WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jan 17, 2007
Page 2 of 3
SPEAKING FREELY

Riches keep the US in Iraq
By Ismael Hossein-zadeh

include "contracts for services that are highly sophisticated, strategic in nature and closely approaching core functions that for good reason the government used to do on its own. The Pentagon has even hired contractors to advise it on hiring contractors." [4]

Private security contracting, a lucrative and rapidly growing industry, is a good example of the Pentagon's policy of outsourcing. These contractors operate on the periphery of US



foreign policy by training foreign "security forces", or by "fighting terrorism". Often these private military corporations are formed by retired special-forces personnel seeking to market their military expertise to the Pentagon, the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or foreign governments.

For example, MPRI, one of the largest and most active of these firms, which "has trained militaries throughout the world under contract to the Pentagon", was founded by former US Army chief of staff Carl Vuono and seven other retired generals. The fortunes of these military-training contractors, or modern-day mercenary companies, like those of the manufacturers of military hardware, have skyrocketed by virtue of heightened war and militarism under Bush. For example, "The per-share price of stocks in L3 Communications, which owns MPRI, has more than doubled." [5]

As the Pentagon's manufacturing contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, make fortunes through the production of the means of death and destruction, they also create profit opportunities for service contractors such as Halliburton that, like vultures, follow the plumes of the smoke of deconstruction and set up shop for "reconstruction".

For example, in the same month (last October) that US forces lost a record number of soldiers in Iraq, and Iraq lost many more citizens, Halliburton announced that its third-quarter revenue had risen by 19% to $5.8 billion. This prompted Dave Lesar, the company's chairman, president and chief executive officer, to declare, "This was an exceptional quarter for Halliburton."

Jeff Tilley, an analyst who does research for Halliburton, likewise pointed out, "Iraq was better than expected ... Overall, there is nothing really to question or be skeptical about. I think the results are very good."

This led many critics to point out scornfully that when around the same time Vice President Dick Cheney told political commentator Rush Limbaugh that "if you look at the overall situation [in Iraq] they're doing remarkably well", he must have been talking about Halliburton. [6]

The service and "rebuilding" contractors are frequently called "reconstruction rackets" not only because they obtain generous and often no-bid contracts from their policymaking accomplices, but also because they habitually shirk on their contracts and skimp on what they promise to do.

For example, an investigative on-the-ground report from Iraq, sponsored by the Institute for Southern Studies and titled "New Investigation Reveals Reconstruction Racket", showed that despite "billions of dollars spent, key pieces of Iraq's infrastructure - power plants, telephone exchanges and sewage and sanitation systems - have either not been repaired or have been fixed so poorly that they don't function".

The report, carried out by Pratap Chatterjee and Herbert Docena and published in the institute's Publication Southern Exposure, further revealed that the giant Pentagon contractor Bechtel "has been given tens of millions to repair Iraq's schools. Yet many haven't been touched, and several schools that Bechtel claims to have repaired are in shambles. One 'repaired' school was overflowing with unflushed sewage."

The report also showed that out of a $2.2 billion "reconstruction" contract with Halliburton, the company spent only 10% on "community needs - the rest being spent on servicing US troops and rebuilding oil pipelines. Halliburton has also spent over $40 million in the unsuccessful search for weapons of mass destruction." [7]

The spoils of war and devastation in Iraq have been so attractive that an extremely large number of war profiteers have set up shop in that country to get a share of the booty: "There are about 100,000 government contractors operating in Iraq, not counting subcontractors, a total that is approaching the size of the US military force there, according to the military's first census of the growing population of civilians operating in the battlefield," reported the Washington Post in its December 5, 2006, issue.

The report, prepared by Renae Merle, further points out, "In addition to about 140,000 US troops, Iraq is now filled with a hodgepodge of contractors. DynCorp International has about 1,500 employees in Iraq, including about 700 helping train the police force. Blackwater USA has more than 1,000 employees in the country, most of them providing private security ... MPRI, a unit of L-3 Communications, has about 500 employees working on 12 contracts, including providing mentors to the Iraqi Defense Ministry for strategic planning, budgeting and establishing its public affairs office. Titan, another L-3 division, has 6,500 linguists in the country." [8]

The fact that powerful beneficiaries of war dividends flourish in an atmosphere of war and international convulsion should not come as a surprise to anyone. What is surprising is that, in the context of the recent US wars of choice, these beneficiaries have also acquired the power of promoting wars, often by manufacturing "external threats to our national interest". In other words, profit-driven beneficiaries of war have also evolved as warmakers, or contributors to warmaking. [9]

The following is a sample of such unsavory business-political relationships, as reported by Walter F Roche and Ken Silverstein in a July 14, 2004, Los Angeles Times article titled "Advocates of war now profit from Iraq's reconstruction":
  • Former CIA director R James Woolsey is a prominent example of the phenomenon, mixing his business interests with what he contends are the country's strategic interests.
  • Neil Livingstone, a former Senate aide who has served as a Pentagon and State Department adviser and issued repeated public calls for [Saddam] Hussein's overthrow. He heads a Washington-based firm, GlobalOptions, Inc that provides contacts and consulting services to companies doing business in Iraq.
  • Randy Scheunemann, a former [defense secretary Donald] Rumsfeld adviser who helped draft the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 authorizing $98 million in US aid to Iraqi exile groups. He was the 

  • Continued 1 2 3 

     

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110