Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Middle East

Terror coiled for the next strike
By Mark Berniker

It's not a question of whether there will be another major terrorist incident, but rather when, where and how much human tragedy will be exacted the next time.

Unfortunately, the chaos being perpetuated by militant extremists is working. If their intention is to complicate bids by the United States, the United Nations and others to bring stability to Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, then their actions are instilling a constant sense of fear in governments and public alike.

With the news of more terrorist decimation at the UN mission in Baghdad to a bus full of civilians in Jerusalem, another day, another week, another serious act of deadly terrorism. The wave of killings is taking on a more coordinated feel, with the intention of destabilizing not only Iraqi reconstruction, and the Middle East peace process, but to further rattle a shaken world waiting for the next horrific event to occur.

But while the US and its partners in the "war on terrorism" are going to great lengths to tell the public that they are doing everything to crack down on terrorists around the world, concerns about the next attack do not appear to be waning. The threat looms, and the battle against terror appears unending, and perhaps without solution.

While intelligence officials around the world are constantly trying to track down individuals and groups it believes are planning future attacks, there are still serious gaps. Major captures of extremely dangerous ringleaders, like Hambali, the brains behind the Jemaah Islamiya in Southeast Asia, are encouraging, but there is no sense that imprisoning individuals is doing much to stem the spread of underlying, rampant Islamic extremism.

On August 18, the London-based World Markets Research Center (WMRC) came out with its Global Terrorism Index exposing vulnerabilities in a number of countries, despite the best efforts of law enforcement in certain nations to stem the tide of terrorism.

WMRC points to the Philippines, Pakistan, Israel, Colombia and the US as the most likely sites of new terrorist acts. The group goes on to say that terrorism has become a serious threat to multinational corporations, as the recent bombing of the JW Marriott hotel in Jakarta underscores. And the extremely explosive car bomb attack appears to be the vehicle of choice for Islamic extremists.

The WMRC in its calculation of the risks of terrorism says that the "motivation of terrorists" is the most significant factor in its criteria. The terrorism index report says that another September 11-style attack in the United States is "highly likely".

"The fact that there have not been any major attacks on US soil since September 11, [2001], is by no means an indication that the United States is seen as any less of a target by terrorist organizations," the report says. "Because of its leading roles in the wars on Iraq, Afghanistan and terror, the US remains the prime target for attacks by al-Qaeda or its auxiliaries, both within the US itself and, crucially, against US interests abroad.

"Networks of militant Islamist groups are less extensive in the US than they are in Western Europe, but US-led military action in Afghanistan and Iraq has exacerbated anti-US sentiment," the report says.

There is the question of who is going to be the next target, and then there is the other issue of internal security, special police and undercover counterintelligence measures. Britain is said to have "the strongest counter-terrorism capabilities in the world".

But not everyone's anti-terrorism activities are being championed. A report out of Australia is critical of the government's intelligence agencies. The Australian Defense Association, an independent watchdog of the government's defense policies said that the prime minister has insufficiently qualified staff, hiring too many journalists and not enough intelligence professionals.

However, the group's criticism flies in the face of WMRC's terrorism index, which found that Australia should be praised for readiness against an attack of terrorism. Australia is ranked 38th most at-risk out of the 186 countries in the index.

The report goes on to say that Colombia is the country "most at risk" followed by Israel, Pakistan and the US, with Colombia and Israel as the only countries deemed at "extreme risk".

On August 20, the Pakistani government said that it is putting together a new anti-terrorism force with the assistance of the US. Pakistan has been criticized for not doing enough to crack down on the remnants of al-Qaeda and the Taliban, who fled from Afghanistan into Pakistan. The presence of militant extremists along the Pakistani border are a major concern of Afghanistan and the US, which are attempting to provide a modicum of stability to yet another very dangerous corner of the world.

At the end of the day, chaos is winning, stability and reconstruction are being stymied by a series of terrorist incidents. While intelligence officials have yet to determine if the recent spate of attacks is coordinated, their coincidence is troubling, not giving anyone a sense of safe haven.

Mark Berniker is a freelance journalist who writes frequently for Asia Times Online.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Aug 22, 2003



Blood on the sky-blue flag
(Aug 21, '03)

Looking faceless terror in the eye
(Aug 21, '03)

Captured in the name of terror
(Aug 19, '03)

Jihad virus attacks Pentagon logic
(Aug 7, '03)

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong