Middle East

True facts and fallacies
By David Isenberg

The short-lived and controversial Office of Strategic Influence (OSI), proposed by the Pentagon in November 2001 and terminated in February 2002, may no longer exist, but its central tenet - aid to influence countries overseas to help or at least support the war against terrorism - lives on. The only difference is that the propaganda function is now assumed directly by the White House, and the target is the American public.

To that end, on January 22 the White House's new Office of Global Communications, which President George W Bush created by executive order and opened the day before, released "Apparatus of Lies: Saddam's Disinformation and Propaganda, 1990-2003". The aim of the publication is "to reveal the disinformation and propaganda of the Iraqi regime". The release of the document coincided with faltering support for the Bush administration’s push for war. In short, it was the latest salvo in the administration’s public relations offensive.

The document details what it views as Iraq's propaganda and disinformation in four broad categories: crafting tragedy; exploiting suffering; exploiting Islam and corrupting the public record.

The 32-page document details what the US says are Iraq's material breaches of UN Resolution 1441 and previous resolutions. It lists recent events as breaches of Resolution 1441, such as:
  • The discovery on January 16 of previously undisclosed empty chemical warheads.
  • The ongoing intimidation of Iraqi scientists.
  • Numerous chemical, biological and nuclear weapons stockpiles and programs unaddressed in Iraq's 12,000-page declaration in December.

    To those who have followed Iraq and Saddam Hussein closely over the year, none of the items detailed are new. Indeed, the report details several of what might be called golden oldies of Iraqi deception operations, such as collocating military assets within the civilian infrastructure.

    Something that is new - as well as bordering on the surreal - is the issue of dead babies. The report says "they have staged mass children’s funerals, and to stage those funerals they need dead children. There is only one problem, according to defectors, journalists and participants in these funerals. To have enough children’s remains to make a proper show, the regime has to collect and store them. A BBC documentary that aired on June 23, 2002, exposed how the Iraqi regime staged these processions. Instead of burying dead children immediately in accordance with Muslim custom, Iraqi authorities hold the bodies in cold storage until enough bodies are available to conduct a 'parade of dead babies'."

    Another section deals with the humanitarian impact of sanctions. The report correctly points out that Iraq has greatly exaggerated the number of children who have died as a result of sanctions. But it minimizes the overall impact of the sanctions. A fair reading would note that agencies across the board, such as UNICEF, World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Food Program have documented a serious deterioration in the physical and psychological well being of the Iraqi people.

    However, at least one of the claims made in the document is at least arguable, namely, the section on depleted uranium. The report claims that in recent years "the Iraqi regime has made substantial efforts to promote false claims that the depleted uranium rounds fired by coalition forces have caused cancers and birth defects in Iraq". That Iraq has made such claim is certainly true. Whether they are false is not certain.

    The document says "scientists working for the World Health Organization, the UN Environmental Program and the European Union could find no health effects linked to exposure to depleted uranium". But a 1998 report by the US National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine found that "health effects of natural uranium have been widely investigated, mostly in occupational settings. While these studies have either shown no effect or a small effect as a result of uranium exposure, our committee found weaknesses in many of these studies. We could not draw conclusions about exposure to uranium and death from a number of diseases, including lymphatic or bone cancer, nonmalignant respiratory illness, and diseases of the liver and gastrointestinal tract."

    Oddly, the report also cites the January 6 discovery of previously undisclosed warheads for chemical weapons discovered by UN inspectors as an example of Iraq lies and deception. It is odd, because the rest of the Bush administration has downplayed the discovery, recognizing that it is far from a smoking gun. And as a threat to the United States, the discovery is laughable. Artillery shells have a limited range, measured in miles, so they can only be a threat to Iraq's citizens and those within a few kilometers of its borders.

    In fact, although it is not mentioned in the report, it should be noted that most of what is reported in the media about what Iraq has or does not have in the way of chemical and biological weapons suffers from a lack of context. Consider some of the points made in a recently published online report "Claims and evaluations of Iraq’s proscribed weapons".

    For example, the report makes the claim that "Iraq has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes and other equipment needed for gas centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons". But according to the director-general of the International Atomic Energy Agency Mohammed ElBaradei’s briefing to the UN Security Council on January 9, "The IAEA’s analysis to date indicates that the specifications of the aluminum tubes sought by Iraq in 2001 and 2002 appear to be consistent with reverse engineering of rockets."

    Similarly, with regard to the biological weapons that Iraq is said to have, nobody ever points out that many of them have short shelf lives. Botulism toxin and clostridium perfringens, which cause gas gangrene, are anaerobic bacilli and have a short shelf life. And Iraq did not seem to have produced dry, storable anthrax; rather, it only seems to have deployed wet anthrax agents, which have a relatively limited life.

    (©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies, or to submit a letter to the editor.)
  •  
    Jan 29, 2003





    This war brought to you by Rendon Group (Nov 13, '02)

    'P2OG' allows Pentagon to fight dirty (Nov 5, '02)

     

    Affiliates
    Click here to be one)

     

     
       
             
    No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
    Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.