WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Sep 11, 2007
Page 3 of 3
DISPATCHES FROM AMERICA

Uh, uhhm: Say no more, Iraq is a slam dunk
By Julian Delasantellis

politically inspired process of redefining victory, as the US now accepts the Sunni tribal sheikhs' rejection of the central Baghdad government that it fought and spilled blood for the three previous years to force them to accept. Americans would, as the football season starts, much rather believe that they're driving deep down into al-Qaeda territory, about to score a touchdown in their end zone so they can spike the football in bin Laden's face. As Bush  



told Australian Deputy Prime Minister Mark Vaile at last week's at Sydney Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, when Vaile inquired about Iraq, "We're kicking ass."

In the US, that's called "trash talk". White Americans love this macho, tough-talking rhetoric, unless, of course, it's being to addressed to them in an actual US ghetto.

Of course, the big one that many Americans believe is, "We're fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here." No serious observer of contemporary Iraq believes this; it's saying that the insurgents, instead of traveling to the United States to attack a sea-to-shining-sea of soft targets, would rather stay in Iraq to be chewed up and spat out from the maw of the most technologically advanced killing machine in history.

But the war's lies are a lot more palatable than its truth, a fact that Bush or, more likely, Karl Rove, very methodically and scientifically testing these specific themes with suburban focus groups, know far better than do the anti-war forces.

There are two basic, unspoken reasons that the US is still in Iraq. One is that a large part of the US population sees the Iraq war as the last battle of the Vietnam War, a final chance to win a conflict that was seen as lost in 1975. ( I wrote about this sentiment in my June 6 ATol article Yes, Rambo, you get to win this time.)

The other reason gets to Bush's unique qualifications to lead this war. A 2004 poll found that, if asked whether they would like to have a beer with either Bush or John Kerry, 57% of Americans chose Bush. Of course, in wishing to have a beer with Bush, one would hope that the respondent had a taste for one of those bizarre-tasting non-alcoholic brews.

There is Bush, seen not as the lecturing patrician scholar, not as the smart kid, but as just a regular, down-to-earth average American guy.

And what the real American guy wants, but is way too polite and reserved to tell the pollsters, and what he doesn't trust the political left to do, is to turn live Arabs, or live Muslims (to most Americans there's no difference), into dead Arabs and dead Muslims.

This is the fatal flaw that doomed the US anti-war movement. Far from responding to a rational, coolly logical argument that the anti-war left might produce, Americans, almost at the level of the primal, tribal cave passions that conservatives repeatedly tap into so well, want to see Americans kill Arabs - whether they're our enemy or not is immaterial . Heard again in this current war is a slogan that so well defined America's method of differentiating friend from foe in Vietnam: "Kill them all and let God sort 'em out."
A lot of this results from a desire for September 11 payback, but it's deeper than that. If you're an American male in your late 40s or 50s today, your first realization that there was a people called Arabs whose actions personally affected you might have been in 1973 and 1979, during the first and second Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries oil shocks. The "A-rabs" had raised the prices on "our" oil, so gasoline became scarce and its price skyrocketed. That meant that you couldn't afford to cruise the teen hangouts as long as needed to get a date. That meant you were less likely to score that night. Put this seething resentment in a pot, cover and let it simmer for more than 30 years, and the Iraq war is what you get.

The cerebral brainiacs of the anti-war movement will never understand these base motivations, but, in Bush, the US middle class sees a regular guy who, just like them, acts more on his emotions and passions than his intellect. In sharing their emotion and passion to hurt the Arab world, Bush perfectly reflected the desires of his people - too bad the whole thing went straight to hell when those Arabs had the cheek to fight back.

But here is the true brilliance of 2007 Miss Teen South Carolina Lauren Caitlin Upton's answer to the question of why Americans are so ignorant. What would have been the point if Upton had produced a rational, well-thought-out, coherent response (as she actually did on US morning television two days later; when you're cute and blond in the US, unlike if you're poor and black in New Orleans, you get second chances in life)?

In her first response, her disjointed logic and reasoning, her brutally tortured syntax, her inappropriate bolting together of so many well-sounding platitudes and cliches into one terrifying mass of overarching incoherence perfectly reflects the mental processes that define the way in which the US looks at the world in general, and the manner in which it has prosecuted the Iraq war in particular.

In the same manner in which Ronald Reagan appointed Jeanne Kirkpatrick US ambassador to the United Nations to reflect his conservative views, perhaps Bush will do the same with Upton; more so than the ineffectually combative John Bolton, at last Bush might finally have someone at the UN who can best explain the delicate nuance of his foreign policy.

Point of full disclosure: I was the kid who did the term paper on the European Common Market in the ninth grade, and somewhere around here I've got the bent, rusted paper clip to prove it.

Julian Delasantellis is a management consultant, private investor and educator in international business in the US state of Washington. He can be reached at juliandelasantellis@yahoo.com.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 3 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110