WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 13, 2007
Page 1 of 2
The end of cowboy diplomacy, Part 2?
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - Just nine months ago, Newsweek spoke for the conventional wisdom at that moment when it pronounced "The end of cowboy diplomacy" in the United States.

The phrase signaled the apparent victory - at last - of the State Department-led "realist" wing over hawks led by Vice President Dick Cheney and then-Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld in gaining control over the foreign policy of President George W Bush.

One month later, however, war broke out between Lebanon's



Hezbollah and Israel, and the hawks, particularly neo-conservatives around Cheney and Rumsfeld, enjoyed a strong resurgence.

Bush not only spurned the pleas of Washington's European and Arab allies to press the Jewish state for a ceasefire, but his top Middle East aide, Elliott Abrams, reportedly encouraged Israel, to the horror of both his State Department colleagues and his Israeli interlocutors, to expand the war into Syria.

Now, one Democratic election landslide later, Rumsfeld's departure, and the longest-running record of sustained low public approval ratings for any US president in more than 50 years, conventional wisdom has again concluded that the realists have indeed taken the reins of power.

That such an assessment coincided with last Tuesday's felony conviction by a jury of Cheney's former chief of staff and the most powerful neo-conservative in Bush's first term, I Lewis "Scooter" Libby, for lying to federal investigators was probably not entirely coincidental given the "cloud", as chief prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald described it, that it cast once again over the vice president's office.

That the case - which, at its heart, involved the lengths to which Cheney's office and the White House went to discredit critics who charged that the administration's hawks had manipulated intelligence to rally the country behind the 2003 invasion of Iraq - seems likely soon to become the subject of congressional hearings will almost certainly deepen that cloud.

Even before Libby's conviction, however, the notion that the realists had finally triumphed was growing in Washington. "Diplomacy could define end of Bush's terms: Pragmatism colors policy, experts say", headlined a story this month in USA Today, while on the same day, the New York Times ran an analysis titled "Pragmatism in diplomacy" about recent moves by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to engage North Korea, Iran and Syria.

"White House foreign policy has shifted", noted a front-page Los Angeles Times article last week that asserted that recent moves reflect "the ascendancy of Rice and her State Department team over hawks" once led by Cheney and Rumsfeld.

"Bush shows new willingness to reverse course" ran another headline last week in the Washington Post, while one of the newspaper's columnists, David Ignatius, argued that Bush has apparently embraced the recommendations of the bipartisan, realist-led Iraq Study Group (ISG) in a piece titled "After the rock, diplomacy".

Meanwhile, Jim Hoagland, in a column titled "What has happened to Dick Cheney?" suggested that the vice president has in effect been marginalized by Rice, who "has won full agreement and support from the president on strategic goals and methods she and her diplomats are pursuing".

While Hoagland himself indicated that this view remains to be confirmed by events, the evidence that power has shifted in the realists' favor has indeed grown increasingly persuasive in just the past month, if only because the hawks, such as Cheney favorite and former ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton and his colleagues at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), have become increasingly distressed by changing balance of power.

The most dramatic sign of the realist ascendancy to date was last month's accord between North Korea and the US under which Washington agreed to begin normalizing relations and resume the supply of fuel oil in exchange for Pyongyang's shutting down its plutonium-processing plant and the admission of international inspectors.

The deal, which resembles the 1994 bilateral accord repudiated by Bush early in his term - albeit this one within the framework of a regional agreement involving South Korea, Japan, China and Russia - marked a sharp reversal of the US administration's stance and was cleared by Bush after a direct appeal from Rice, who reportedly circumvented the normal inter-agency process that would have guaranteed a stronger voice for Cheney and the hawks.

At the same time, the State Department's persistent if mostly tacit support for Saudi Arabia's efforts to midwife a Palestinian government of national unity in which both Hamas and President Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah would participate last month in Mecca - in defiance of the hawks, in this case led by Abrams - has been seen by some analysts here as demonstrating a new flexibility that would have been inconceivable just a few months ago and that was consistent with the ISG's recommendations.

What has gotten the most attention to date, however, is Rice's announcement at the end of last month that Washington would participate in at least two regional meetings convened by the government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. The first took place this weekend in Baghdad, and the second, at the ministerial level, is set for early next month. Rice herself is to take part in the April meeting, which will also include Syria and Iran.

Her announcement confirmed the growing impression that Rice was indeed trying move the administration toward implementation of the recommendations of the ISG, which was chaired by former secretary of state and neo-conservative nemesis James Baker and former congressman Lee Hamilton, and which called explicitly for Washington to engage Tehran and Damascus as part of a larger regional strategy.

Significantly, her announcement came while Cheney was out of the country and, on the day after his return, White House spokesman Tony Snow denied that Rice's announcement constituted a change of policy and said that, in any event, "there

Continued 1 2 


The rise and decline of the neo-cons (Nov 22, '06)

US hawks smell blood (Jul 19, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110