WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 10, 2007
Page 2 of 2
A key summit and Russia's hour of decision

By Kaveh L Afrasiabi

much longer, no matter how intensely Washington is lobbying Russia to put it on hold until Iran complies with the UN's demand to halt its uranium-enrichment activities.

Regarding the latter, Russia's envoy to the UN, Vitaly Churkin, has urged Iran to give a "positive response" to the UN's demands, and Russian Foreign Minister Igor Lavrov has stated that Russia "relies on the International Atomic Energy Agency's professional judgment". This week, the IAEA's governing board opted to cut aid



to 23 Iranian nuclear projects, doubtless a significant blow to Iran's nuclear program.

But Russia's refusal to deliver the promised nuclear fuel may turn out to be the straw that breaks the camel's back, leaving no doubt whatsoever in Iran that the price of its present intransigent posture in nuclear negotiations is turning out to be simply too high.

Simultaneously, such a setback serves the interests of Iran's hardliners, who can point out the absolute necessity of nuclear-fuel self-reliance in light of the unreliability of foreign sources. The question, of course, is whether or not Iran has the capacity to achieve nuclear-fuel self-sufficiency, given its technical deficiencies and lack of natural uranium.

Another question is: How will the UN Security Council, whose permanent members are also participating at the Baghdad meeting, along with the Arab League, react to Iran's continued defiance at a time when the international community is soliciting Iran's cooperation on Iraq? The answer depends to some extent on the result of the impending discussions at the meeting and on its sidelines.

Iran and the Baghdad meeting
In his press conference before departing to Baghdad, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, an astute diplomat with whom this author shared experience at a number of round-table discussions at European think-tanks in 2005, stated that Iran participates at the meeting "with the goal of supporting the Iraqi government, particularly in the economic and security dimensions".

High on Tehran's agenda is the issue of five Iranian diplomats kidnapped by the US in Kurdistan. Araghchi stated that they are "in Baghdad, held by the Americans, and the Red Cross has assured us of their physical health". As a sign of US goodwill, one of those hostages has been allowed to contact his family and report about their good health, according to the latest reports by the Iranian news agencies.

According to Araghchi, "We will know at this meeting if the US is after resolving the Iraq crisis or adventurism."

Meanwhile, in a clear signal of their united front at the meeting, Syria and Iran have once again emphasized the "continuation of the strategic relations" between the two countries, to quote a joint statement by the vice presidents of Iran and Syria in Damascus.

For its part, the Iraqi government has set its own high expectations, reflected in the statement of Iraq's former oil minister, Ibrahim Bahr al-Oloom, that Iraq favors Iran's involvement for "guaranteeing the stability of Persian Gulf". This raises the prospect of a future security conference in Tehran whereby Iran can push more vigorously for a common Gulf security infrastructure, inclusive of all the littoral states.

Doubtless, a great deal of confidence-building among Iran, Iraq and the oil sheikhdoms of the Gulf Cooperation Council, including on the thorny issue of Iran's nuclear program, is required before this long-standing Iranian objective for Persian Gulf security can see the light of reality.

Yet in light of the recent meeting of Iran's president with the king of Saudi Arabia and the positive mood for greater cooperation set by the multilateral meeting in Baghdad, the stage for the Tehran conference is already set, and that is one small dose of positive news in an otherwise dark regional climate.

Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD, is the author of After Khomeini: New Directions in Iran's Foreign Policy (Westview Press) and co-author of "Negotiating Iran's Nuclear Populism", Brown Journal of World Affairs, Volume XII, Issue 2, Summer 2005, with Mustafa Kibaroglu. He also wrote "Keeping Iran's nuclear potential latent", Harvard International Review, and is author of Iran's Nuclear Program: Debating Facts Versus Fiction.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110