WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jul 7, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Iran's moment of nuclear scrutiny

By Kaveh L Afrasiabi

political science professor. He has urged the government to accept the proposal and to seek tangible incentives from the international community in return. [1]

However, a number of other analysts and politicians are concerned that (a) Iran's acceptance of a "time-out" will be misinterpreted as a sign of its weakness and (b) would embolden the US and its allies to capitalize on it for a permanent cessation of Iran's nuclear fuel program. This is a legitimate concern that



should be addressed by the IAEA officials in their meetings in Tehran.

In view of China's stance against new sanctions and Russia's official position that it will back further sanctions only if the IAEA formally condemns Iran for a breach of its obligations, Iran's current path of cooperation with the IAEA is aimed at softening the international community's opposition to Iran's uranium-enrichment program.

The idea of "zero enrichment" is no longer feasible and some European diplomats are tilting toward the revised approach reportedly favored by Solana, that is, the idea of putting a ceiling on low-enriched uranium under a rigorous IAEA inspection system.

This idea, repeatedly put forth by Iran as part of its proposed "objective guarantees", is still adamantly opposed by the US, which stubbornly clings to, among other things, the notion of an "international consortium" to produce nuclear fuel for Iran on foreign, eg, Russian, territories.

But the pace of developments on the ground with respect to Iran's nuclear progress has made those suggestions moot. After his summit with Bush, Putin's officials have reiterated Russia's guarantee regarding the return of spent fuel to Russia, and they are under contractual obligation to finish Bushehr, or face embarrassment internationally as untrustworthy business partners.

Iran has called for a meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement in Tehran in the near future to discuss the nuclear crisis and, given NAM's past support for Iran's positions, this will bolster Iran's nuclear diplomacy both inside and outside the IAEA (and the Security Council).

If events proceed as envisioned by Iran, the US will increasingly appear as the odd man out, playing the spoiler role with regard to the nuclear negotiations with Iran. Congress is in the process of devising its own nuclear policy toward Iran through pending legislation that would deny US nuclear cooperation to countries that assist Iran's nuclear program.

If adopted and signed by Bush, this bill would seriously complicate the already complex US-Russia relations, as well as set back the US-Iran dialogue on Iraq's security, given the bill's other provision calling for the State Department's designation of Iran's Revolutionary Guards as "terrorist".

Such legislative initiatives would, in effect, torpedo both the nuclear talks and the Iraq diplomacy. More fruitful would be a serious consideration of returning Iran's nuclear dossier from the Security Council to the IAEA if the Iran-IAEA negotiations prove successful.

There is, after all, the absence of a legal basis to continue pressing Iran with sanctions as long as its nuclear activities are legal within the framework of the NPT, and monitored by the IAEA. Even leading arms control experts such as former senator Sam Nun have admitted as much. Perhaps some of that wisdom will trickle down to the US Congress and the White House.

Note
1. For more on this, see Kaveh Afrasiabi, The case for a nuclear time-outSan Francisco Chronicle, February 4, 2007.

Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD, is the author of After Khomeini: New Directions in Iran's Foreign Policy (Westview Press) and co-author of "Negotiating Iran's Nuclear Populism", Brown Journal of World Affairs, Volume XII, Issue 2, Summer 2005, with Mustafa Kibaroglu. He also wrote "Keeping Iran's nuclear potential latent", Harvard International Review, and is author of Iran's Nuclear Program: Debating Facts Versus Fiction.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110