WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
              Click Here
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jan 9, 2007
Page 4 of 4
Spidermen and exploding frisbees

By Nick Turse

which will, according to an army spokesman, be available to "all friendly nations that support the war on terror".

American terminators vs drug-dealing guerillas
As both the high-tech programs and the proliferating training facilities suggest, the Pentagon views the foreign slum city of tomorrow as a dystopian nightmare and the bloody battle space to be feared and controlled in the coming decades. Beyond this, the Pentagon exhibits a palpable fear of urban disorder of any



sort. In response, it is creating its own Hollywood-style solutions to its Hollywood-esque Escape From New York-meets-Bladerunner-meets-Zulu-meets-Robocop vision of the Third World city to come.

For example, the navy/marines recently launched a program seeking to develop algorithms to predict the criminality of a given building or neighborhood. The project, titled "Finding Repetitive Crime Supporting Structures", defines cities as nothing more than a collection of "urban clutter [that] affords considerable concealment for the actors that we must capture". The "hostile behavior bad actors", as the program terms them, are defined not just as "terrorists", today's favorite catch-all bogiemen, but as a panoply of nightmare archetypes: "insurgents, serial killers, drug dealers, etc". (For its part, the army's recently revised "urban operations" manual offers an even more extensive list of "persistent and evolving urban threats", including regional conventional military forces, paramilitary forces, guerrillas and insurgents as well as terrorists, criminal groups and angry crowds. In fact, even the threat of computer "hackers" is mentioned.

To do battle in dystopian mega-cities where serial killers, druglords, hackers and urban guerillas may have joined forces, DARPA is intent on developing a program worthy of a direct-to-video sci-fi thriller. In a recent solicitation, it offered a vision of a human-robot military SWAT team busting down doors in a favela of the future. It reads:
The challenge is to create a system demonstrating the use of multiple robots with one or more humans on a highly constrained tactical maneuver ... One example of such a maneuver is the through-the-door procedure often used by police and soldiers to enter an urban dwelling ... [where] one kicks in the door then pulls back so another can enter low and move left, followed by another who enters high and moves right, etc. In this project the teams will consist of robot platforms working with one or more human teammates as a cohesive unit. The robots should be under autonomous control rather than remote/teleoperated.
This scenario of tomorrow already seems well launched. The military has, in fact, been obsessed with the idea of sending to war heavily-armed, teleoperated robots - such as the Special Weapons Observation Reconnaissance Detection System, or SWORDS Talon, a small, all-terrain tracked vehicle, used by the US military since 2000, that can be outfitted with M240 or M249 machine guns, Barrett 50-caliber rifles, 40mm grenade launchers and anti-tank rocket launchers.

Pentagon to global cities: Drop dead
This past autumn, the Pentagon's US Joint Forces Command engaged in a $25 million, 35-day, computer-based simulation exercise involving more than 1,400 soldiers, marines, airmen and sailors. A year in the making, "Urban Resolve 2015" had one simple goal - to test concepts for future "combat in cities" - and, not surprisingly, it was set in Baghdad 2015.

An article put out by the Pentagon's American Forces Press Service was quick to say, however, that the virtual exercise really could be taking place in "any urban environment". And the reason why was clear in the words of Dave Ozolek, the executive director of the Joint Futures Lab at the Joint Forces Command. Urban zones, he said, were "where the fight is, that's where the enemy is, that['s] where the center of gravity for the whole operation is".

While the Joint Forces Command may already be war-gaming the 2015 Battle for Baghdad, right now it looks like the US military will have trouble hanging on there for even a couple of more years. Still, if present plans become reality, odds are US military planners will be attempting to occupy some city, in some fashion, come 2015 and 2025. In the future, as the army's new Urban Operations Manual puts it, "every soldier - regardless of branch or military occupational specialty - must be committed and prepared to close with and kill or capture threat forces in an urban environment".

The way the Pentagon seems to envision the future, its human-robot expeditionary forces will spend increasing amounts of time dropping in on Third World super-slums armed not only with heavy weaponry, but also with gadgets galore. They will be able to read instant three-dimensional maps of the buildings they're approaching and watch real-time video of the most intimate activities in the urban zone they've been tasked to subdue.

As tiny flying UAVs blanket an impoverished neighborhood, a squad of special-ops Spidermen and geko warriors will crawl and slither up apartment-building walls, while teams of robots are simultaneously hopping through first-floor windows and terminator-human teams are kicking down front doors to capture an enemy drug kingpin. Nearby "angry crowds" of politically-minded youth will be engaged by heavily-armed teleoperated SWORDS Talon robots, while a few up-armored cyborg troops, at a safe distance, fire their loitering smart grenades at a gathering crowd of armed slum-dwellers who believe themselves well hidden and protected in nearby alleyways.

Of course, no matter the fantasies of Pentagon scientists and planners, such futuristic solutions will not replace US reliance on massive firepower, even in labyrinthine cities, as was true with Tokyo during World War II, Pyongyang during the Korean War, Ben Tre in Vietnam and the Sunni city of Fallujah during the current war in Iraq.

As Major Tim Karcher, the operations officer for the army's Task Force 2-7 Cavalry, recalled of the American assault on Fallujah in November 2004, "We sat there for a good six or seven hours ... watching ... this death and destruction rain down on the city, from AC-130 [gunships] to any kind of fast-moving aircraft, 155 [millimeter] howitzers. You name it, everybody was getting in the mix."

Given the military's fear of sending large numbers of American troops into the enemy-friendly landscape of the urban mega-slum, where significant casualties are almost unavoidable, this form of Pentagon-preferred urban renewal is unlikely to be replaced, no matter what technologies come down the pike.

The military and the metropolis
Cities are obviously on the Pentagon's hit list –today, it's Baghdad; tomorrow 2015 or 2025, if military planners are right, it could be Accra, Bogota, Dhaka, Karachi, Kinshasa, Lagos, Mogadishu or even a perennial favorite, Port au Prince. Regardless of the exact locale, Pentagon strategists looking into the DARPA crystal ball of the future have determined that urban slums will be a crucial battleground, and slum-dwellers a crucial enemy.

Yet the outlook for the US military is not upbeat - even with high-tech exploding frisbees, Spiderman suits, terminator-like robots and urban training facilities galore coming on line. In the wars begun since the US high command moved into its own self-described virtual "city" - the Pentagon - a distinct inability to decisively defeat any but its weakest foes has been in evidence.

Korea in the early 1950s, Vietnam in the 1960s and 1970s, Lebanon in the early 1980s and Somalia in the early 1990s were all failures. More recently, victory in Afghanistan has proved worse than elusive and a ragtag insurgency in Iraq has fought the Pentagon's technological dominance and superior firepower to a standstill. While able to cause massive casualties and tremendous destruction, the Pentagon war machine has proven remarkably ineffectual when it comes to achieving actual victory.

Now, the Pentagon has decided to prepare for a fight with a restless, oppressed population of slum-dwellers 1 billion strong and growing at an estimated rate of 25 million people per year. To take on even lone outposts in this multitude - like any of the 400 cities of over 1 million people that exist today or the 150 more estimated to be in existence by 2015 - is a fool's errand, a recipe for both carnage and quagmire.

Nick Turse is the associate editor and research director of Tomdispatch.com.

(Copyright 2007 Nick Turse.)

(Used by permission Tomdispatch)

 1 2 3 4 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110