WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Aug 10, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Turks take no delight in Iraqi visit
By Sami Moubayed

angered by Turkey's independent actions - especially after Erdogan came out victorious last month.

Walkouts on Maliki
One reason Erdogan cannot believe Maliki is that in June the Iraqi premier expressed support for the Kurds in their confrontation with Turkey. Neglecting a Turkish request this summer to defuse the situation, Maliki went to Iraqi Kurdistan and met with its president, Massoud Barzani, a friend of the PKK. Maliki stressed that he will



not allow the peaceful district of northern Iraq to be turned into a battleground.

From there he said that Article 140 of the constitution, which most likely will lead to the "Kurdification" of oil-rich Kirkuk, is "obligatory". Maliki was referring to the article that calls for a plebiscite in Kirkuk to decide whether the region should be incorporated into Iraqi Kurdistan, along with a population census to see how many Kurds live there.

Maliki knows he cannot work against the PKK or his Kurdish allies in Iraq. They are his only friends left in the government. If the Kurds walk out, Maliki is history - even now he is hanging on by a thread. He has already alienated the Sunnis, who walked out with their five ministers last week, representing the Iraqi Accordance Front. He alienated the Sadrists, who abandoned him with their six ministers in April, by refusing to work for a timetable for US troop withdrawal.

This week, another five ministers "froze" their membership in the cabinet. They are members of the Iraqi Nationalist List, headed by Allawi, who is secular. This was "Step 1", they claimed, to complete withdrawal. Allawi's team holds the ministries of Justice, Human Rights, Sciences, Telecommunications, and State for Tribal Affairs. Allawi also commands the fourth-largest group in Parliament, with 24 of the 275 seats.

When the walkout becomes final, Maliki will have lost 18 of his 37 ministers, thereby becoming unconstitutional. The cabinet, which should represent all parties in the political system, would only be representing Shi'ites of the United Iraqi Alliance (UIA) and Kurds. It would have no seculars, Sunnis or Sadrists.

Maliki and the Sunnis
Making life worse for the prime minister was Vice President Tarek al-Hashemi, who came out on Tuesday with a fiery set of new accusations against Maliki, accusing him of malpractices and violations at the Ministry of State for National Security, which is controlled by the UIA.

Hashemi, who is head of the Islamic Party, which is a member of the Iraqi Accordance Front, called on Maliki to abolish the ministry, claiming it has become "scandalous for Iraq". Hashemi added that Maliki had expanded the ministry, creating branches for it in all Iraqi provinces, whereas under the constitution it was entitled to no more than 17 employees. Its role should be to advise and consult with other government agencies, whereas it has become a major player in its own right, with more than 1,400 employees, all pledging their loyalties to Shi'ite political Islam.

The ministry's expansion is "unconstitutional", Hashemi said, "and it has a budget whose source is unknown until today", hinting that the ministry is being financed by Iran.

Shortly after Hashemi's remarks, eight masked terrorists assassinated one of his top commanders in the Islamic Party at his home in a town 10 kilometers northwest of Fallujah. Omar Hassan al-Mulla was shot in front of his family, and the act was blamed on al-Qaeda, which persecutes Sunnis involved in the US-backed political process. Hashemi's allies contest the story, claiming it might have been the doing of Shi'ite militias, who carried out the crime to punish Hashemi and then blamed it on al-Qaeda.

Maliki vs Jaafari
On Wednesday, as Maliki arrived in Tehran, the Saudi-run television station Al-Arabiyya ran a story on serious divisions between the prime minister and his former boss and predecessor, Ibrahim al-Jaafari. Jaafari was no different from Maliki when it came to tolerating Shi'ite militias during his tenure in power. He too gave the Ministry of Interior to Shi'ite militias, who used it to persecute traditional enemies in the Sunni community.

But since leaving power last year, Jaafari has developed a new political philosophy based on collaboration with Sunnis. Perhaps sectarian to a degree at one juncture of his career, Jaafari has learned from his mistakes and is trying to project himself as an Iraqi nationalist, not just a Shi'ite statesman. He strongly criticizes Maliki's narrow alliance with the Kurds and pro-Iranian Shi'ites within the UIA, claiming this does not represent the Iraqi people.

The Saudi TV station, maximizing benefit from the internal divide, reported that Jaafari was about to create a new political movement, the Union for National Reform. This would be a political movement that includes Shi'ites, Sunnis, Christians and seculars. Among its proposed members are the Islamic Party of Hashemi and Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Jaafari will run in upcoming municipal elections single-handed, without the UIA and without the Da'wa Party, which he has headed for decades. The Saudi station added that Jaafari proposes that he become prime minister, or president if the constitution is amended to give the presidency more powers (these were taken away after the downfall of Saddam Hussein).

Last week he proposed giving the presidency as a permanent seat to the Sunnis, as a confidence-building measure to bring them back into the political process. Regardless of whether he succeeds or not, his opposition to Maliki, from within the Da'wa Party and the Shi'ite community, is a great source of disturbance to the premier.

Having the Sunnis walk out on him is one thing, but having his boss, patron and colleague and the legitimate head of al-Da'wa (who won the party's elections in May with an overwhelming majority) run against him as another. It spells disaster for Maliki.

The world is divided over Maliki. Some see him as a reformer whose hands are tied because of the civil war and sectarian conflict that are crippling his country, claiming that in different times he would be a completely different leader. They portray him as a man with vision, courage and leadership qualities.

Others dismiss him as a sectarian clown, a man who cannot reconcile with the Sunnis because of his radical Shi'ite loyalties. They see him as completely incapable of reform. Some claim he is a puppet of the United States. Others accuse him of being on the Iranian payroll. Many things can be said about Maliki, but one fact that is becoming increasingly clear, and non-negotiable, is that he is not a man who can be counted on to keep his promises.

He promised the Sunnis greater power in the political process. He pledged to give the Ministry of Interior to an independent rather than to a member of the Shi'ite parties that use its police apparatus to persecute Sunnis. He then let them down and gave the ministry to an Iran-backed radical Shi'ite party. Now that the Sunnis have abandoned him, he is promising greater political reforms, such as amending the de-Ba'athification laws, but nobody believes him in the Sunni community.

He promised to uphold secularism in Iraq, along with religious liberties, but his country is looking increasingly like an Iran-style theocracy. He promised the Americans he would disarm the militias, but has been unable to deliver. Now that they have started searching for a substitute premier, he has began cracking down on his former allies in the Mahdi Army, to prove his sincerity to the Americans. Instead, however, he is courting the Badr Organization militias of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim.

He promised Muqtada he would steer clear of the US orbit, but failed. He promised the Iraqis more security, but he has failed them as well - over and over again - since May 2006. He promised better relations with his Arab neighbors, but none of that has materialized, because he insists on maintaining strong relations with Iran.

All of the above explains why Erdogan did not take his Iraqi guest very seriously in Ankara this week. Probably neither will Ahmadinejad.

Sami Moubayed is a Syrian political analyst.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110