WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 4, 2008
Iran makes its mark in Iraq
By Syed Saleem Shahzad

KARACHI - Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad is making all the right noises on his landmark two-day visit to Iraq, which began on Sunday, but at the same time Tehran is keeping its options open in the broader context of its ties with the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan and with al-Qaeda-linked militants.

"This is a new page in the history of the relations between the two countries," said Ahmadinejad, the first Iranian president to visit Iraq since the 1979 Iranian revolution. "We have the same understanding of things and the two parties are determined to strengthen their political, economic and cultural cooperation," said Ahmadinejad, while offering Iraq a US$1 billion loan for development projects to be handled by Iranian companies.

Iran's influence in Iraq - with which it fought an eight-year war in




the 1980s - has risen steadily since the US-led invasion of the country in 2003 to oust the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein and it supports the Shi'ite-dominated government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki as well as Shi'ite militias.

However, Tehran is widely accused - most notably by the United States - of also backing the anti-Shi'ite al-Qaeda-led Iraqi insurgency. It is on this issue that the Shi'ite and Kurd-dominated government in Baghdad will want to press Ahmadinejad.

To a large extent, the answer to this apparent contradiction lies in the changing face of broader regional alliances, particularly with reference to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

For years, Iran's intelligence and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) were engaged in a covert war against the Taliban and Salafi Islamic militant movements (like the Jordanian-based anti-Shi'ite Jamaat al-Tauhid of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, which later merged with al-Qaeda) and made countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan and Lebanon a battle ground for proxy wars.

But in the post-September 11, 2001, era of the "war on terror", traditional alliances have been shaken up and now the Taliban and regional Salafi militant organizations are no longer targets in Iran's covert wars.

Changing times
Soon after the September 11 attacks, and with Afghanistan about to be invaded, China secretly approached the Taliban with an offer of help as Beijing was aware that the Taliban would be routed without inflicting any harm on the Americans. This offer was made despite the fact that the Taliban were hosting Muslim separatists of China's Xinjiang region.

The message was conveyed through the Taliban's ambassador in Pakistan, Mullah Zaeef. However, Taliban leader Mullah Omar rejected the overtures outright on the grounds that it would upset the separatists in Xinjiang, who would consider that the Taliban had betrayed their cause.

Mullah Omar, did, though, want support from Iran. He sent a delegation to Tehran which tried to smooth over the contentious issues between them. The killing of Shi'ites, the delegation explained, as well as the kidnapping and execution of Iranian diplomats during the Taliban rule, were the acts of individual commanders who had personal tribal feuds.

Iranian officials met the delegation, but did not respond to the Taliban's call for help.

Meanwhile, Taliban commanders associated with Jalaluddin Haqqani took matters into their own hands and in defiance of Mullah Omar's directives they established connections with China. In 2006, they received their first shipment of arms through the Wahkhan corridor, the only territorial link between Xinjiang and Afghanistan, but the goods were seized by Pakistani security forces. Subsequently, Haqqani's group did succeed in getting some arms from China.

And in 2007, they established ties with Tehran. According to a Haqqani family source who spoke to Asia Times Online on the condition of anonymity, "We can give no word on the modalities of our relationship with Iran, other than to say it provided us with money and arms."

This development took place at a time that the Taliban and local Shi'ite groups clashed in Khurram Agency in northwest Pakistan. The strongest Shi'ite outfit - the banned Tehrik-i-Nifaz-i-Fiqah-i-Jaferi (now renamed the Islamic Movement) - is financed by Tehran and many of its leaders have been educated in Iran and they are considered the most important Iranian proxy in Pakistan. "We [Taliban] had sustained severe damages and then Sirajuddin Haqqani [son of Jalaluddin], Moulvi Fariq Muhammad [from Bajaur Agency] and Baitullah Mehsud [Pakistani Taliban leader in South Waziristan] sent a few thousand fighters to save us from complete defeat," a Pakistani al-Qaeda member told this correspondent recently in Peshawar.

"We moved forward and blocked all their supply lines and cornered them on the Afghan border. Then Pakistani air force aircraft bombed their positions [Shi'ites'] and they were forced to flee into Afghanistan." Those Shi'ites, about 5,000 in number, were given refuge by the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai. He said that since Pakistan had once given Afghanis shelter, when the Taliban made some Pakistani people's lives hell, they would be given refuge. At the same time, Iran provided a convenient corridor to al-Qaeda traveling from Afghanistan through Iran into Iraq to fight against the Americans, despite the knowledge that Iraqi Shi'ites, Iran's allies, would also be casualities.

These strange alliances are not restricted to regional players. International players have their own intrigues, a senior Pakistani security official explained to Asia Times Online.

"British intelligence worked on a theory back in 2004 that if al-Qaeda and the Taliban, regrouping in Waziristan, could be engaged to fight against Pakistani forces, pressure on North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops in Afghanistan would be reduced," the official said.

"They used agents to spread their ideas through little-known religious decrees, saying that attacking Pakistani troops was a priority, and this at a time when Pakistan had mounted military operations in the tribal areas [against militants]. This thinking became popular and now we see the Afghan front is quieter and Pakistan faces the worst sort of insurgencies."

Meanwhile, while in Iraq Ahmadinejad is expected to ask his counterparts for the release of 11 IRGC members held in Iraqi jails (exclusively run by Iraqis, not the US) and he will pledge good ties with the Iraqi government.

There is also the possibility Tehran will offer to mediate in talks with southern Iraqi Shi'ite militias influenced by the IRGC to get them to cooperate with the Iraqi government.

All the while, Iran's connections with al-Qaeda and the Taliban in the regional "war on terror" theaters of Afghanistan and Iraq will remain intact.

Syed Saleem Shahzad is Asia Times Online's Pakistan Bureau Chief. He can be reached at saleem_shahzad2002@yahoo.com

(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about
sales, syndication and republishing
.)


How never to withdraw from Iraq (Feb 21, '08)

Iraq's broken pieces don't fit together (Feb 13, '08)


1. Obama's women reveal his secret

2. China, India, play it again for Uncle Sam

3. Pakistan, US raise militant tempo

4. A long road from Kosovo to Kurdistan

5. Mouth-to-mouth will fail economies

6. Cell swingers in Cambodia

7. Heads I win, tails I break even

8. Every clause has a gold lining 

9. Medvedev ready for his Russian moment

(Feb 29-Mar 2, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110