Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Middle East

Rebuff for Iran's reformists
By Safa Haeri

PARIS - The refusal of Mir Hoseyn Moussavi, the Iranian prime minister during his country's war with Iraq, to become the candidate of the beleaguered reformists in the next presidential elections has thrown the movement into further disarray.

With President Mohammad Khatami's second and last term in office ending next June, the reformist movement had identified Moussavi as the best hope of regaining some of its lost credibility with the public, which feels let down by Khatami and the reformists.
Moussavi, a left-leaning intellectual, put an end to months of intense lobbying by leaders of the Second Khordad Coalition (SKC) - made up of 18 groups, organizations and parties that backed Khatami in the 1997 presidential elections, leading to his landslide and surprise victory - when he made it clear that he refused the nomination.

"Unfortunately, Mr Moussavi, the prime minister from the glorious [grand ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini era, has refused to be a candidate in the presidential elections," said Mehdi Karroubi, the Speaker of the former majlis (parliament) that was dominated by the reformists at the end of a two-hour meeting in the presence of leaders of the coalition, including Khatami.

Though Karroubi did not explain why Moussavi had rejected the offer, the most plausible reason is the one given by Elaaheh Koola'i, a former outspoken reformist lawmaker, who says the former premier did not want to "experience what has already been experienced", referring to a popular Persian proverb.

Sitting on the executive board of the Islamic Iran Participation Front (IIPF), the country's biggest political formation led by Dr Mohammad Reza Khatami, the president's younger brother, Koola'i, who is also a university professor, said, "The experience lived by Mr Khatami, the obstacles placed on the road of reforms by the opponents [conservatives], the traumas the last majlis was subjected to and the way the new hardline-controlled parliament treats the government all forms a picture clear enough to make up Mr Moussavi's mind."

She was referring to the impeachment of roads and transport minister Ahmad Khorram on charges of mismanagement, corruption and abuse of power, and a law that requires the government to get prior authorization from the majlis for all major deals it signs with foreign firms, to name some of the humiliation Khatami has suffered at the hands of the current conservative-dominated parliament.

"The political situation of the nation is such that the president has no field to fulfill the minimum of his prerogatives," added Jamileh Kadivar, the secretary general of Women Journalists of Iran.

For most analysts, if Moussavi, 63, enjoys certain popularity it is because Iranians remember him as the man who during the difficult period of Iran's bloody war with Iraq in the 1980s and international isolation due to the victory of the Islamic Revolution of 1979 kept prices more or less stable and corruption at a minimum level.

"Faced with an unseen level of corruption among the ruling clerics and their families, the widening gap between the rich and the poor, skyrocketing prices, widespread prostitution and rampant injustice, ordinary Iranians are nostalgic for the time when Moussavi was in charge," one journalist pointed out.

But Moussavi's success can also be attributed to the constant and firm backing he enjoyed from the grand ayatollah Khomeini, the founding father of the Islamic Republic, giving him a free hand in running the country's daily affairs.

At one point, when Moussavi had serious clashes with the president, then Ali Khamenei, Khomeini leaped to the defense of the prime minister, forbidding the president from interfering in the daily affairs of the government, a humiliation Khamenei never forgot.

However, Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani scrapped the post of prime minister when he became president in 1989 under Khamenei as the leader, replacing Khomeini, who died in August the same year of a heart attack.

Badly defeated in the last legislative elections, rejected by the population because of their failure in fulfilling the limited reforms they had promised and their constant retreat in the face of the conservatives, the coalition of official reformists had pinned all their hopes on Moussavi, mostly because he had almost no role in the now discredited reform movement.

"The eight years of Khatami's presidency has proven that although the president is, according to the constitution, the second personage of the system [after Supreme Leader Khamenei], but the distance between his powers with those of the leader and the non-elected institutions depending on the leader is so great that the post and job of presidency is lowered to the rank of a logistic clerk," Akhbar Rouz (Daily News) noted.

Although Moussavi has made it known that he is one of the reformists, he does not share their preoccupations, with some of them flagging fundamental differences with Moussavi on economic, cultural and even political matters. Also, the experiences of the past 16 years have proved that under the present system of velayate motlaqeh faqih , or the rule of the absolute leader, the position of president is a euphemism, if not a joke.

"Who can pretend he would succeed where Khatami, with the immense popularity he used to enjoy and supported by more than 25 million of voters, was not able to implement one single item of the limited social, economic and cultural reforms he had promised?" one scholar asked, adding that the big difference between the two men is that "Khatami is like a bamboo that bends to any wind, capable of accepting any humiliation and insults, while Moussavi looks more like an oak, a man of solid principles and uncompromising".

In 1979, Moussavi was picked by students as the leading candidate to run against Ali Akbar Nateq Nouri, then Speaker of the majlis and the conservatives' choice, backed also by the leader. But he declined the proposal after Ayatollah Khamenei ruled him out, opening the way for the then much lesser-known personality, Khatami, a former minister of Islamic guidance and culture.

However, many analysts say that in the present situation in Iran and its position in the world (nuclear controversy), Moussavi is "the most untypical, if not the worst" candidate the reformists could find to represent them in the next presidential race.

"The picture of Iranian society has dramatically changed since the difficult but heroic time when Moussavi, with the firm backing of Khomeini, was a real prime minister. Being out of touch and mummified in a way, somehow, he is a typical French cafe intellectual of the 1960s, when it was good to have Mao [Zedong]'s famous red book in his pocket, still favoring a state-controlled economy and revolutionary ideals in a modern time of liberalism," commented Masoud Behnoud, an Iranian journalist and political analyst.

"Maybe one of the reasons Mr Moussavi refused the accept the candidacy is because he realizes that the world's situation has changed since the time when he was prime minister," confirmed Mohammad Bani Habibi, the general secretary of the Islamic Associations Party, formerly the League of Islamic Associations, the shadowy and powerful group that is believed to control most of the ruling clerics from behind the scenes.

As noted by Akhbar Rouz, the SKC chose Moussavi to guarantee its presence in the establishment. "In fact, many of the Second Khordad Coalition, including the two largest of them, have, in the course of time, become divorced from the ideas defended by the former prime minister."

"Reformists' insistence on Moussavi was like using a drug whose use has expired," pointed out Bizhan Safsari in the popular Iranian Internet site Gooya.

At the same time, the same pundits agree that Moussavi's refusal to take the candidacy can be translated as a protest against Iran's present situation, hence several pro-reform personalities calling on him to explain his decision publicly.

"Moussavi must come out and tell the people why he has rejected the candidacy. By doing so he can help open the eyes of the people to the realities of the regime," one journalist suggested.

"The decision of Moussavi is an alarm bell for both Iranian society and the regime, for it shows that people with certain potential are not willing to come forward," warned Mohammad Salamati, general secretary of the Islamic Revolution Mojaheden's Organization, an influential and well-organized group of the official reformists, talking to ISNA, the news agency that strongly promoted the former premier for the presidency.

While Internet news site Baztab, which belongs to Mohsen Reza'i, the secretary of the Assembly for Discerning the Interest of the State (ADIS, or the Expediency Council) headed by Rafsanjani, says "in order to be credible, the next presidential elections must be popular with the participation of more than 25 million voters", political analysts agree that with the absence of Moussavi, the "exact opposite" will happen.

The least one can say is that Moussavi's decision seriously jeopardizes the future of the almost defunct SKC, heralding its explosion, as each of the coalition's groups will now have to look for its own candidate at a time that the conservatives are determined to also conquer the bastion of the presidency after capturing the majlis in February.

While, according to analysts, the pro-reform Association of Combatant Clergymen and some other smaller groups would very probably turn to Karroubi as their candidate, the IIPF leans toward Mostafa Mo'in, the minister of higher education.

Moussavi's withdrawal from the presidential race also highlights rifts in the conservative camp, which is as divided as the reformists.

On the one hand, the hardliners prefer former Revolutionary Guard turned politicians such as Ali Larijani, the former head of the conservative-controlled Radio and Television Organization, and Mahmoud Ahmadi Nezhad, the present mayor of Tehran. On the other hand, the so-called moderate conservatives favor experienced civil servants such as Ali Akbar Velayati, the former foreign affairs minister, and Hasan Rohani, the secretary of the Supreme Council for National Security and Iran's senior negotiator on nuclear affairs.

This will leave Rafsanjani, the former president, as the most "eligible" of all candidates, having strong support in both the conservative and reformist camps of the Iranian theocratic establishment. However, the big problem with Rafsanjani, the only politician to have been present on the Iranian political scene since the victory of the Islamic Revolution of 1979, and for this reason many Iranians consider him a "savior", is too big for Ali Shah (the nickname Iranians have bestowed on Ayatollah Khamenei because of his poor imitation of the former monarch's imperial attitudes) to handle, analysts noted.

According to some unconfirmed reports, the majlis, presided over by Qolam'ali Haddad Adel, a close family friend of the leader, is already preparing a law preventing the former president from running again for presidency.

A president likely to accommodate Khamenei must be someone with no political ambitions, believing blindly in the system of absolute rule of the leader, and with some administrative experience. The mayor of Tehran and the former general director of the Voice and Visage (Radio and Television), who also have the advantage of having served with the Revolutionary Guards, are the archetype of the future head of the executive.

Safa Haeri is a Paris-based Iranian journalist covering the Middle East and Central Asia.

(Copyright 2004 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)


Oct 19, 2004
Asia Times Online Community



Iran's hardliners tighten their squeeze
(Oct 8, '04)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong