WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 27, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Iraq's good terrorists, bad terrorists

By Sami Moubayed

relative depending on where one stands) but, more alarming, sees a difference between good terrorists and bad terrorists.

To him, Sunni militias are bad, but the Badr Organization and the Mehdi Army, because they are Shi'ite nationalists, are tolerable. He has done nothing since the Baghdad security plan started to disarm either militia. Under pressure from Khalilzad he cracked down on some of their bases - particularly the Sadrists - and



issued tough comments to the press on how he planned to deal with the militias.

A media stunt was staged by Maliki and Muqtada, who disappeared shortly after the security plan started, ostensibly showing the world that he was afraid of Maliki's strict measures. It has been more than a month since the security plan began, yet the Mehdi Army is still there and still all-powerful in the slums of Baghdad.

Good terrorist, bad terrorist
Khalilzad is a friend of Iraq's Kurds, who are pro-American Sunnis, anti-insurgency, anti-Iran and anti-Shi'ite militias. He has encouraged the activities of Kurdish militias, particularly the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK) operating against Turkey from Khaftanin and Qanimasi in northern Iraq.

The PKK wants to create a Kurdish state out of southeastern Turkey, northeastern Iraq, northeastern Syria and northwestern Iran. The PKK rebellion, which has hit Turkey the hardest, has led to the deaths of 35,000 Turks (including 5,000 soldiers) and cost the Turks billions of dollars.

These militias, because they are pro-American, are good militias, as far as Khalilzad is concerned. This patronage, and his latest farewell tour of Kurdistan, has set of red sirens in Turkey, which is threatening an all-out invasion of Iraq if PKK activity against its territory continues.

Senior US administrators have come out in recent days to assure the Turks that they will clamp down on PKK activity. That's what the Americans said last summer, to avert a similar showdown with Ankara. To date, however, the PKK in northern Iraq is alive and kicking, thanks to Khalilzad. And according to reports in the US media, the Bush administration is funding Iranian Kurds as well to destabilize the Iranian regime, making the threat to Turkey all the more serious.

Abdullah Gul, the Turkish minister of foreign affairs, has said 3,800 PKK guerrillas operate from Iraq, under the watchful eye of the Americans, against southeastern Turkey. He said, "We will do what we have to do, we will do what is necessary. Nothing is ruled out. I have said to the Americans many times: suppose there is a terrorist organization in Mexico attacking America. What would you do?" Murat Karayilan, a PKK leader, acknowledged that the Turkish threat is real, and unless diverted, could lead to a "mad war".

This would be disastrous for Iraq and the United States and would certainly ruin Maliki. To date northern Iraq has been the most stable region since the US-led invasion in 2003. Violence in Kurdistan could spill over into more violence in central and southern Iraq. Last summer, Turkey mobilized 250,000 troops against the PKK (nearly double the number of US troops in Iraq), and Iran began attacking PKK offices in Iraq.

Both countries cited self-defense, despite loud objections from Maliki. At the time, the Turkish message to Iraq was: "They [PKK] are the infiltrators and we are protecting our border. Do not allow the terror network to use your territory. Fight against the terrorists who will only terrorize you in the future."

Another communique issued by Turkey addressing the Iraqis read, "We are not considering ending our activity there [in Iraq] for as long as the PKK is also present and active in that area." General Hilmi Ozkok, commander of the Turkish army, asked whether Turkey planned to seek US permission before further invasions of Iraq, confidently replied, "We cannot take a decision of that kind based on the US. Every country is sovereign. Every country makes its own decisions. If the conditions change, you act by the changing conditions."

Then, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice visited Ankara to get the Turks to back down. So did Iranian statesman Ali Larijani, however, who commented, "If the string breaks, and it is heading that way currently, it will not be possible to repair it. We are telling you this plainly now. Later, do not come and complain that we didn't warn you." While in Ankara, Larijani said he had documents proving US meetings with the PKK and asked: "If the US is fighting terrorism, why then is it meeting with the PKK?"

Although the US combated the PKK at one point, it has been very passive - and at times encouraging - toward its activities in northern Iraq. This pleases the Kurds, and the Americans are desperate for continued support within the Iraqi political community, since so many Shi'ites and Sunnis are at odds end with the US administration.

Turkish media claim that PKK attacks on Turkey have in the past been authorized by the Americans and the two prominent Kurdish leaders in Iraq, US-backed President Jalal Talabani and Masoud al-Barzani, president of Iraqi Kurdistan.

Continued PKK activity, while the rest of Iraq is falling apart, raises more questions about the seriousness of both Khalilzad and Maliki. The PKK cannot be acting at will, without an okay from the Americans. Nor can it operate without approval from Barzani. If it is getting a green light from the Iraqis and the Americans, how can Maliki and company claim a security plan for Baghdad when the rest of Iraq might erupt into new violence?

All of this casts serious doubt on Khalilzad, who has been widely praised in the Western media for his efforts in stabilizing Iraq. It also further tarnishes Maliki's credibility. If the Americans indeed gave him a deadline of June 3 to stabilize Iraq and meet his benchmarks, he will fail at achieving it as long as Iraq is governed with the mentality of "good terrorist, bad terrorist".

Sami Moubayed is a Syrian political analyst.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110