WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Dec 8, 2007
Page 3 of 3
US espionage enters the 'un-Rumsfeld' era
By Tim Shorrock

that the transfer of authority over the national agencies to the DNI would weaken the power of the Pentagon to wage war. In effect, Hunter fought a rear-guard action on behalf of Rumsfeld and Cheney, who could not openly oppose legislation that their commander-in-chief supported.

According to Washington Post political reporter David Broder, many Republicans were comfortable opposing Bush because they believed the legislation "had not originated with Bush but was in



effect forced on him by the commission". Hunter's maneuvers stopped the intelligence bill dead in its tracks.

After weeks of delay, Cheney stepped in to negotiate a provision that met the demands of the pro-military lawmakers that guaranteed direct access to intelligence for military commanders. Afterwards, Hunter - who is now a Republican candidate for president - explained how the provision would work. In a wartime scenario, he told reporters, "It's important for the combatant commanders and their subordinates, whether it's a platoon leader in Fallujah or a Special Forces team leader, to be able to access that information very quickly." That intelligence, he pointed out, included satellite surveillance. The die was cast: henceforth, the NSA, the NGA and the NRO would remain under the Pentagon's control.

Consolidation continues
After winning the battle for control over the NSA, NGA and NRO, Rumsfeld and Cambone set to work institutionalizing that control within the Department of Defense. Even before the ink was dry on the reform legislation, Rumsfeld was circulating a directive instructing regional military commanders to create a plan for an expanded Pentagon role in military intelligence.

In December 2004, US Army Lieutenant General William G Boykin, the controversial general chosen by Cambone as his deputy, proposed a major expansion of human intelligence gathering within the Pentagon, "both within the military services and the [DIA], including more missions aimed at acquiring specific information sought by policy makers". Boykin also wanted military planners to work "more closely with the intelligence analysts" tracking terrorists and insurgency cells. "We've got to recognize intel as a war-fighting component," he said.

By 2005, special forces units under control of the Pentagon were routinely entering countries like Somalia and Iran to launch covert military operations. The NSA, NGA and NRO were enlisted to play key roles in Rumsfeld's "transformation" of the military through network-centric warfare: NSA signals and NGA imagery intelligence are now cornerstones of this 21st-century military doctrine.

Military power in intelligence was also concentrated at home. In 2002, deputy secretary of defense Paul Wolfowitz created the Counterintelligence Field Activity office, ostensibly to provide security at US military bases. By 2004, however, it was spending millions of dollars each year to monitor the activities of American citizens, including thousands of people who were simply exercising their rights to protest US foreign policy.

Over the next two years, Rumsfeld and Cambone took aggressive moves to diminish the DNI's power. They made it harder to transfer defense intelligence officers into joint "fusion" centers run by the ODNI and the Department of Homeland Security. And when officials under their command took contrary positions, they took action.

Rumsfeld was especially angered when the NGA director, retired Air Force General James Clapper, told a Senate panel that his agency wouldn't be harmed if it was put under DNI control. Rumsfeld called him to the Pentagon and told him he was out of line. A few months later, Rumsfeld let it be known that Clapper would not be reappointed when his term at the NGA expired in June 2005.

End of the Rumsfeld era
The appointment of Gates brought the Rumsfeld dream of Pentagon control over intelligence to an end. Almost immediately after Rumsfeld's firing, key officials who led the Rumsfeld drive to dominate intelligence, including the neo-conservative hawk Cambone and the controversial Boykin, were quickly shown the door and replaced.

In a direct slap at Rumsfeld, Gates brought Clapper back into the Pentagon as under secretary of defense for intelligence, replacing the neo-con Cambone. Since then, Clapper has moved to dismantle some of Rumsfeld's pet programs, including the infamous TALON database created to spy on American citizens.

In an important step last spring, Gates and McConnell jointly agreed that Clapper and future under secretaries for intelligence will also report to the ODNI as the deputy for military intelligence. And McConnell, through his many appearances before Congress, is indisputably the top US official for intelligence. His release this week of a National Intelligence Estimate concluding that Iran had stopped its nuclear program in 2003 underscored his agency's independence from the Pentagon.

But bureaucratic maneuvers can only go so far in ending the Pentagon's direction of intelligence. Only a change in law, taking the NSA, NGA and NRO out of the department's hands and putting them under the direct control of the ODNI and the White House, will ensure that these agencies are under true civilian control.

Carrying out the original mandate of the 9-11 Commission will give future presidents greater control over those agencies and allow them to be used for broad national goals - including the protection of human rights and monitoring the environment - that will never be the top concerns of the military.

Putting those assets under White House control won't prevent future leaders from misusing them, as Bush and Cheney misused the NSA to spy on Americans. But it will provide a framework that could make intelligence collection a function of national leaders concerned with all aspects of national security, not just the tactical needs of the military.

FPIF contributor Tim Shorrock has been writing about US foreign policy and national security for many years. His book on the outsourcing of US intelligence will be published in May 2008 by Simon & Schuster. He can be reached at timshorrock@gmail.com.

(Posted with permission from Foreign Policy in Focus)

1 2 3 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110