WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     May 25, 2006
SPEAKING FREELY
Palestinians knocking on Asia's doors
By Oren Rawls

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

Palestinian Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar is in Asia this week on a fundraising tour for the nearly bankrupt Palestinian Authority. With financial isolation exacting a steep price on the Hamas-led government, the Palestinian foreign minister is turning to Indonesia, Malaysia, China and Sri Lanka to help defray the costs.

Before Zahar's hosts rush to open their checkbooks, however, they would do well to examine the bottom line from his previous fundraising campaign. While his tour of the Middle East in April netted several headline-making pledges of foreign aid, it also



underscored the need for real investment in Palestinian society - in particular by those defending loudest the Palestinians' democratic rights, their Arab brethren.

During last month's tour, Zahar secured commitments of nearly US$200 million from governments in the region, including $92 million from Riyadh and $50 million each from Doha and Tehran. Now, $200 million is no paltry sum, particularly given the short time in which the money was raised.

But as Zahar's Asian hosts consider making a similar expression of solidarity with the Palestinian people, they might want to consider this: barring totally unexpected developments, the Palestinian Authority will continue to face a monthly recurrent budget deficit of $130 million. In other words, to balance the books, the Hamas-led government will need to ask for a $200 million handout every seven weeks.

The United States, the European Union and other international donors have made clear that they have no intention of doing business with Hamas, and have frozen aid to the Palestinian Authority. Israel, for its part, has suspended indefinitely the transfer of tax revenues it collects on the authority's behalf, which amount to at least $54 million per month.

The US, European and Israeli moves have predictably sparked outrage in the Muslim world. But to all those now demanding that the world respect the Palestinians' democratic will, let this question serve as a response: Are you prepared to shoulder the Palestinian government's economic burden?

The bill is indeed high. To begin with, there are the salaries of the Palestinian Authority's 174,000 employees. Last year, finance minister Salam Fayyad estimated the wage bill to total $938 million. Then there are civil service and security retirement expenditures; last year's estimated figure was $625 million. Add in other non-wage outlays, and expenditures total roughly $2 billion annually - 10 times the amount of aid Zahar secured from Middle Eastern governments in April.

The situation in the private sector is just as bleak. Even before the government found itself unable to pay the salaries of its own employees, the Finance Ministry was warning that the bloated public sector would be unable to absorb the 40,000 youth entering the job market annually. And since Hamas won the Palestinian Legislative Council elections, the youth have not been the only ones having a tough time finding jobs.

On an average day last year, roughly 45,000 Palestinians worked in Israel, not counting those with East Jerusalem residency permits. After the January elections, the Israeli government took steps to restrict the labor flow; now, on an average day at least a third fewer Palestinians make a living in Israel. Based on last year's figures, that means a loss of about $135 million in earnings - roughly 2.3% of the Palestinian gross domestic income.

And the labor flow will only become more restricted. Of the 45,000 Palestinians working in Israel on an average day in 2005, more than 40% entered either clandestinely or illegally from the West Bank. When the separation fence between the West Bank and Israel is completed - and given the overwhelming support the project enjoys among the Israeli public, it would be naive to think that it will not be finished, and soon - those 18,600 or so Palestinian workers will find it awfully hard to sneak into Israel. That means an even more saturated job market in the West Bank, which ultimately translates into dimmer prospects for putting pita on the table for more and more Palestinians.

That a humanitarian crisis is looming is well known to the international donor community. The United States and the European Union have gone out of their way to point out that they are still funneling aid to Palestinians, just not through the Hamas-led government. And as pictures of desperation increasingly emerge from the West Bank and Gaza, we can expect to see more pledges of the sort made last month by five large Arab investment funds, which earmarked $50 million for Palestinian humanitarian projects but refused to deal directly with the Palestinian Authority.

Such humanitarian aid is undoubtedly well appreciated by needy Palestinians. Ultimately, however, what they need is not more handouts, but more jobs.

A welfare check helps make ends meet, but it does precious little for the self-respect and independence of the unemployed. Some Palestinians may find honor in fighting for statehood, but how many find pride in fighting a losing battle for a job?

For more jobs to be created, of course, more businesses need to operate in the West Bank and Gaza. And for that to happen, more companies in the region are going to have to take a leap of faith and do their part to support the Palestinian economy.

To be sure, foreign direct investment in the West Bank and Gaza is a risky proposition. And undoubtedly Israel has been, and will continue to be, in no small measure to blame. Yet it is disingenuous to argue that Israeli policies are the sole reason for Arab businessmen investing far less in the Palestinian economy than in those of other Middle Eastern countries - as the recent dealings of Mohamed Ali Alabbar illustrate.

In February 2005, the chairman of Emaar Properties, the Dubai-based joint stock development company, secretively offered to buy for $56 million the 21 settlements Israel was scheduled to abandon in Gaza. The deal was to include not only the settlers' houses and agricultural plots, but also 12 fully functioning factories. The factories employed thousands of Palestinians, and the development project surely would have employed thousands more.

No sooner did word get out about Alabbar's offer, however, than he was angrily criticized around the Arab world. In the face of supposed expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian cause, he backed away from the idea.

Eight months later, Alabbar received a far different reception when his company announced plans to build Damascus' first fully planned communities, a project valued at $3.9 billion. In stark contrast to the public outcry that greeted his Gaza proposal, his plans for developing the Syrian capital were embraced at a high-profile press conference. At the Dubai developer's side when he unveiled the deal stood Syrian Deputy Prime Minister Abdulla al-Dardari, who said it was an "honor to be working with an internationally recognized company like Emaar".

How else but politics - politics at the Palestinians' expense - to explain how Alabbar's two deals were treated so differently? On paper, at least, the investment climate in Syria is not so spectacularly better than that in the West Bank and Gaza.

In the "Ease of Doing Business Index" compiled by the International Finance Corp, the World Bank Group's private-sector arm, the West Bank/Gaza is listed 125th out of 155 countries. To be fair, that may not sound like the kind of place that Arab businessmen would feel confident investing in, but then neither does Syria, which is ranked 121st on the index.

Nor, for that matter, do more than a few other countries in the region. Egypt, which outperforms the United States, Japan and Germany when it comes to the amount of foreign direct investment attracted relative to economic size, is ranked 16 places below the West Bank and Gaza on the "Ease of Doing Business Index". Algeria, which recently sent $35 million to the Hamas-led government to help it pay Palestinian Authority salaries, is also ranked lower than the West Bank and Gaza. So, too, are Arab League members Sudan and Mauritania.

The numbers, in short, just do not add up - and no handout from Zahar's hosts this week, no matter the amount, will lessen the need for investing in more Palestinian jobs.

Oren Rawls is the opinion editor and European bureau chief of The Forward, America's leading Jewish newspaper.

(Copyright 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.


Handing victory to the extremists (Apr 1, '06)

Hamas's lesson for Indonesia and the US (Feb 11, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110