WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Nov 8, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Turkish decision weighs heavy for US
By Sami Moubayed

acceptable, but only for two months, adding that anything longer would be a constitutional violation.

All of these thoughts must have been running through Erdogan's head as his plane landed in Washington at 3.30am on Monday. Before departing, Erdogan had said he would demand "concrete measures" from Bush. He added, "Our visit comes at a time when [Turkish-US] relations are undergoing a serious test." He wrapped



up, "We have run out of patience."

The two leaders talked about various ways to minimize damage in Iraq if the Turks were to invade Iraqi Kurdistan. Erdogan repeated a request, originally made at the Istanbul conference, for the extradition and arrest of 150 members of the PKK, based in Iraq and Europe. Most of them are residents of northern Iraq, while a significant number are based in France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Austria and Russia.

Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a US ally and a Kurdish nationalist, who had earlier said that extraditing the PKK was a "dream" for Turkey, then came out with a new argument, saying that he had no information that such a "wanted" list even existed.

Erdogan added that his country was disappointed with the slow pace of response from both the US and Europe. Major European media outlets have not referred to the PKK as a "terrorist" organization, although the European Union brands it as such. France and Belgium cracked down on PKK activists in 2006 but refused to hand them over to Turkey.

The Turks claim that had the US been more firm, then Europe would have behaved differently on the Kurdish issue. Among the dangerous PKK commanders who were arrested - then released - by the Europeans were Riza Altun, in charge of Europe, and Nedim Seven, in charge of purse strings and youth affairs.

Many in Europe are still sympathetic to the Kurds, claiming that they are the only major ethnic group in the world that still does not have a national home (presuming that what the Palestinians have is a state).

At the Washington summit, Erdogan bluntly said, "We have decided for an operation, the Turkish armed forces will determine its methods." He was informing the US president - rather than consulting him. He then added, "We are expecting tangible steps from our strategic ally."

President Abdullah Gul, meanwhile, on Tuesday said that Turkey had made a decision on how to proceed against PKK militants in northern Iraq and had informed the US of this decision. He did not elaborate, other than to say the PKK issue "should be handled through soldiers not through diplomats".

One of the problems that makes Bush reluctant is Iraq. In addition to the 70% of supplies channeled to US troops via Turkey, the Turks are a major component in the economic revival of Iraq. They are heavily involved in investment, banking, construction and commerce with the Iraqis. All that could come to an end and shake the already dislocated Iraqi economy.

If the US is left with no option but to help the Turks against the PKK, diverting its attention from central Iraq to its Kurdish north, other militias will get the upper hand in their war against the United States. This applies to the Mahdi Army of Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, former Ba'athists and al-Qaeda. That makes Bush think twice before saying "yes" to Erdogan.

On the other hand, Bush, who has been dying for a "success story" in Iraq to score him points among the US public, finally found it in al-Anbar province after the US started funding Sunni tribes to combat al-Qaeda. Violence has been reduced in these provinces, enabling Bush to say, "All is not lost. Victory is still in sight." But these Sunni tribes are 100% opposed to any partitioning of Iraq or giving the Kurds their separate entity.

If Bush continues to support the Kurds, on Kirkuk and other issues related to separatism, it might inspire Shi'ites to demand the same for their districts. That has already happened with the ambitious Abdul Aziz al-Hakim of the Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council, who is calling for an autonomous Shi'ite district in southern Iraq, similar to the Kurdish one in the north. This leaves Sunnis in central Iraq - where there is no oil - and no real republic anymore.

For two years, various US decision-makers, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates and former ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad, have been advising Bush to promote reconciliation between Shi'ites and Sunnis, claiming that only that would bring an end to the Sunni insurgency. That started to materialize with the Anbar "success story". The Sunnis, even those working with the Americans, however, would abandon them in a minute if the Americans gave the Kurds the green light to take Kirkuk. Anbar province would be set ablaze again.

The only way forward for the US is therefore to side with the Turks, as this serves the US's interests best. If the US were to side with the Kurds, it would alienate the Sunnis of Iraq, the pro-unity Shi'ites of Iraq (Muqtada and the Mahdi Army), the seculars of former premier Iyad Allawi, the Turks, the Iranians and the Syrians (who both suffer from a similar PKK problem).

Whereas, if the US sides with the Turks, the only ones who would sulk would be Iraq's Kurds and Maliki. The move would be widely welcomed by Iraqi Sunnis - and, perhaps, encourage them to cooperate further with the US in combating al-Qaeda in Iraq; the case that really matters to the Bush White House.

If the US decides to do that, it would have to put its full weight behind keeping Kirkuk out of Kurdish hands. Then it would have to come up with a formula to divide the oil revenue of the city equitably for all in the country.

It is now up to Bush as to whether he contains or magnifies the Turkish-Kurdish problem. But if the Turks do invade northern Iraq, Erdogan can safely say: "Don't say we didn't warn you."

Sami Moubayed is a Syrian political analyst.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110