WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     May 26, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Tehran ignores the bluff and bluster
By M K Bhadrakumar

American interlocutors. He negotiated with US ambassador James Dobbins in 2001 the post-Taliban transition in Afghanistan - and indeed would have taken forward the dialogue beyond the Afghan problem but for the contrariness of the Bush administration's Iranian objectives at that time.

Clearly, Khamenei himself endorsed Monday's talks with the US, though he insisted that they be restricted to matters concerning Iraq's security. The day after Khamenei spoke in Mashhad, Ali



Larijani, the secretary of the National Security Council, offered that the US could count on Iran's cooperation to break the stalemate over Iraq's security problems. Again, on May 18, Mottaki repeated, "If the US officials ... have a serious will to remedy the situation [in Iraq] ... then these negotiations could be fruitful."

Tehran has consistently signaled that it is prepared to look for solutions in Iraq; that it is not stuck on ideological issues; that there could be common ground between Iran and the US; that Iraq's stability is a matter of common interest; that the extremist Salafi movements in Iraq pose as much a threat to Iran as to the pro-US regimes in the region; that Iran is prepared to look beyond a Shi'ite-dominated government and work toward genuine intra-Iraqi reconciliation; and, above all, that Iran is keen to address its strategic problems with the US.

As a former general in the Revolutionary Guards and prominent strategic analyst, Hussein Alaii, put it, "The United States needs Iran, and the two sides are in complete consensus that they must closely cooperate to resolve the Iraq crisis ... Tehran is prepared to put aside its differences with the US for the time being and work together."

The influential secretary of the Human Rights Headquarters of Iran's Judiciary, Mohammad-Javad Larijani, told the official Iranian news agency in an interview on Monday that next week's talks with the US regarding Iraq will be a "good test for the US".

"If Washington shows goodwill and is committed to the conventional principles of negotiations, then this will be effective in resolving other regional problems as well," he said.

Conceivably, Tehran sent a high-level delegation (including Mottaki, Ali Larijani and Mohammad-Javad Larijani) to participate in the World Economic Forum summit in Amman last weekend with the expectation of using all available back channels - including the Jordanians and other pro-Western Arabs - to communicate with the US. Mohammad-Javad Larijani said in Amman that it is possible that Iranian and US officials will also discuss issues related to Iran during the talks in Baghdad. "We will not spare any efforts to restore peace and stability to Iraq and support that country's territorial integrity," he added.

Tehran has refrained from reacting to the series of unfriendly moves by Washington in recent days. On Wednesday, Speaker of the Majlis (parliament) Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel called on Washington to abandon its "hostile behavior" toward Iran, as it is not consistent with the United States' professed willingness to talk, but he went on to endorse Iran's decision to hold talks with the US.

Ahmadinejad has brushed off the "enemy's hue and cry and psychological warfare" as of no real consequence. Addressing commanders of the Revolutionary Guards in Tehran on Thursday, he said Washington is resorting to various stances from time to time ranging from military threats to economic sanctions to calls for direct negotiations. But the US tactic "will bear no fruit ... We have got closer to our final goals, with the grace of God."

Clearly, Tehran factors that the US remains wedded to a plan of comprehensive containment of Iran. But Tehran is confident that for a variety of reasons - Europe's need to diversify energy sourcing; the United States' overstretch in Iraq and Afghanistan; volatility in the oil market; tensions in US-Russia relations - the plan will not work.

Tehran knows that the US is in need of Iran's cooperation to extricate itself from the crisis in Iraq. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon implicitly underscored Iran's growing regional influence when he telephoned the Iranian foreign minister on Thursday to seek his help in defusing the developing crisis in northern Lebanon.

Equally, Tehran knows that the US doesn't really have a "military option". (According to the latest Angus Reid Globe Monitor survey in May, released by CNN, 63% of American respondents would oppose the Bush administration if it took military action in Iran.) More important, Iran estimates that Washington's efforts of assembling a phalanx of pro-Western Arab regimes and Israel, working in tandem to confront the Iran-Syria-Hezbollah-Hamas axis, are floundering.

Mottaki did some plain speaking on the sidelines of the Amman forum. He openly rejected the Saudi peace initiative (adopted at the Arab League summit in Riyadh in February), saying it was doomed to fail. "No capital for Palestine, no for the returning of refugees numbering 5 million Palestinians ... We can recognize more than 132 plans for peace in the last 30 years. Why were these plans or initiatives not met or realized?" Mottaki posed derisively.

Thus Iran isn't in any tearing hurry as long as tensions with the US remain in check. Meanwhile, focus has shifted to a far more important topic - the downstream impact of the latest report on the Iran nuclear issue by the International Atomic Energy Agency that the country could make a nuclear bomb in about three years. Also, the prospect of Lebanon teetering on the edge of civil war presents itself as an opportunity to play the role of conciliator.

The talks on Iraq may have become a sideshow. Iran rightly estimates that the United States' Iraq quagmire is after all not going to vanish. With just two days to go, Tehran had yet to name its diplomat to sit across the table from Crocker.

M K Bhadrakumar served as a career diplomat in the Indian Foreign Service for more than 29 years, with postings including ambassador to Uzbekistan (1995-98) and to Turkey (1998-2001).

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110