. It is evident that some of these news agencies have become tools of Western hegemony and they cannot be trusted for their fair reporting. Boycotts are not good for anybody but this is the only way common Chinese people know that is within their power of expression. CNN does not bother with the third call for apology from the Chinese government regarding Jack Cafferty's lewd statement against, he claimed, the Chinese government. Maybe it's time for Chinese government to think if CNN's purpose of doing business in China is justified.
Wendy Cai
USA (Apr 23, '08)


The article Time to outgrow boycott calls by Wu Zhong on April 23 makes sense until the last sentence: "why ... still resorting to irrational and fruitless boycotts of foreign products?" It is the foreign dignitaries who started the boycott of the Olympics' opening ceremony, the governments which [didn't post] guards to protect the Torch Relay in an effort to humiliate China, the Western media who highlighted the disruption and not the happy crowds welcoming the torch, all of [those who] followed the biased reporting on the Tibet disturbance. Beating and burning are justified by "lack of religious freedom" and the lawful policing work as "brutal suppression". Now it is all right for CNN to publicly humiliate the Chinese government, but not for the Chinese people to express their anger. In case the few Western media outlets do not know, including Mr Wu Zhong, over a hundred [world] governments have expressed their support of the way China has handled the Tibetan riots. I think it is perfectly natural and justified for the Chinese people to feel angry just because Mr Wu Zhong does not feel angry. However, the Chinese government has been more tempered and has called for calm. Now that the ridiculous sideshows have been staged and instigated, the glorious main events will come to pass in August.
Seung Li (Apr 23, '08)


ATol, I wish all my girlfriends were like you. To my pleasant surprise today you added videos, and not some dog in a tutu. You're getting better with age, and I love you. Please don't be afraid to put stuff from al-Jazeera on there, and [other] articles that we can't get anywhere else. I know that it's not easy, but I look forward to this. Also, your ads are getting mainstream, a long way from when the page was pretty empty. I guess that lots of important folks are turning on to you [and] I don't mind taking a little credit for that. Even though I often wanted to keep the knowledge to myself to seem smarter because your info is ahead of the curve and [is] real on-the-ground stuff, But, alas, I always told people to go to atimes.com and check it out; That's where the truth is (except for Spengler) so keep it up - you're doing great. I am very impressed with your commercial growth and the strength of your articles is still there if not [even] more quality, good stuff. Love for you, keep it up.
Jubin Ajdari (Apr 23, '08)

Al-Jazeera, unfortunately but understandably, has not offered us their content free of charge. Our new video and breaking news content comes to you courtesy of an arrangement with the wire services, eg, Reuters and AFP, and it's all we can afford. Thanks for the kind words. - ATol


[Re Bush and Lee talk T-bones and bombs, Apr 23] No 10-ton gorilla sprang out the bush to disturb the Bush-Lee meeting at Camp David. The two conservative presidents simply passed lightly over North Korea. What the meeting of the presidents of the United States and South Korea did highlight was that Mr Bush does control the pace and direction of South Korean issues. Seoul's economic policies are moderated by America's concerns: read opening South Korea to US beef imports and widening access of its goods and capital. As for the continued stationing of American troops in South Korea at a high level, Mr Lee's pleas fell on deaf ears for its military policy is circumscribed by Pentagon needs. Since Mr Lee campaigned for tighter ties with the US during the recent South Korean presidential elections, he has had no choice but to mould his public statements to mimic American demands. Mel Cooper (Apr 23, '08)
Singapore


If you don't stop displaying pop-up ads, I will visit your site less often, and will install the ad blocking software. Idiots.
Lew Glendenning (Apr 23, '08)

Idiots that we are, we pay for our content with the help of pop-up ads. All ATol costs you, Lew, is a little annoyance. One alternative to pop-up ads is making the website available only to subscribers. Or you could just send us US$5,000 per month. - ATol


Reading Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23], by Richard M Bennett, reminded me how effortlessly Israeli agents produce and disseminate their disinformation. Iran is a signatory to the NPT [nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], what they are doing is perfectly acceptable under the NPT. I'd like to see Mr Bennett do a similar innuendo-filled piece on Israel, which is not a signatory to the NPT and which has, unlike the Iranians, actually built and is prepared to deploy nuclear weapons. If the US had dealt with the Israeli nuclear weapons program with the same vigor that it appears to deal with the Iranian nuclear power program, Iran, and many other countries near Israel would likely be more open to cooperation. We are beginning to see the long-term costs of US and Israeli "exceptionalist" policies. H Annen (Apr 23, '08)


Regarding Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23], by Richard M Bennett. Speaking of dud intelligence, is this the same flawed and largely discredited Richard M Bennett who, prior to the 2003 attack on Iraq, held the considered opinion that al-Qaeda had 200 trained operatives in Iraq capable of carrying out CBW attacks? Did Asia Times Online pay Richard M Bennett, or did he pay you? Does Richard M Bennett have some intrinsic virtue that gives him access to your pages? Or was this article a professional courtesy between purveyors of mushrooms (feed them manure and keep them in the dark)? In the recent exchange of threats between Israel and Iran, while Iranian leaders threaten destruction of the Israel/Palestine governing regime, Israeli leaders threaten the destruction of the Iranian nation - as in "people". Given the example of the ongoing destruction of the Palestinian nation by the nuclear-armed Israeli regime, it seems logical that the Iranian regime would seek a nuclear deterrent if it seriously aims to change the behavior of the Israeli regime.
David George (Apr 23, '08)


Richard Bennett's Iran's 'bomb' and dud intelligence [Apr 23] presents timely and cogent points about a top-tier international security problem/issue/situation. A useful reference, reinforcing Bennett's main points, with very long historical perspective, is Legacy of Ashes, A History of the CIA, by Tim Weiner, a thoroughly researched and abundantly sourced work which documents scores of intelligence failures. In recent decades, the billions of dollars spent on "national technical means (NTMs)" has apparently not closed an abiding "accuracy and timeliness" gap regarding high priority US intelligence topics/targets. Regarding the lead-in to the Iraq War, to my knowledge, there has not been an adequate explanation regarding two central factors: Did these NTMs produce the required imagery and other data regarding Iraq's WMD activities during the years leading up to the decision to invade? And, if the NTMs functioned as designed and described, why were the analysts not able to properly interpret and analyze the data? If the NTMs did not function as designed, the US Government should have recouped billions of dollars from the contractors who designed and built them. If they did function properly, scores of analysts and their superiors should have been fired, or even brought up on criminal malfeasance charges. As in so many endeavors, the Bush Administration has achieved yet another nadir in governance and ethics through the manipulation, selectivity, and prevarications it has perpetrated regarding national intelligence processes and products. Now, Douglas Feith, one of the neo-con "idiotlogue" ringleaders in the Rumsfeld-Wolfowitz dysfunctional Department of Defense, has continued his ego-paroxysm by having his book, War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at The Dawn of the War on Terrorism, newly published. Feith was the chief operator of Rumsfeld's shadow intelligence operation which tried to justify the neo-cons' parallel universe of geopolitical and WMD fantasies. The best uses for his book are (1) material for charges in a bill of indictment for criminal malfeasance while in office; and (2) lining for bird cages.
Sagacity Seeker
USA (Apr 23, '08)


Dear Mr Spengler, I loved your article just out [Rice, death and dollar, Apr 21] but, um, if the monk was wearing a saffron robe, he was Thai; Tibetan monks hang out in burgundy and sunshine yellow garb only.
Arthur Borges (Apr 22, '08)


Regarding Rice, death and dollar [Apr 21], by Spengler: I enjoyed reading it and offer my comments. The solution to global economic crisis would be to stop China saving so much and to re-inject demand back into the world. But persuading [China] to do that was a task beyond central bankers. It is still a global challenge facing global economies and political leaders. The main trouble now is the US housing market decline engulfing the world, losses by banks in the UK, US and around the world because of uncontrolled and crooked lending which have brought subprime mortgage paper, the liquidity crisis and pessimism about equities. Low-interest rates have their origin in China as lending was made cheaper and demand became rampant, resulting in the impending global recession, high food and fuel prices. China has been hogging all the world brass, copper, zinc, steel and now rice, wheat and carrots to save for rainy days and lean years. China may not be America's equal yet, but of all other contenders it will win the race in the not-too-distant future. The Iraq war and mishandling of the economy by US President George W Bush has jeopardized not only its own economy but also the global one. "If you sink, you all sink with me," has been [Bush's] economic policy. The Chinese economy is growing at a rate nearly three times the US's and is prudently projected to catch up in terms of GDP by 2041. The fact is that the US is currently running a trade deficit of approximately 8% of GDP, and a large part of that deficit is financed by China in the form of purchases of American bonds, so both sides have become interdependent. It is a weird situation: economic rivals, political adversaries and increasingly competing as No 1 and No 2 consumers of the world's energy resources. The average American earns US$40,000 per annum, but has savings of 0%, whereas a Chinese earns hardly $1,500 per year but has savings of 23% of his income, and a large part of it his bankers are lending to the Americans. There is also this matter of consumption. The US consumes fully 25% of world oil supplies. China and India are growing rapidly and their economies consume more and more oil. China currently consumes 8.2% of the world's oil production. Soon it will increase to 10% or even 14%. Where is that oil going to come from? Is the US willing to reduce its share for China? No. So, it must invade Iran to capture its oil reserves.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 22, '08)



I refer to Rice, death and the dollar, by Spengler on April 21. The greatest threat to mankind is coming from warmongers in the US, their powers can be clipped by implementing following program in this order:
1. End the war in Iraq and Afghanistan: instant saving of 3 trillion dollars.
2. End financial and military support of Israel: instant savings of hundreds of billions of dollars.
3. Remove all neo-cons and Israel-firsters from American federal, state and local governments and all political parties: instant liberation of America from foreign influence.
4. Close down all commodity exchanges: instant end of commodity speculation and end of hunger and saving of hundreds of millions human lives.
5. Tear up the GATT agreement: instant end of neo-colonialism over Third World countries.
6. Bring back the gold standard: end of inflation and finance capitalism.
7. Shut down the United Nations:: instant saving of billions of dollars and human lives.
8. Stop subsidizing [the] weapons industry: instant boost to industries producing for the needs of civil societies and end of wars.
9. Destroy all nuclear weapons: societies can start living without fear.
Vincent Maadi
Cape Town, South Africa (Apr 22, '08)


[Re Room for two: US, Iran in the Middle East, Apr 21] Trita Parsi always brings a breath of fresh air to discussions on Iran and the United States in the Middle East. He once again states the obvious that the next American president will have to work out a solution to restore stability in Iraq with the Islamic Republic of Iran. A solution which will encompass American concerns and fears, but one which will dampen the US's expansionist designs on the region, thereby recognizing the political role of Shi'ites in Iraq. Yet it is necessary to point out that Shi'ite Iran and Shi'ite-dominated Iraq do not share completely identical views and will necessarily not see eye-to-eye when it comes down to each country's national interests. Should Washington and Tehran work out a modus vivendi, the big loser will be Israel; and as an American client, it will accept the new reality, but with its usual bad grace.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 22, '08)


In Trita Parsi's article Room for two: US, Iran in the Middle East [Apr 21], Parsi stresses that the US must accommodate Iranian desires even though he writes that Iran is reluctant to clarify what it wants. He talks as if the US and Iran are equal powers, however, the US could lay waste to Iran from the air in a matter of hours, completely destroying Iran's air force and navy. Iran is responsible for the death of hundreds of US servicemen dating back to the 1980s in Lebanon; they correctly assume the US is too frightened or stupid to do anything to stop their reign of terror. The US cannot take action against Iran while 160,000 US soldiers are in danger of Iranian terror attacks. It is time for the US to withdraw and consolidate its troops in Iraq so the US can balance the ledger with Iran. The US will not need to worry about Iranian desires when their power to achieve their aims will have been greatly reduced. The Iranian mullah government will always be an enemy of the US and take measures to injure the US and its interests. In the end, regime change is the only effective plan towards Iran and the US has never made a serious effort in that direction.
Dennis O'Connell USA (Apr 22, '08)


All the moral indignation coming from Westerners about China and Tibet and human-rights violations [China bunkers down behind its great wall Apr 16] made me wonder: How would Western countries have fared in the good ol' days of wanton imperialism? So I imagine some of the headlines in the 19th century: "Chinese Emperor Denounces Slaughter of Red Indians by US Army"; "Siamese King Decries Manufactured Excuse for US War with Mexico." How about "Lynching of Blacks in American South Criticized by Ethiopian Emperor Menelik?" And the list could go on and on. The point is, what country has not had its period of turmoil, created by ethnic conflicts, economic disparities and religious antagonisms? I dare say if we compared how many indigenous North and South Americans were exterminated by European-descended peoples, the numbers would far exceed those of any non-white nation. And it appears the Westerners concerned about these rights transgressions have selective tastes and memories; the Sudanese conflict has been around for more than 20 years before this sudden outburst of George Clooney-inspired activism, and the Buddhist majority's repression of Tamil rights in Sri Lanka has been assiduously avoided by these so-called human rights activists for the 30 years that civil war has been going on. Perhaps the latter is because the typical Western liberal has been brainwashed into equating Buddhism with peace and love and social equality (the myth that has got them so juiced up about Tibet.) That China's possessions of Tibet and Xinjiang have been recognized for decades by all nations and is totally within its rights to suppress civil disturbances seems not to matter a whit to the Western white who still has images of Mongol hordes and Yellow Perils lurking in their collective zeitgeist. But since China is the latest substitute for the Soviet Union (al-Qaeda just can't quite cut the mustard in this regard), any excuse to pillory them and deflect attention from Western violations of international law and humanity comes in quite handy. China is successful internationally precisely because it has chosen a different path than the militaristic pseudo-diplomacy of the West, yet Westerners want them to violate that success strategy and engage in Western-style interference in the Sudan conflict. This level of hypocrisy staggers the imagination. Perhaps the West should be more like the East, not vice versa. But that philosophy will never fly in the Western know-it-all mindset that all good things originate in their hemisphere. The bottom line is the Western modality of thinking is fundamentally racist and two-faced; Asians will always be perceived as slightly less than human, with only the thin veneer of civilization cloaking their barbarism, and that any analogous behavior on the part of whites is merely their way of spreading Judeo-Christian, Greco-Roman values, which everyone knows is the guiding light of the universe. ...
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas, USA (Apr 22, '08)


This letter refers to Dhruba Adhikary's article A Maoist in Nepal's palace [Apr 19]. After reading the article one can easily envision the possible political trajectory that Nepal is likely to follow. As the author has rightly pointed out, the country is undoubtedly poised for drifting from ... a monarchical feudalism to a communist republic driven by totalitarian ambition in the Stalinist model. The most significant part of the article is the writer's reference to the signature campaign launched by Baburam Bhattarai, the second in command in Nepal's Maoist hierarchy, in the early 1990s denouncing [former] president Alberto Fujimori of Peru and demanding the release of the Shining Path guerilla leader Gonzalo. In fact, the Shining Path movement formed the role model for Nepal's Maoist insurgency. Adhikary has somewhat obliquely pointed out that India was the sole savior of the Maoist leaders during the insurgency period and the 12-point agreement, signed in the Indian capital with the covert assistance from the Indian establishment, is its irrefutable proof. For all practical purposes, India was behind the entire Maoist operation against the monarchy and the democratic institution established in the aftermath of the people's movement of 1990. However, the author has wittingly or unwittingly failed to point out that the just-concluded polls in Nepal were not for forming a parliament or assembling a government with radical political agendas. The electoral exercise was meant for electing representatives for drafting a statute that would shape the destiny of the nation. But the Maoists, having felt the pulse of the power-hungry Prime Minister [Girija Prasad] Koirala, have misused the popular mandate and are heading for implementing their radical agendas. Koirala cannot shy away from shouldering responsibility for such a political debacle. His insatiable lust for power and parochial hangover are the major contributing factors.
Ratna Bahadur Rai
Kathmandu (Apr 21, '08)


[Re Afghanistan moves to center stage, Apr 19] another slam bang home run of an article by MKB [M K Bhadrakumar] that had at least two semesters of political science work concisely woven together with brilliant prose and analysis into one article. I feel educated and indebted. Thank you ATol.
Jubin Ajdari (Apr 21, '08)


[Re Petraeus hid Maliki's resistance to US troops, Apr 19] Gareth Porter either misleads your readers or just doesn't want to acknowledge his compatriots' incompetence. What gives it away is that Porter fails to mention [Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council head Abdul Aziz] al-Hakim's closeness to Iran's leaders, a closeness far tighter than that of his rival [Muqtada] al-Sadr. Maybe Porter doesn't want to besmirch the reputation of the American vice president [Dick Cheney], who heaps praise on Hakim while continuing to cast Iran as the villain responsible for American failure. Or maybe Porter wants to boost the American military chief in Iraq so that he can keep building walls dividing the Iraqi people. It was only after the fiasco became apparent that Americans started hearing how their leaders were surprised when the Iraqi puppet government ignored American advice in carrying out the Basra attack, as if American air support hadn't been readily available to cause the deaths of women and children, thus swelling the body count that American leaders still cherish despite its fruitlessness in Vietnam. As long as commentators like Porter insist on getting their facts from those who wield power in Washington, the American people won't learn how the death and destruction their nation is visiting on Iraq will come back to haunt them. Instead, the latest American controversy centers on whether Iraq is costing American taxpayers too much, which shows that the only way to get past American hypocrisy and apathy is to pick Americans' pockets.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (Apr 21, '08)


I wish to comment on the article Petraeus hid Maliki's resistance to US troops [Apr 19] by Gareth Porter. President [George W] Bush, his generals and real Iraqis tell two different stories about the war in Iraq. Most Iraqis say that the US's illegal invasion and occupation have fueled violence. [The] White House's parrot-like repetitive story is that US forces are curbing sectarian violence and making things better and friendly for the Iraqis. This misleading narration and perception is severely hindering progress and understanding of the ordinary Iraqi point of view. [The] majority of Iraqis are of the opinion that the US presence in Iraq is fueling sectarian violence and has been a recruiting ground for al-Qaeda and other foreign fighters who want to defeat the Americans and liberate their land for them. It is the indignity and humiliation of illegal occupation that the Iraqis want to end and they want the US to announce a timetable for its troops' withdrawal and departure. I believe that the violence will only decrease when the US leaves. The fact of the matter is that the US will continue to stay in Iraq to justify building permanent military bases and to ensure access to Iraqi oil for US oil moguls and business for arms manufacturers and security firms. The US wants a "soft partition" of Iraq that would allow greater influence by US and corporate interests. This month, a new ABC/BBC poll showed that over 70% of Iraqis want the US to leave Iraq. Most believe the US troop "surge" has increased rather than decreased violence in Iraq. General [David] Petraeus cautioned more than a year ago that in Iraq "there is no military solution, the solution is economic and political". The US economy is in rapid decline and facing recession, and with oil prices increasing daily and in short supply, the US wells will not only remain in control of Iraqi oil but Bush will attack Iran to seize its oil fields.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 21, '08)


I find it very interesting and a bit disappointing that Asia Times Online, a website on which I rely more and more for unbiased views of the world, has not reviewed any books exposing the numerous lies, distortions and manipulations associated with the alleged 9/11 "attacks". Like most people, I was initially shocked by the brutality and suddenness of that tragedy. But soon I started asking myself questions about the emerging "party line" on the whos and whys. The closer I looked and listened, the murkier and more suspicious things became. Being a structural engineer, the reasons given for the collapsed towers did not ring true. Then I discovered others were skeptical also, including journalists (many of them non-American), who started doing some investigations outside controlled government sources. Then I read important books, several of them by respected academics, and the floodgates opened. Now I have no doubt that the official US government position is a complete fabrication and utterly devoid of truth about who and why these "attacks" took place. That does not mean I know who ... perpetrated the crime, only that what we have been told is a lie, now elevated to the status of indisputable American myth. That is why no one in the US media dares disturb this scared cow, because to do so is to put your career, if not life, at risk. Which brings me back to Asia Times Online. I respect your position as an independent voice in a Western imperialist world, so this naturally makes me curious why your site is so reticent to review these books. The label of "conspiracy theory" is used in this country to instantly dismiss as lunacy brave efforts to discern the truth, even though many such labeled theories, denounced at the time, have proven correct with the passage of time. I have no doubt that one day the true criminals will be exposed, but only after even more blood and treasure are expended. I urge Asia Times Online to provide its readers around the world the opportunity to see the 9/11 lie shorn of its rather thin veneer of credibility and learn just how sinister America's wars really are.
Hardy Campbell (Apr 21, '08)

Over the years, ATol has published reviews and articles touching on the various conspiracy theories. And for a different take on the attacks, see September 11 was a third-rate operation Asia Times Online, March 28, 2008.


[Re Asia pushes, West resists, Apr 19] I was deeply concerned by the use of the words in Sreeram Chaulia's sentence "Had [author Kishore Mahbubani] picked Bangladesh, where religious fundamentalism is at an all-time-high". This is completely wrong. India instead should be the candidate for the Gujarat riots where close to 10, 000 (mostly women and children) were burned to death because they were Muslims. Such things do not happen in Muslim countries. The so-called problem of religious extremism of Bangladesh that this author wishes to pitch is simply because most likely he/she is [an] Indian who has a vested interested in labeling all other countries as belonging to the dark ages, except for India. There are many problems with India which never reach the media because it is not considered a Western ally. I don't see India cooperating with rest of Asia - I see it in complete isolation from Asia and working in complete cooperation with an awful American government.
Shotta (Apr 21, '08)


The article Asia pushes, West resists [Apr 19] by Sreeram Chaulia reminds me that time has rhymed again. When the West went through the Renaissance, which led to the age of Enlightenment and finally to the Industrial Age, many Asian countries resisted Western incursions into their cultures. This could be said about India, China and even Japan. But history has proved that the West, using either coercion, diplomacy or warfare, was able to enter into trade and finally create the world's largest Christian empire ruled by the British. This East/West relationship spawned both positive and negative results. Asia absorbed from the West its government systems, economic systems, its innovations and artistic heritage, but Asia had to pay a heavy price for these Western instruments to ... culture. Through the rule of colonialism, Asia experienced some of her worst famines, a loss of her dominance in the world economy and in some cases a blow to her various cultures. Now the table has turned. Asia, using a large part of her Western inheritance, is on the economic rise ... In addition, Asia's various cultures have reawakened. In the case of Islam, it has taken the form of [a] violent jihad. But Asia's other religions have taken flight across the world too. This could be said about Hinduism, Sikhism, etc ... but the most profound rebirth goes to Buddhism. Since the early 20th century, Buddhism started reblossoming in India. India now is home to a growing Buddhist population with enormous Buddhist monuments in the pipeline or already built. Due to the cruel mishandling of Tibet by Beijing, even the cloistered form of Vajrayana Buddhism of Tibet is now a worldwide phenomenon. Cultural practices like Zen and yoga are common in the West. To add to this, unlike the West during the 19th century, far more Asians are emigrating to the West [and] taking along with them the cultural baggage of their homelands. Like bygone Asia, the West will resist and will experience the "pains" of Asia's rebirth, but will eventually adjust. Just like the Western cultures, Asia has her own spark of the divine quality in her multitudes of cultures. Like Hinduism's famous Jagganath procession (or the English adaptation of this Indian word: juggernaut) [this change] is unstoppable and irresistible. As was the case with Asia, the West is now on the receiving end of Asia's high civilizations and will experience both the good and bad qualities that go with this shift.
Chrysantha Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 21, '08)


The manner in which you adhere to classical rules of English grammar, syntax and hyphenation (as opposed to the US ones) is most commendable, and, as far as I am concerned, is an important reason I use ATol as a web-hub for information and analyses. These rules where developed by the British to make writing clearer and thus quicker to read and understand; they are a testimony to practicality and elegance. However, I have noticed lately that you are allowing the noun "State" to be written as "state". In the classical English tradition, the use of an uppercase S in the noun "State" is not meant to make sacred the body which forcefully enforces its monopoly on racketeering and killing, but simply as a practical way of unequivocal identification within a text.
G Bittar, PhD (Apr 21, '08)


Jakob Cambria [letters, Apr 18] should read an article "The hypocrisy and danger of anti-China demonstrations" by Professor Floyd Rudmin of the University of Troms. Rudmin wrote: "China's treatment of its minorities has been exemplary compared to what the Western world has done to its minorities," and "China's recent history has good reasons why social order is a higher priority than individual rights." It was only about 20 years ago China really started to develop economically. Now the majority of Han people are living poorly, not just the minorities. Recent riots definitely told the Chinese government that it needs to quickly integrate the minorities in the distant provinces and improve the economic conditions in those places, because the Palestinians have show us that when people's hope is taken away, they will use any method to express their anger. In her article China confronts its Uyghur threat, [Apr 18], Elizabeth Van Wie Davis said: "While there is no uniform Uyghur agenda, the desired outcome by groups that use violence is broadly a separate Uyghur state, called either East Turkestan or Uyghuristan, which lays claim to a large part of western China and some territory in neighboring Central Asian republics." I have a question for Jakob Cambria - if Hawaii wants independence now, how do you think the US government will react? Everyone can be a five-star armchair general when reality is ignored.
Tang (Apr 21, '08)


[Re Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road, Apr 15] Wow, how can a respectable journal such as ATol publish such drivel is beyond me. Your paper hasn't been bought by the neo-cons or AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] yet, or has it? What a shameful display of journalistic lack of professionalism and lack of editorship.
Ali B (Apr 18, '08)


[Re China confronts its Uyghur threat, Apr 18] China's recent repression of Tibetans has brought to the world's attention the plight of another minority group, the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, who are suffering the same heavy hand of Beijing. Elizabeth Van Wie Davis looks at China's Uyghur troubles through a military lens. Yet they do have heavy political content which fuels the call to arms of a small percentage of militant Uyghurs. Davis mentions that Uyghurs had had military training in Pakistan since the 1980s. But she forgets to mention that such training was [sanctioned by] the administration of the then US president Ronald Reagan ... since it was a response to the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan. Thus, under the guise of combating godless communism, arms and instruction more likely than not had ... American origin and the good seal of Washington's approval. Saying this, it is important to emphasize [that] China is pursuing the same goal among the Uyghurs that it has been doing in Tibet. It is trying to turn its Turkmen Uyghurs into ersatz Chinese with second-class status. Also by encouraging massive Han emigration to Xinjiang, the one majority ethnic group is liable to become a minority in its own historical land. Since Uyghurs have their own language and many do not speak Mandarin at all ... they are at an economic and social disadvantage, the more [so] since Beijing's policies favor Chinese. The central government is doing everything to marginalize the Uyghur language, customs and national pride - not to speak of the strong attachment these Turkemenic peoples [have] to Islam. Unlike the Tibetans, some Uyghurs have taken up arms against Beijing; others use the weapons of the oppressed through peaceful demonstrations for civil rights or simply by passive resistance to Beijing's attempt to foist Han values on them. Armed struggle rises out of Beijing's internal colonial policies ... which ignited stifled and repressed Uyghur yearnings for dignity and autonomy, if not independence. And therein lies the problem [because] the troubles in Xinjiang can be laid fair and square at Beijing's door.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 18, '08)


[Re Man at work: Rudd walks Asian tightrope, Apr 17] Australia's prime minister Kevin Rudd is a man hard at work. Tanja Vestergaard's long article says as much. A Mandarin speaker, Rudd is aware that Australia's economic prosperity is found in the deep pockets of cash-rich China. He can speak China's language in its own idiom, and in this sense, he has recognized that Australia has fallen under the long shadow of China. Canberra is an exporter of raw material to China, and as such, this industrialized nation, has assumed the role normally assigned to Third World countries. The Chinese leadership will not demand of Mr Rudd that he perform nine times the traditional kowtow, for it is obvious that former prime minister John Howard and now Rudd have turned Australia into an economic vassals of Beijing. They both steered Australia, willy nilly, into China's sphere of influence.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 17, '08)


The articles you post are as interesting as ever but the accompanying advertising has gone downhill. Formerly, on bringing up your website, I'd find smiling Asian women inviting me to meet them. Now, it's just a list of dry-as-dust items like real estate, how to work at home or whether Scientology's a religion or a cult. Color me disappointed.
Harald Hardrada
Chapel Hill, USA (Apr 17, '08)


Michael T Klare gets is mostly right in The rise of the new energy world order [Apr 17]. However, he's completely mistaken about one important thing: uranium. Uranium is one of the most plentiful elements on Earth and, even with existing technology, it can be extracted economically, and practically indefinitely, from seawater at a price merely 50% above the current market price. Energy capture from uranium is also free of CO2 emissions. There is no need to panic, much less start pre-emptive wars and kill millions of innocent people, over energy. Given proper leadership, we have energy options that are both abundant and readily utilizable.
Francis
Quebec, Canada (Apr 17, '08)


At the conclusion of Mr Noland's article The Greenspan Episode [Apr 17], I was left wondering if, in the interest of all concerned, it would be better if we just pretend that Alan Greenspan is totally innocent of all charges so that he can just leave us alone, once and for all, and stop writing all the op-eds.
Sir Rogers
USA (Apr 17, '08)


Regarding Kent Ewing's China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16], it's really very naive to believe China would "cave in". China is much more vulnerable to the charm weapon. Remember the saying, "Chinese fear the soft, not the hard"? But where in the West can you find charm? It will take decades, if not centuries, to develop. Charm is as alien to the West as slippers to a snake (a pun I copied from of one of your readers; no offense meant). But perhaps [Barack] Obama will help. After all, he was raised in Africa and Asia. The West should strengthen its weak points, not keep on adding fat to its strong points. Honestly.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 17, '08)


After reading all the letters reacting to Kent Ewing's article China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16], I find that the letter from Professor William Cooper shows that he should go back to teaching instead of being retired, as he sounded so "academic". How on earth [could] the international community decide on the choice of the two sites for permanent stadiums? Simply put, the disturbance on the Olympic torch relay has been organized by an unruly segment of the Dalai Lama group and aided by outside forces and propagandized by many Western media outlets. This ridiculous chain of events has gone so far that the positions of the Chinese people and government have only hardened. The latest outburst by a CNN employee on TV is an insult not only to China but also to America as well.
Seung Li (Apr 17, '08)


Re "Crisis? What Crisis?" [Apr 16], in effect, Mr Delasantellis is saying that the American republic is doomed. Why? The short American history presented indicates the failed memory of the electorate, and his parting shot squarely puts the blame on the supposed inattention of the people. So soon after America allowed the taxpayer bailout of the S&Ls and permitted no retribution for most of the benefiting criminals, we are immersed in another fiasco. We allowed it to happen by sitting idly by while the rich fleeced us with the help of an administration that proved its corruption over its first term, but was given another by unenlightened voters (relatively given, anyway, even if you believe stolen elections in Ohio). Not only are we forgetful of the S&L bailout, but we are even lauding the probably-in-the-early-stages-of-dementia president who was on the S&L watch. An informed public is needed to preserve democratic rule. Well, judging from the last three decades, Americans had better start investing in other currencies: the euro, the yen, the yuan, etc.
Jim
Southern California, USA (Apr 16, '08)


I hope there is a web connection in whatever computer heaven is now the home address of my not-so-long-dead mother and sister, so they too have access to Asia Times Online and Rebecca Solnit's Men explain things to me [Apr 16]. There were times when we, a trinity of women, fumed, laughed at the absurdities by some men ... husbands, brothers, casual acquaintances. And, yes, make that both genders; none exempt. Small parable: It's a church basement in the 1950s, somewhere on the plains of North Dakota. Minister CJ calls on the ladies' aid society to volunteer a willing spouse to build a safe box for the church records. No one raises their hand among the corseted, biblically reserved faces. My mother raises her hand. "Thanks for volunteering your husband," the minister responds. "No I will build it." "Heretic" shone like fool's gold in the disdainful eyes of old CJ. But he had no other offers. Mother built a fine cabinet, for her father, a Norwegian carpenter, had taught his girl child a few skills some years before. Amazement and a reluctant, grumpy acknowledgement was old CJ's response when mom delivered the cabinet. We never knew what later filled that fine piece of craftsmanship with its locked cover, but we often wondered at the contents ... church records or dog-eared Playboys?
Beryl K
Gullsgate, Minnesota, USA (Apr 16, '08)


[Re Nepal triggers Himalayan avalanche, Apr 15] Maoist communists in Nepal, who derive their name and inspiration from the Chinese communists, have shown their gurus the way to political power through democratic means. By contrast, the Chinese Maoists have never won an election and rule only by virtue of an armed insurgency that was funded and controlled by foreigners. If they are as convinced as they want us to be that the Chinese people love them and want them to rule then, why do they fear dissent and what have they to lose in multi-party elections? They gained international legitimacy by way of a deal they made with former US president Richard Nixon in 1972, but in their hearts they surely know that they were put in Beijing not by the people of China but by Stalin and the Comintern. It is time for Maoist gurus in China to learn from their students in South Asia.
Cha-am Jamal
Thailand (Apr 16, '08)


Regarding China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16] by Kent Ewing. It's as obvious as the sun in the daytime sky that the whole Olympic torch circus is orchestrated by the US, a country that is currently occupying Iraq after killing at least 1 million civilians and displacing another 5 million as refugees. So, why is the pot calling the kettle black? M K Bhadrakumar in his ATol article of January 23, 2008, US woos a partner over Iran, correctly explained the diplomatic dance whereby the US, by way of [US Deputy Secretary of State John] Negroponte, offered China support for its "core interests" on Taiwan, in exchange for China's support of the United States' "core interests" on Iran (actually a core interest of Israel, which in the end amounts to the same thing). Well, after anteing up on Iran, resulting in an election result favorable to China, the US waited for it's quid pro quo on Iran - but this never came. So to prevent China from having its cake and eating it too, the US is now going to spite China on the Olympics using Tibet as a lever. The torch protests are unlikely to achieve much for the Tibetans. But disrupting the Olympics and embarrassing China after all its preparations for the games will, in the minds of the US leaders, teach China a deserved lesson for breaking its half of the "bargain" - a bargain which probably only ever existed in the imaginations of the leaders of the United States. Tibet and the torch relay are but Act One for the US - the wrath of the lover scorned. Acts Two, Three and Four will assuredly follow.
Francis Chow
Quebec, Canada (Apr 16, '08)


[Re China bunkers down behind its great wall, Apr 16] China will and can admit no wrong in ruling its vast territory. It is fighting back to maintain a modicum of dignity. It is employing the sophisticated techniques of advertising ... It may not be working since the throbbing sore of its brutal occupation of Tibet has rendered its Beijing Summer Olympic slogan "one world, one dream" [to ring] hollow. If world opinion has turned its plans for staging the Games into a nightmare, China has ripped off its cheerful face and shown us its true, authoritarian visage. It has reverted to the wooden language so reminiscent of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, and has reserved in English and other languages the gutter language it usually reserves for its opponents at home and abroad in the national and local press. China has dug in its heels, but the Games will go on if anyone nurtured illusions it wouldn't. Yet the Olympic International Committee [OIC] is not forcing Beijing to live up to its signed and sworn agreement for a loosening of authoritarian restraints when it came to the Games. It isn't the first time the OIC has suffered such a blow. One only has to think of the Berlin Games of 1936 which Hitler used to glorify his 1,000-year Reich. Beijing's hold on Tibet won't weaken, but the rise of Tibetan nationalism is a warning to China that its authority is not universal, nor will it last a thousand years.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 16, '08)


Kent Ewing's China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16] joins a chorus of commentators who wish to excuse China for its actions. It is true that protesters are naive in believing their protests will cause China to change suddenly. But to warn that, "Their rising tide of angry nationalism will last well beyond the Olympics" is absolving China of responsibility. The argument might be similar to a husband who abuses his wife: "don't make me angry because I can't control myself, therefore, it is your fault that I have to beat you" (ie I am not responsible, you made me angry). By warning that protests will only fan the flames of nationalism, isn't Ewing saying the same thing? Why must protests inevitably lead to nationalistic fervor? Why is this a bad thing (unless people are worried that China will do something rash)? Rational thinking argues that individuals are responsible for their actions and can choose how to respond. Why is a nation not held to the same standards? If China is a responsible nation, then it will find an appropriate way to harness its nationalism (leading the medal count in the Olympics, sending more people into space, cashing in some present political capital to explore long-term peaceful solutions to the problems in Tibet and Xinjiang, etc) rather than channeling it towards some sinister end. If, however, China chooses to use the nationalism in a destructive fashion (crushing dissenters with the army, withdrawing into itself and shunning foreigners, stamping out democracy and political reforms), then the fears of the protesters and activists will have been justified and China's rise will be viewed as extremely dangerous. The Chinese Communist Party should not be let off the hook so easily. Creative, enlightened leaders will find a way to respond that strengthens their nation and assuages the fear of foreigners. Great nations are used to being flogged publicly. China has shined a spotlight on itself, hoping that its dirty laundry can be kept in the shadows. The problem is people can still see it, and as humans, once we are told it is forbidden, we immediately desire to know more. I hope Mr Hu [Jintao] will try to show the world it has nothing to fear.
Ken Arok
Vermont, USA (Apr 16, '08)


In reference to Kent Ewing's China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16]: Mr Ewing couldn't hide his joy that the torch relay in London, Paris and San Francisco was violently interrupted by followers of a CIA-backed religious cult mixed with dirty politics. However, Mr Ewing, like CNN anchors, was obviously devastated that the torch relay in Buenos Aires showed people all over the world what the Olympic torch relay should be. Mr Ewing did not know, or pretended not to know, that even in Paris the majority of the people lining the streets were there for the torch, for the Olympic Games. Mr Ewing did not see how the media in these places loved the professional protesters and their handlers while ignoring the crowd cheering for the torch. Mr Ewing did not see how ridiculously CNN anchors guided the reporters on the scene in San Francisco. Anchors: "There is some disturbance. These are anti-Chinese demonstrators." Reporter: "Unfortunately ... As a matter of fact ... these are not protesters ..." The camera immediately moved away from the crowd in search of "peaceful" demonstrators. Mr Ewing cannot understand that China, its government, and more than 1.3 billion Chinese at home and abroad, should have turned out to be the winner and that those like him are actually the pathetic losers. For from now on, you, Mr Ewing, just like CNN, do not have any credibility left in China and among the Chinese people.
JM
Newport, Rhode Island, USA (Apr 16, '08)


[Re China bunkers down behind its great wall, Apr 16] Now that in-your-face Olympic torch bearing has been met with in-your-face protesting, perhaps those who call for future Olympics to be held at fixed neutral sites have a point. By selecting, let's say Seychelles for the Summer Games and Liechtenstein for the Winter Games, nationalistic fervor that so often attends the jockeying for host privileges among competing nations would be dashed. Gone, too, would be bribes of Olympic officials of the sort that accompanied the Salt Lake City Games and strident appeals to nationalistic fervor. While it is not surprising that the Chinese have only hardened in the aftermath of these protests, we might be better able to focus on the substance of improving international cooperation without the distraction of torch bearing gauntlets and their critics. As for the Olympic sponsors, they could perhaps lavish the new host sites with permanent stadiums, Olympic villages, and the like in pristine climates that would welcome star athletes and guests in a celebration of sport with minimal political overtones.
William E Cooper
Professor and president emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 16, '08)


[Re China bunkers down behind its great wall, Apr 16] In an effort to improve its human rights image, China should nullify all of the commercial contracts it signed with French companies during President Nicolas Sarkozy's recent visit. At a time when China is being branded as a human rights violator, the country can ill afford to be further seen as encouraging foreign firms to work with a "rogue" government. Simultaneously, such a decision would also signal to the world that China is now ready to accept and play by the rules of conduct currently governing the international community.
John Chen
USA (Apr 16, '08)


I have always found ATol very informative and of academic significance. However, I feel very sad to see Mr Kent Ewing's China bunkers down behind its great wall [Apr 16] published here. This piece provides the author's subjective, rather than academic and objective, understanding of a country that he proclaims to understand. According the piece, readers will come to the point that it is unfortunate that, Mr Kent Ewing, who claims to be based in China (be it in Hong Kong), have such poor knowledge about China and what is happening in this country. Some words that Ewing uses in his piece like "nightmare", "repressive", "crackdown", and so forth, prove nothing but his subjective views. How can Ewing come to the conclusion that a handful of pro-Dalai Lama supporters are anyhow right, while 1.3 billion Chinese people are wrong? Is this your understanding of democracy? Freedom of speech is a good thing. But it does not mean that one can say anything disregarding the facts, let alone taking the basic responsibility of wishing a peaceful world. Let's not forget that there are so many people living a desperate life in many corners of the world, while [the] situation in China, including Tibet, seems hopeful.
Careful cat (Apr 16, '08)


I wish to thank M K Bhadrakumar for another interesting article, Nepal triggers Himalayan avalanche [Apr 15]. Every article he writes is interesting, informative, and - I think - pretty objective. I hope you're paying him enough ...
Francis
Quebec, Canada (Apr 15, '08)


Regarding your article Nepal triggers Himalayan avalanche [Apr 15], often you know something important is happening when nobody writes about it. Take Nepal, for instance. Hardly any news in the mainstream media, then a flurry of indignant reactions worldwide, following the photographs of brutal Chinese - oops, Nepalese police beating Tibetan monks, then all quiet again. Now I know why, thanks to MK Bhadrakumar. In his deceptively inoffensive way, Mr Bhadrakumar again lays his finger on the sore spot. But I wonder: Why is it all right for Nepalese to beat Tibetan monks? Nobody seems bothered about that. Perhaps China should hire some Ghurkas.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 15, '08)


Spengler argues in Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15] that the only way for Israel to defend itself against Hezbollah and Hamas is to attack their benefactor Syria. However, Spengler fails to mention that Israel could have stopped Syrian support for Hezbollah, and broken the Syrian-Iranian alliance any time it wanted The price for this political windfall is the Golan Heights, or, more precisely, the last 10 feet of the Golan that would give Syria access to the Sea of Galilee. This I do not believe is too high of a price to pay for a great strategic victory. Yet Israel cannot bring itself to make this decision, thus you will get more wars like the one in 2006 where thousands of missiles will rain down on Israel. One reason might be who in Israel owns land in the Golan Heights. Billions of dollars of land probably went to the economic and political elite in Israel or their children and friends. Israel needs to realize that its present policies do not secure the long-term future of Israel. An Israeli attack on Syria will destroy the last shreds on international credibility that the state of Israel possesses, not to mention the billions of dollars such a war will cost. Time for Israel to bite the bullet, and give back the Golan for a comprehensive peace treaty.
Dennis O'Connell
USA (Apr 15, '08)


[Re Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road, Apr 15] Spengler writes, "The only practical way to defeat irregular forces embedded in a civilian population is to destroy the states that back them. That is why America overthrew Saddam Hussein." Who exactly was the irregular force embedded in Iraq's population prior to March 2003?
Shawn O'Neill
USA (Apr 15, '08)


[Re Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road, Apr 15] Why on earth do you keep printing Spengler? He has neither taste nor skill. Your website is one of the best around, only flawed by his presence!
James First (Apr 15, '08)


Hit the road [Apr 15] by Spengler was an interesting atrocity to read, while Spengler also wrote another of his odious articles, Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15].
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 15, '08)


Re Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15] by Spengler. He has come up with one of his sinister, mad and ominous imaginations, "The only practical way to defeat irregular forces embedded in a civilian population is to destroy the states that back them. That is why America overthrew Saddam Hussein, and also why Israel is considering a pre-emptive war on Syria on the model of 1967. America overthrew Saddam to rob Iraq of its oil wealth and destroy its infrastructure [back] to [the] Medieval ages so that it [could be] occupied ... for another 100 years. The ignominy surrounding Israel is that it has not learned from its tragic Biblical and recent history, and goes on committing even worse crimes and atrocities on the innocent and helpless Palestinians. Israel is a violent state that belittles its neighbors and has created the worst of all worlds for them in the Middle East. It has lost its high moral ground by building high walls, barriers, cutting water, electricity and medical supplies of the Palestinians; its Apache helicopters and bombers fire missiles on innocent Palestinians houses and [people] walking on the roads or in the streets, and yet it is portrayed as the victim of aggression. Israel has defied world opinion and [is] a proxy state of US. The irony is that the Zionists believe that they are immune [to] criticism because it [is] their Biblical right promised by their God. The fact of the matter is that the Zionist Israelis do not want peace because if permanent peace is established the Zionist state of Israel will disappear as the Palestinians will outnumbers the Jews in 10 to 15 years. Israel has to talk and negotiate with Hamas and not only to [the] Palestinian Authority to bring some sense to the peace talks. But Israel does not want peace, instead its Zionist leaders want to defeat Islam in Iran and Syria, and [with the] help of [US President] George W Bush to invade Iran.
Jalal Ahmed Rumi
Pakistan (Apr 15, '08)


Spengler's latest tirade Ehud Olmert on the Damascus road [Apr 15], shows once again, how close Spengler is to his favorite perpetrator of false-flag ops, the Israeli Mossad. Spengler proclaims that "Hamas and Hezbollah would represent no threat to Israel without the backing of Syria and Iran". Maybe Spengler should look at both sides of this equation and add that Israel would be no threat to [the Middle East], if not world peace, without the blind loyalty and unconditional backing of the US. Take away that component and Israel might have to actually look at a prospect that they shun: a word that begins with the letter "P". What is the 'P" word that sends Zionists and Likudnuts everywhere into a hysterical rage? The "P" word is peace.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Missouri, USA (Apr 15, '08)


The comments from DC [letters, Apr 14] who criticizes ATol as another outlet of Chinese propaganda illustrates the frustration many Chinese people, especially those in Western countries, feel when expressing opinions contrary to sympathizers of the Free Tibet movement, many of whom are Westerners. There is a general perception in the Western world that any such comments are interpreted as "pro-Chinese" and therefore directives from the CCP [Chinese Communist Party]. The divisive and Bushistic zero-sum mentality inevitably destroys any goodwill for continual constructive discussions. They overlook the fact that the Chinese people, though repressed as they are, have genuine opinions of their own and see the unfolding complicated issues from perspectives that are equally, if not more, credible than those held by the pro-Tibet camps. Many Chinese people confess to "love the country, but not the party". They realize, behind the facade of economic development, the multitude of problems affecting their country and the limitations of the present political system. Overseas Chinese have the advantage of having lived in China, have first-hand understanding of the workings of the Chinese government and society, and are informed of the country's history. Most Westerners have never been to China, consumed news purely from Western media outlets, and tended to dismiss, as a general rule, any information coming out of the Chinese press and blogsites. Though justly proud of their freedom, Westerners need to realize that differing opinions are bound to exist in this world as they are formed by people living under varying sets of circumstances. Though Chinese views may be biased to some degree, but so are Western views, and just as certainly, those from the Tibetans. The Chinese would appreciate if their views and opinions are equally respected. To dismiss us as mindless people who merely "follow the party line" is simply a gross insult to us all.
Tom
Australia (Apr 15, '08)


[Re Deadly struggle for migrants in Thailand, Apr 15] There was an incident in Ranong, Thailand, in which a human trafficking event went horribly wrong and resulted in the death of 54 migrants from [Myanmar]. Thereafter, a Myanmar official from Bangkok traveled to Ranong to commiserate with the survivors. This outward show of sympathy comes from a government that is not willing to repatriate its citizens who have been arrested for illegal entry into Thailand and a government whose misrule and mismanagement has so devastated what used to be the richest country in Southeast Asia that its citizens are now forced to flee their home at great risk to life and limb to find work in countries where [the] government is competent. Whatever the proximate causes for the misery of Burmese migrant workers in Thailand, ultimately it is the junta that must be held liable and accountable. Their misrule is a crime against humanity.
Cha-am Jamal
Thailand (Apr 15, '08)


[Re Bush, Lee and that North Korea problem, Apr 15] Dr Song-Yong Lee has written a thoughtful article with recommendations. He may very well learn, if he has not already, that the US's chief negotiator, Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill, has announced conditions in dealing with North Korea that soften Washington's demands on Pyongyang's giving a full accounting for its nuclear arsenal and stockpile of enriched uranium. South Korea's president Lee Myung-bak might be bewildered by Mr Hill's announcement as he prepares his journey to meet President George W Bush at Camp David. But it is too early to tell. One thing is sure: Washington is anxious to get a deal with Pyongyang before Mr Bush finishes his last year in office. Call it face saving, if you will. Mr Lee has taken a hard tack with Kim Jong-il. Will he again find that he has embarked on a lonely road, as he did when as a student activist he opposed Seoul's accommodation with its former colonial ruler Japan, "a move strongly endorsed by the US"? If Mr Bush is now endorsing further accommodation with Kim Jong-il as a junior partner of the US, Mr Lee has a very circumscribed field of action. Mr Bush has not-so-gently pulled the welcoming rug from under Mr Lee as he arrives in Washington.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 15, '08)


Thanks to Pepe Escobar for debunking the pronouncements of Senators Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman, [Evil Iran, the new al-Qaeda, Apr 10]. If they were not influential US senators, their comments would be laughable. Any observer of the Middle East knows it was only a matter of time before the George W Bush administration, its neo-con cronies and other hangers-on (like the good senators) would further demonize Iran by blaming it for all of America's ills in Iraq. They are hoping the American people have forgotten the sorry spectacle of the last five years: an occupation of massive folly aided and abetted by the two senators; more than 4,000 brave American service personnel killed; countless Iraqi civilians and military dead; Iraq on the verge of being a failed state and an occupation costing over $2 trillion and counting ($12 billion a month) contributing to America's economic malaise. Iran has not been responsible for any of that as the Bush/Dick Cheney, neo-con, Graham/Lieberman axis would like us to believe. Iran showed how it can play a positive role in calming Iraqi violence by brokering the recent ceasefire in Basra. The question Senators Graham/Lieberman should have asked US ambassador Crocker and General David Petraeus is why the US did not, or could not, do that. Everyone knows the Bush administration and its apologists are further and further divorced from the truth. The irrefutable facts are that Iran not only has a relationship of cooperation with the government of Iraq, but it also enjoys close relationships with all so-called Shi'ite factions. These are relationships, developed over hundreds of years. No amount of Pollyannaish statements by Bush and his cohorts about Iraq which deify belief and insult our common sense will change reality on the ground, nor will evidence-free charges that Iran's backing of "special groups" is the reason for US difficulties. If the occupation is to end, the Bush administration and its allies must get real and start talking with Iran.
Fariborz S Fatemi
Former staff member
House Foreign Affairs Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
McLean, Virginia, USA (Apr 14, '08)


[Re US edges closer to engaging Iran, Apr 12] M K Bhadrakumar never misses a trick. He is a close reader of events in Western and Central Asia. The US, however, has been edging closer to engaging Iran indirectly and now perhaps directly for the past 29 years. At times through surrogates like Saddam Hussein during the murderous Iran-Iraq war, or through backdoor dealings as former president Ronald Reagan did during the Iran Contra scandal or through veiled threats of former president [George H W] Bush. On the other hand, Iran is cautious in dealing with the US; it has foiled President [George W] Bush's plans by playing America's European allies against the US in how best to deal with Iran's nuclear development; it has steadied the hand of its Shi'ite allies in Lebanon and Iraq. Iran has been able to bell the American cat not so much out of cleverness but by its ability to profit from Bush's sorry record of war and attempted imperial peace in Iraq and Palestine, and its complete misreading of western Asia history.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 14, '08)


The article ... China Hand [Euro mantra undermines sanctions, Apr 12] made fascinating reading. ... Most useful information for those trying to understand what exactly the warmongers and cheats of Washington have in their sleeves. It's fundamental essays like these that make ATol such a valuable analyses hub. In Switzerland, financiers have known pretty well that the last decades have been an incessant war of imperial dominance by the US, with the favorite tool being financial domination. It is cheap, and very efficient. What is most worrying is that this war becomes more and more intense by the year, and that this new mammoth entity that is the European Union is more and more copying the imperial bad manners of the US. It will be harder and harder to be a small and free country.
Dr G Bittar
Switzerland (Apr 14, '08)


China Hand [Euro mantra undermines sanctions, Apr 12] refers to "unanimous desire of American political parties and candidates to be tough on Iran" as though he understands what is happening in the US. The Republicrats and Demicans are not the only parties in the US. Please do not ascribe their long-term foreign relations stupidity to the rest of us. There are political parties and candidates that have not bought into the empire-building nonsense and economy-ruining activities.
Tom Gerber (Apr 14, '08)


Normally, I am a compassionate Christian, however, after [Spengler's] recent article [Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] that said Union General Sherman should have finished his job burning the South, which equates to killing all Southerners. Wouldn't that be akin to Asian war crimes like the Baatan Death March, starving, beating and beheading of allied POWs during World War II, etc. Yet the same US military that crushed Asian forces was made up by a large percentage of Southern men. Perhaps, it is we who should be saying Douglas McArthur and General LeMay should have finished their job of turning the Far East into a nuclear cinder since you wished total death and destruction upon the people of the old Confederate states. If you want some more of what we gave you last time just keep maintaining that arrogant, ignorant and ... smart mouth.
Billy E Price (Apr 14, '08)


The article on the destruction of the [South] by the war criminal [Union General William Tecumseh] Sherman [Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] is like saying the Japanese should have completed their China policy during World War II.
Farrell Dutton (Apr 14, '08)


[Re Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8 ] Ignoring Spengler's comic-book understanding of the US war between the States, I have questions about the following:
Americans need a higher threshold for horror. Tragedies sometimes must play themselves out, and the losers must be allowed to lose. Whole peoples can go bad, and sometimes it is necessary to prevent them from doing evil by winnowing their ranks.
As a self-confessed advocate of state-sponsored collective punishment, ethnic cleansing and genocide, what positive aspects does Spengler attribute to Hitler's "winnowing" of gypsies, trade unionists and Jews? Does Spengler see any difference between Hitler's lebensraum and Israel's approach to the Palestinians?
Jeb
Norway (Apr 14, '08)


Given the recent media hype on India-Africa summit, it is very easy to forget the relative positions of India and China in the area of FDI [Foreign Direct Investment] as Siddharth Srivastava seems to have done in India loads up presents for African safari [Apr 11]. According to a report from UNCTAD, the relative sizes of the stock of FDI to Africa, from China and India in 2004 were $49.2 million and $1.9 billion respectively. Also, it seems that relative to the Chinese, the India FDI is more focused towards manufacturing and tertiary sector [development] as opposed to the primary (extractive) sector.
TutuG
Scotland (Apr 14, '08)


Tibet a defining issue for China by Francesco Sisci [Apr 10] truly defines the grudge of some Western countries against the justification of "territory". One wonders why so many countries in Asia, Africa, Eastern Europe and South America do not join in the chorus as these are mostly the countries which suffered under Western imperialism and know their true motive in promoting Tibetan independence. Government policy aside, many Western media outlets have shown how biased they have become while championing freedom of the press. An unintended result is that they have successfully rallied the Chinese - and also overseas Chinese - to support Beijing. It is better for China not to have unfriendly guests at the Olympics when these guests naively think their presence is important ...
Seung Li (Apr 14, '08)


Sorry if I'm late in commenting on this, but I finally managed to struggle through the bizarre and convoluted arguments of Francesco Sisci's Tibet a defining issue for China [Apr 10] - and this man is [the Asia] editor of La Stampa! Did any reader actually understand what he was trying to say? Let me see: first, he tried to give a history of China and Tibet, something even he considered extremely murky (Mr Sisci, you are definitely not cut out to be a historian); then he tried to explain why China was trying to rationalize or had to justify its control over Tibet before the world (Mr Sisci, do you think you succeeded in your explanations?); and then went around some bizarre comparison of China with "Europe the Wonderful" and "America the Good" (Mr Sisci, are you delusional?). And somewhere in there was a rather abstract discussion of religion that we should pass by our friends in the Spengler collective. In contrast to Mr Sisci's bit of nuttiness, I've really appreciated the many fine articles on the global financial problems recently published in Asia Times Online. Keep up the good work.
Jonathan
UK (Apr 14, '08)


A question to the author of Tibet a defining issue for China [Apr 10] ", Francesco Sisci. As the author said:
These stories about Rome's enemies and its shortcomings did not belittle Rome. Instead, they made it even bigger: it was an empire that managed to overcome and triumph over great difficulties and setbacks. In a way, the same tradition is preserved in present American journalism and contemporary history, where writers go to great lengths to detail American problems and to ultimately show the triumph of the "good American empire". This history is more convincing, especially in a culturally permeable world, because it does not rule out competing visions, and therefore it sounds real. Furthermore, with the final Roman victory, it proves the ultimate greatness of Rome because it was able to overcome all its troubles. The same did not happen in China, where the official history covers all but convinces few ...
I want to know, in the author's mind, how convincing are those Western historians' research on China history? Remember, they are all using the unconvincing Chinese emperors' history to do their research!
Min Du (Apr 14, '08)


Until recent centuries, China has been the hegemon of Asia. Since World War II, China has been speaking out against alleged US hegemony and alleged US attempts to "contain" China. How could the US possibly "contain" China unless China were intent on expanding its territory? In China's Pacific strategy unfurls [Apr 10], Zhang Guihong all but admits to China's expansionist plans, as expressed by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao. Although the Pentagon complains about a lack of a legitimate articulated reason for China's aggressive military buildup, it is clear to all who wish to see that China is attempting to make preparations to be the hegemon of Asia, and in the process reducing Japan, Korea and Southeast Asia to vassal states. Or at least that is what the Chinese government is hoping will happen.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (Apr 14, '08)


As an overseas Taiwanese I praise Stephen A Nelson's article Devils and angels in Taiwan. Ma Ying-jeou's KMT [Kuomintang party] with big help [from] the People's Republic of China, and perhaps many short-sighted Taiwanese and America's George W Bush administration as well, have defeated [the Democratic Progressive Party] overwhelmingly in Taiwan. Taiwan's political troubles are comparable with those of Ukraine and Estonia, which have to deal with a big "race" problem. While in Taiwan last March during the presidential election, I encountered a China-born "Taiwanese" citizen who proclaimed, "China has so many people, what's wrong [with] killing some Tibetans?"
Tan Lim
Canada (Apr 14, '08)


It is obvious your news agency is just another propaganda machine for the Chinese government. What your agency is conducting is brainwashing via proxy. Your news agency will never pass as a legitimate news organization when you continue to categorize Taiwan as Greater China. Educated readers will see through the ulterior motives. Stick with what you guys know and go back and print the little red pamphlets.
DC (Apr 14, '08)


Wouldn't it be cool to compare the lies [and] promises about Vietnam that came out of president [Lyndon] Johnson's and General [William] Westmoreland's mouths in the 1960s with the current parallel falsehoods from [George W] Bush and [General David] Petraeus? From the manufactured Gulf of Tonkin incident (now Saddam's WMDs) to the multiple massive 1960s troop buildups (now the Iraq "surge"), Vietnam seems to have provided this idiot Bush with a blueprint for eventual American defeat. He and his stooge general parrot almost verbatim the Vietnam lies, so that for people of my generation, it's like deja vu all over again. But I hold no hope that the compromised American media can undertake such an exercise in historical comparison. Nowadays, that sort of news coverage seems to be the exclusive bailiwick of the only real journalists left in this corporate-controlled country, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert on Comedy Central.
Hardy Campbell
Houston, Texas (Apr 11, '08)


In US sanctions send Iran into Asia's arms [Apr11], China Hand writes a very accurate and informative article on how the UN Security Council's newest sanctions regime against Iran "backfires" against the long range economic interests of the US. He left out perhaps the most important factor that motivated Iran's allies, China and Russia, to go along with the latest round of sanctions: the sanctions put the George W Bush administration in a much more compromised position vis-a-vis carrying out a bombing attack against Iran before the end of President Bush's term in office. Had the Security Council -plus-one not agreed to this escalation in sanctions (and no doubt Iran's former number one trading partner Germany considered it to be a bitter pill to swallow) there would have been a much higher probability of US attack on Iran. The last two days of testimony from General Petreaus and US ambassador Crocker to US congressional committees in which they devoted much time to demonizing Iran and their "unhelpful" role in Iraq, may be based on the administration's belated recognition that the additional UN sanctions make it harder to make the case for war against Iran. The Security Council-plus-one, like everyone else, are just trying to get to the end of Bush's disastrous presidency without another disastrous war.
David Sheegog
Paoli, Oklahoma, USA (Apr 11, '08)


First of all, I want to confirm the observation of your reader, Orace River: "I believe it [Asia Times Online] represents a standard of journalism which Western media and press were once capable of but which has long since disappeared ..." ATol indeed is often peevish, petty, sulky, truculent, bigot[ed], and a lot more of the like, but it at least still has some respect for its readers, even in the writings of your favored court jester, Spengler. Regarding Tibet and the Olympic Games, what strikes me most is the placid attitude of the United States, as compared with the revanchist ravings of Sarkozy. I would have expected the opposite. Can any of your writers shed some light on this? Thank you.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 11, '08)


A minor point of order regarding Spengler's latest, Horror and Humiliation in Chicago [Apr 8]. Folks in the 'hood have moved on! 50 [Cent] is "ol' skool", check out T-Pain and Lil Wayne!
Sir Rogers
USA (Apr 11, '08)


With reference to the article Horror and humiliation in Chicago [Apr 8], by our infamous Spengler, I would like to offer a different perspective and perhaps the point Spengler was making. Not that I am a fan of Spengler, mind you, but he does provide for some entertainment particularly when readers jump up and down. I do remember a similar article somewhere else about war in general. While noting Clauswitz's contention about war being an extension of politics, we need to look at a very familiar scenario in the form of WWII. There was no attempt to seek a political solution but instead the objective was to annihilate the enemy, pound it to dust and totally destroy all will to resist. This was carried through "carpet" bombing of cities in Germany for example. There was no attempt to disguise the wholesale killing of citizens and the Allies took great casualties to carry out this strategy. Japan would have suffered the same fate if US didn't have the Atomic bomb. The result was that in the end when Germany fell, there was no more will to resist. I think that perhaps the point is that war is a very serious thing. You go in to win and to destroy the enemy completely. Half measures such as human rights, reducing collateral damage will end up with a situation like Iraq now. Not that I am advocating doing that to Iraq. What I am saying is you cant be naive and have a "noble" or "clean" war. Bush tried to sell that to the American public and found himself in a trap of his own making.
Scarlet Pimple
Malaysia (Apr 11, '08)


I have read nothing but biased views in Mr Francesco Sisci's seemingly "comprehensive" overview of Tibet in Tibet a defining issue for China, Apr 11. Nothing fresh, indeed. You can read a lot of this kind from the Western media, in particular in these days. According to Mr Sisci's theory, whites should return North America to the Indians, and Australia to the old tribes. Come on, the violence happened in Tibet can be called an "uprising", and rioters in Los Angles and Paris only deserve batons and bullets. Be quiet, let's forget about Iraq and Afghanistan. People there deserve ignorance, or nothing. What is history? The unearthed bones tell us that history means that human beings all come from East Africa; all the other places should have belonged to animals and insects. Fortunately, at the end of the article, the danger seems to have been acknowledged: we don't need too many small states! My question for the author is: how can you judge that China's governance is totally worthless? Do you know when the Dalai Lama was in Tibet, he and his deputies kept slaves, which violated the basics of human rights?
Andrew Yong
Lhasa, China (Apr 11, '08)


[Re Tibet a defining issue for China, Apr 11.] Thanks should go to Francesco Sisci for offering a more common-sensical analysis of the Tibet issue. On the other hand, I’m not so convinced that the recent turmoil is as fateful and defining as the author makes it out to be, not when only a tiny group of people, whose motives behind the uprising may not be all that noble and irreproachable, is involved. The well-orchestrated riots, while arousing much hue and cry at the moment, likely will be a distant memory after the Olympics. Anyone who thinks the protests will cause Beijing consternation is sadly mistaken. If anything, I believe Chinese President Hu Jintao owes the schemers of the riots much gratitude for creating a godsent opportunity to rally the 1.3 billion Chinese people behind the country’s leadership. As for those who harbor illusion in the high ideal of equal representation for all, they just might want to wake up from their woolgathering and smell the roses. The American Indians and the Australian Aborigines have been screaming bloody murder for well over a century; somehow I don’t think they’re going to get their land back anytime soon, or ever. Yet history marches on.
John Chen
USA (Apr 11, '08)


[Re Tibet a defining issue for China, Apr 11] Gaining independence per se is neither necessary nor sufficient to providing good government, whether in Tibet or Zimbabwe. In whatever form, good government for Tibet should encourage rather than bridle the freedoms of religion and speech, demonstrating respect for Tibetan and Han citizens alike. Only if the Chinese government celebrates and fosters its minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang will it avoid more protests, more unrest, more calls for independence.
William E Cooper
Professor and President Emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 11, '08)


Stephen A Nelson's article, Devils and angels in Taiwan [Apr 11] reeks of one-sided bias in the guise of a balanced article. To say that Ma Ying-jeou is a "chameleon on a weather vane" is to dismiss the 58% of Taiwan voters who support Ma's message of reconciliation and peace. Perhaps Nelson would like to continue to support the DPP's pattern of corruption, intimidation, and race-baiting for the past eight years? And to say that Taiwan "saved" Chiang? If that is not the most biased comment I've ever heard, even for a deep-green DPP that is pretty ignorant. Taiwan saved Chiang as much as Chiang saved Taiwan. Would the US 7th Fleet have even arrived if Chiang wasn't on Taiwan? You would be a fool to believe that the US would have defended Taiwan if Chiang had decided to flee to Hainan Island instead. Chiang defended the island against the inevitable communist invasion, that is a fact no one can dispute. Chiang has many faults, and no one can deny that he was effectively a dictator. But please, let's get some perspective and balance in your articles.
Garrett Lu (Apr 11, '08)


[Re Devils and angels in Taiwan, Apr 11] Although bruited as "informal", President Lee Myung-bak will be welcomed next week in Washington by President George W Bush with much fanfare. It is not everyday that Bush, who is in the last year of his presidency, finds a soul mate in foreign policy, especially when it comes to dealing with North Korea. Relations between Bush and the last two presidents of South Korea have not been as friendly and relaxed as the US had wanted; with Lee, chances are very good that the old spirit of camaraderie between South Korea and the US will be rekindled with the old warmth. Discussions, however, will not be circumscribed to issues with Pyongyang, they will encompass loosening the central government's hold on the economy which corporate America feels are too state-directed and out of step with globalization. Lee is a believer in privatization and freer trade, but that might prove difficult since Lee's party - the GNP - has a fragile hold on parliament. And Lee is a man that Bush can do business with, it goes without saying. Even though South Korean voters put Roh Moo-hyung's party in the minority, anyone surfing the website of today's New York Times will find an interesting article. It seems that ex-president Roh's home has become a star for South Koreans who flock to his home for a glimpse of the man. This should tell us something about the ambivalent behavior of the South Korea electorate and might be a warning to Lee that he has to go softly in carrying out bold economic reforms which might earn him popular ill will.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 11, '08)


Kudos to Chan Akya [ Asia must rally behind China, Apr 10] for calling for Asia to flex its muscles and throw off modern US/European imperialism. Sadly, Mr Akya's ideas about economics are the same as those dominant in the US and Europe, and a shift of power to Asia as he imagines would keep these same ideas in power. Such a power shift from neo-liberal West to neo-liberal East would be one merely of bodies, not minds. Unless, of course, what Asia does with the world's economic reins in its hands is markedly different from what Western capitalists have been doing. Otherwise, if the cat catches mice the same way, what does its color matter?
Josephus P Franks (Apr 10, '08)


I do not understand why Asia Times Online continues to provide a forum for the bigoted rubbish produced by Spengler. His April 8 anti-Southern diatribe Horror and humiliation in Chicago is nothing less than a regurgitation of the vilest Yankee propaganda. The victors of any conflict have an opportunity to rewrite history, justify their actions however heinous, and force their version of events upon those they've conquered. What continues to rile individuals like Spengler is that the people of Dixie refuse to accept the lies and falsehoods about our people and history. The War for Southern Liberation was not about slavery, or "keeping the black man down". My ancestors and 70 to 80% of the families in the South were not slave holders. They chose to secede and resisted the invading armies of the North because they knew what freedom was. Secession is America's oldest tradition, and liberty from English tyrants was won in the South. When oppressed by the new tyrants in Washington DC, they exercised their rights to secede. It would be nice if pious propagandists like Spengler would open their eyes and see where racial bigotry originated. No slave ship ever flew a Confederate flag, but countless ships sailed under the "stars and stripes" out of Northern ports. One could spend weeks refuting the nonsense Spengler has written with facts, but it will be simpler if Asia Times Online cut ties with this so-called columnist.
Richard Thomas
California (Apr 10, '08)


[Re The Black Death of financial collapse, Apr 10] Well, at least there is one man who understands that any commodities-based economy which manages to end up with the world's fifth largest current account deficit right on top (or close to it) of the commodities pricing cycle, has got to be a basket case of monumental proportions. If Australia is unable to balance its external ledger in the most favorable conditions, what's going to happen to its currency and its standard of living when prices for most [of] its exports start heading down under (pun intended). One has to wonder if [the] Australian government considers wishful thinking a viable substitute for hard competence, or if it simply assumes that since this "Titanic" has no lifeboats, it might as well sink to the bottom playing a piano.
Oleg Beliakovich
Seattle (Apr 10, '08)


I wish to compliment you on the quality of reporting and excellent articles in your paper. I believe it represents a standard of journalism which Western media and press were once capable of but which has long since disappeared in political timidity and economic greed. Keep up the good work.
Orace River (Apr 10, '08)


Regarding the article Why Beijing just can't grasp Tibet there is symbolism in all these protests against China for wherever the Olympic torch is brought. The torch which once represented a democratic culture (the ancient Greeks) now has taken on an avatar of worldwide protests towards China's handling of Tibet. This should have taken place back when China annexed Tibet, destroying six thousand monasteries, butchering monks and civilians, raping Buddhist nuns, etc, along with a lot of Tibet's written religious culture. What did the UN do roughly at the time China annexed Tibet? The UN gave China the coveted Security Council seat. The form of Buddhism that Tibet follows is unique to Tibet. The Vajrayana school of Buddhism that the Tibetans practice is a very "heady" form of Buddhism where the Hindu Tantric system is incorporated into the school of Vajrayana. These protests may not change any ground realities regarding China and Tibet but it is gratifying that the (Olympic) torch flame is blazing the trail of world protests right to Beijing. Better late than never. Chrysantha Wijeyasingha
Clinton, USA (Apr 10, '08)


Mr [Sami] Moubayed 's latest [War and peace, Israeli style, Apr 10] is a taunting and possibly unintended participant in sending untruthful signals to all the intelligence agencies in the Middle East long accustomed to a danse macabre which the actors in that part of the world have been engaged in for several millennia. What with reports in the media that the AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] is splintering [into] offshoots in Washington DC, the need to de-accentuate the disastrous cakewalk into Iraq and the reported impending visit to Syria within the next two weeks by former president Jimmy Carter with the promised intent to meet with a member of the Hamas leadership, and the reported publication by the Israeli Defense Forces that the Israeli airstrikes in Syria were intended to destroy WMDs that Saddam Hussein had sent to Syria before the neo-cons' shock and awe that is over five years old and still has no success. It's becoming clear that dancing in the Middle East is heating up again due to the emergence of conflicting and parallel styles. Mr Moubayed does know his Middle East well.
Armand De Laurell (Apr 10, '08)


I refer to the Evil Iran, the new al-Qaeda by Pepe Escobar on April 10. Despite massive opposition within America against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, [Senator Joe] Lieberman and his co-religionists are pushing for wars in the Middle East to be fought on behalf of Israel by Americans and Europeans. The degree of hatred shown by Lieberman and the neo-cons against the Muslims has no historical precedence. All kinds of propaganda tools are being used to demonize Muslims and Islam and to cover up Israeli crimes against Muslims. This hatred and the lies against Muslims and Islam are becoming apparent to all the people around the world and the world is tiring of the Zionist lies ... The economic and financial problems in America and Europe are making people aware that they have been used as cannon fodder for Zionist self-interest ... Many Jews have themselves realized that the ... Israel lobby is breeding anti-semitism. Should [Senator John] McCain get elected as US president, it will be the best thing that can happen, as this will convince even the doubters that the wars indeed are being fought for Israel. Conspiracy theories will no longer be theories but will become visible for all to see.
Vincent Maadi
Cape Town, South Africa (Apr 10, '08)


Thankfully, there are sites like ATol and journalists like Pepe Escobar who gives us the real "straight talk" in his article Evil Iran, the new al-Qaeda [Apr 10]. Truth, these days, is a vital commodity, which must be why those "fair and balanced" and "best in the business" news sites use so little of that precious stuff. This whole month will be one long "dog and pony" show, to show those uniformed masses around the world that the "surge" is working, Iraq is a success and hey, by the way, since we're already in the neighborhood, let's turn Iran into another American success story. The last time General Petraeus did his best PT Barnum imitation was last September. Back then, [Petraeus] warned us of the dreaded "Lebanese Hezbollah Department 2800", which according to the general, was responsible for damned near every evil in the Middle East. Good story, except that it was a concoction of the Bush/Cheney Junta to try and gin-up another war fought against another of Israel's "existential" enemies, Iran. There wasn't then, and there isn't now, any Deptartment 2800, unless one goes to the mall and shops at a large box store. Watching part of the current hearings damned near made me nauseous. The amount of gushing and fulsome praise heaped on Petraeus by the craven and immoral cowards in the US Congress must make the rest of the world wonder if not only McCain has dementia, but if the whole country doesn't belong in some padded room, restrained to prevent us Americans from harming ourselves.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Missouri, USA (Apr 10, '08)


What’s up with the 600-plus points that the Dow has gained since Bear Stearns' demise? Are investors oblivious to the string of bad news emanating from global financial markets and to the rickety underpinnings of the US economy? The answer, alarmingly, may be found in R M Cutler’s latest report The East, no the West, is (in the) red [Apr 5], in which he observed, "Market sentiment interpreted the Swiss bank UBS's writedown of US$19 billion, connected with the unfolding subprime debacle, as a sign of the beginning of the end rather than as a glimpse of the iceberg beyond the tip." Yikes! This when the end of the subprime mess, not to mention that of the much larger credit crisis, is nowhere in sight? Double yikes!! Makes you rather feel like watching a fantasy thriller titled "Irrational Exuberance: Episode II - the Ignoramus Menace," except the outcome will be all too real and none too thrilling. But I suppose when investors behold every economic report put out by the Fed as though it were the Book of Truth, fools rush in.
John Chen
USA (Apr 9, '08)


Regarding Horror and humiliation in Chicago, Apr 8, by Spengler, I have never read as much rubbish as regards to the people of Dixie in my life. Does this person ... not realize that, like many people throughout this world, they fought for hearth and home? There were very few slave owners among the ordinary people, their fight was with those who invaded their homeland. This, I would suggest, is what many other people have done for centuries. If [Union General William Tecumseh] Sherman was alive today, he would be hauled in front of the courts of human rights. He would be condemned as a war criminal. His actions were more akin to Attila than a general of an army. Consider the behavior of men like [Confederate General Robert E] Lee and [General Stonewall] Jackson, beside this butcher. The Ulster-Scots/Scotch-Irish people have always had to fight their corner, and still are to this dhttp://huahinmetalblending.com/ay. We will continue to do so wherever the flame of freedom is threatened. We will never surrender to tyranny. And that's what Sherman was - a tyrant.
Rab (Apr 9, '08)


I wish to thank writer Wu Zhong for the article Courts withdraw verdict on ATM bandit and for the insight that public opinion in China can influence [the] outcomes of cases. What Wu Zhong does not point out to us, however, is that dishonesty seems to be the rule rather than the exception in today's China, as a consequence of the Cultural Revolution destroying the integrity and moral character which existed in pre-Cultural Revolution Chinese society. Today, dishonesty, corruption and scams are more common in China than even in Africa. The recent case of Chinese businessmen selling brown cows painted black and white with silicone injected into their udders in order to obtain a higher sale price from prospective dairy farmers in inner Mongolia is just one of many thousands of examples of the cancer metastasizing across the Chinese moral character.
Daniel McCarthy
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (Apr 9, '08)


In regards to your anti-Confederate article Horror and humiliation and Chicago [Apr 8], the author Spengler says "the only thing to regret is that Sherman didn't finish the job". OK ... The only regret I have is that the Japanese Imperial Army didn't "finish the job" in mainland China and Hong Kong! How do you like that?
William Potter
ScotWatch International (Apr 8, '08)


Re Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8] Spengler asserts that 80-90% of Confederate soldiers that did not own slaves had aspirations of so doing - [and] therefore that was their prime motivation for fighting. Ludicrous. Most of the soldiers were of Scotch-Irish ancestry from Appalachia, an area hardly conducive to slave labor agriculture. Is Spengler absent the feelings of most people concerning the love of a land and its people? He must be a true cosmopolitan without roots of any kind.
Rick Johnson


Re Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8] Thank you, Spengler, with your sharp insights and wit that is totally based on reality and a keen, sharp, eye which refuses to be as delusional as everyone else on the Asia Times Online staff. Your writings are never flavored, spiced, or overcooked - just the truth! Thank you,again!
Joseph Giramma (Apr 8, '08)


From Spengler's essay Horror and humiliation and Chicago, Apr 8:
"Southerners thought of themselves as an oppressed people, the descendants of Scots-Irish immigrants driven out of their Celtic homelands by the English, flying the X-shaped cross of Scotland's patron saint in the Confederate battle flag, redolent of Scotland's "Lost Cause". The self-pity of the South pervades American popular culture, from Margaret Mitchell's Gone with the Wind, to The Band's bathetic song, The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down. It is best known in the cover version by Joan Baez, an old civil rights campaigner. Such is the pull of identity politics."
With good reason, the descendants of Scots villagers expelled from the Highlands after the rebellion of 1746 may have thought themselves oppressed. Spengler seems to be under the false impression that the Scots-Irish had some connection to the Highland clearances. In fact the Scots-Irish are better known today as northern Irish protestants. In their ancestral country far from being victims of disposition they were beneficiaries from the disposition of the O'Neill clan from its lands. They have a history of ascendency over the Gaelic Catholics enforced by violence. The alleged penchant of their hillbilly (hill-Billy originally referred to their immigrant forbears' hero veneration of King Billy [William] of Orange) American progeny for aspiring to own slaves as well as plantation land may have more to do with that than the fictional victimhood Spengler alleges their immigrant ancestors suffered.
PygmyPossum (Apr 8, '08)


[In] Liquidation is only solution to crisis [Apr 8], Doug Noland hit the nail right on the head - the Federal Reserve is essentially trying to cover up the simmering flames of a financial disaster with paper. Unfortunately, as The Mogambo Guru pointed out [A crude source of welfare, Apr 8], the more paper money Fed chairman Ben Bernanke throws into the fire, the more calamitous the ensuing conflagration will be. To be fair, Mr Bernanke is really faced with a Hobson’s choice. His fervent belief in fighting fire with fire notwithstanding (or excessive liquidity with even more liquidity), his boss in the White House simply would not allow him to voluntarily let a gut-wrenching market correction set in even if the Fed chief so desired, not in the crepuscular hours of the president’s expiring term. In accepting broader power and latitude from President Bush to combat the economic crisis, however, Mr Bernanke is giving himself every opportunity to shoulder the large amount of blame and vituperation sure to be directed his way when the financial-market house of cards does eventually collapse.
John Chen
USA (Apr 8, '08)


With reference to Mr Zinn's excellent article What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr 4], I find myself not only in total agreement with his truth which few Americans can handle (witness the reactionary responses) but heartened by his patriotism. It is true Americans like Mr Zinn that offer hope to a country betrayed by its militaristic, imperialist warmongering "patriots". Yes, the O'Connells will foam at the mouth and call him nasty names but at the end of the day they have nothing else to argue with except the same tired lies and distortions. They will accuse him of "hating" America in the same way Jesus was accused of "hating" Judaism. The modern Pharisees in America are many, and they all defend the bloodthirsty status quo with the flag wrapped around their hypocrisy. These same pseudo-Americans believe fervently in the myths of conservative compassion, Islamic Terror, the 9-11 "attacks" and those abundant WMDs. I believe in America because of people like Mr Zinn. I pray for America when I read letters from the likes of O'Connell.
Hardy Campbell (Apr 8, '08)


Criticism of Howard Zinn's article What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr 4], is fair when it addresses the simple black and white way he goes about framing his arguments, but not on the substance. The Roman Empire is the foundation of Western civilization, and they did bring law and order and prosperity to a wide swath of the ancient world, but they were still an empire that got things done by bopping people over the head. It is strange how it's the wacky leftist conspiracy nut jobs who say that the same things have always motivated people to go to war since the beginning of recorded history, while the rationalists and "rightheaded" ones are those who say the US is an anomaly, a strange blip on the radar screen of everything we know about human behavior. The US as benevolent caregiver of the world is the wacky conspiracy theory. The reason things look a little different this time around is that the US has perfected the methodology of empire the British started with India, where a few thousand troops held a country of hundreds of millions - by setting up a system where people basically oppress themselves. We don't need to seize the oil wells in Kuwait because we get everything we want from them. We don't need to militarily conquer Western Europe as the Soviets did in the east for the same reason. The American Empire is a bit more carrot than stick. We let them do as they please as long as they do what we please. But we do see the results of what happens when we are denied quite clearly in Iraq, Vietnam, Panama, etc. The other side of it that might cloud the US as an empire is the sheer ineptitude of how we go about it, which is plainly on display in Iraq. You hear every day about bank robbers who write their ransom note on the back of their tax form or drop their wallet on the way out, or their get-away car is out of gas. That doesn't mean they aren't trying to rob the bank.
Dan Sullivan (Apr 8, '08)


Renewed urgency to rein in North Korea [Apr 5] raises an interesting point. The American ambassador to South Korea in his remarks betrays a sudden qualm whether the US has acted wisely in engaging North Korea through negotiations. His hesitation far transcends any minor scruples of a professional diplomat. His uneasiness and yet his hopefulness that dealing with North Korea will lesson tensions and resolve the nuclear question calls upon the Bush administration to render accounts of a policy of engagement with Pyongyang. It also concerns Mr Bush's misreading of North Korea at the time he called it an axis of evil state. Without rehashing the history of the past five years, it is worthy of note that the US has painted itself into a corner without little choice but to continue talking to North Korea.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 8, '08)


Rarely have I enjoyed an article such as Ira Chernus' The general and the trap in your [April 8] edition. Please keep up the good work. Thank you.
Angela Crisp (Apr 8, '08)


[Re Demythologizing central bankers, Apr 8] Oh that Thomas I Palley would have demythologized central banks. The actual turmoil in worthy financial markets thrusts central bankers into the spotlight. The subprime meltdown and the ubiquity of such ambiguous complicated financial instruments such as CDOs, CMOs, SIVs bring to the fore the seismic shift in the capitalism and the rise of finance capital as a spur to mask the inherent stagnation that this system nurtures and spawns. The burst of the dot.com bubble in 2000 and the housing bubble in 2007 simply draw attention to the central role of investment banks which have even less ability to smooth the business cycle. The central bankers faced with a crisis they know neither the extent of nor have the ability to tame ... , are running faster in place until the ballooning recession the world is fast slipping into, rides out its crest. The will have a long wait. The have to bring discipline back into the market place which their lax oversight and the greed of investment banking houses are to blame. The full story is waiting to be told.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 8, '08)


This is simply to observe that [Saleem Shahzad's] April 3 piece on an "old friend" [Taliban welcome back an old friend] is one of the most unbalanced, inaccurate reports on the Afghan conflict I have seen in over three years. Apart from being one-sided and sycophantic, it is plainly wrong - lacking any genuine sense of proportion about the trends in the Afghan insurgency as they really are on the ground today. To cite only the most minor point, it does not even mention al-Qaeda or the "friend's" other allies and enablers - without whom he would be a "broken reed". Why have you descended to the level of a common propagandist? As someone who read many of your earlier pieces with interest, an answer to this question would be most appreciated.
Christopher Alexander (Apr 7, '08)


Christopher, the story was about a particular event: the release of the Haqqani video, and it was not the occasion to write each and every thing about Haqqani's network as this would require a book to be written. If somebody needs to read everything [about] Haqqani, he need only Google my name or Haqqani's name. However, I don't expect that a senior official from an organization like the United Nation could descend to the level of calling a writer a "propagandist" and a "sycophant". My straight question to you is: who enabled you today to mention Haqqani's alliance with al-Qaeda, etc? My past writings in Asia Times Online elaborated on Haqqani's alliance with Punjabi fighters and Arabs and even with the Pakistani establishment. My interview with [Sirajuddin] Haqqani is unanimously considered the only interview done by any correspondent. Otherwise, what else do you or your international organization know about the Haqqani network, or for that matter about the dynamics of today's Afghan resistance? You simply cannot move out of the urban centers of Afghanistan and [now] you are challenging me and my knowledge on the dynamics of the Afghan insurgency? [I] spend every second or third month in the mountains [as well as] the urban centers of Afghanistan interacting with both sides ...
Saleem Shahzad (Apr 7, '08)


Saleem Shahzad in subtle routine tarnishes the liberation struggle of Afghans against Bush-NATO in his article Taliban welcome back an old friend [Apr 3]. His words, "a relatively new string in the Taliban's bow is the reliance on thousands of Pakistani and other jihadis put out of 'work' since the struggle in Kashmir de-escalated”, are parroting the styles of Bush and India. Nothing could be farther from the ground truth. It is 1000% indigenous and Afghani. The mouthpieces of the West - Bush, Musharraf, Karzai - keep confusing the freedom [and] liberation struggle as being foreign inspired while it is [in fact] fought by [the] great Afghani nation. [Regarding] Haqqani's re-induction: he will only perform his duty to liberate his sacred land from foreign occupiers. The freedom struggle will continue until every occupier leaves Afghanistan.
Noorudin Zangis
Kabul, Afghanistan (Apr 7, '08)


Mr James Glassman wrote irritatedly and stridently [letters, Mar 31] against what Richard Bennett wrote in Tibet, the 'great game' and the CIA [Mar 26]. In defense of the Radio Free Asia [RFA], he wrote: "They have been won the hard way - mainly by cultivating reliable sources in Tibet to bring accurate, unbiased news to the people of the region." Is this not evidence, if not proof, of bias? If you cultivate any source solely, then it is not "accurate" or "unbiased" by definition.
Frank Yeo
United Kingdom (Apr 7, '08)


[Re Pyongyang shoots itself in the foot, Apr 5] Sung-Yoon Lee derives a grim satisfaction in parsing North Korea's Korean Central News Agency [KCNA]'s press releases' and official statements' wooden language. He's not the first nor the last person to do this exercise. Others have mocked KCNA's house style with humor, still others with a deadpan seriousness of mockery. Mr Lee's earnest foreign intelligence agencies, however, do take these eye-dulling and mind-numbing statements very seriously for the obvious reason that, like Kremlinologists of the past, they do here and there offer up shifts in the wind of North Korea's policy. Pyongyang cares ostensibly not one iota what Mr Lee thinks of its style, it will continue to say what it does in its own inimitable style. Mr Lee's audience is elsewhere. Nonetheless he does nurture the aching hope of imminent collapse of the Kim regime, which many have been predicting for the last 15 years but has not happened. It is not in the interests of either South Korea or China to allow North Korea to fail as a state.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 7, '08)


Macau’s rotten basket of riches [Apr 3] shows once again that gaming is no substitute for the kind of constructive effort that adds value rather than merely redistributing it. No wonder gaming is the cousin of corruption, indolence, and crime. We can continue to hold out hope that the big winners who own the casinos will plow back a sizable fraction of their profits into worthy causes like education, but doing so would go against their need for both cheap labor and irrational consumers who too seldom realize that Adam Smith was right all along when he noted that the only way to be sure of winning the lottery is the buy all the tickets, whereupon you lose.
William E Cooper
Professor and President Emeritus
University of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, USA (Apr 7, '08)


For those incensed by Spengler's raves and rants, please stop patronizing [him]. Stop reading ... and stop writing letters about his columns. By responding to his columns you are giving him more reason to keep up his hatred-filled columns. Once you stop, he will be reduced to praising himself using a dummy name but even that will stop after hits to his columns go down. ATol will have no choice to but to cut ties with this person, and ATol will be better for it.
Jayant Patel (Apr 7, '08)


In Asia Times, you never speak about the environment. I know that this matter can be very politically incorrect, but it is a question of morale. How about a new rubric about it in Asia Times? I would be very interested about it.
Guy Courtois (Apr 7, '08)


Hooray for Dennis O' Connell! On his commentary [letters, Apr 4] regarding What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr 3] by Howard Zinn, I heartily applaud. When I first read Mr Zinn's article, my reaction was one of revulsion - I wanted to write such a letter as Mr O'Connell's, but thought - why bother? Mr Zinn seems to be one of those bogus leftists caught up in their own absurd condition - I call them radicals with assets! The US did not lose the war in Vietnam - the war was never meant to be won; it was meant to be sustained, just like the war in Iraq - ask the Vietnamese after 25 years of an embargo. The liberal imagination fostered by the likes of Mr Zinn [is] wreaking havoc on possibilities for change [and] making a better world better for everyone. Mr Zinn hates himself and America because he refuses to confront reality - he has no control over the situation, we are part of nature, we do what we can with what we are given. Everyone is an imperialist, everyone is a Nazi, everyone is a fascist - fight it in yourself first and it is amazing what you will find. Marx and Engels said it best when they stated that "reality is the recognition of necessity". Mr Zinn should be grounded in a little more reality and realize that we are all part of history; we have very little control of anything - actually, no control. But no, Mr Zinn wants it only his way. He wants to keep his blinders on and not give up the good life, the good job, the few cars, the nice house, etc - all the things that come with the Imperialist Mind. Unless Mr Zinn can give up his narrow thinking about what it means to be alive, what it means to eat well while the rest of the world starves, what it means to be "number 1" while other countries are waiting in line, he will always remain to me a bogus leftist - a man who calls himself an anarchist but really belongs to that strange, bitter, ingenuous world of people who are perpetually on the fringe of society, cultivating their own eccentricity, not to say their absurdity - a world which seems to me peculiarly Spanish, the patron saint of which is Don Quixote. I call them ideological throwbacks who are unable to love this fierce and beautiful world over which we have very little control with all its ambiguities, anxieties, ambivalence. Once upon a time, when I was [a] simple thinker, I truly admired Howard Zinn, but he is on the wrong track. George Bush is not the problem, we are! George Bush is simply another man who cannot live without contradictions, who is incomplete without enough information. Onwards with the journey - the truth is nowhere to be found - except maybe in ourselves! Hats off to you, Mr O'Connell!
Joseph Giramma  (Apr 7, '08)


In taking on Howard Zinn's excellent commentary, What schools didn't teach about empire, [Apr 3] one of the letters [letters, Apr 4] asks why didn't the US take over Western Europe after WWII? Well, buddy, we did. Since the US came out of WWII as the top dog, we were able to set financial conditions for the entire world in a little document called the Bretton Woods Agreement, in July 1944. Bretton Woods set up the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) that established the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. In other words, if you want to play, you gotta pay ... in USD. With that document in hand, the US Federal Reserve shifted their printing presses into high gear, giving the Pentagon the monetary means to build the most gigantic military in the world, with bases numbering around 800 in about 125 countries around the world. So we did establish a global empire on the ashes of WWII. An empire that is now coming apart at the seams, due to our tendency to "shock and awe" countries that no longer want to play with USD. By the way, the IBRD morphed into the World Bank [which] is controlled by the US and the International Monetary fund, funded by the US. Yes, life is good, when you're the King.
Greg Bacon
Ava, Montana, USA (Apr 7, '08)


Regarding M K Bhadrakumar's article Iran torpedoes US plans for Iraqi oil [Apr 3], it is encouraging to learn that Kissinger and Baker are amongst others reaching a "culmination" point as a counter force vis-a-vis US-Iran relations. After Vietnam and over 30 years of "attrition" policy versus Iran, perhaps the old wise (white) men are reaching the "MacNamara" capitulation moment. The recent Chinese revelations, true or not, about their own complicity in teaching the Islamic "republicans" in how to shape uranium warheads, while outrageous (but let's not mince words, Iran is very close to weaponizing, regardless of the 2007 US National Intelligence Estimate) are in the end calculated to be deflationary and decelerating, forcing the VIP attack dogs back home for the imminent moment (but not out), and the US to work through the IAEA and the UN. Perhaps the realpolitik establishment has come to understand "can't we all get along?" and finally realizes that there is so much more to be gained through real Iranian engagement, especially if the US ever hopes to outplay the Bear and the Dragon.
Jubin Ajdari
Los Angeles (Apr 4, '08)


The article Local pride buffets Bangalore business" is biased and derogatory to Kannada culture. I am a simple citizen born and brought up in the city of Bangalore, India, and have seen the story from very near. First of all, for god's sake, KRV [Karnataka Rakshana Vedike or Karnataka Protection Forum] is not a militant outfit. It is not like the LTTE [Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam] created by Sri Lankan Tamils. Militancy is not in Kannada culture. [The KRV] is an association to protect the interests of local people which is supposed to use democratic means of protest against injustice. Tamils want all the water, land, jobs, etc, from Karantaka state and want to impose their rule here. This has led to protests. I am amazed at the vindictiveness of this article ...
Sathya (Apr 4, '08)


Howard Zinn has his hatred of the United States on full display in What schools didn't teach about empire [Apr 4]. Like all good leftists Mr Zinn savages the US for its many failing both real and imagined but nowhere does he have a bad thing to say about the communists or their actions over the last 90 years. Hopefully in one of his books the 100 million people killed by the communists in the last century might have merited a footnote, but if they did it was probably to blame the US for something. Lets look at what Mr Zinn has to say about the Korean War: "It seemed clear to me then that it was not the invasion of South Korea by the North that prompted US intervention, but the desire of the US to have a firm foothold on the continent of Asia." So it was not the communist North Korean invasion that started the war but evil US intentions. Just for the record the US was already in South Korea before the invasion. So after the death of 53,000 soldiers and billions of dollars defending Korea the US is now hated by the majority of South Koreans under forty thanks to the leftists that control the education system in South Korea. What does Mr Zinn have to say about the millions of North Koreans who have died under their brutal communist governments actions, or does he consider them acceptable casualties on the road to perfecting socialism? Mr Zinn further attacks the US for its actions of overthrowing the communists of Grenada, who in 1979 came to power in a revolt and quickly banned all other parties. Mr Zinn also attacks the US for the 1991 Gulf War; evidently no one has a right to oppose a savage dictator as long as he hates the United States. If the US is the imperialist power he makes them out to be, why didn't the US seize the Kuwaiti oil fields? Why didn't the US seize all of Western Europe like the Soviet Union seized all of Eastern Europe? I don't look for any answers to these questions, because Mr Zinn's world view is quite simple: the US is evil thus anyone opposed to the US is good.
Dennis O'Connell
USA (Apr 4, '08)


There is nothing to fault in Ken Ewing's Macau's rotten basket of riches [Apr 4]. It is a sober rendering of what's happening in today's Macau, and another bird's eye view of the unrest which is sweeping the People's Republic of China. On the other hand, the tiny island is a vestige of the [former] Portuguese empire, [and] a microcosm of the accelerating and dramatic pace of globalization. Macau is a world Mecca of casino gambling, which at ... the same time brings in fabulous wealth to the coffers of China and produces asymmetric and unbalanced growth, corruption, and social inequality to the island's inhabitants. It also serves as a safety valve for the pent-up emotions of an ever rich China by catering to the Chinese penchant, if not passion, for gambling and for making a quick fortune. Thus discontent on the mainland suddenly turns to avid devotion to winning the favors of dame fortune. As Ewing reports, any demonstration against this rage for riches will meet the brutal force of not only the island's police, but the quick arrival of [China's] armed forces in order to safeguard and maintain Macau as a gilded, golden cage.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 4, '08)


[Re The age of the immigrant spy, Apr 3] Spying is as old as the hills. Caleb in the bible comes to mind. Josef von Sternberg turned Marlene Dietrich into a beguiling temptress a la Mata Hari in film. Richard Sorge labored quietly in setting up a Soviet network during militarist Japan's expansion and war in Asia. And in a spate of books on America's CIA of recent vintage, we have endless tales of the US's spy power. Countries use any means available to spy on other countries. Is it any easier for China or India to do so in the US with a patch-work quilt of immigrants from all corners of the world? Maybe. Take the Chinese diaspora. Is Singapore more in danger of harboring recent immigrants from China who might act as moles? Or Indians in Malaysia? Vietnam expelled a large percentage of its Chinese when China brought war to its borders after the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia in 1979. It didn't trust its own citizens of Chinese ancestry even though they may have been pure dyed-in-the-wool, loyal Vietnamese communists. Immigrants usually act out of greed, though a smaller number do out of nostalgia or a tug for the old mother country. And that is true for any and all.
Mel Cooper
Singapore (Apr 3, '08)

Speaking of spies, there is also the legendary Chanakya: "Incidents of espionage are well documented throughout history. The ancient writings of Chinese and Indian military strategists such as Sun-Tzu and Chanakya contain information on deception and subversion. Chanakya's student Chandragupta Maurya, founder of the Maurya Empire, made use of assassinations, spies and secret agents, which are described in Chanakya's Arthasastra." (Wikipedia) - ATol


A very informative article The other Iraqi civil war [Apr 3] by Pepe Escobar, I enjoyed reading it and would like to comment. The latest round in Iraq's Shi'ite versus Shi'ite civil war was hoped by President Bush to be the defining moment for free Iraq but it turned out to be another utter humiliation and a ceasefire brokered by an Iranian group. That leaves Muqtada al-Sadr, a hellraiser, political thug and a conspirator who collided with the Shi'ite political leaderships and clerics in inviting the USA and Europe to invade Iraq [and] topple Saddam Hussein now demands an end to the US occupation of Iraq because the job was well done for the Iranians. He has grown increasingly close to Iran as he was always an “Iranian Iron Man”, doing their dirty and filthy job of killing hundreds of thousands of Sunnis and making another one million homeless. In Basra, he's the boss. His murderous, criminal and cruel Mahdi Army fighters control most of the city and remain in charge. The real winner in the latest round of Shi'ite versus Shi'ite civil war is Mahmud Ahmedinejad who is making George W Bush ... look like a clown without an audience. For the past five years, Iran has built up enormous political, economic and military influence in Iraq right under the noses of 170,000 helpless American occupying troops.
Jalal Rumi
Karachi (Apr 3, '08)


It appears that Law Siu-lan has correctly pointed out a separate Tibetan group, the TYC (Tibetan Youth Congress) in Cracks emerge in 'Dalai Lama clique' [Apr 2] that in fact has been responsible for the violent demonstrations in Lhasa and elsewhere. Is this a mistake on Beijing's part? One would guess Beijing has more intelligence on this subject but has deliberately lumped the Dalai Lama and the TYC together. There is no guarantee that a degree of self autonomy will lead to lasting peace. In fact, people always want more and the Tibetans are likely to continue receiving outside help toward that goal. Take for example the Kurds in southern Turkey and northern Iraq in perpetual struggle. The Chinese have not used tactics like those on the American Indians or the Australian Aborigines. Therefore it will take much longer to achieve assimilation. In Chinese history, millions of invaders like the Mongols and Manchu were absorbed readily and almost quietly. This time the "absorbents" have to be transported to Tibet. It is expected that economic development, cultural transformation, and support of local religion can eventually succeed, albeit more slowly due to outside interference. For once one region becomes autonomous, others want to follow in a domino manner, which is intolerable.
Seung Li (Apr 2, '08)


Regarding Cracks emerge in 'Dalai Lama clique' [Apr 2] by Law Siu-lan, my experience with Tibetans and Uighurs alike is that they tell you different stories depending on the size of your nose and the color of your skin. I don't blame them: Minorities always do, to protect themselves, as all minorities know (including myself). You can be sure that the Dalai Lama is telling different stories to the Chinese authorities and his Western patrons, and perhaps even to his own "clique". Considering all the conflicting messages of the Dalai Lama in the past few weeks, I wouldn't be surprised if he is pondering now [whether] to switch sides. Of course he has to prepare for his next incarnation, and he needs China's cooperation. The Westernized young Tibetans in exile have quite a different problem. Why should Tibetans in Tibet, educated quite differently, or not educated at all, accept them as their new leaders? It's begging the question.
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 2, '08)


Regarding Mr McGlynn's article The day the US declared war on Iran [Apr 1]. The recent financially motivated US moves against the Islamic "republic" are simply another late-out-of-the-gate counter move on the board. As reported in ATol by Pepe Escobar, the February 17, 2008, formation of the IIPE [Iranian International Petroleum Exchange] was a direct challenge to IPE/NYMEX interests (ie, Goldman Sachs, including the fact that the dollar is excluded from the basket) and can be considered the "preceding" move to the US's recent counters (and in fact was it not the same type of move that got Mr Hussein deposed?). As stated here in the past, the US is very much out-classed and outplayed where direct force is not the primary impetus for change. As such, an actual military strike on Iran is absolutely imminent. This would be a disaster. Iran is playing well in the new tri-polar world. Straddling the Sino-Russo card in riposte to the US. The recent Qom ceasefire is another move in this game. A display from the "republic" of its control of the "faucet". It remains to be seen if the only US counter will be: "Cleared hot!, rapid release!".
Jubin Ajdari
Los Angeles (Apr 2, '08)


Re Spengler's Turn it into a theme park ... [Apr 1], where is the Spengler we love to hate? Maybe as the attendant photo suggests, he had a hair cut, his ears lowered; or brain surgery?
beryl k
Minnesota, USA (Apr 2, '08)

In fact, he merely donned an Ann Landers wig. - ATol


Regarding Muhammed Cohen’s Black and white and barely read at all, Mar 26. I assume Cohen mentioned Obama’s “nuanced perspective on race” because he appreciates it. Yet Cohen’s comment that “It might be that Americans can’t handle complexities” is about as nuanced as a Reverend Jeremiah Wright rant. Cohen has Obama saying “progress on racial issues has stagnated". What Obama actually said is that there is a racial stalemate in the sense that race-based resentment has not diminished at all in recent years; white resentment of affirmative action, and black resentment of whites’ failure to appreciate that the toll exacted by centuries of racism partly explains blacks’ relative lack of economic and social progress (Unfortunately, Obama only briefly, elliptically mentions blacks’ share of the responsibility for getting their own families and communities in order.) Obama is not making a broad brush statement about all racial issues. Cohen’s comments about Americans would receive the same withering treatment from Obama that Wright’s disgusting comments received: “ ... in [Wright’s] offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality," said Obama. How stagnant is progress on racial issues in America when one of the front-running presidential candidates is black, and wins primaries in states like Iowa, which is 95% white? Obama says “what we know, what we have seen, is that America can change.” This is a view that is diametrically opposed to Cohen’s stereotyping. Lastly, Cohen is hardly qualified to comment on Don Imus. If he is not a regular listener of Imus’ radio show (I can guarantee you he isn’t), he cannot possibly comprehend that Imus does not have a racist bone in his body. Imus’ problem is that he is too honest. Like all painfully honest people, he sometimes says stupid, careless things. Of Don Imus, Vivian Stringer (coach of the Rutgers University women’s basketball team), and those who called for Imus’ firing, only Imus’ critics came out sounding like buffoons. Imus and Stringer handled it all with incredible grace and dignity, and left folks like Cohen sputtering and stupefied.
Geoffrey Sherwood
New Jersey, USA (Apr 2, '08)


[Re The new Brahmins, Mar 29] Chan Akya writes, "[T]hus, people's natural tendency to grow and become richer was sacrificed at the altar of this demon called market socialism. The net result is that Scandinavia boasts the highest incidence of suicides in the Western world." I can only imagine that perhaps Mr Akya is seeking to unseat Spengler as Asia Times Online's best comedic writer? People's natural tendency to grow has certainly not been sacrificed in Scandinavia; people are quite a bit taller on average there than in just about any other region in the world. What remains is Mr Akya's assertion that the Satanic ritual sacrifice of "people's natural tendency to ... become richer," in the name of the demon market socialism, led to Scandinavia's high suicide rate. (The plus side of this Faustian bargain must have been happiness; Scandinavians report the highest well-being of any people in the world.) I would have to ask demonologist Akya precisely which evil spirit has led to Belgium, Russia, China, Japan and Korea's (among many others) higher suicide rates? Is is it the trampling of market socialism's hoofed feet that has awarded the honor of "highest suicide rate in the world" (148 per 100,000) upon downtrodden young southern Indian women? Preposterous! Displaying a sort of collective Stockholm Syndrome, many residents of formerly colonized countries idealize and glorify their former colonizers. I would advise Mr Akya to give up his crush on Anglo-Saxon economics.
Josephus P Franks
New York City (Apr 2, '08)


Chan Akya is correct to point out in The new Brahmins [Mar 29] that the US has now followed Japan, and the Europeans in the past few months, in socializing the costs of financial institution failure. David Wessel's rift in the Wall Street Journal yesterday was on the same theme. I have no complaints with Chan Akya's being a member of the "moral hazard" crowd and his indictment of G7 central bankers as "utterly corrupt". Most of us on the Left are of the same opinion. My position is, perhaps, more extreme as I see systemic, ongoing criminal enterprise where he sees corruption. I see the capitalist system as more a less a pyramid scheme in as much as it cannot exist without exponential growth, and is supported by a large base of working "peasants" whose generated wealth rises to the apex of financial "kings". Mine is not an irrational notion; it is supported by the rush of central bankers to prop up "money changers" in deregulated free-market capitalist systems around the world. For the moral hazard crowd, this propping up goes against their fundamentalist faith in neoclassical liberal economics. Too bad. Central bankers know how the system works; they know it is fundamentally "corrupt"; they know the free-market is a myth carefully nurtured by its beneficiaries and their paid-for politicians and media spokesmen; they know from the experience of the Great Depression that neo-liberalism, left unregulated, will itself collapse - and the whole world with it if they have run "the pyramid" deep, wide, and long enough. As for Europe's "fractured" economy, there is no doubt that there are structural problems, particularly around labor issues and the ongoing integration issues that are being addressed within countries, and in the EU parliament, in a slow and "mind-numbing" way. That said, the efficiencies in transportation and health care, both largely socialized, are alone enough to give the EU important competitive advantage over the US. Not to be ignored in the petro-scarce future is the fact that Europe's per-capita carbon footprint is one-fifth that of the US; France's is one-tenth; even Germany's is nearly a third of ours. And how does Chan Akya explain Europe's higher worker productivity (on an hour basis) than the US? Chan Akya laments Europe's high tax rates without mentioning what people get for their money. My daughter and son-in-law, who have lived and worked in Europe more than me, explained it to me this way when I expressed shock at how much the government took from their paychecks: "Daddy, we felt the same way our first year or so, but when we began to see how much we get back in benefits, not to mention almost no poverty, and low-crime, we calmed down. And so should you." How forward-looking was it of France to recently put in place a carbon tax on cars at point of purchase that progressively taxes cars that emit more than 160kg/km of carbons up to [$4,555] on the worst guzzlers, and rebates to purchasers up to [$594] for cars that emit less than 160kg/km? As James Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, said at the Economic Club of Washington last week, " ... look at France; they have a long term, well thought through, non partisan energy policy ... , where we have none. The US, since 1974, has a policy of default." In many important ways trying to compare the economies of Europe and the US is "apples and oranges". Not to say that they can't learn something from the US (although I would like for someone to point out what), it is certain that we could learn from Europe. One last comment: Chan Akya's cheap shot about suicide in Scandinavia ignores the centuries long high suicide rate in that part of the world, ignores the same phenomenon in Seattle/Puget Sound, and ignores the decades of research on seasonal affective disorders that has shown that dark, cold winters produce depression in humans and higher suicide rates than the rest of the world. Maybe researchers failed to figure in the socialized market system of Seattle? And my offer of a bet on Europe to emerge less scathed from this financial crisis than the US still goes. I will put up to 10,000 pounds [$19,805] in escrow if he wants to wager, and we'll let his pals at the Financial Times or The Economist judge the winner.
David Sheegog
Paoli, Oklahoma, USA (Apr 2, '08)


[Re The day the US declared war on Iran, Apr 1] March 20 will not go down in US history as the day it declared war on Iran. John McGlynn's thesis is interesting but doubtful yet not completely spurious. Some can argue that President Bush shot the first first salvo over the yardarm when he declared Iran an "axis of evil". Washington is in no position to impose its will on Tehran as its failure in Iraq demonstrates. President Bush's push to impose sanctions on Iran has not achieved his stated aims nor has he achieved an identity of view with America's European allies who prefer negotiations to the iron fist of threats. McGlynn's draws a false analogy in using the pressure brought on North Korea in turning off its access to hard currency it had on deposit in a Macau bank. In the end, Bush had to back down to jump start face-to-face negotiations with Pyongyang by having the US Treasury to sanction the unblocking of some $25 million in funds. Iran is another case. It is not as isolated as North Korea is; it has oil which is selling at top dollar on world markets, and it has access to European financial houses which by that very fact challenges or ever checks any move by Hank Paulson at the Treasury may try. Washington is in a cold war mood to engage Iran, but here's the rub: Iran is and has proven very able to hold the US at bay. Bush has not learned this lesson yet: [the US] has not the means nor the strength to impose its will on Iran. And for that simple but obvious reason it reveals McGlynn's argument as anachronistic.
Jakob Cambria
USA (Apr 1, '08)


[Re Turn it into a theme park, Apr 1] I will totally disagree with your profanity: Spengler dispenses, "Pearls of wisdom, too, for an American presidential hopeful ducking and weaving over religion and race, and a burned-out banker charged with bailing out a faltering financial system.” I should rather say that Spengler could only dispense perilous advice to the peril of a desperate seeker leading to nothing but catastrophe. Because, wisdom is as alien to him as ... slippers to a snake. He is [a] messiah of death and destruction, and an advocate and preacher of devil’s wisdom. I should imagine that even President Bush would be more happy asking his dog, Barney, for an advice than ringing Spengler.
Saqib Khan
UK (Apr 1, '08)


[Re Shi'ite fight shows other side of the COIN, Apr 1] It appears that Mr Ahari wants to give the impression that the problems in Basra have nothing to do with Iran-supported Muqtada al-Sadr and other elements. That follows the US line of blaming troubles on the Mahdi Army - a big mistake. Like the intervention of US and UK forces in the Basra confrontation, Ahrari's attitude will reinforce the impression that Maliki is nothing more than a puppet of the US. That can be a catastrophe.
Tom Gerber (Apr 1, '08)


[Re Pakistan in tug of war over terror, Apr 1] I have enjoyed and learned from Syed Saleem Shahzad's articles in Asia Times Online. In this particular article today you refer repeatedly to the Pakistani "establishment" without defining it. It seems to exclude the parliament and the community of lawyers, but includes the president and apparently the army. But I get the impression the term is meant to include still some other individuals and institutions. Could you elaborate? Thanks.
Yen-Ling Chang (Apr 1, '08)

The Pakistani establishment is the military oligarchy comprising the Pakistani army, intelligence agencies and retired General Pervez Musharraf, the incumbent president of Pakistan. - Syed Saleem Shahzad  (Apr 1, '08)


Pity Darfur is not in Asia. Nobody seems interested anymore, but I would love to see M K Bhadrakumar reporting on that [issue]. How about changing ATol into AATol, Asia Africa Times Online?
Migrant Worker
Luxembourg (Apr 1, '08)


[Re Turkey seeks a more modern Islam, Mar 27] Asia Times Online's weak spot has always been history. Too often historical information is limited to cliches or to facts long since discredited by serious historians. In the case of the above article, the problem is compounded by a typically Turkish unilateral (not to say pan-Turkish) view, in which accomplishments by non-Turks are too often appropriated ahistorically in the name of the Turks. While recent Turkish efforts to modernize Islam and cleanse the mass of Hadith from a plethora of nonsensical material added over time is to be applauded. Turkey can hardly take credit for much of what Ms Zahir attributes to her nation. Most conspicuous is the disputed figure of Rumi, the great poet, who was of Iranian stock from Balkh (Bactria), now in Afghanistan and moved with his family to Anatolia to escape the Mongols. All his poetry is in Persian, as one can see even on the walls of his mausoleum in Konya where I was distressed to see that no Turk can read it. But Rumi came from a long line of Sufi traditions which began in 8th-century Baghdad among the not too harmoniously converted Iranian converts (remember, the capital of the last of three great Persian empires, that of the Sasanians, was at Ctesiphon near present-day Baghdad), the most notable of whom in that period was Mansur al-Hallaj, who was executed by order of the Caliphs for saying "I am the Truth" , meaning that he too, like all else, was an offshoot of the one universal truth. The tradition did not die with him, it grew into a highly sophisticated Gnostic philosophy, one of the main proponents of which was Sohravardi who, summoned to Damascus by Saladdin's son, was eventually sacrificed to the more urgent cause of ensuring the suppport orthodox clergy to the fight against the Crusaders. These well-wrought traditions then spread far and wide, including through Sufis who converted the Turks, and indeed, most of whom were of Iranian stock and Persian language and culture. True, the shamanistic background of the Turks soon attracted many of them to esoteric Sufism, but the first Sufi sheikh of Turkic stock was the 12th-century Sheikh Ahmad Yasawi, whose mausoleum is extant today in southern Kazakhstan. The Sultans, however, who, as self-proclaimed caliphs of the Islamic world, embraced Sunni orthodoxy, did not look too kindly upon esotericism. Why else would they have expelled the Qizilbash tribes who joined the very young Ismail Safavi in Tabriz to help him proclaim himself Shah and declare Shi'ism as the state religion of Iran in 1501? The Alavis of Turkey are the remnants of those Shiite heretics who left Turkey for Iran. Shi'ism, at its best and not in the politically motivated hardline interpretation of the populist regime in Tehran, allows for an interpretation of the hidden meaning of the words of the Koran (in other words, any adjustments can be made), an arch-heresy in Sunni orthodox eyes. Much earlier, at the end of the 12th century, Iranian Ismailis had declared the end of all prophecies on the basis that religion had progressed enough to be internalized ... without any need for the imposition of canonic laws. The world was not ready for such a progressive view and the Ismailis, finding themselves isolated from the mainstream, moderated their stance and became powerful in the wake of the decline of the Turkic Saljuqid dynasty. It was not to last long. The Mongol viceroy, Hulagu Khan, destroyed them after the sack of Baghdad in 1258. His troops, similar to that of his forefather, Genghis Khan, were largely composed of Turkic tribal units. So much for the Turkic precedent of "modernized Islam". And so much for Spengler's view that Islam can never be reformed. It was reformed more than once by Iranians, but their reforms were foiled every time by the Arabs or the Turks. I believe that the Ismailis example will revive once again and inspire Iranians who have always had a schizophrenic attitude towards their adopted religion.
Fatema Soudavar Farmanfarmaian (Apr 1, '08)


March Letters

 
 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110