WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     May 31, 2012


SPEAKING FREELY
Iran's pipe dream in space
Radhakrishna Rao

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

Iran, in the eye of a storm over its nuclear program, wishes to attain the status of a global space power status by putting an astronaut into space by the end of the decade. But since at best, its space capability appears on par with that of North Korea, that quest is likely to remain a pipe dream.

Iran is nowhere near the Asian space front runners - Japan, China and India. What's more, it will have to go a long way before its catches up with its sworn enemy, Israel, which has built a series of high profile radar imaging satellites that can be deployed for surveillance and reconnaissance. In the backdrop of its modest success in launching lightweight satellites, many factors stand in its way. Iran is far from having a high-tech industrial base and has

 

a glaring lack of expertise for building a man-rated, high-performance launch vehicle and autonomous crew vehicle, along with its virtually nil expertise in re-entry technique crucial for the successful accomplishment of a manned mission,

As Western space analysts point out, the rudimentary nature of the Iranian space program hardly provides credence to the Iranian claim of launching a manned space mission by the end of this decade. Indeed, China ,which realized its first manned flight in 2003, had successfully built and launched its high thrust cryogenic fuel-driven space vehicle in 1980. And India, despite its successful space program, is struggling it out to prepare a solid technological platform for its maiden human space flight mission slated for a take off in 2016.

Without doubt, in the backdrop of UN authorized sanctions, Iran will have problems sourcing critical components and hardware for building advanced , heavier class satellites meant for applications such as communications, weather watch, navigation and earth observation. For instance, Mesbah-1 (Mesbah means lantern in Farsi), a low earth orbit telecom satellite that Iran had ordered from the Italian aerospace company, was prevented from being exported . Other European space nations like Germany and France have already refused to make available high-speed computers and star sensor technology that Iran needs to build its high performance satellites.

Amid the mounting international concern over Iranian nuclear program, the Islamic Republic of Iran quietly launched a satellite named Navid (Gospel in Farsi) in February this year. This satellite, weighing around 50 kilograms, will help Iran collect data on climatic conditions and monitor natural disasters. Navid, which happens to be the third satellite to be launched from the Iranian soil, was built by the students of the Sharif University of Technology. Significantly, Navid was delivered into space by means of Safir-II block II rocket equipped with two liquid fuel-driven stages. Indeed, the international concern over the military potentials of the Safir (ambassador in Farsi) rocket, whose second stage details were kept under a wrap, was very much in evidence in the aftermath of Navid launch.

Reports suggest that Iran is developing a large diameter solid propellant rocket. For solid fuel, being earth storable and easy to handle and transport, is quite ideal for use in a ballistic missile. Unlike solid fuel, the volatile liquid fuel, it cannot be stuffed into the missile stages in advance to derive strategic advantage in the event of a sudden and quick nuclear exchange. As it is, during the long drawn out Iran-Iraq war of 1980s, Iran had made extensive use of solid fuel-driven missiles. As such Western intelligence sources hint at the possibility of Iran reconfiguring the launch vehicle used for hoisting Navid into space into a long range strategic missile. The political establishment in Tehran made a point that despite sanctions that prevented Iran from buying some of the critical components for Navid satellite, Iranian space scientists managed to develop these components indigenously.

Prior to this, in June 2011,Iran had successfully launched a satellite named Rasad-1(meaning Observation in Farsi) by means of Safir-1B rocket. Rasad -1 described as a mapping satellite was meant to provide Iran inputs for building operational surveillance space platforms. However, a September 2011 Iranian mission to send a monkey on a 20 minute sub-orbital flight came a cropper.

Uzi Rubin, a former head of the Israeli missile development program observes that 29 months span between Iran's first and second successful launches indicated that Iranians are pouring money into its space program. US Air Force Intelligence believes that the Safir launch vehicle could be a test bed for developing long range ballistic missile capability. But then there is a lack of solid and indisputable proof about the militaristic ambitions of the Iranian space programme.

Even so, Western space analysts hold the view that the Iranian satellite launch missions are but a cover to boost its long range missile capability. For many elements such as chemicals, electronics and guidance as well as materials are common to civilian launch vehicles and military missiles. And with some fine-tuning it is possible to turn a launch vehicle into a military missile. Meanwhile, the US Intelligence authorities have expressed the concern that North Korea and Iran may strengthen their collaboration in nuclear and space sectors to boost their arsenal of nuclear tipped long range missiles.

Iran sent its first domestically made satellite Omid (Hope in Farsi) into orbit in February 2009. With the successful launch of the 27-kilogram Omid, Iran became the ninth nation in the world to go into space on the back of its "own rocket power". Described as a micro satellite, Omid was designed for data processing and technology evaluation. In 2005, Iran launched its first satellite, Sina-1, which was built in cooperation with Moscow, on a Russian rocket. Russia, along with North Korea and China, has been supporting the Iranian space program. Iran says it wants to put its own satellites into orbit to monitor natural disasters in the earthquake prone nation and improve its telecommunications network.

On another front, Iranian officials while pointing out to the stunning success with which American armed forced used a wide variety of satellites for their smooth intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, say that Iran needs similar capability. Indeed, Iranian space endeavors are based on the ambitions to derive both military and civilian advantages.

Meanwhile, Iran has announced that it would orbit the 65 kilogram Fajr (Dawn in Farsi) reconnaissance satellite by means of Safir-1B rocket in June this year. This satellite would boost Iranian surveillance capabilities. Tehran views its space program as a source of national pride and victory against external forces. Strategic analysts believe that by riding on the success of its satellite launches, Iran may develop a missile capable of reaching Northern Europe .

Meanwhile, India's rapidly expanding defense and space ties with Israel cannot but be an "unpalatable development" for Iran. The RISAT-11 radar imaging satellite that ISRO (Indian Space Research Organisation) had built in association with IAI (Israel Aerospace Industries) and launched in 2009 is said to have been acquired recently by Israel. This satellite with a radar imaging capability along with the Ofek-9 Israeli satellite launched in 2010 could help boost Israel's surveillance capability particularly aimed at Iranian nuclear and missile development sites by a substantial extent. Israel had also made use of India's four stage space workhorse PSLV (Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle) for getting its TECSAR surveillance satellite off the ground in early 2008. TECSAR has been described as a spy satellite primarily meant to monitor Iranian military activities.

Expressing unhappiness over Indian launch support to this surveillance satellites of Israel, the Iranian ambassador to New Delhi, Seyed Mehdi Nabizadeh, observed, "Wise and independent countries like India do not give their advanced space technologies to launch spying operations against Iran". Nabizadeh added, "The US continues to be hostile to Iran and even today is trying to create problems between Iran and its friendly countries. We expect friendly countries to realize this".

On account of its geographical location, Israel is in a position to launch satellites only in western direction against earth's eastward spin. This anomaly is known to have limited the range of Israeli satellite's orbit over Iran. And the launch of Israeli satellites from Sriharikota island on India's eastern coat facilitate their eastward movement for their ultimate positioning in the desired orbit.

Meanwhile, Iran has been watching with dismay the growing US pressure on New Delhi to keep a distance from this West Asian Islamic country. Not long back, the United States had opposed the Iran-India-Pakistan gas pipeline project with the warning that India could face sanctions if it went ahead with the project. And more recently, India has fallen in line with US dictate to reduce oil imports from Iran. And in Washington, Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Robert Blake, informed lawmakers that India had been working on a plan to cut down on crude imports from Tehran.

On another front, for quite sometime now, officials from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have been pressing for access to a site at Iran's Parchin military facility that they suspect was being used to test multi-point rapid explosives of the kind needed to set off a nuclear charge.

A recent , well documented IAEA report says that Iran has built a large chamber at Parchin, southeast of Tehran, to conduct explosive tests that are "strong indicators" of efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. But the widely perceived view is that Iran is years away from having a deliverable nuclear warhead. Iran is believed to have achieved some degree of success in uranium enrichment, the technology of which is zealously guarded. But Iran has not yet achieved the "sufficient quantity or level of purity" to help fuel a bomb. Intelligence reports say Iran conducts uranium enrichment at the Natanz plant in central Iran and at a site deep in mountainous region in the proximity of the holy city of Qom. The United States, Israel and Western countries believe that the Iran could exploit its advances in enrichment technology to build nuclear weapons. But then as independent strategic analysts point out this observation may not be more than just a "conjecture".

A section of US intelligence officials believe Iran has the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle East and many of these projectiles could be reconfigured to deliver nuclear warheads. Israel looks at Iran's nuclear programme as potential threat to the very existence of the Jewish state. Obviously, on several occasions, top ranking Iranian officials had made a call for the destruction of Zionist state. Against this backdrop, Israel has not ruled out the possibility of making a pre-emptive military strike to paralyze the Iranian nuclear program.

But then there is as yet no clear picture pointing out to a reliable ground reality of Iran's nuclear weapons development program. In the ultimate analysis, the hype and concern over Iranian nuclear programme could prove no more than a "damp squib" much the same way as the "weapons of mass destruction" of Saddam Hussein that acted as a trigger for US intervention in Iraq.

Radhakrishna Rao is a full time aerospace and defense writer with three decades of experience in contributing stories in areas of his professional interest to a wide ranging global media.

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing. Articles submitted for this section allow our readers to express their opinions and do not necessarily meet the same editorial standards of Asia Times Online's regular contributors.



(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)





 


1.
Ill winds swirl around Pakistani doctor

2. US hard line in Iran talks driven by Israel

3. Egypt divides on familiar fault lines

4. What made Iran's revolution any different?

5. Unification hint flagged at Ma's speech

6. Macau casinos face a difficult decade

7. India plants for energy

8. Instability spreads

9. Beijing, Seoul, and Tokyo look to an uncertain future

10. Mumbai's booksellers face the digital age

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, May 29, 2012)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110