WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jan 19, 2007
Page 1 of 2
A blueprint for chaos in Iraq
By W Joseph Stroupe

The "New Way Forward" strategy to be implemented by the Bush administration amounts to a new way forward to regional chaos. The policy pointedly asserts itself to politically unite Iraq's fractious and troublesome sectarian entities and, simultaneously, defang Iraq's more radical Sunni and Shi'ite sectarian militias. The goal is stability inside Iraq, but with the assured cost of a deadly boomerang in one form or another.

Notably, the Bush administration is likely to get a deadly form of tactical "unity" among Iraq's diverse factions that it foolishly and



shortsightedly didn't bargain for. This will include a newborn cohesion among Shi'ite and Sunni factions and militias arising out of their impending joint struggle against a desperate and dangerous common foe - the foreign occupiers.

If the US and Britain are perceived by Iraq's Shi'ites as excessively targeting Shi'ite militias while largely ignoring Sunni militias, then they risk mobilizing the entire body of Iraq's Shi'ite population against the continued presence of foreign forces, resulting in a virtual Shi'ite insurrection, with catastrophic results.

Repercussions inside Iraq
Iraq's heavily armed and all-pervasive sectarian militias do not wish to lay down their arms and they will all, from the more "moderate" to the radical, fight the US and Britain to retain and further consolidate their hard-won power and leverage within their respective regions.

Additionally, and very importantly, the majority of the nation's peoples, who have come to rely on their respective militias for safety and security in the environment of the abject failure of Iraq's government - and the US and Britain - to provide such, do not wish to see their favored militias weakened or defanged.

Hence these peoples can be relied on to deny all meaningful support to the US and Britain as they implement their "new way forward" strategies. Many will actively oppose the occupying powers through their respective militias, thereby dooming the entire effort to massive failure.

The new US strategy betrays the failure to comprehend even the basics of Iraq's emerging political, ideological and security situation. While the occupying powers have been focused for years on the surreal, castle-in-the-sky political process in Iraq, Iraq's Shi'ite and Sunni neighbors have been constructing genuine power bases across the country via the sectarian militias. They have been entirely pleased to let the occupiers be distracted by their democratic dreams.

Iran, especially, has adroitly succeeded in pulling levers to genuinely obtain influence and power within Iraq. Saudi intelligence recently declared, correctly, that Iran had succeeded in creating a Shi'ite state-within-a-state. But neighboring Sunni regimes have also achieved considerable success in their respective regions of Iraq, which is, in reality, already fundamentally divided into two parts, with a third part in the north inhabited by Sunni Kurds.

This has been accomplished under the unintended auspices of the presence of US and British forces, which have so far kept the warring factions from wiping each other out in a full-blown civil war, Instead, each faction has been able to solidify its power base.

Iraq has become the main focal point of intensifying regional Shi'ite-Sunni sectarian rivalries in which all of Iraq's neighbors have enormous stakes. The US did not anticipate that attacking Iran's insurgent networks in Iraq was virtually inconsequential with respect to limiting or ending Tehran's influence there. The same is true with respect to Syria and other Sunni Arab regimes, whose influence inside Iraq is also considerable.

Insurrection to expel the occupiers
Inside Iraq, the rival militant Shi'ite and Sunni factions, both facing a renewed US assaults, will be obliged to unite on a purely tactical basis against their common foe.

If the Nuri al-Maliki government in Baghdad genuinely aligns with the US and Britain in their final push against the militias, then it, too, will become part of the "larger enemy" and a prime target for the powerful militias. The government, already struggling for legitimacy, voice and leverage, would likely fall quickly.

Under such a threat, the "sovereign" Maliki government is likely to abandon the US and Britain, aligning with Iraq's militant factions and demanding an emergency withdrawal of all foreign forces from Iraq, thereby creating a crisis of immeasurable consequences for the US.

The tactical union of factions opposed to the US presence will cause the rapid transformation of the Iraqi political-militant landscape from the current complex mixture of anti-US insurgency and sectarian warfare into a much simpler and unified landscape. What will emerge is a nation-wide insurrection against the newly aggressive occupiers.

However, if the US push is perceived to inordinately target Shi'ites, then the insurrection will be mostly of Shi'ite composition, though still extremely potent.

Either way, the US is presiding over its own impending forfeiture in Iraq, leading to forced withdrawal ("redeployment") .

In this event, there will no longer be anything to act as a check on Iraq's disparate sectarian factions, which will then turn on each other in a massive and chaotic civil war fought over the issue of which faction(s) will achieve and hold dominance. Iraq's Sunni and

Continued 1 2 


Shi'ite time bomb has a short fuse (Jan 13, '07)

A president thoroughly in the dark (Jan 13, '07)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110