WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Apr 29, 2008
Page 1 of 2
Syria bristles at US charges
By Sami Moubayed

DAMASCUS - For the past 48 hours, the Syrians have been amused, laughing off United States accusations that Israel had hit a nuclear site in Syria in September 2007, operated by the Syrians and North Korea.

According to the George W Bush administration, Syria was "within weeks or months" of completing its nuclear reactor. Beneath the Syrian laughter at what seems to be a ludicrous accusation was a certain worry - fear that these accusations could snowball into something similar to what happened when Iraq was accused of developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in 2002-2003.

The Bush administration managed to keep a straight face while

 

spinning these tales and then bombed Iraq on faulty intelligence. Today, five years on, everybody knows that Saddam Hussein was not developing WMDs.

The Syrians cannot tolerate more sanctions and are fed up with the chorus of accusations coming from Washington since 2003. First it was harboring Saddam and all of his henchmen after the fall of Baghdad. These accusations proved baseless when all of them - Saddam included - were hunted down, arrested and executed, in Iraq.

Then came accusations of sending jihadis into Iraq. Although insurgents did cross into Iraq through the Syrian border, it was clear - by 2005 - that Syria was unable to keep full control of the 605-kilometer border (nor were the Americans for that matter) and was doing its best to keep tabs on Islamists entering or leaving the country, deporting many of them to their countries of origin.

Colonel William Crowe, who controls the border between Syria and Iraq, spoke to reporters at the Pentagon in January 2007, saying, "There is no large influx of foreign fighters that come across the border [with Syria]." One month later, US Senate majority leader Harry Reid said that based on the National Intelligence Estimate, "Syria is not causing strife within Iraq ... the Syrians have nothing to do with it."

The Americans then said that Syria was laundering money for the former Iraqi regime. They sent experts to Damascus but later gave the Syrians a clean bill of health, testifying that no money laundering was taking place at the Central Bank of Syria.

And now comes the story of an alliance with North Korea, based on developing nuclear technology. The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) released a 10-minute video and photos (obtained from Israel) based on footage of a building, supposedly in Syria (believed to be a nuclear operator in the making) that resembled the North Korean reactor in Yongbyon.

The report said, "Information we acquired since 2001 has indicated cooperation between North Korean nuclear entities and high-level Syrian officials." They also showed photos of North Korean scientists with people they claimed to be Syrian, adding, "It is clear to us that this cooperation between North Korean nuclear-related personalities and entities and high-level Syrian officials began probably as early as 1997."

The intelligence report added, "North Korean nuclear officials were located in the region of the [Syrian] reactor both early and late in 2007. Our information shows that North Korean advisors also probably assisted with damage assessment inference after the reactor was destroyed [in September 2007]. A high-level North Korean delegation traveled to Syria shortly after the reactor was destroyed and met with officials associated with Syria's covert nuclear program."

Presumably and according to the Americans, Syria was developing a reactor capable of producing plutonium to feed a nuclear reactor, but it was destroyed in its early stages. One senior US official whose name has not been revealed explained, "We obviously were looking very closely at options, and we had looked at some approaches that involved a mix of diplomacy and the threat of military force with the goal of trying to ensure that the reactor was either dismantled or permanently disabled, and therefore, never became operational."

The Israelis, he added, believed that the "reactor posed such an existential threat" that required a more severe and immediate response, "As a sovereign country, Israel had to make its own evaluation of the threat and the immediacy of the threat, and what actions it should take. And it did so."

No mention was made of Syria's sovereignty, and of the international law violation of carrying out such assault between two countries - technically at a state of war - without approval of the United Nations.

The Syrians do not have a history of pursuing expensive and costly nuclear technology, nor are they prime allies with North Korea to pursue such a project, which would be politically expensive for both Pyongyang and Damascus. The entire story comes in the middle of critical times for both presidents Bashar al-Assad and Kim Jong-il. The Syrian president is in the midst of talks with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, debating an offer by Israel to restart talks on the Golan Heights. The Americans are not pleased at these talks, and have repeatedly claimed they are in no hurry for Syrian-Israeli peace; making a point they would not encourage it.

Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem had just met his French counterpart, Bernard Kouchner, in Kuwait, and the two men talked about Lebanon months after relations soured - again - between Paris and Damascus over the lack of progress in the Lebanese presidential elections. The Muallem-Kouchner meeting was an indicator that the French were willing to re-engage the Syrians over Lebanon.

Former US president Jimmy Carter had just wrapped up a 24-hour visit to Damascus, which also restored hope that if the Democrats come to power, a new channel could be opened between the Syrians and Washington. The accusations of working with North Korea will make it difficult for those willing to talk to the Syrians - whether it is Barack Obama, the Germans, or Jimmy Carter - to make any future initiative towards Damascus.

For his part, the North Korean leader has been involved (since September 2005) in a series of six-party talks (North and South Korea, the US, China, Russia and Japan) aimed at abandoning his country's nuclear inventory. These talks have been harshly condemned by the hawks in Washington, mainly former US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton. North Korea was supposed to declare the size and capability of its arsenal (as required by the US) by December 301, 2007, but missed the initial date. The accusations that both countries have been collaborating on nuclear technology - if proven or if pushed through a la WMDs in Iraq - will probably spell difficult times for both the Syrians and North Koreans.

In September 2007, the world speculated that Israel had hit a stockpile of North Korean nuclear weapons, hidden in Syria. At first, some said it was a training center for Palestinian groups based in Syria. Others said it was a military warehouse for Hezbollah. Some speculated the Israelis hit ballistic missiles recently obtained from Russia. Others said it was a facility for nuclear weapons, developed between Syria and North Korea. The

Continued 1 2 


Back to the hard line on North Korea
(Apr 26, '08)

US edges closer to engaging Iran
(Apr 12, '08)


1. Taliban bitten by a snake in the grass

2. Hillary, the war chick

3. Western excess is the Earth killer

4. Petraeus' rise lets Cheney loose on Iran

5. Abdullah's second-chance reform drive

6. Rice, death and the dollar

7. Back to the hard line on N Korea

8. BOOK REVIEW: The Fed's king of bubbles

(Apr 25-27, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110