WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Sep 18, 2008
A peek at Obama's Middle East vision
By Bankole Thompson

DETROIT - Amid rising anti-Tehran rhetoric, Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's senior foreign policy advisor has said an US led by Obama would make every effort to avoid resorting to a military attack on Iran, instead using "robust diplomacy" to curtail its nuclear ambitions.

An Obama administration would galvanize support from the international community to stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons - an objective Tehran denies - as one of its main priorities for the Middle East, Susan Rice said in a recent interview.

"Senator Obama's view is that we need to collectively toughen our sanctions and step up direct diplomacy, so we do our utmost

 

politically and economically to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapons capability without resorting to war," Rice said.

An National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) report released in December last year contradicted President George W Bush's repeated assertions that Iran is looking to a develop nuclear weapons capability.

"We do not know whether [Iran] currently intends to develop nuclear weapons," said the NIE.

"Senator Obama has been very clear in this issue," Rice said. "He believes we still have time for robust diplomacy backed by tougher sanctions to try and prevent Iran from pursuing its nuclear program. He has been clear that we cannot take any options off the table."

Rice, who served on the National Security Council and as assistant secretary of state for African affairs during the second Bill Clinton administration from October 1997 until January 20, 2001, outlined the Obama administration's plans to strengthen security in Iraq and the greater Middle East region.

"Our priorities include clearly and safely deploying US combat brigades from Iraq, and working diplomatically with the Iraqis and the countries in the region to help support a political settlement which bridges the divisions between [Shi'ites and Kurds] and helps to stabilize Iraq," said Rice.

"Vitally important and related to that is the need to step up efforts to counter al-Qaeda and the Taliban, which are resurgent in Afghanistan and Pakistan. At the same time we will work with Pakistan authorities to root out resurgent al-Qaeda Taliban elements in the Pakistan's border regions."

Nazar Janabi, a Next Generation fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a generally hawkish think-tank, said it is possible an Obama administration could be in a unique position to bridge the gap among warring factions in Iraq.

"The challenge would be to find the common ground between these factions. It seems to me that striking a balance without sacrificing some of the US key interests in the Middle East would be very difficult without some form of long-term engagement and presence," Janabi said. "That said, it is my understanding that Mr Obama has a better image in the Middle East and is likely to be more credible to the audience there."

Janabi said Obama's plans to withdraw US troops from Iraq "responsibly" were a very good idea. "However, this might mean maintaining a sizable contingent for a few years down the road ... The security achievements in Iraq are still fragile and still could go either way depending on the circumstances."

On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Rice said Obama would be "supporting the Israelis and Palestinians in their efforts to broker a lasting peace based on two states - the Jewish State of Israel and the Democratic Palestinian State - living side-by-side in peace and security."

Osama Siblani, editor and publisher of the Arab American News in Dearborn, Michigan - home of the largest concentration of people of Middle Eastern descent outside of the Middle East - said Obama will face an uphill struggle convincing the Israeli government to work for peace.

"I don't see Obama as a broker. He needs a partner first. You must first have a partner which is willing to give and compromise before making any peace deal," Siblani said, adding that it is in the interests of both nations to reach a deal which creates two peaceful states.

But Siblani said the "carelessness and procrastination" of the Bush administration, had made it unlikely that a Palestinian state will ever be created. "There is the question of refugees, Jerusalem, and the lack of resources in Gaza and total poverty there that needs to be addressed. You have to have guarantees for peace and security from both states."

Should Obama get elected, Siblani said he will have some leverage because "a US president carries a lot of weight" in the Middle East and he will likely have a Democratic Congress to help him push things through.

After the fall of key US ally Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan has elected Asif Ali Zardari, widower of the nation's political star Benazir Bhutto, as president. It is unclear what Pakistan's relations with Washington will now shape up in the "war on terror".
"He [Obama] opposed and objected to a policy that put all of our eggs in the basket of a dictator - Pervez Musharraf - a policy supported by George Bush and John McCain that really slow walked our support for the Democratic aspirations of the Pakistani people," Rice said.

"Barack Obama's view has been and remains that it is in our interest - the best long-term interest - that Pakistan becomes a stable, sustainable democracy."

Musharraf, who ruled with an iron fist after overthrowing former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in October 1999, was forced to resign on August 18 following threats of impeachment from the government. The low point of his rule was when he attempted to use Pakistan's judiciary as a political tool by firing the Supreme Court.

Rice said she hopes that under Zardari the US will see more concerted efforts to combat terrorism and terrorists inside of Pakistan, including elements of al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

(Inter Press Service)


Big-bang report blasts Iran
(Sep 16, '08)

The Biden factor in US-Iran relations
(Aug 28, '08)


1. US a step closer to Iran blockade

2. Lehman and the end of the era of leverage

3. Big-bang report blasts Iran

4. In Pakistan, sympathy for the Taliban

5. Silences say it all

6. Spooky stats from the US Mint

7. Dust off the Chicago Plan

8. Fed's misplaced fulcrum

9. Borneo hinge to Anwar's ambition

10. An anatomy of collateral damage

11. US forces the terror issue with Pakistan

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, Sep 16, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110