WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jun 27, 2007
Page 3 of 4
THE GATES INHERITANCE, Part 3
The world that Bob made
By Roger Morris

Gates' memoir dutifully notes the ensuing stream of bland speculations by the CIA's Soviet analysts about what the Soviets might next do in their tortured relationship with a faltering, needy, yet independent Afghan communist regime. But he spares us the covert actions the CIA carried out, amid a stream of memos Brzezinski and he sent Carter about the Soviet "threat" in South Asia - an intervention kept secret from their hated rival, secretary of state Vance and the rest of government.

By summer 1978, the old insurgent training camps in Pakistan were open again and thronged with Islamic radicals. They were 



eager to fight a regime pushing land reform and education for women, while establishing a secular police state. By the autumn of 1978, more than a year before Soviet combat troops set foot in Afghanistan, a civil war, armed and planned by the US, Pakistan, Iran and China, and soon to be actively supported, at Washington's prodding, by the Saudis and Egyptians, had begun to rage in the same wild mountains of eastern Afghanistan where US forces would seek Osama bin Laden a little more than 23 years later.

In April 1979, with arms and agitators paid for by the CIA and Pakistani intelligence (the shah fell in January, ending SAVAK's role), a radical Islamic uprising in Herat, western Afghanistan, led to the slaughter of thousands on both sides, including more than 200 Russian military and civilian advisers and their families. Even so, the Soviets stoutly refused to intervene militarily. They even made their refusal absolutely plain to Washington by pointedly conducting telephone conversations with the Afghan leadership for the Americans to intercept. But Gates, Brzezinski and Carter were having none of it in what had become a deliberate plot to "suck" the Russians into Afghanistan.

The old Great Game was now in cynical full swing. In the sort of mad plan not even Rudyard Kipling could have imagined, they plotted personally to "give the Soviets their Vietnam", as Brzezinski was fond of saying.

The ceaseless machinations and bloody civil strife culminated, of course, in the December 1979 Soviet invasion. The Politburo had resisted it for more than a year and hesitated even at the eleventh hour. It is, by any measure, one of the more dramatic, and chilling, stories in the annals of world politics. By now, Brzezinski and Gates had in essence created a new foreign policy for the United States and put it into action in secret with few co-authors and no parallel.

By the time they and their co-conspirators are through, a course will have been set that will take the Afghans into a nightmare universe in which one and a half million of them will die, millions more will become homeless (in what the United Nations will call "migratory genocide"), and, for more than a quarter-century, their country will be a continuing catastrophe beyond any other in the history of nation-states. In part, it is his own work that Gates now faces as secretary of defense.

'Love at first sight'
Meanwhile, during 1978, they were attending, with similar heedlessness, to the long death rattle of the shah's regime. That disaster, prelude to another crisis that now confronts the new secretary of defense, is captured in snapshots.

There is Jesse Leaf, the CIA's analyst for Iran who has never been to Iran or met an Iranian. Like Gates, as a Soviet specialist, he is an "expert" in the country he "analyzes" only "from afar". He nonetheless grasps the coming collapse, not from the "shahdulation" of official reporting, but from incidental reading of Alexis de Tocqueville's work on the rotten ancien regime of 18th-century France. When he tries to warn his superiors of what the future may hold, unlike Gates, he sees his career stunted.

There is Brzezinski's call to US ambassador William Sullivan in Tehran in February 1979, as fighting rages in the streets of the Iranian capital. The national security adviser tells the ambassador that the US Army attache must have his friends in the Iranian military "overthrow" the weak post-shah regime and "take control of the country ... to restore order". The attache is hiding in the basement of the Iranian Army commander's headquarters, pinned down by gunfire, and can hardly save himself, much less Iran, for Washington. "I can't understand you," Sullivan replies sarcastically. "You must be speaking Polish." It might have been an epitaph for so much.

By the time the mullahs control Tehran, with American diplomatic hostages languishing in endless months of captivity, and Soviet troops occupying Kabul, Gates has gone back to the CIA. It's a move he has long lobbied for, part of his careful career climb - and an escape, though not from Brzezinski, whose office he considers "a lonely island of sanity" in a beset president's "otherwise very screwed-up White House".

He is just settling in as a "senior manager" in the CIA's "Strategic Evaluation Center" when a call comes from director Turner, who has met him often outside Brzezinski's office. Would he be the director's assistant? Gates is reluctant - he knows a failing regime when he sees one, in Washington anyway - but he feels he has no choice. So he works for Turner through 1980, watching Carter's tormented last year - the failed hostage-rescue raid in Iran, the "green light" Washington covertly gives Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein to attack Iran in what will be a million-casualty, decade-long war, and, of course, the president's relentless political decline, ending in the election of Reagan. This he finds "heartening", as he tells friends.

He still does not know just how important the Turner job he didn't want has been; for it's there that he meets Reagan's new CIA director, a Republican wheeler-dealer who had been the new president's campaign manager. He arrives at the agency intending, as he often says, "to make war on the Soviet Union". It is, of course, what Bob Gates has been doing, in his own modest way, since joining the agency in 1968. For the 37-year-old Cold War bureaucrat and the gruff 68-year-old Bill Casey, as one witness remembers, "It was love at first sight."

A chronology from hell
Kids on his block in the New York borough of Queens nicknamed him "Cyclone", which will fit for the rest of his 74 years. Casey pounds his way through Fordham and St John's Law, stumbles into a stint with the CIA's precursor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), in World War II, and goes on to make a fortune as a flamboyant business lawyer and schlock publisher. The future CIA director is, by now, a self-described "expert" not on any part of the world, but as the author of those forgotten 1960s classics, How to Raise Money to Make Money and How to Build and Preserve Executive Wealth, manuals that dot drugstore magazine racks of the era.

Through it all, there will be seedy connections in the milieu of the New York Mob, shady practices that bring lawsuits for plagiarism, an unsuccessful congressional run, and constant jockeying for position on the right-wing fringes of Republican politics. Fired by his rise as a devout leader of the Roman Catholic laity, he also becomes a ferocious anti-communist. Buccaneering Bill Casey, his (Jesuit-educated) agency deputy John McMahon and Gates (with his own fervor) will give new meaning to the old quip about what CIA really stands for - "Christians in Action".

If Gates had only done his time at the NSC and then vanished into the bowels of the CIA, his role would have been significant, though largely unseen and barely recorded. But with Casey's arrival in 1981, he began to rise into the kind of visibility that would, in 2006, take him into the Pentagon as a potential savior.

Under Nixon, Casey had been chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, where he had lied to the Senate Banking Committee about his past business imbroglios, and narrowly survived ouster. In 1976, and again in 1980, he was an energetic fundraiser and fixer for the Reagan campaigns. When campaign manager John Sears ran afoul of Nancy Reagan, Casey was an obvious choice for Reagan handlers and future Washington power-brokers Ed Meese and Mike Deaver. With Reagan's victory, when the secretary-of-state job that he yearned for went to former Kissinger aide Alexander Haig - "He's more handsome than I am but not nearly as smart," Casey would quite accurately say - the CIA was his recompense.

What now followed for Gates was a history as convoluted as it was momentous. Here it is, ever so briefly, in year-by-year snapshots - against the backdrop of the era's furious, far-flung covert actions, from Nicaragua and El Salvador to Lebanon, Iraq and Iran to Afghanistan. All of this was, in turn, accompanied by secret "wars" in Washington that, beyond the usual clash of ambitions, called into question the very integrity of US intelligence. Gates would be a combatant in all of them.

1981: Casey names Gates to head his executive staff, where he "smooths" relations between the director and his initial chief deputy, Bobby Ray Inman, a 50-year-old ex-admiral off various intelligence postings. On finding Casey leaking to New York Times columnist William Safire to discredit him - leaks Gates joins in - Inman hits the ceiling and departs. About the same time, Gates begins to tell friends that he has aspirations someday to "get to the top" of the agency.

Gates writes Casey a crucial memo on the agency's "lagging" covert-action capabilities and sluggish "responsiveness". "The CIA," he argues, "is slowly turning into the Department of Agriculture." It is what the director has long suspected and just what he wants to hear from his assistant.

Near the end of the year, Gates is offered a lucrative job with a private company providing intelligence to corporations doing business abroad. It will double his salary with a huge signing bonus. He decides to take it; but, the day before he is to sign, he suddenly changes his mind. The company goes out of business in a few months.

1982: In January, Casey appoints Gates deputy director for the Intelligence Directorate. He promptly informs the analysts under him that he wants their "best estimates", but begins to keep a "scorecard" of favored analysts that influences promotions. "A little Napoleon," one analyst calls him.

"It was well known among analysts at the time," wrote former Soviet affairs officer Jennifer Glaudemans, "that we would have a hard time getting Gates to sign off on analyses that did not fit his ideological preconceptions." Added Thomas Polgar, an agency veteran who returned as a consultant in the 1980s, "You never heard about a Gates position that differed from Casey's. Either he sincerely believed in Casey's ideology or he catered to it."

Casey asks Gates for a new National Intelligence Estimate on "Soviet support for international terrorism" and also "how far ... the Soviet Union would go in its support for leftists in Central America". It is the beginning of what one analyst will call "slanted studies all over the place". Commented Glaudemans: "I heard terms such as 'soft on the Soviets' and 'Soviet apologist' thrown in certain people's direction."

Gates begins "astutely" (as Time magazine would later put it) cultivating vice president George H W Bush. He takes special pains to brief Bush personally and offers quiet personal briefings to his staff as well, which is otherwise in essence ignored by the Reagan White House.

Late in the year, Gates issues a report that leftist rebels in El Salvador depend "largely" on Sandinista arms, citing as evidence a Nicaraguan customs officer who allowed a Volkswagen allegedly carrying such arms to cross into Honduras. "It was a laughable document," says David MacMichael, former senior estimates officer for Latin America.

1983: Casey names Gates as chairman of the National Intelligence Council that oversees the preparation of all National Intelligence Estimates. Though the CIA put such documents together, intelligence analysts at the Pentagon and the State Department traditionally inserted footnotes of dissent. Now, they are suddenly prevented from doing so. "This false unanimity was no accident," comments a former ranking State Department official. "It was the personal creation of Mr Gates."

1984: On December 14, Gates writes Casey a five-page policy memo, arguing that the "Soviets and Cubans are turning Nicaragua into an armed camp with military forces far beyond its defensive needs and in a position to intimidate and coerce its neighbors ... the only way we can prevent disaster in Central America is to acknowledge openly ... that the existence of a Marxist-Leninist regime in Nicaragua closely aligned with the Soviet Union and Cuba is unacceptable to the United States, and that the US will do everything in its power short of invasion to put that regime out." This is an unprecedented step for a deputy for intelligence.

Without US aid the Nicaraguan Contra rebels will not survive, Gates argues, but the US should also break relations with Managua, impose sanctions and a quarantine, set up and recognize a government-in-exile, and launch "air strikes to destroy a considerable portion of Nicaragua's military buildup". He is recommending "hard measures", he tells Casey; it's time to "stop fooling ourselves".

Gates will later claim that he never shared Casey's hawkish convictions or priorities regarding Nicaragua. "For reasons I never fully comprehended," he wrote in his memoir, "Bill Casey became obsessed with Central America."

1982-85 (the Middle East and Afghanistan): The Bir bombing in March 1985 is part of a grim sequence of events most Americans never acknowledge. Gates knows it all intimately.

In September 1982 - despite US diplomatic pledges that its peacekeeping marines would protect civilian innocents while Palestinian Liberation Organization forces made a negotiated exit from Lebanon - the marines are suddenly withdrawn and Israeli-backed Lebanese forces massacre more than 600 unarmed people (mostly women, children, and the elderly) in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps. Even American officials later call the withdrawal "treacherous" and "criminal".

Continued 1 2 3 4

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110