WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 21, 2007
Page 2 of 3
BOOK REVIEW
The man who would be king
Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall and Catastrophic Legacy
by
Andrew Cockburn

Reviewed by Pepe Escobar

the presidency. Upstarts don't cross a Rockefeller for nothing. Rockefeller made sure that Rumsfeld was smashed.

The man who would be king actually got to be king for a day - in make-believe, of course. A few months after the start of the



George W Bush presidency, in 1989, he played president in a game devised by a Washington think-tank to test a program called Continuity of Government (COG). He always loved those
games. "He was fighting World War III," writes Cockburn, adding that he always had "one primary response. He always tried to unleash the maximum amount of nuclear firepower possible." Shock and awe may have been just the prelude for a nuclear bombing of Iran - were he still in the Pentagon.

The games evolved. The Reds were replaced by "terrorists". Rumsfeld felt at home. His player pals were almost exclusively Republican hawks. A former Pentagon official tells Cockburn, "You could say this was a secret government-in-waiting. The [Bill] Clinton administration [had] no idea what was going on." Rumsfeld kept making money - now at General Instrument. By the end of the 1990s he was worth "between $50 million and $200 million". Relaxation on his own spread in Taos, New Mexico, was "to go out and chainsaw the lower branches of trees".

That Saddam handshake
Cockburn correctly evaluates that "much of the Iraqi experience, at least from the point of view of Rumsfeld, was a rerun. Years before, he had brandished intelligence reports on a growing military threat. Doubters within the intelligence community were overridden. He had acted in alliance with a powerful neo-conservative lobby. Subsequent investigation revealed that the intelligence on which he relied was almost entirely baseless. His actions were a major factor in the political ruin of the president he served" (p 35).

Cockburn is of course referring to the infamous "Team B" work in the mid-1970s - when Rumsfeld had his first stint as Pentagon chief under Ford. "Team B" basically lied through its teeth about Soviet missile capability to endorse the wildest speculations concocted by the ultra-powerful, ultra-right-wing industrial-military complex. As Cockburn writes on page 41, "The marketing of Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction a quarter-century later was merely history repeating itself as tragedy." Cockburn should have added how, as the tragedy unfolded, the healing powers of US investigative journalism also mysteriously vanished.

Cockburn puts into the context of the 1970s battles over arms control the rise of the neo-cons as well as the alliance between the opportunistic Rumsfeld and some of these neo-cons "that was not to reach its full fruition until the dawn of the next century". It was already Henry "Detente" Kissinger against Rumsfeld and Richard Perle, later to acquire his "Prince of Darkness" mantle.

Rumsfeld came back from the long (corporate) cold to be appointed Ronald Reagan's special envoy to the Middle East in 1983. He knew absolutely nothing about the Middle East (not that subsequently he became an expert). So the Middle East had to fit into his already pre-packaged answers. Cockburn is especially delighted to stress that in Saddam Hussein's Iraq, Rumsfeld was praised as "a good listener" (p 76), also revealing, according to a former Iraqi intelligence officer, that behind that famous handshake photo that inundated the Web in early 2003, all Rumsfeld wanted to talk about with Saddam was business deals, such as an oil pipeline from Iraq to Aqaba, Jordan, in which Bechtel was tremendously interested.

When Rumsfeld went back to Baghdad in 1984, Saddam's army had already unleashed mustard gas on Iranian troops. But, as Cockburn writes (p 77), Rumsfeld "was apparently happy to reassure his hosts that they should not take objections to what would one day be called weapons of mass destruction personally. He was certainly enthusiastic in promoting business deals between Saddam and Israel."

How I won the war
Rumsfeld became Bush Jr's Pentagon supremo almost by accident. He was being considered for CIA director. The Pentagon suggestion to Bush came from Cheney.

Cockburn delightfully frames it the Freudian way. Rumsfeld and Bush the Father hated each other. Bush Jr hated Dad. He needed father figures - such as Cheney. Rumsfeld, for his part, had maneuvered Nixon into accepting him as a protege. He was now maneuvering the extremely insecure George W Bush to accept him as a pillar of security - but always making it very clear that Bush was in charge.

Rumsfeld's "emotional intelligence" was spot-on. Cockburn: "It was a relationship that would enable Rumsfeld to change the president's mind on issues in public, to ignore decisions that he found inconvenient" (p 98). Perhaps in a flight of fancy, Cockburn states that Rumsfeld "should be remembered as one of history's great courtiers". Not "great" in a Richelieu way, by any means - but uniquely hubris-prone.

Cockburn carefully details the Pentagon's Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA), which was conceptualized by former Rand analyst

Continued 1 2 3 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110