WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Oct 17, 2008
US blowback in Iran's elections
By Hossein Askari

While the Islamic Republic of Iran is always careful to flaunt its independence from the United States, its next presidential elections in March 2009 may be decided more by the result of the US elections than any other single factor.

Iran has its own unique electoral system. Serious candidates visit Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to seek his approval to run for office. The Supreme Leader, while not openly endorsing any candidate, will privately encourage or discourage candidates. Candidates who are discouraged invariably do not run for office. The candidates declare their candidacy a few months before the election as required by the Guardian Council for the vetting of candidates. The Guardian Council disqualifies many candidates, including all females. The eligible candidates campaign for a few

 

weeks before the election. The serious candidates have already begun approaching the Supreme Leader.

The Supreme Leader's preferred candidate, while never publicized, receives significant support from the regime. The most important source of tangible support is from Iran's intelligence services, the most powerful entity in the land; and the support of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps is a close second. The support of these two entities embraces votes, access to the media and campaign donations. The actual balloting, while not completely free from irregularities, is quite clean by most Third World standards.

What will the Supreme Leader consider this time around in picking his favorite candidates?

For this Iranian presidential election the landscape is unique. Three factors dominate. First, Iran has moved ahead with its nuclear enrichment program despite drawing several rounds of United Nations sanctions, as well as some from the United States. President Mahmud Ahmadinejad has managed to keep Iran's progress on course.

This success has been important for the regime in Tehran. Iran has demonstrated its ability to withstand Western, especially US, pressures. Enrichment is a matter of pride to a large segment of the Iranian population. The mastering of the peaceful enrichment process affords Iran a credible deterrent against foreign aggression. In a dangerous region, success in pushing ahead with enrichment would point to continued support for Ahmadinejad.

The second dominant factor on the Iranian landscape is Iran's economy. Ordinary Iranians are disappointed with the government's economic performance; they have not seen the changes and benefits promised by Ahmadinejad. While oil prices have reached record highs during his time of office, Iran's economic growth, while respectable, has not been sufficient to reduce unemployment, now around 20%, while inflation exceeds 30%.

Iran's income distribution may have deteriorated over the past three-and-a-half years. Government finances have suffered in a period that should have resulted in large surpluses. All the while Ahmadinejad has fired technocrats from the Ministry of Finance and at the central bank and replaced them with his cronies. Even the Supreme Leader, and especially those close to him, has voiced his disappointment in economic performance. Economic failure is the number one issue for the average Iranian and it is the regime's Achilles' heal. Economic failure would suggest a break from Ahmadinejad.

The US presidential election is the third factor that will impact the Iranian election. While not panicked, Iran is still concerned about a US or Israeli military strike on it. Iran is mindful of developments on its borders. Iranians are concerned about the downward spiral of the economy and the regime sees adverse economic developments as a threat to its very survival. To the regime in Tehran, the next US president will cast a long shadow on developments affecting these key areas of concern.

In Iranian eyes, one candidate, Democratic Senator Barack Obama, believes in dialogue and peaceful resolution of conflicts. While the other, Republican Senator John McCain, is belligerent and endorses the military option. The leaders in Tehran see Ahmadinejad better positioned to tackle a president McCain, while a total break from Ahmadinejad would afford Iran the best opportunity for rapprochement with a president Obama. It is that clear cut.

Likely candidates
Hashemi Rafsanjani, former president and Expediency Council chairman, is arguably the most popular politician in Iran today. The most important reason for this popularity is that he is seen as a pragmatist and most likely to deliver economic benefits. But he is not a candidate and his time is past. Former president Mohammad Khatami, largely irrelevant in today's Iran, has joined forces with Rafsanjani to endorse a common reformist candidate.

The leading candidates from the conservative camp are Ahmadinejad, Ali Akbar Velayati - a top adviser to Ali Khamenei, and Majlis (parliament) speaker Ali Larijani, a former chief negotiator on Iran's nuclear dossier. They are followed by the head of the Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Mines, Mohammad Nahavandian.

Velayati, a medical doctor and foreign minister for many years under Rafsanjani, is the confidant of the Supreme Leader on foreign affairs. He is also personally close to him and has the support of a number of conservative groups, including intellectual conservatives and clerics.

Larijani has been a cabinet minister and was a presidential candidate in 2005. He was also secretary general of the Supreme National Security Council before falling out with Ahmadinejad. He received a PhD in Western philosophy from Tehran University. He comes from a family of clerics and is a confidant of the Supreme Leader. He is a darling of the hardliners, but Larijani is unlikely to be a candidate. He only recently became speaker, a powerful post in its own right; and in doing so he ousted a confidant and relative of the Supreme Leader, Hadad Adel. He won't take the risk entailed in running for president so soon after becoming speaker.

Nahavandian is a George Washington University-trained economist. He was deputy national security advisor and head of Iran's efforts to join the World Trade Organization - Tehran currently has observer status. Nahavandian is a close friend of Larijani and had a falling out with Ahmadinejad soon after Larijani quit as national security advisor in October 2007; he would enjoy Larijani's support if he ran for president.

The two leading candidates from the reformist camp are Mohammad Ali Najafi and Mohammad Reza Aref. Najafi is a Massachusetts Institute of Technology-trained mathematician and former minister of education in the Rafsanjani government and minister of planning in the Khatami government.

Aref, a Stanford-trained scientist, was first vice president under Khatami. It is likely that Rafsanjani and Khatami will together pick one of these two candidates to represent the reformist movement and give him their total political and financial backing.

The other talked-about candidate is Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, the current mayor of Tehran. While he would have been classified as in the conservative camp some time ago, he is now seen as a centrist. Qalibaf's faction did well in the last elections for Tehran's City Council and he is positioning himself to be the pragmatic candidate who can deliver tangible economic benefits to all Iranians.

If there is a president McCain, there will be a second term for Ahmadinejad. If there is a president Obama, the next Iranian president will be a moderate, soft-spoken and Western-appealing individual, one who is not weighed down by Ahmadinejad's baggage and who can start afresh with the US and achieve favorable results for Iran with an Obama administration. In that event, the leader would come from Qalibaf, Najafi, Aref and Nahavandian.

The Supreme Leader and leading contenders in Iran will be watching the US presidential results as never before.

Hossein Askari is professor of international business and international affairs at George Washington University.

(Copyright 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)


Bush set to go with a whimper
(Oct 16, '08)

In the shadow of war and peace with Iran (Oct 16, '08)

McCain's 'crusader' logic concerns Syria (Oct 14, '08)

A peek into a Persian paradox
(Sep 27, '08)


1.
Bush set to go with a whimper

2. Inflation targeting for idiots

3. Soulmates in latte land

4. A mad scramble over Afghanistan

5. Gambling, growth and imagination

6. The bounce of a ping-pong bomb

7. Yes!! It's a miracle!!!

8. Thailand and Cambodia open fire

9. In the shadow of war and peace with Iran

10. Holy row over India's first woman saint

11. Zardari takes begging bowl to Beijing

12. China needs sharper eyes in space

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET,Oct 15, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110