WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Jun 26, 2009
Iraq puts US presence to a vote
By Mohammed A Salih

WASHINGTON - As Iraqis witness a spike in violence after a months-long relative lull, the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has decided to put its security agreement with the United States to a public referendum, although the move appears to be only heightening a sense of uncertainty over the fate of the country.

Last year, Iraqi and US negotiators included a provision in the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) for a referendum on the presence of US troops on Iraqi soil, to be held six months after the deal went into effect. Although the referendum was supposed to be conducted in July, recently Iraq's cabinet decided to hold it

 

along with national parliamentary elections in January 2010.

The government allocated about US$100 million for the polls last week, and cited financial and time constraints as reasons for the delay.

According to the SOFA's roadmap, the US should retreat from Iraqi cities by June 30 this year, and from the country in its entirety by January 2012. However, it is not yet fully clear whether the US will embark on a full withdrawal or keep some forces in troubled areas like Mosul and Kirkuk in the north, as well as the capital Baghdad.

Discussions of the referendum come against a backdrop of rising violence in recent weeks.

Experts believe that while al-Qaeda and other insurgent groups have been significantly weakened, they are still capable of carrying out lethal attacks aimed at dragging the country's Shi'ite majority into a new round of intense violence. That is in addition to high tensions at the fault lines between the country's Kurds and Arabs in the north.

One critical question is: if the Iraqi public votes against the SOFA, will Iraqi security forces be ready to take over security tasks from their US counterparts in 18 months?

Deadly attacks across the country over the past few days underline the fragility of the situation. A series of bombings this week has killed more than 160 people, according to news reports, including a blast on Wednesday that killed at least 72 people at a busy market in Baghdad's Sadr City.

A truck bomb last weekend killed some 75 people in Kirkuk province in northern Iraq a part of the country that is at the center of disputes between Iraqi Kurds and Arab ethnicities. It was meant to touch on sectarian as well as ethnic nerves.

To many, the attack served as a grim reminder that if Iraqi security forces are not capable of securing the country in spite of the US military's support, they will be even less likely to accomplish it without that support.

Despite public statements by Iraqi politicians bragging about the new capabilities of their forces to meet security challenges inside the country, a Washington Post report last month depicted an ill-managed army with incompetent and corrupt commanders.

To make matters even worse, low oil prices over the past several months have adversely affected plans to better arm, equip and expand Iraq's armed forces. The shrinking budget has meant the country has not been able to rebuild its navy and air forces.

In a recent interview with France's Le Monde newspaper, Maliki acknowledged that Iraq's army still faces serious logistical problems, relying on US military aircraft for troop movements.

That has some experts convinced that despite his rhetoric supporting the referendum, Maliki is all too cognizant of the dangers of a premature withdrawal of US troops.

"I think PM Maliki and some members of his circle were not very enthusiastic about the referendum and were demanded by some other parties like Sadrists (to put the SOFA up for a vote)," Matthew Duss of the Center for American Progress told Inter Press Service.

Followers of the young Shi'ite cleric Muqtada Sadr were staunch opponents of the security pact during the debate in the Iraqi parliament last year, decrying it as a legitimization of the US occupation.

Iraq's upcoming parliamentary election scheduled for next January is a key factor behind the decision by the Iraqi government.

Maliki would have found it damaging to his nationalistic credentials to not agree to the referendum given that Iraqi voters showed during the last provincial elections that they can oust key parties. During those elections held earlier this year, the largest Shi'ite party, the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, failed to hold onto power in several key provinces, including Baghdad.

But there are some who believe even if a referendum is held, Iraqi leaders will convince their people not to reject the agreement given that time is running out for the US military in Iraq regardless.

"The referendum means little in terms of hard value, because now we have an American administration that is keen to pull out its troops from Iraq," said Laith Kubba, a former spokesman for the Iraqi government.

"Iraqi politicians will align themselves with their interests and will not rock the boat very hard, since it is not in their interests," Kubba said.

Whether Iraqi leaders venture to publicly sell the deal to their constituencies during an election season and what verdict the public will pass on US military's presence remains to be seen. In their attempt to balance nationalism with realism and political survival, Iraqi politicians have a hard struggle ahead of them.

(Inter Press Service)


Taliban put on a 'friendly face'
(Jun 9,'09)

Al-Qaeda spreads its tentacles
(Jun 12,'09)

Pakistan fights for its tribal soul
(Jun 12,'09)


1.
Iran's streets are lost, but hope returns

2. Nightmarish financial numbers

3. China makes a choice in Iran

4. China's rise stirs Vietnam's anxiety

5. Israel stunned by Washington's tough love

6. Shoot first, talk later in Myanmar

7. Pyongyang turns back the clock

8. India tightens the screw on Maoists

9. Solar-powered downturn

10. 'Color' revolution fizzles in Iran

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, June 24, 2009)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110