WASHINGTON - A cross-border raid into Syria by United States forces in Iraq,
and a subsequent stonewalling by US officials unwilling to divulge details, has
led to rampant speculation among US analysts about the origins and meaning of
the attack.
"So the question is: Why?", geostrategic analyst and journalist Helena Cobban
wrote on her blog, wondering if the raid could have been pulled off without
explicit permission from the highest levels of the President George W Bush
administration.
"Why now at the end of the Bush administration, with Washington trying to play
nice with Damascus and tensions easing throughout the region, would US forces
stage such a gambit?" echoed
Borzou Daragahi on the Babylon and Beyond blog at the Los Angeles Times
website.
The questions started to swirl late on Sunday afternoon when US helicopters
allegedly crossed eight kilometers over the desert border between Syria and
Iraq. According to reports, eight US soldiers were deployed when a helicopter
landed, attacking the al-Sukkari farm in the Syrian Abu Kamal border area.
The cross-border raid - the first of its kind involving a helicopter attack and
US boots on the ground that far into Syrian territory - left eight dead,
according to Syrian press reports.
The attack is especially curious since, according to a report this weekend in
the New York Times, Bush appears to have rolled back his initiative of
troop-driven cross-border attacks - initially approved this summer - by
Afghan-based US forces into Pakistani territory.
The raid also comes as Syria is negotiating with Israel, through Turkish
mediation, presumably in a calculated effort to alleviate tensions with the
West and the US. The Bush administration's take on the Israel-Syria talks has
been lukewarm at best.
More immediately for the US, the raid could complicate negotiations on a Status
of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with Iraqi authorities which would allow US forces
to keep operating in Iraq after the United Nations mandate expires at the end
of this year.
The talks on the SOFA have been bogged down, and a persistent Iraqi demand has
been that Iraqi soil not be used as a launch pad for attacks on other
countries.
"The Iraqi government rejects US aircraft bombarding posts inside Syria," a
government spokesperson, Ali al-Dabbagh, said on Tuesday. "The constitution
does not allow Iraq to be used as a staging ground to attack neighboring
countries."
Dabbagh said Iraq had opened an investigation into the incident and urged US
forces not to repeat it.
The US Department of Defense has repeatedly declined to comment on the Syrian
incident, including to a direct request by Inter Press Service, but several
press reports have quoted unnamed US officials confirming the attack, and
saying that it was ordered by the Central Intelligence Agency.
One US official anonymously told Agence France-Presse that the strike was aimed
at Abu Ghadiya, whom the official called "one of the most prominent foreign
fighter facilitators in the region". The official said he believed the target
was killed.
The spokesman for the Syrian Embassy in Washington, Ahmed Salkini, told IPS
that the name did not appear on the official Syrian list of those dead.
In retaliation, Syria has shut down a US school and cultural center in
Damascus, and its United Nations envoy has requested that the Security Council
intervene to prevent further incursions into Syrian territory.
"This act of aggression perpetrated by the US forces against Syrian civilians
indicates the US administration's determination to go on in its policies that
brought nothing but killing and destruction to the region," said Syria's letter
to the Security Council.
Neo-conservatives and hawks within the Bush administration have long clamored
for expanding Middle Eastern conflicts into Syria, which was named as one of
the three countries in Bush's famous "axis of evil".
Indeed, Bush's neo-conservative deputy national security adviser, Elliott
Abrams, told Israeli officials during a high-level meeting that the US would
not object if Israel extended its 2006 war with Hezbollah in Lebanon into
Syria.
But if the cross-border attack was an attempt by hawks to lure Syria into a
war, it appears to have failed; Syria has engaged in a measured response,
although it did call the act of aggression "a dangerous violation of the Syrian
sovereignty and the UN principles and conventions", in its letter to the UN.
Syria's press attache in London, Jihad Makdissi, told the British Broadcasting
Corporation that the US should have approach Syria first.
"If they have any proof of any insurgency, instead of applying the law of the
jungle and penetrating, unprovoked, a sovereign country, they should come to
the Syrians first and share this information," he said.
Cobban, a well-respected commentator and veteran analyst, said on her Just
World News blog that the Syrians had not responded, and are not about to
respond, in any way that is violent or otherwise escalates tensions.
"I've been studying the behavior of this Ba'athist regime in Syria closely for
34 years now. They have steely nerves. They are just about impossible to
'provoke', at any point that they judge a harsh response is not in their
interest," she wrote.
While foreign fighters from Syria have long been problematic to the US
occupation of Iraq, since 2006, US patrols along the border and some Syrian
cooperation have dramatically reduced the number of foreign fighters flowing
into Iraq.
Last December, the former US commander in Iraq and now the CENTCOM chief,
General David Petraeus, said, "Syria has taken steps to reduce the flow of the
foreign fighters through its borders with Iraq."
Petraeus reiterated the notion this month when he reported that fighters from
Syria moving into Iraq have had their monthly total reduced from about 100 to
20.
But last Thursday, the commander of US troops in western Iraq, Marine Major
John Kelly, said that while there has been progress, it wasn't enough.
The suspected involvement of some of the most vociferous anti-Syria hawks at
the highest levels of the Bush administration, including Vice President Dick
Cheney, have combined with US silence on the matter to fuel a guessing game as
to just exactly who ordered or approved Sunday's cross-border raid.
"This operation was pretty clearly run by US special operations forces pursuing
a terrorist target," Colonel Pat Lang, a retired US military intelligence
officer, told IPS. "Their sole mission is like a SWAT team to go around and
hunt terrorists."
Lang said that these special operations forces sometimes operate distinctly
outside the normal military chain of command by design of hawkish former
Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld.
"If left to themselves, they would do this kind of thing [the Syria raid].
That's what they do," said Lang. "They don't follow policy, they carry out
their assigned mission."
Because the US commander in Iraq, General Ray Odierno, is dealing with mounting
concerns about the SOFA, Lang suspects that he'd be hesitant to directly
approve such a bold a provocative attack as Sunday afternoon's.
"I haven't established it yet, but I have a sneaking suspicion that the
authority to do this came right out of the White House," Lang told IPS.
Asked if the decision undermines pressing US goals for commanders in Iraq, Lang
said that while the considerations are there, they don't always filter up into
decision-making in the executive branch.
"Usually command arrangements of various kinds are messy," Lang said, "and this
White House has shown a tendency to want to bypass the established chain of
command and influence what's going on [in the field]."
But in addition to being a bold foreign policy move, the raid has also been
interpreted by some as a political stunt, albeit one unlikely to succeed.
Some journalists and experts have speculated that the raid was a Bush
administration attempt to deliver an "October Surprise" - a late game-changing
development favoring one candidate - for Republican candidate Senator John
McCain just over a week before the presidential election in which he badly
trails Democratic rival Senator Barack Obama in most polls.
McCain has been seen as holding an advantage in issues of national security,
but the strike does not appear to have made too much immediate impact, as on
Wednesday the Democrat led McCain by 52-45% in the latest ABC News-Washington
Post poll.
Head
Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East,
Central, Hong Kong Thailand Bureau:
11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110
