Middle East

Syria expects the worst
By Hooman Peimani

The Syrian regime, fearful of the expansion of the ongoing American-British war to its territory once the invading side has achieved its objectives in Iraq, has reacted angrily to US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld accusing Syria of "interference" in Iraq, with Syrian Information Minister Adnan Omran saying that "it takes only a madman to widen the circle of war".

Rumsfeld has accused Syria and Iran of being engaged in "hostile acts". He warned Iran about allegedly allowing an Iran-based Iraqi opposition to deploy its forces in Iraq, but he reserved his anger for Syria for its alleged delivery of military equipment to the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein. Rumsfeld claimed that Syria had transferred Russian-made night-vision goggles and other unspecified military equipment to the Iraqi military, which posed "a direct threat to the lives of coalition forces". He added, "We consider such trafficking as hostile acts and will hold the Syrian government accountable for such shipments."

Syria was not named in the US "axis of evil" of Iran, Iraq and North Korea, but the United States apparently believes that there is evidence of support for terrorism by Damascus. Syrian President Bashar Assad has been at the forefront of Arab opposition to the Iraq war and there is suspicion in the US that Assad has actively collaborated with Saddam Hussein and agreed to take weapons, including Scud missiles, from him so they would not be discovered in Iraq by United Nations weapons inspectors.

The Syrian government is understandably concerned about a US attack on it to change its regime, a policy backed, if not pushed, by Israel, which wants to turn hostile Syria, its last major Arab enemy, into a docile neighbor. Despite United Nations resolutions, Israel's refusal to withdraw from Syria's Golan Heights, which has been under its occupation since 1967, has demonstrated its willingness to annex that territory. The Syrians therefore see Israel as the real force behind the US war on Iraq and a call for its expansion to Syria and Iran. No wonder Omran held, "We see no sign that the United States can look at the region except from one vantage point - Israel's."

A few days after his initial attack, Rumsfeld repeated his warning. During a Pentagon briefing he accused Syria of continuing to allow the shipment of military equipment into Iraq, stating: "We have seen that Syria is continuing to conduct itself the way it was prior to the time I said what I said." Rumsfeld did not specify if, when and/or how the United States would react to Syria's alleged "hostile" activities. Among other factors, lack of such specification and the longer-than-expected war in Iraq convinced the Syrians that they should not expect an immediate attack. Thus Hassan Shaban, head of the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs' information bureau, felt confident enough to state that his government did not take Rumsfeld's remarks as a threat of US military action against Syria.

Nevertheless, the Syrians have taken the threat very seriously. Hence they have sought to stop the ongoing war against Iraq along with other regional states (Iran and Turkey) concerned about its long-term implications. Unlike Turkey, with which Syria has had troubled relations, Iran is a friendly country sharing Syria's concern as another target of recent US accusations and warnings. Turkey, which cooperates to a limited extent with the Americans in their war, is also concerned about the radicalization of its Kurdish minority as a result of the emergence of an Iraqi Kurd independent state.

Sharing borders with Iraq, the three states have been in close contact since the war broke out. On April 1, Syrian Foreign Minister Farouq al-Shara held separate telephone conversations with his Iranian (Kamal Kharrazi) and Turkish (Abdullah Gul) counterparts to find a way to stop the war. According to the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA), the three ministers called "for further measures to be taken by the United Nations in line with peaceful settlement of the Iraqi crisis within the framework of the international laws and based on maintaining the territorial integrity of Iraq".

Syria has also sought the assistance of the European Union, which has its own reasons for grievances with the US. During a news conference on April 1, European Commission spokesperson for external relations Emma Udwin clearly expressed the EU opposition to any US war against Syria and Iran. Despite the mentioned US warnings, she stated, "Our relationship with those two countries remains unaffected." She added, "We are in a situation where in each case our relationship allows dialogue including on the question of non-proliferation and there is no reason at this moment to change the terms of our relationship with Iran and Syria ... one needs to do everything possible to reduce the emergence of new tensions or escalating of existing tensions."

The Americans' hint at a plan to expand their war to Iran and Syria has so far failed to receive any encouragement from regional and non-regional states, including the members of the "coalition of the willing". The Australian government has clearly stated its opposition to such expansion, while the British government has denied any such plan and distanced itself from any such war in the future. During a March 3 interview with the British Broadcasting Corp Arabic service, British Prime Minister Tony Blair stressed: "I know of absolutely no plan to do that." He added, "There is no question of 'who next?' We are in Iraq for a particular reason ... They [the Americans] have got absolutely no plans to attack those two countries."

Given that the Americans are yet to achieve their desired victory in Iraq, they are currently unable to expand their war against Iraq to any country. Added to that, the opposition of their close allies and the EU to such a plan has forced the US government to deny it. Al-Hayat, a London-based Arabic newspaper, quoted US Secretary of State Colin Powell on March 5 as saying, "Nobody in the American administration [has] talked about invading Iran or Syria." He added, "It seems that there is a constant desire by everybody to accuse us of invasion operations. That didn't, and won't, take place."

Given the circumstances under which Powell denied any new war plan, his assurances do not convince anyone in the Middle East. However, it is certain that, as an immediate option, such a war seems unlikely, although the repeated US accusations create grounds for its future occurrence. The remarks of a former head of the Israeli military intelligence, Amus Golad, during a television interview of Israel's Channel One suggested that a US war against Syria could be conceivable at some point in the future. Accordingly, the US government requested from Israel unspecified "urgent intelligence" about Syria.

Dr Hooman Peimani works as an independent consultant with international organizations in Geneva and does research in international relations.

(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Apr 9, 2003




In the pipeline: More regime change
(Apr 4, '03)

 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.