WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Dec 6, 2006
Page 1 of 2
Saudi-Iran tension fuels wider conflict
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi

Tehran's politicians and military leaders nowadays boast publicly of the country's military power and regional influence, yet beneath the surface there is a great deal of concern regarding the multiple crises facing Iran. These range from the threat of United Nations sanctions to Iraq's civil war, to growing re-Talibanization of Afghanistan to Lebanon's political unrest, and, increasingly, signs of crisis with the Persian Gulf's other dominant power, Saudi Arabia.

With such an array of national-security headaches, and the



distinct possibility of their getting worse, it is all the more important for Iran to ponder seriously its "crisis avoidance" foreign-policy options. Adding to the complexity is that at the same time, Iran must ensure that internal unrest is not generated as a result of the steps taken. For instance, undue compromise over its nuclear program may precipitate a political crisis. At the same time, though, an inflexible approach that aggravates the nuclear issue could accentuate the differences between the competing foreign-policy tendencies in the Islamic Republic.

Crisis of Iran's perception
With Saudi officials openly complaining of Iran's meddling in Iraq to the detriment of Sunni interests, and sparing no criticism of Iran's role in Lebanon, which teeters on the brink of civil war, there is much need for confidence-building measures between Tehran and Riyadh.

From the Saudis' vantage point, Iran's verbal commitments cannot be trusted anymore and its actions - fomenting trouble in the region - speak louder than words. Iran, on the other hand, complains that the Saudis and other Sunni powers have yet to reconcile themselves to the idea of a Shi'ite-run Iraq. That is why, according to a report in a Saudi newspaper, the Saudis are even pushing for the release of Saddam Hussein and the resurrection of Iraq's Ba'ath Party, to act as an anti-Shi'ite bulwark.

According to a Tehran University political scientist, "If the Saudis had been gassed by Iraq and lost a million people to Saddam's butchery, then they would not be surprised that Iran is angry at their lobbying for Saddam's pardon." Iran has openly wondered why the US is not pressuring Saudi Arabia to stem the tide of its nationals infiltrating Iraq on a daily basis to fight a sectarian war. "And why hasn't Saudi Arabia bothered to respond to Iran's call for a collective security arrangement in the Persian Gulf?" the same professor asked in a recent conversation with the author.

But while Iran says the Saudi criticisms are unfounded, the Saudis are not buying it and, as a result, the stage is set for a sharp deterioration in relations between the "twin pillars" of Persian Gulf geopolitics.

Iran could take steps to reverse the trend, such as by publicly backtracking from recent statements that have conveyed the image of a "domineering" Iran. A case in point is a recent editorial on Baztab.com, a website close to the Revolutionary Guards: "The Saudis are seeking to exclude Iran's domination in the Middle East." Another example: a regional military commander in the province of Khorrassan boasted of Iran's transformation into an "unchallenged power" (ghodrat-e bela monaze) in the Persian Gulf.

Such manifestations of Iran's hegemonic intentions are bound to break rather than build bridges with Persian Gulf neighbors and convey an aggressive foreign-policy orientation not in harmony with official pronouncements. Indeed, in 1991 the presidency of Hashemi Rafsanjani unveiled Iran's quest for collective security in the region.

It should not be forgotten that, in the post-September 11, 2001, context, Iran and Saudi Arabia share economic, energy, religious and political concerns, including the Arab-Israeli conflict and terrorism. The countries also play a leading role in both the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC).

Relations revisited
Iran and Saudi Arabia established diplomatic relations in 1928. In 1966, King Faisal visited Iran and the (second) Pahlavi Shah visited Saudi Arabia in 1968. By then, the countries had successfully resolved their dispute over the two islands of Farsi and Arabi by agreeing on Iran's possession of Farsi and Saudi Arabia's possession of Arabi. The agreement also did not designate a continental shelf for either island, only territorial waters.

During the Cold War, Iran and Saudi Arabia were commonly concerned about the threat of communism and the expansion of power of the Soviet Union in the Persian Gulf. Also, both were opposed to the radical Arab nationalism led by Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser. This sought to sow divisions between Tehran and Riyadh by labeling the Persian Gulf as the "Arabian Gulf" and the Iranian province of Khuzestan as "Arabestan".

In 1968, Britain's announcement of its decision to vacate its forces from the Persian Gulf culminated three years later in a new geostrategic situation known as the "twin pillar", whereby Iran and Saudi Arabia assumed the primary responsibility for peace and security in the region.

This was in conformity with the foreign-policy approach of the United States during the presidency of Richard Nixon and came to be known as the "Nixon Doctrine". Despite their common security concerns and similar political systems, prior to the Islamic Revolution in 1979, relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia were not always harmonious.

Saudi Arabia was concerned over Iran's military modernization and military dominance in the region, and the issue of Bahrain's independence and Iran's reluctant forfeiture of its historical claim to Bahrain was a sour point for some time. Another source of tension was Iran's repossession of the three islands of Abu Moussa, Little Tunb and Big Tunb in 1971, given the competing claims of the United Arab Emirates over these islands.

The 1979 Iranian revolution initially ended decades of friendly ties between the two Persian Gulf countries. Tehran's revolutionary regime accused the Saudis of corruption and of acting as an "American puppet" with which it could not have friendly relations. For its turn, the Saudi government accused its Iranian counterpart of seeking to destabilize the Saudi political system through its "export of revolution" policy.

The Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s worsened Saudi-Iranian relations. Saudi Arabia took sides with Iraq and availed to Baghdad its gigantic financial capability and its impressive influence in the Arab world and elsewhere. At the end of the Iran-Iraq War and the implementation of United Nations Resolution 598, Saudi Arabi welcomed the new developments and King Fahd openly asked the

Continued 1 2


Civil wars or proxy wars? (Dec 5, '06)

Titans square up for clash in Iraq (Dec 1, '06)

The Saudis strike back at Iran (Nov 28, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2006 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110