Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Middle East

Underlying motives to Iran's U-turns
By Safa Haeri

PARIS - The Islamic Republic of Iran, feeling the chilling contact of the American knife at its throat, is seriously considering its reintegration into the international community by dramatically changing its policies.

This process of transformation is set to begin with the shelving of some of the 1979 Islamic revolution's fundamental principles, as highlighted by accepting humanitarian relief missions from the United States for the earthquake-stricken people of Bam, followed by the resumption of relations with Egypt - the first Arab state to have officially recognized the state of Israel, while considering seriously the possibility of resuming open dialogue with the United States, aka the "Great Satan".

As Iran's vice president for legal and parliamentary affairs, Hojjatoleslam Mohammad Ali Abtahi, announced that Iran and Egypt have decided to restore ties, government spokesman Abdollah Ramezanzadeh informed journalists that the "topic" of Iran-American relations was "debated" at the Supreme Council for National Security, the regime's highest decision-making body, supervised by strongman Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

"The government could not give the green light to these dramatic decisions, such as normalizing with Egypt, the United States's closest Arab ally in the region, and to American relief missions without prior authorization from the leader, a staunch adversary of normalization with the Great Satan," a Tehran-based Iranian analyst observed, speaking to Asia Times Online on condition of anonymity.

His view was confirmed indirectly by Habibollah Asgar Owladi, the general secretary of the Association of Islamic Leagues - an old and powerful Iranian group cloaked in secrecy to which most present Iranian ruling conservative clerics are members - reminding that "antagonistic relations among nations are not a fixed criteria and could change according to [different] situations".

"Today, as the power balance between nations is changing and evolving rapidly, if there is a listening ear in Washington, it can go through the thick book of Iran-American hostile relations and look for a new, blank page for our future ties," Owladi noted in support of the new initiatives taken by the hardliners.

Iran-Egypt relations
The announcement of resumption of relations with Egypt came one day after Tehran's city council, controlled by pro-conservatives since last February's municipal elections, agreed to remove the name of Khaled Eslambouli, the Muslim terrorist who assassinated Egyptian president Mohammad Anwar Sadat 24 years ago, from a Tehran street, thus removing a major obstacle standing in relations between the two great Muslim nations.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Hamid Reza Asefi, the senior spokesman of the Iranian Foreign Affairs Ministry who personally took part in the council's stormy meeting, said that the removal of the name was "crucial" if the Islamic world was to stand up to Israel, the Middle East state that Iranian ruling ayatollahs have wowed to annihilate.

Several members of the council spoke out against the move, but in the end they accepted to rename the street to "Intifada", the Palestinians' "Stone Revolution", after they were told that Cairo had reciprocated in changing the name of Pahlavi Street - named after the late Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran who was deposed in the Islamic revolution - to that of Dr Mossadeq, Iran's popular prime minister who nationalized the Iranian oil industry in 1953. But observers said no streets in Cairo or in any other Egyptian city had in fact ever been named after the Iranian royal dynasty.

Cairo made a sine qua none condition that the removal of the name "Eslambouli" from the street was essential to normalizing relations with the Islamic Republic, ties that were severed on order from the late grand ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader and founder of the Islamic Republic, to "punish" the Egyptians for officially recognizing Israel and for offering exile and badly needed medical treatment to Pahlavi, the deposed Iranian monarch, who died some months later of an acute cancer.

In a vicious article published only last month, the daily Jomhuri Eslami (Islamic Republic), the mouthpiece of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, called on the Egyptian people to assassinate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. "Examining the consequences of the Iran-Iraq war, it becomes apparent that Hosni Mubarak, the cold-blooded Butcher of Cairo and the arch-slaughterer of Cairo's Camp David regime, is the first on a long list of sickening personalities and among the first who should be brought to trial in the court of Islamic justice," wrote Jomhouri Eslami.

But a possible sign that relations between Iran and Egypt could be on the mend came from spokesman Asefi, who welcomed a statement made in Cairo on Monday by Ahmad Maher, the Egyptian foreign affairs minister that suggested "past ups and downs in Iran-Egypt relations, including the Camp David issue, be buried to prepare the future for better relations between the two nations."

Iran-United States relations
Tehran's quick acceptance of American relief missions for the quake-stricken people of Bam, the city and region in south eastern Iran that was hit by a strong earthquake on December 26, killing close to 50,000 people and destroying 80 percent of the houses and infrastructure, prompted speculation that the disaster might help warm relations between Tehran and Washington, cut since the victory of the Islamic revolution of 1979.

"The topics of relations with the United States are debated at the Supreme Council for National Security, [SCNS] the regime's highest decision-taking body," spokesman Ramezanzadeh told reporters when asked about the need to study Iran-US relations. "Of course, Tehran-Washington relations are complicated and full of problems which require appropriate time and atmosphere," he added.

Iran has also welcomed US President George W Bush's decision to lift some American sanctions against the Islamic Republic, allowing American non-governmental organizations and Iranians living in the US to send money and other equipment to the needy people of Bam.

According to an Iranian scholar who did not wish to be named, this Iranian volte face is dictated by the "syndrome of surviving, just like the situation of someone who, abandoned in a tumultuous sea, would, in order to save his life, cling to a shark".

"The original idea of dialogue with Washington is aimed mostly at buying time to the date the Americans get fully engaged in the electoral process ... a time period where America is totally paralyzed politically," the scholar noted, reminding that the Americans sent relief and rescue teams to Bam only after Ayatollah Khamenei gave authorization.

In fact, prior to dispatching the teams, Iranian ambassador to the United Nations Mohammad Javad Zarif was contacted by US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, who received a prompt reply from Zarif, after he received a positive answer from the office of the leader in Tehran.

According to well-informed sources in Tehran, the scenario worked out by the trio of Hojjatoleslam Hasan Rohani, the influential secretary of the SCNS, Dr Ali Akbar Velayati, special adviser to the leader on foreign affairs and Mohammad Javad Ardeshir Larijani, also a senior adviser to Khamenei for international relations, envisages that the conservatives will win control of the next majlis - Iran's 290-seat parliament - following legislative elections next month - in turn keeping Khatami's hands tied for the rest of his final term of office, which expires in 2005. In this very likely case; the next speaker will be Rohani. The majlis would then give the go-ahead to the start of open negotiations with the Americans, the Iranian delegation being led by Larijani. This process is necessary to prepare the public for accepting the change of heart by the leader and the conservatives, until now, stubbornly opposed to any dialogue with the Great Satan.

It is interesting to note that it was Rohani, in tandem with Larijani, who conducted the talks with the International Atomic Energy Agency, as well as with the envoys of Europe's Big Three, namely the foreign affairs ministers of Britain, France and Germany, leading to Iran's signing of the Additional Protocol to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, allowing international nuclear inspectors to visit, at will, any Iranian nuclear-related site or project without the slightest restrictions from the Iranian authorities.

Of the three American preconditions for normalizing relations with the Islamic Republic, namely giving sound assurances that they are not after weapons of mass destruction, stop supporting terrorist groups and stop supporting Arab and Palestinian organizations opposed to peace with Israel. Tehran has directly and indirectly fulfilled two of them by signing the protocols and normalizing ties with Egypt, leaving the issues surrounding hostilities with the Jewish state.

The surprise decision of Libyan maverick President Muammar Gaddafi last month to abandon all projects for building an atomic arsenal and open the nation to unrestricted international inspections as well as granting Libyans the freedom to travel anywhere, including Tel Aviv - moves that quickly won him international acclaim, including from Washington - did not go unnoticed by the Iranian leaders.

"As things are unfolding in Tehran, maybe Khamenei might become an ally to Washington, as Gaddafi is becoming, just in order to survive," the Iranian analyst suggested.

But it is speculated that such efforts by Tehran to gain Washington's approval will be counterproductive - particularly in terms of enhancing the lives of the Iranian people.

"It is an irony of history that for 25 years the gentlemen that have ruled Iran have suppressed freedoms and imprisoned dissidents in the name of hostility with the United States and foreign threats, and now they try to continue oppression and opposing freedom by buying American's friendship," said Ali Keshtgar, editor of the Paris-based monthly Mihan (Motherland), adding that the change of policy by Iran was "dictated" by the fear of drawing the same fate as disposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Jan 8, 2004




Tragedy prompts rethink in US-Iran ties (Jan 6, '04)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong