WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Sep 27, 2007
Page 1 of 2
All power to the weak in Lebanon
By Sami Moubayed

DAMASCUS - Lebanon's Parliament on Tuesday postponed the first stage in electing a new president after a Hezbollah boycott. If legislators do manage to complete the process - despite the mountainous obstacles - it will be the first real election in Lebanon since the country erupted into civil war in 1975.

Parliament's 127 deputies will now vote next month on who should replace pro-Syrian President Emile Lahoud, whose term ends on



November 23. Parliament has until then to finalize the issue, though there is disagreement over just how this should be done to get a new man in Baabda Palace.

Lebanese politics is sharply polarized into two camps, which refuse to back down. On another level, the contenders are divided Lebanon caught in a proxy war between the great powers.

One faction is headed by Saad al-Hariri, the parliamentary-majority leader who rose to fame after the assassination of his father, former prime minister Rafik al-Hariri, in 2005. It includes heavyweights from the Sunni community, like Prime Minister Fouad al-Siniora, the Christian community, including former warlord Samir Gagegea and ex-president Amin Gemayel, and Druze leader Walid Jumblatt.

Most of this team (with the exception of Gagegea and Gemayel) were once loudly pro-Syrian. They worked with and legitimized the Syrian military presence in Lebanon throughout the 1990s. As long as the Syrians continued to support and reward them with government office, they remained pro-Syrian. All of them, including Jumblatt and Siniora, were ministers under Rafik Hariri, during the Syrian heyday in Lebanon.

Matters changed, however, when the Syrians abandoned Hariri in favor of Lahoud. They feared that Hariri had become too strong in the international community (thanks to his friendship with then-French president Jacques Chirac), and too independent in Lebanon. The only person to "clip his wings" was a military officer - someone like Lahoud, Damascus reasoned.

Hariri objected to Lahoud's ascent in 1998 on the grounds of democracy, claiming that an officer would turn Lebanon into a police state. As a result, he resigned and moved into the opposition in 1998-2000. Lahoud greatly persecuted the Hariri bloc and brought charges of corruption against many of its members, including then-finance minister Siniora.

Hariri made a thundering comeback in 2000, winning parliamentary elections and imposing himself on Lahoud, who was becoming increasingly unpopular within Lebanon. Relations were poor between the president and his new prime minister. Hariri tried hard to continue appeasing the Syrians and even - very unwillingly - agreed to extend Lahoud's mandate in 2004.

Relations between Hariri's team and both Lahoud and Syria broke after Hariri's assassination in February 2005. The Hariri bloc blamed Syria and Lahoud's generals for the murder. This explains why this team is so bent today on electing a new president from within its parliamentary bloc. Controlling the premiership through their parliamentary majority (won in 2005) they would be in complete control of Lebanon if the presidency went their way as well.

This team, known as the March 14 Coalition, is backed by the United States, France and Saudi Arabia. All three are traditional friends of the Hariri family and support his political movement for a variety of reasons. First, it is pro-Western and opposes the Syrians. Second, it holds Sunni heavyweights who are opposed to the strengthening of Iran-backed Lebanese Shi'ites (mainly Hezbollah).

Supporting Hariri is part of the US scheme (devised by Deputy National Security Adviser Eliott Abrams and Vice President Dick Cheney) to counterbalance Iranian influence in the Arab world and halt the spread of so-called Shi'itification.

After all, Hariri and Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah have very different agendas for Lebanon. One wants to transform Lebanon into an investment hub and tourist center for the Arabs. The other wants it as a hotbed to combat the Israelis. One is committed to a booming economy. The other wants to liberate the Sheeba Farms (and Palestine) from Israeli occupation. The Saudis, in addition to their strong ties to the Hariri family, are very much opposed to seeing Lebanon ablaze. They have too much at stake (both in financial and political investments) to see Lebanon fall apart. They cannot let Lebanon fall into the hands of the Iranians. That is why they are betting on Hariri to bring down the Hezbollah coalition.

Scramble over candidates
In this presidential race, there are three candidates from March 14: Boutros Harb, Robert Ghanem and Nassib Lahoud. All of them, by nature of Lebanese norm, are Maronite Christians. Two have to step down for March 14 to choose one candidate for the job.

That choice, undoubtedly, will rest on what the Christian heavyweights in March 14 (Gagegea and Gemayel) decide, and what is advised by the US, France and Saudi Arabia. Ghanem, who has little support, is unlikely to continue. The draw remains between Harb and Lahoud.

Sources in Lebanon claim that the Americans "prefer" Harb and the Saudis "prefer" Lahoud. The French are undecided, with an official line saying they will back whoever is selected by the Lebanese people. Press reports in Beirut, however, claim that France is in favor of avoiding a crisis by bringing army commander Michel Suleiman - a compromise candidate - to Baabda Palace.

The proposal envisages an interim period of two years, during which a new election law will be devised and current tensions will be resolved. That suggestion is problematic, however, because it would require a constitutional amendment to allow Suleiman to run as he is a government employee and thereby barred from standing.

Suleiman is neither pro- nor anti-Syrian and is a decorated officer whose approval ratings have skyrocketed in recent weeks after his men defeated Fatah al-Islam, a terrorist Islamic group, at the Nahr al-Bared refugee camp in northern Lebanon. March 14 does not object to him and Hezbollah likes him because he firmly believes in the need to combat Israel, saying at every occasion: "The rifles of the Lebanese Army should always remain pointed at the Israelis."

If he becomes president, he will not work to disarm Hezbollah - on the contrary, he will try to find common ground between it and March 14 and lobby to give Hezbollah and the Shi'ites in general a greater role in decision-making. That scores him points with the Syrians and Iranians, but limits the chances of his success with March 14, Saudi Arabia and the US.

The Saudis' man
The Saudis like Lahoud because, of all the March 14 candidates, he is by far the most principled. Lahoud, a cousin of the current president and son of Salim, a former minister, is from Baabdat, Metn province, in Mount Lebanon. He studied engineering in

Continued 1 2 


Al-Qaeda sets Lebanon record straight

Lebanon douses a terrorist fire (Sep 5, '07)


1. 'Hitler' does New York

2. Military brains plot Pakistan's downfall

3. Russia bolsters ties with Iran

4. The Gotterdammerung of central banking

5. Iran, Israel ratchet up tensions

6. National extinction and natural law

7. The making of Vietnam's oil giant

8. Inflation eats into China's mooncakes

9. Silver and gold salvation

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Sep 25, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110