WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Nov 27, 2007
Page 1 of 2
Even more good news for Maliki
By Sami Moubayed

DAMASCUS - On Sunday, the Iraqi Parliament debated a draft bill granting permission to 14,000 former Ba'athists, all being from the Sunni community, to rejoin government jobs and the armed forces. All of them had been fired in 2003 in a ill-advised process called de-Ba'athification, engineered by US proconsul L Paul Bremer and the United States' number one man in Iraq at the time, Ahmad Chalabi.

Reconciliation with the Sunnis is a demand put forward by Sunni notables and the former US ambassador to Baghdad, Zalmay



Khalilzad. It has been echoed at the highest level by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and US President George W Bush. The Americans believe that unless the Sunnis take part in government, they will never share in the rebuilding of Iraq, nor will they shoulder responsibility for its security. Only when given their former role in government and society (minus the presidency), would they work for a stable Iraq and successful political process, seeing it as an extension of their own success, stability and continuity.

Additionally, the Americans realize that all of their major allies in the Arab world (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Kuwait, Jordan and Qatar) are Sunni states which will not stand by and watch Iraqi Sunnis being crushed by the Shi'ites and Kurds. Not everybody in Iraq, however, shares in the US's enthusiasm for cooperation with the former Ba'athists, who total 1.4 million.

The new proposal says that members of the former security services and Republican Guards will be entitled to their pensions, while ordinary partisans will be reinstated to their jobs and considered eligible to run for any office, including prime minister, speaker of Parliament, or president, if voted for by the Iraqi people.

This does not apply, naturally, to the 38,000 senior Ba'athists who are standing trial, or have been convicted, or crimes under Saddam Hussein. Major disagreements were clear at the heated parliamentary session, with led to its postponement, spearheaded by Kurdish deputies and members of the Sadrist bloc.

Having suffered persecution and genocide at the hands of Saddam, both blocs were equally opposed to any kind of cooperation with the Ba'athists. They failed to see any difference between Saddam loyalists who had actually ordered the massacres, and Sunnis who had joined the Ba'ath Party with the sole purpose of professional development and social elevation. As far as the Kurds and Shi'ites are concerned, all of them are criminals for having worked with Saddam.

The proposal was turned down, Kurdish member of Parliament Mohammad Othman said, because Parliament speaker Mahmud Mashadani (a Sunni) had not presented it to the legal committee of Parliament (probably fearing that in its current form, it would be immediately rejected). The debate will continue.

Despite tremendous US pressure applied on Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to push his weight around for a rapprochement with former Ba'athists, the Iraqi leader stood by and watched the parliamentary session in complete silence. Like the Sadrists and the Kurds, he simply could not digest bringing the Ba'athists back into power. He wanted the parliamentary meeting to fail. As far as he is concerned, there is no such thing as an "innocent Ba'athist".

Recently, adding to Maliki's anger, the disbanded Ba'ath Party announced that it is willing to work with his rival, the prime minister-in-waiting, Iyad Allawi. The Izzat Douri branch of the Ba'ath announced it was "more than willing to work with Allawi, because we see him as a nationalist and Iraqi patriot, and not a sectarian figure [like Maliki]." Although they do not agree with all that Allawi did when serving as prime minister in 2004 (mainly his ties to the US Central Intelligence Agency), "we have no doubt that he would represent the interests of Iraq, not of Shi'ites, or Sunnis, or any other group [another clear reference to the prime minister]".

But all of this is not new. The tug-of-war between Ba'athists and leaders of post-2003 Iraq has dominated political life in Baghdad. What's new is the apparent willingness of Muqtada al-Sadr, leader of the Sadrist bloc, to coordinate with Kurdish politicians. Muqtada also sent a very strong message to Kurdish politicians through one of his top loyalists, member of Parliament Bahaa al-Araji. Speaking to the Iraqi newspaper Ilaf, Araji defended article 140 of the constitution, pertaining to Kirkuk. That is certainly a new line for the Sadrists. The article, which has caused a storm in Iraqi political circles, calls for a census and referendum in the oil-rich city to see whether it can be incorporated into Iraqi Kurdistan.
In 1986, as part of his Arabization process, Saddam called for the relocation of Arab families to Kirkuk, the center of Iraq's petroleum industry, to outnumber the Kurds living there. He also uprooted thousands of Kurds from Kirkuk. Since the downfall of Saddam's 

Continued 1 2 


Fears grow of post-'surge' woes (Nov 22, '07)

Bin Laden talks of victory, not defeat (Nov 22, '07)

Maliki thrown a political lifeline (Nov 22, '07)


1. Bin Laden talks of victory, not defeat

2.  The general has no uniform

3. Israel, the hope of the Muslim world
4. Leave, or we will behead you

5. Warning shot for Iran, via Syria

6. Eyes back on Fed for emergency rate cut

7. Muslim democracy: An oxymoron?

8. Bush administration conquers Washington

(Nov 21-25, 2007)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110