WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Oct 11, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Ahmadinejad scores 'fair' in mid-term report
By Kaveh L Afrasiabi

to enhance Iran's Islamist ties of solidarity, particularly within the OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference); the OIC, like NAM, has provided solid support for Iran's nuclear rights.

Projecting power with principles, championing NAM's cause of a multi-polar world order and the rights of oppressed Palestinians, while maintaining good relations with the new governments in Kabul and Baghdad, as well as with practically all of the other neighboring states and "near-neighbors" in Central Asia, the



Caucasus, and the Middle East, these are among the chief foreign policy pluses cited by Ahmadinejad's supporters. There are, however, several problem areas that paint a somewhat different, less glorious, picture, including the following:

  • Iran's policy in the Caspian Sea region has been neglected. In light of the upcoming summit of the leaders of the five Caspian littoral states in Tehran in mid-October, Iran's relative neglect of this facet of the country's foreign policy has begun to receive public attention and the upcoming summit provides an opportunity for Ahmadinejad to quiet his critics by causing a much-needed breakthrough in the stalled, marathon negotiations on the legal status of the Caspian Sea. Russia, which has already parcelled out parts of the Caspian Sea to Kazakhastan and Azerbaijan,(1) must show serious initiative as well, otherwise this summit will turn into another failure, as was the case in the Asghabat summit.(2) But, of course, this summit is Russia's opportunity to prove its friendship with Iran, by committing itself to complete the Bushehr power plant irrespective of the nuclear row.

  • Iran-Russia relations need improvement. Indeed, the current setbacks in relations, represent a minus on Ahmadinejad's record, and yet the situation can be reversed with deft diplomacy, due to shared Iranian and Russian apprehensions about the US's interventionist policies, NATO's eastward expansion, and the like.

  • Iran's EU policy needs a facelift. Iran cannot realistically afford the present negative trend in its relations with Europe, Iran's main trade partner. Thirty seven percent of Iran's foreign trade is with Europe, and yet almost all the relevant statistics about Iran-EU trade in 2006 reflect a declining trend which, when combined with the new French president's anti-Iran stance, will likely continue barring a breakthrough in the nuclear stalemate. Iranian officials have recently gone on the offensive, reminding the French in particular that their national interests will be harmed if they persist in their Iran bashing. France is the leading lender to Iran, with Iran owing some US$5.8 billion to the French banks, France depends on Iran for oil and gas imports, and Iran has signed major contracts with French firms. According to Tehran, it is unwise for President Nicholas Sarkozy to get on the US bandwagon against Iran since that would harm French economic interests.

    In conclusion, the above cursory look at Ahmadinejad's foreign policy is of course not a substitute for an in-depth, critical assessment at the level of country-to-country, regional, and international units of analysis with the help of appropriate methodology and "risk analysis". The compass of such a mid-term report can shed much light on the areas where Ahmadinejad needs to show more energy and imagination, where continuity and or adjustments or even discontinuities are needed, for the remainder of his presidency.

    Notes (1) Iran's relations with the republic of Azerbaijan have become tense again, due to the publication of a map in Baku that depicts Iran as part of ancient Azerbaijan. Iranian politicians and press have lashed out at the Azeri government for allowing this to happen, reminding them that Baku was a part of Iran until the Russian-Iranian wars of the early 19th century that led to the peace treaties of Golestan and Turkmenchai, ceding not only Baku but also many other parts of the Caucasus from Iran.

    (2) For more on this see the author's Letter from Asghabat: The Caspian quagmire. Also, Afrasiabi, Beyond the conflicting treaties
    Kaveh L Afrasiabi, PhD, is the author of After Khomeini: New Directions in Iran's Foreign Policy (Westview Press) and co-author of "Negotiating Iran's Nuclear Populism", Brown Journal of World Affairs, Volume XII, Issue 2, Summer 2005, with Mustafa Kibaroglu. He also wrote "Keeping Iran's nuclear potential latent", Harvard International Review, and is author of Iran's Nuclear Program: Debating Facts Versus Fiction.

    (Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
  • 1 2 Back

     

     

     

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110