WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Sep 12, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Syria and Israel flirt with war
By Sami Moubayed

DAMASCUS - During the Suez Crisis of 1956, Israel developed a regular habit of violating Syrian airspace to deter the Syrians from supporting the Egyptian army. The Syrians did not have radar at the time, so air force commander Wadih al-Muqabari developed a scheme whereby police stations around the country were linked by a 24-hour hotline to army headquarters in Damascus.

On spotting an Israeli warplane in Syrian skies, police personnel would phone their superiors and report its direction, elevation and



estimated speed. Army headquarters would immediately call the nearest police station to track it further, then send Syrian warplanes to bring it down or chase it away.

On one such occasion, five Syrian aircraft set out for an operation that included a young pilot, future president Hafez al-Assad. They were prevented from bringing down the Israeli plane, although Assad had it in shooting range, because it was flying over Turkish territory. The same plane violated Syrian airspace later in the day. Another five-plane team set out, and the Israeli jet was downed on the Lebanese border by an officer named Louis Dakar. The pilot ejected, and the co-pilot was killed. When interrogated by the Lebanese, the Israeli pilot said there was a 1% chance of his plane being downed by the Syrians. The fact that they had succeeded meant that the Syrian army was "dangerous" for Israel.

That was 51 years ago.

Last week, four Israeli warplanes invaded Syrian airspace after midnight on September 6, breaking the sound barrier, and reaching as far as the village of Tal Abyad in the vicinity of Deir al-Zour, about 160 kilometers north of the city of Raqqa. A military source in Syria was quoted saying that the Israelis violated Syrian airspace "through the southern border, coming from the Mediterranean front toward the northeastern one".

Syrian defenses confronted the Israeli planes, forcing them to drop their fuel and ammunition so they could fly higher and faster and escape. "We warn the Israeli enemy government against this flagrant aggressive act, and retain the right to respond in an appropriate way," the military spokesman said. Witnesses reported seeing the warplanes at about 1:30am, but thought they were US ones, not Israeli.

The news caused a stir around the world, although it was pretty much expected by observers of the Syrian-Israeli front. There has been much speculation about an outbreak of hostilities between Damascus and Israel since June. Both countries had been mobilizing troops, raising the prospects of war, until Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak came out one week before the military operation saying his country was going to withdraw its troops from the Golan border. Israel captured the Golan Heights in 1967 in the Six Day War and, since then, the countries have been in bitter dispute.

War was not an option, the Israeli minister seemed to be saying. He added that mobilization raised the risk of an "accidental incident" between both armies, something that Israel wanted to avoid. For their part, the Syrians have been saying that their strategic choice is peace - not war - with Israel, reminding the world on every possible occasion that they had engaged in the peace process, under US auspices, for 15 years.

If both countries want peace, as the official version implies, then what exactly happened on September 6? One theory says Israel wanted to test Syrian defenses, especially after reports that Damascus had received new ballistic missiles from Russia. The objectives of the intrusion would be to "feel the waters" before Israel actually engaged in war with the Syrians. This was seconded by Israeli counter-terrorism expert Boaz Ganor, who said his country was "collecting intelligence on long-range missiles" deployed by Syria in the north.

A second theory - less credible - claims that Israel wanted to see whether its warplanes could reach Iran without being spotted by Syrian radar. This was in preparation for an upcoming war that Israel expects between the US and Iran.

A third theory claims that Israel was searching for military training bases for Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah. A fourth claims that the operation was nothing more than a provocation aimed at showing the Syrians that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were on alert and had "recovered" from their summer war with Hezbollah last year. The Israelis wanted to see how Syria would respond.

Syrian Vice President Farouk al-Shara, on a state visit to Rome, told the Italian daily La Repubblica, "All I can say is that the military and political echelon is looking into a series of responses as we speak. Results are forthcoming."

When asked what kind of retaliation was expected from the Syrians, he replied: "I cannot reveal details." The journalist then spoke about an appeal from Israeli President Shimon Peres to Syria, to which Shara responded: "Excuse me for smiling. The talks about peace are a disguise for blatant aggression. Israel's responses in light of the aircraft infiltration are amazing, with [Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert saying he knows nothing about it."

Other swift responses came from Syria's main allies, Russia, Turkey and Iran. The Turks even summoned Israel's ambassador to Ankara and protested the Israeli aggression. Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki contacted his Syrian counterpart Walid al-Mouallem, expressing his country's willingness to stand by Damascus. The Russians said the violation was "unacceptable" and condemned it, while the Turks said they were "worried".

The United States, surprisingly, had no comment on the entire ordeal. What makes the crisis all the more troubling is the Israeli silence. Neither cabinet ministers nor IDF sources, or even the Prime Minister's Office, have commented on the intrusion. They have neither confirmed nor denied it, although in the past Israel trumpets when it performs such an operation, either in Syria or Lebanon. The last time its warplanes ripped through Syrian skies was in June 2006.

Before that, they had hit the Syrian village of Ain al-Saheb, near Damascus, in October 2003. According to the London-based newspaper Al-Hayat, whose Syria correspondent Ibrahim al-Hamidi is a well-informed source on his country's foreign policy, Syria believes that the operation was a "diplomatic and military experiment" to test how Syria would react. The paper adds that Syria's warning to retaliate as it sees fit was "serious, deterring and non-escalating".

The Syrians are aware that Olmert is in a difficult position, imposed on him by the less-than-satisfying results of the Israeli war on Lebanon in July-August 2006. In that war - unlike any other in Israel's history since 1948 - none of the Jewish state's objectives was met. They said they were invading Lebanon to rescue two Israeli soldiers abducted by Hezbollah. Today, more than one year later, the two soldiers remain in Hezbollah captivity. Israel said it would crush the Lebanese military group, but Hezbollah remains alive and kicking and, according both to its own reports and to those of Western observers, has managed to rearm itself, with an arsenal that is larger than the one it possessed at the start of the war in July 2006.

Olmert understands all of these difficult realities, and so does the Israeli public, which holds him and his team accountable for the ill-fated Lebanon adventure. With such a defeat on his record, the Israeli prime minister cannot possible talk peace with the Syrians - or anyone else. He needs to obtain his war medals to "right the

Continued 1 2 


Iran-Syria alliance on uncertain ground (Jul 21, '07)

War games, mind games or the real deal? (Jul 14, '07)


1. The discreet charm of US diplomacy

2. The man with the dyed beard returns

3. Pakistan's military kitted for new power

4. Cartoons aid US lynch mob mentality

5. In gold we trust

6. Uh, uhhm: Say no more, Iraq is a slam dunk  


7. Russian revival for Southeast Asia

8. China trumps India in gas stakes


(24 hours to11:59 pm ET,Sep 10, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110