Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Middle East

US on alert over Middle East shuffles
By Adam Wolfe

On January 6, Syrian President Bashar Assad began a landmark visit to Ankara. It was only six years ago that these countries were at the brink of a war when Ankara accused Damascus of sheltering Kurdish militants. This crisis was averted when Damascus expelled Abdullah Ocalan, the leader of the Kurdish guerrilla group known as the Kurdistan Workers' Party, after having offered him sanctuary for nearly two decades. This was one year after Turkey and Israel had signed a military cooperation agreement, and Syria wanted to avoid having two enemies on its borders. Since then, the two countries have been pursuing better diplomatic relations.

There have been major obstacles along the way. Syria's outstanding territorial claim over Turkey's southern province of Hatay, which was ceded to Ankara in 1939 by Damascus when the French ruled Syria, has been a major sticking point for both parties. Syria has also accused Turkey of withholding its share of water from the Euphrates River, which originates in Turkey. However, the US occupation of Iraq has helped to accelerate the diplomatic process between the two countries.

Both countries fear that the Kurds of northern Iraq may be moving towards independence. Damascus and Ankara have criticized the Iraqi agreement where the Kurds will be allowed to keep their autonomy within a sovereign Iraq. Assad told the CNN-Turk news station: "We are opposed not only to a Kurdish state, but also to any action against the territorial integrity of Iraq. For [these] reasons, the breakup of Iraq would be a red line, not only as far as Syria and Turkey are concerned, but for all the countries in the region." Turkey and Syria are worried that an independent Kurdish state would attempt to cut into their borders, or inspire a Kurdish uprising within their states. This is a scenario that could threaten to derail Turkey's push for European Union membership.

Since the November 2002 election of the Islamist-based Justice and Development Party in Turkey, Ankara has looked to strengthen itself within the Middle East, while pushing through the reforms required for EU membership in an attempt to reinforce economic relationships with Middle Eastern countries and to curtail the perception that it is giving up its Muslim roots for Western and secular values. Syria has attempted to fortify its regional ties as well, since the US threatened in April 2003 to apply economic, diplomatic and other sanctions if Syria does not take the proper steps to combat terrorism and halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction. In Turkey, Syria finds a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member and an ally of Israel. Turkey will provide important access to the wider world as American pressures increase.

If Syria builds on its burgeoning relationship with Turkey, the Bush administration will find it increasingly difficult to enforce its hardline policy of accusing Syria of supporting international terrorism and of failing to stop the movement of Islamic militants into Iraq. Assad's calls for peace with Israel in an interview with Britain's Daily Telegraph may not have been taken seriously by many in Israel, but, with a partner in Ankara, Syria has begun to take steps in this direction. Washington's approach to Damascus will have to be flexible enough to account for Syria's new attempts to reach out to regional powers.

Iran
The resumption of diplomatic relations between Iran and Egypt will further complicate Washington's approach to the region. Iran and Egypt severed diplomatic relations in 1979 after Tehran condemned Egyptian president Anwar Sadat for signing the Camp David peace accords with Israel. In the late 1980s, they resumed contact, but at a low level. In December 2003, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and Iranian President Mohammad Khatami met on the sideline of a United Nations meeting in Geneva to discuss the normalization of relations. Then, on January 6, Iranian Vice President Mohammad Ali Abtahi told alJazeera television: "The decision to restore relations has been taken, and in the coming days, inshallah [God willing], we will see the resumption of our relations." Abtahi later stated that there are still a few "questions of protocol" to be worked out, but "the important steps have been taken".

Iran's strengthening of its ties to Egypt, a US ally in the Bush administration's "war on terrorism" and recipient of nearly US$2 billion of US aid annually, will give Tehran greater strength in negotiations with the US. The Bush administration indicated on January 9 that it wanted to talk with Iran about its nuclear program, human rights and terrorism in the Middle East, but Iran declined what they viewed as a lopsided proposal. Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said: "Right now there are no plans to commence a dialogue. What is important is mutual respect and the principle of equality, in a healthy atmosphere without violence. For that to happen, the United States must change its policy to Iran."

After Iran accepted US aid following the earthquake in the ancient city of Bam, many within the Bush administration saw an opening for a dialogue between the two countries. Instead, Iran refused every official call for discussions since. If Iran and Egypt resume diplomatic relations, the window for Washington's hardlined discussions will narrow even further. The Bush administration may have to rely on a softer stance and use its European and Russian partners to open the dialogue with Tehran.

Libya
Reports that Libya and Israel met to discuss establishing diplomatic ties represents another step in Libya's attempt to appease the West and open its borders to foreign investment. It was reported that Ron Prosor, an advisor to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, met with a Libyan representative in Paris in December. Ephraim Sneh, an Israeli opposition lawmaker, claims to have met with Muammar Gaddafi's son and probable heir, Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, at a conference in August. Although both Israel and Libya have officially denied that the meetings have taken place, Ra'anan Gissin, a senior advisor to Sharon, said: "Libya clearly feels that the road to the White House passes through Israel." Libya has never recognized Israel, and has condemned Egypt and Jordan for doing so. The establishment of diplomatic ties between the two countries would be a landmark shift for both governments.

Now that Libya has agreed to disband its weapons of mass destruction programs and after the UN and the EU drop their sanctions against Libya, Washington is going to find it difficult to maintain its tough stance against the North African state. The Bush administration's calls for concrete evidence of Libya's cooperation with weapons inspectors before discussing the dropping of US sanctions may have to be softened if Libya finds a strategic partner in Israel. This would accelerate Tripoli's efforts to open their country to foreign investment and perhaps the liberalization of their economy.

Conclusion
The start of 2004 is showing signs of significant shifts in the Middle East. Syria, Iran and Libya are strengthening their diplomatic ties with the regional allies of Washington. Each country is looking to solidify its negotiating position in respect to the US's toughened stance towards each of their governments. Washington is going to find it difficult to conduct power politics in the region if rogue states start cooperating with international demands. A more flexible approach may be necessary to maintain productive ties to the US's allies.

The US may have to use its regional allies (Turkey, Egypt and Israel), the EU, NATO and Russia to a greater extent than they have since the buildup to the invasion of Iraq if they want to enter into negotiations with the countries it considers sponsors of terrorism in the Middle East. A softer and more flexible approach, using the new ties established by each country, may lead to the administration achieving its goal of ending state sponsored terrorism in the region and a brighter economic and diplomatic future for the Middle East as a whole.

Published with permission of the Power and Interest News Report, an analysis-based publication that seeks to provide insight into various conflicts, regions and points of interest around the globe. All comments should be directed to content@pinr.com
 
Jan 22, 2004



 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong