WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Aug 22, 2007
Iraqi 'surge' misses its mark
By Ahmed Ali

BAQUBA, Iraq - The major US military operation in Baquba city north of Baghdad has ended, but it has left continuing suffering for residents in its wake. The US military launched Operation Arrowhead Ripper in Baquba, 50 kilometers northeast of Baghdad, on June 18. Baquba is the capital city of Iraq's Diyala province.

The stated goal of the operation was to eradicate al-Qaeda from the city and other areas in the province. The region has seen some of the highest number of attacks on US troops. Shortly after



launching the operation, the US military admitted that nearly 80% of al-Qaeda militants had fled the area.

Residents had been looking for an end to raids and abductions by criminal gangs and sectarian death squads, but the US military operation brought no relief.

"People here feel afraid because the coalition forces always push al-Qaeda out of the cities, but unfortunately they return when the troops retreat," resident Mohammed Hulail told Inter Press Service (IPS). "So the coalition forces can provide no solution."

A Baquba city official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told IPS that al-Qaeda militants had already returned to parts of the city. "We are now sure that Iraqi police and army cannot defeat al-Qaeda who are well fortified in the streets and buildings."

Residents have learnt to fear enemies on all sides. "People are the victims of this war because they are in the middle point between the American forces and the fighters of al-Qaeda," Jabbar Ibrahim, a secondary school teacher in the city, told IPS. "The fighters of al-Qaeda came to control the city, but when the US troops came to fight them, they ran away, leaving civilians to face the shells the bombs."

Many residents complain of indiscriminate arrests through the US forces' search for al-Qaeda suspects. "Arrests are sometimes made wrongly; simple people who have nothing to do with fighting and violence were arrested, and those who were the real fighters ran away," a resident who declined to give his name told IPS.

The Iraqi Islamic Party has accused the multi-national forces operating in the area of killing many people in Baquba in the early weeks of the operation. "The operations led by the US forces in western Baquba led to the death of more than 350 people, most of whom are still under the rubble," the party said in a statement.

Many residents in this city of 300,000 say that Operation Arrowhead Ripper has made living conditions worse. "We spent 12 days without water, electricity and food," Hamid Shaaban, a 51-year-old retired city official told IPS. And US forces were of little help. "I have seven children," said Shaaban. "I went to ask US troops for food and water." All he got, he said, was some bottled water. He was then sent away.

The shortage of water hit the city at the worst time of the year. "The temperature was between 45 and 51 degrees Celsius," an elderly woman said. "We have had very long days, it has been terrible."

Most residents IPS spoke to said they would leave if they could, but they either lacked funds or simply did not know where to go. "We do not have another place to go in order to leave this miserable place," resident Kamil Abid told IPS. "All places are the same, and we have no money to start again."

The US military has often detained people who have stayed home during the attacks and searches. Several residents say a decision to stay on was often seen as a gesture of defiance.

Now almost everyone seems fed up with the violence and intimidation from all sides. "What people want is security in order to get back again to their jobs to earn their living," said the owner of a local food store. "Providing this is the responsibility of the coalition forces and the Iraqi government."

Suspicions abound that the US forces do not really want to solve the problem. "The US government always tends to create an enemy, and then fight him in order to show weak governments, like this one in Iraq, that they cannot do without the support of US power," said a retired army officer.

High-level support ebbs for the 'surge'
Meanwhile, Washington's policy makers are growing dissatisfied with the George W Bush administration's troop "surge" in Iraq and a majority agrees that the world is becoming more dangerous for the United States, according to a poll released Monday, reports Eli Clifton of IPS from Washington.

The non-partisan poll, called The Terrorism Index and released by the Center for American Progress and Foreign Policy magazine, surveys more than 100 foreign-policy experts, including former secretaries of state, top commanders in the US military, senior intelligence professionals and academics, to assess the effectiveness of how the United States is fighting the "war on terror".

In this year's results, 91% of participants said the world is becoming more dangerous for the United States, while only 2% said it was safer and 84% of poll participants disagreed that the US is winning the "war on terror". The ongoing war in Iraq appeared to be the cause of the experts' pessimism, with 92% of them saying the war was affecting US national security negatively, up 5% from a year ago.

Opposition to the Bush administration's handling of the war in Iraq was most noticeable in the 53% of respondents who now say that the "surge" of about 165,000 troops is having a negative impact, up 22% from six months ago.

"What I take away from that is that the last six months may have been the most defining months in the 'war on terror'," Foreign Policy's senior editor Michael Boyer told IPS.

How to withdraw troops from Iraq brought mixed reactions from the bipartisan group of experts, with a majority - 68% - supporting a redeployment of troops from Iraq in the next 18 months, while most of the experts opposed an immediate withdrawal.

Perhaps surprisingly, slightly more conservatives - 25% of conservative respondents - called for an immediate withdrawal than liberals or moderates. "It's rare to see foreign policy experts in this sort of agreement on such a politicized issue. The sentiment on the surge is shared across party lines," said Boyer.

Despite claims from Bush administration officials and presidential candidates that a withdrawal from Iraq will lead to further terrorist attacks in the United States, 88% of experts polled agreed that a troop withdrawal from Iraq would have no correlation or was unlikely to lead to future terrorist attacks within the US.

"We have an administration that says we need a victory in Iraq or suffer consequences at home but experts say that's just not so," said Boyer. "Foreign-policy experts really don't see a correlation between being in Iraq or leaving and terrorist attacks at home."

As well as contradicting the Bush administration's justification for continued troop deployments in Iraq, the experts expressed concern with the lasting legacy of the administration's Middle East policy.

Fifty-eight percent of poll respondents said that in 10 years' time, Sunni-Shi'ite tensions will have increased; 35% believe that Arab dictators will have been discouraged from reforming; 5% believe that al-Qaeda will be weaker; and only 3% believe Iraq will be a "beacon of democracy" in the Middle East.

More than half of the experts surveyed believe that the current US policy of providing aid to Pakistan - which has dramatically increased since the US invasion of Afghanistan - is having a negative impact on national security.

Furthermore, 35% of those polled thought that Pakistan is most likely to become the next al-Qaeda stronghold, and 74% believed that Pakistan is the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years.

Only 22% of respondents, however, found Pakistan to be Washington's least useful ally, while 34% of those polled picked Russia as the ally that least serves US interests - presumably a response to Russian President Vladimir Putin's increasing role as a strongman.

"In terms of national security, the war in Iraq and the 'war on terror', the foreign policy communities agree that all three are on the wrong track," said Boyer.

Ahmed Ali, IPS correspondent in Iraq's Diyala province, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, IPS's US-based specialist writer on Iraq who travels extensively in the region.

(Inter Press Service)


US 'surges', soldiers die. Blame Iran (Aug 16, '07)

Escalation in Iraq by the numbers (Aug 15, '07)


1. US marches closer to war with Iran

2. When the Fed's big guns fail, call in China

3. It must be the end of secularism ...

4. South Asia's schizophrenic twins

5. Taliban, US in new round of peace talks 

6. India's blue water dreams may have to wait

7. Philippines teeters on brink of total war


(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Aug 20, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110