Middle East

Power play in northern Iraq
By Hooman Peimani

As the international community is focused on the rapid unfolding of events in southern Iraq, a potentially dangerous ethnic conflict is taking shape in the northern part of the country. In particular, Kirkuk has become the scene of ethnic rivalry between the Turkmens and the Kurds who have claims to the city and its adjacent oil-rich region. If the current trend continues, armed and bloody ethnic war will likely engulf Iraq's northern part with a potential for regional expansion arising from Iran's and Turkey's sensitivity to instability in their neighboring country.

The Turkmens minority of Iraq residing in the greater Kirkuk area composing of Kirkuk and its large oilfields is claiming that the Iraqi Kurds have resorted to a violent campaign of intimidation against the Turkmens. It also accuses the American troops stationed in their region of turning a blind eye to killings and "ethnic cleansing" of Turkmens by Kurdish armed groups.

The Iraqi Kurds have a territorial claim to Kirkuk and its surrounding area, which, along with another nearby city, Mosul, have been a target of Arabization by the Iraqi central government over the past few decades. As a result, many intimidated Iraqi Kurds have had to leave their homes for safety in mainly the nearby Kurdish region. Controlling Kirkuk will enable the Kurds to address their financial problems through exporting oil and to increase their international significance as an oil exporter. By creating a substantial amount of annual revenue and by creating stakes for the oil importing nations in the security of the Iraqi Kurdish region, Kirkuk could also help them survive as an independent state should they opt for that plan. While they deny having such motivation, the Turks and the Turkmens suggest otherwise.

The Turkmens view Kirkuk as their homeland, which the Kurds seek to take from them by force. They claim to constitute 65 percent of the population of greater Kirkuk, estimated at 600,000, of which the Arabs account for 25 percent and the Kurds and Assyrians account for only 10 percent, an assertion contested by the Kurds, who claim to be in majority.

According to a Turkmens group, the Iraqi Turkmen Front (ITF), the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) have launched a campaign since the fall of the Iraqi regime to make the Turkmen and Arabs leave Kirkuk. Allegedly, this is part of their bid to incorporate that city and its nearby oilfields in their self-ruled territory.

Despite promises to the Americans and the Turks, PUK and KDP forces entered Kirkuk in early April when the Iraqi forces left the city then under heavy American attack. Concerned about the encouraging impact of an independent Iraqi Kurdistan on its own rebellious Kurdish minority, Turkey interpreted the development as a step towards an independent Iraqi Kurdish state. Ankara's warning of taking military action against those forces made the Americans ask the Kurds to leave the city. The American troops have since controlled both Kirkuk and Mosul.

However, the ITF claims that the PUK and the KDP forces have returned to those cities under the pretext of "helping the Americans with security" as part of a plan to incorporate them in their future independent state. To that end, the ITF suggests, they harass and intimidate the Turkmens and Arabs to force them to leave Kirkuk and Mosul.

Last week, Ahmet Muratli, the ITF representative in Turkey, accused the Kurdish forces of "attacking" and "plundering" Kirkuk's Turkmens and of their arrest of 11 Turkmens who fought against them. As claimed also last week by another ITF representative, Mohammed Kemal Yaycili, the Americans simply ignore the return of the Kurdish forces and tolerate their attacks on the Turkmens. According to him, the Turkmens have experienced "a series of attacks as soon as the [American] war [against Iraq] ended and the Kurds moved in. The Americans [claimed that] they had asked the Kurds to leave, but nothing happened. When we complained to [the Americans] about the attack, nothing happened either. The Americans favor the Kurds. They are working hand in hand."

Along the same line, concerned about a possible American-Kurdish design on Kirkuk, the Turkish government has expressed anger at a statement attributed to Jay Garner, the retired American general charged with restoring basic services to Iraq, allegedly described Kirkuk as a Kurdish city in his last week's visit of the northern part of Iraq.

In addition to attacks on individuals and looting properties, Kirkuk's Arabs and Turkmens claim that Kurdish forces have forced dozens of families, mainly Turkmen, to leave their homes. A KDP representative, Mohammed Kamal Salah, has reportedly confirmed the killings of an unspecified number of Turkmens, which he attributed to the rival PUK.

Moreover, Muratli has expressed concern about the Kurdish control of Kirkuk and a Kurdish effort to reclaim the city and also Mosul by sending back there 300,000 to 400,000 Kurds who were forced out of their homes during the Saddam era. "We do not like this," said Muratli. "I call on the world not to let the demographic structure of the cities be disrupted," he added.

While the Turkmens accuse the Kurds of atrocities and separatism, the Kurds also level charges against the Turkmens. Accordingly, the Iraqi Turkmens pursue their own pan-Turkist agenda backed by Ankara. Allegedly, they follow a policy of unification with neighboring Turkey, for which they have resorted to terrorizing Kurds. There are claims of murders of Kurds by Turkmens, including the killing of 15 Kurds celebrating the "liberation" of Kirkuk. Also, the Turkmens have been accused of looting Kurdish houses and properties after the Kurdish forces left Kirkuk on American demand.

Furthermore, Kurdish sources claim that Turkey provides military assistance to the Turkmens. Last week, Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul denied such accusations, including a reported arrest in northern Iraq by the American military of an unspecified number of Turkish officers in civilian clothes tasked with arming the Turkmens.

While the full extent of anti-Turkmens activities is not known, there is no question that Kirkuk's "liberation" brought extensive looting and lawlessness to the city affecting all the ethnic groups to a varying extent. Like elsewhere in Iraq, these phenomena have since continued in one form or another. As well, it is also certain that fighting between armed rival ethnic forces has resulted in the killing and wounding of Arabs, Kurds and Turkmens. Reportedly, at least 11 people have been killed and more than 50 have been injured since mid-April.

The emergence of ethnic and territorial disputes has created a suitable ground for instability in the northern part of Iraq. In particular, fighting between armed Kurdish and Turkmens groups with the aim of defending their rights, settling scores or seeking strategic objectives will likely push the oil-rich region into bloody conflict, if the current trend continues.

Should the Iraqi Kurds incorporate Kirkuk and/or Mosul into their self-ruled region, fear of the feasibility of creating an independent Iraqi Kurdish state will likely push Iran and Turkey into the conflict. Concern about the impact of such scenario on their Kurdish minorities could push Ankara and Tehran to follow the lead of Washington in preemption, with a much stronger case to justify their action.

Dr Hooman Peimani works as an independent consultant with international organizations in Geneva and does research in international relations.

(©2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Apr 29, 2003



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.