Asia Time Online - Daily News
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese

    Middle East
     May 9, 2008
Pressure for Iraq to pay its own way
By Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON - Growing impatience in the US Congress over the enormous costs incurred by the Iraq war, as well as the Pentagon's belief that it needs more troops in Afghanistan to fight insurgents there, is putting the vaunted success of the George W Bush administration's "surge" strategy to the test.

Although the House of Representatives appears poised to approve an additional US$163 billion on Thursday for military operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan through the end of the year, most observers believe that Congress will impose unprecedented conditions on Iraq-related spending. This could include requirements that the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki pays substantially more in reconstruction and related costs


than it has to date.

The argument that Baghdad must bear more of the burden gained momentum last week when the Pentagon's Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction reported that Iraq's oil revenue in 2008 should exceed $70 billion, twice as much as had been forecast just a few months before.

That report, which comes amid growing concern in Washington over the weak domestic economy, has fueled efforts by a bipartisan group of senators to halt virtually all US funding for major reconstruction and infrastructure projects in Iraq.

Indeed, the Senate Armed Services Committee voted unanimously last week to approve a bill that would ban the Pentagon from funding any reconstruction or infrastructure project in Iraq that costs more than US$2 million. Similar legislation is expected to be taken up by the House.

"This is the first significant bipartisan change in our policy toward Iraq," declared Republican Senator Susan Collins, one of the sponsors of the legislation after last week's vote, while the committee chairman, Senator Carl Levin, said Iraq's failure to pay reconstruction costs was "unconscionable [and] inexcusable" given the windfall it has received from the stunning rise in world oil prices.

Another provision of the same bill would require Iraq's government to pay the salaries and training costs of the predominantly Sunni militias, or so-called Sahwa or Awakening Councils, on which the US has been spending roughly $27 million a month.

Despite US pressure, the Maliki government has strongly resisted integrating the vast majority of the estimated 90,000 members of these militias - most of which were previously part of the Sunni insurgency - into the army or police for fear that they will eventually turn their guns on the regime.

The result has been growing frustration on the part of the militias, frustration that reportedly was significantly enhanced last month after Maliki enlisted thousands of members of the Badr Organization into the government's security forces during fighting with Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army in the southern city of Basra and Sadr City in Baghdad. The Badr Organization is the armed wing of the Shi'ite Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, the strongest party in the coalition.

Both the intra-Shi'ite conflict between the Sadrists and the government and the growing anger of the Sahwa militias - most recently dramatized by a series of strikes and public protests and by an increasing number of attacks on US and Iraqi forces in al-Anbar province and other Sunni strongholds where the militias have kept the peace for most of the past year - have resulted in a sharp rise in both Iraqi and US casualties over the past two months, threatening the security gains made by the "surge".

The "surge", which was initiated in February 2007, was aimed at pacifying both Anbar province and the capital by adding some 30,000 US troops to the 140,000 already deployed to Iraq to stop and reverse the drift to sectarian civil war between Sunnis and the various Shi'ite militias. Its strategic aim was to foster a climate of peace and stability that would encourage all factions to make the political compromises necessary for national reconciliation.

While the "surge" made substantial headway in achieving its tactical goals of improving security - with the critical help of the Sahwa militias which had mostly broken with al-Qaeda in Iraq and allied themselves with the US even before the "surge" got underway - its strategic goal of political reconciliation has been far more elusive.

Moreover, the tactical success of the "surge" has failed to translate into additional popular or Congressional support for the war at home. As a result, the Bush administration, which promised months ago to withdraw the 30,000 "surge" troops by the end of July, is adhering to its pledge, leaving fewer troops to ensure that a new round of violence does not break out.

At the same time, the Pentagon leadership is pressing the White House to continue the drawdown from Iraq beyond July so that it can deploy the three brigades - between 10,000 and 12,000 troops - it says it needs to cope with the Taliban and their allies in Afghanistan. While Bush has announced that there will be at least a 45-day pause to assess the impact of the "surge" withdrawal after July, the pressure on him to resume the process - not only from the Pentagon, but from Republican candidates in the November elections - is expected to be intense.

Republican backing for the Armed Services Committee bill banning additional spending on major reconstruction projects and support for the Sahwa militias is clearly seen by both the administration and the promoters of the "surge" as a worrisome portent, and not only for maintaining the relative - albeit fragile - peace that has prevailed for much of the past year.

One of the architects of the "surge", Frederick Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute, said that legislation would "do catastrophic damage to our image in the world, particularly the Muslim world ... The argument that Iraq should use its oil revenues to pay the United States sounds like the ultimate proof that we invaded Iraq for mercenary reasons."

Ending US funding for the Sahwa militias, in particular, will pose a critical - and long overdue - test of the "surge" strategy, according to a number of observers, who see Maliki's failure to integrate them as a critical stumbling block to national reconciliation.

"If the Awakenings are not integrated into the national security forces, then there is little hope for political accommodation or for lasting security and the US is effectively trapped," according to Marc Lynch, an expert at George Washington University whose blog, abuaardvark.com, is widely read in Washington. "Since all other forms of persuasion seem to have failed, it's time to give Maliki an ultimatum ... If he gives in, then there may finally be some hope for political accommodation ..."

"The downside is that if Maliki doesn't go along ... then things may well get ugly. But all signs suggests that they will get ugly anyway - and better that they get ugly while the US is at the highest troop levels it will ever have," Lynch wrote.

"If Maliki won't do this now, when US troop levels are high and security is relatively better, with the shadow of a new president who likely will not continue to offer an open-ended commitment, then he never will ... and everyone should know this."

Jim Lobe's blog on US foreign policy, and particularly the neo-conservative influence in the Bush administration, can be read at http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/.

(Inter Press Service)

US terror report misses the point
(May 8, '08)

Yes, the Pentagon did want to hit Iran
(May 7, '08)

1. Gold price suppression scheme

2. Yes, the Pentagon did want to hit Iran

3. Draining national prosperity

4. US trains Pakistani killing machine

5. Speculators knock OPEC off price perch

6. Myanmar courts political disaster

7. New offer threatens Iran's 'red line'

8. US terror report misses the point

9. Massage for number crunchers

10. Iran moving into the big league

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, May 7, 2008)


All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110