WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     May 31, 2012


The sweet and sour of oil
By Hossein Askari

This is the second article in a special series on oil and the Persian Gulf.
Part 1: Riddle of the sands

Contrary to popular belief, all crude oils are not the same. They don't even look the same or have the same color or smell. While there are well over 100 types of crude, depending on where they are found (similar to the wine regions of France!), two important characteristics are used for their classification - specific gravity (that is the density, referred to as light, medium or heavy) and sulfur content (referred to as sweet or sour).

"Heavy" crudes are those that have an API (American Petroleum Institute) specific gravity of less than 20 (the lower the specific gravity the higher the density of the crude), while "light" crudes are generally those with an API in the range of 32-42; crudes in

 

the middle range of 20-32 generally classified as medium crudes.

The characteristic of crudes matter for a number of reasons:
i. The heavier the oil, the harder it is to pump the oil through pipelines and the more expensive it is to refine into the higher priced fuel products-jet fuel and gasoline;
ii. Sweet crudes are less expensive to refine; and
iii. Most refineries are built and configured to refine a particular type of crude and produce a given mix of products (refineries can be built to handle a range of crudes and produce a wider range of products, but such refining flexibility increases design and construction cost).

It is precisely because all crudes and refineries are not the same that a shortfall in Libyan crude exports (which is both light and sweet) as we experienced during the Libyan crisis could not immediately be filled by Saudi exports of a heavy sour crude. It also takes time to reconfigure refineries, shift crude exports and trade products where they are in demand.

Also and crucially, the extraction of crudes that are similar to Libyan crude may not be increased quickly because of limitations on installed capacity. Oil fields have a capacity, and while output may be increased somewhat and temporarily beyond capacity, extraction beyond a certain rate can damage the field and significantly reduce the amount of oil that can be ultimately recovered by conventional means.

To increase installed capacity for crude production in a region takes time, requiring exploration, reservoir and field development, production installation and transportation to markets. Depending on the location, this could even take up to nearly 10 years.

For the reasons above, a major oil field disruption (through fire, war, and so forth) can have a significant adverse impact on oil prices, especially if excess global installed capacity is low and there is no excess capacity in the type of crude that was disrupted.

The most frequently cited crude benchmarks and prices are: Brent (North Sea), West Texas Intermediate (WTI), Arabian light, and the OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) basket. [1]

Another factor (besides crude quality) that affects the price of crudes is the location of the oil - that is, how difficult it is to transport it and how close it is to the market.

From the crude producers' side, the production (or lifting) cost may be the most important factor about any crude oil, and this varies dramatically across the world depending on the size of the reservoir, the condition of the reservoir, the depth of the oil from the surface and the nature of the general surroundings.

While precise figures are trade secrets, an overall picture is possible with rough figures we have compiled for marginal cost of a barrel (the cost of producing an additional barrel) and the average cost (including all costs such as development and capital costs divided by the number of barrels produced) over the years:
  • Persian Gulf on shore - marginal cost US$1-$3; average cost $5-$10;
  • North America - average cost $15-$40;
  • Arctic fields - average cost $35-$100;
  • Deep off-shore - average cost $30-$70.

    Modern technology has increased the availability of crude oil through enhanced oil recovery methods from existing reservoirs and from non-conventional sources (oil shale and tar sands), with the average cost of enhanced recovery oil coming in at $30-$70, and for non-conventional sources $35-$120.

    The advantage of Persian Gulf oil is clear - it is the cheapest oil to produce and get to market. This affords Middle East oil exporters an unbelievable operating margin (or rent) when oil is selling for about $100 per barrel.

    In terms of location, besides having the cheapest production cost, the Persian Gulf has crude in abundance, with about 55% of global reserves of conventional crude oils. This will likely increase to about 65% as exploration activity in Iraq picks up, economic sanctions on Iran are lifted and reserves outside the Persian Gulf are depleted more quickly. The estimated reserves of recoverable oil from non-conventional sources are roughly on a par with conventional crude reserves.

    While the Persian Gulf is the center of conventional crude oil reserves, North America (the United States and Canada) are at the center of crude that may be recovered from shale and tar sands, with North America having about 50% of the global reserves from these sources.

    The role of technology in all of this must be appreciated. The reserve figures are rough estimates with the level of technology that we have today. Advances in technology involved in exploration, drilling (offshore platforms and horizontal drilling), enhanced recovery and extraction from non-conventional sources add to reserves and increase the lifespan of oil-based hydrocarbon fuels. Technology, in turn, is in large part driven by oil prices. As oil prices rise, it is more profitable to develop new technologies and to produce from oil fields that were previously unprofitable.

    While oil continues to be the world's most important traded fuel, natural gas has become increasingly significant over the past 30 or so years. There are two major sources of conventional natural gas - associated or wet gas (gas that comes out of the ground along with oil) and unassociated or dry gas (fields that produce only gas and little or no liquid hydrocarbons) - and a number of sources of un-conventional gas, principally shale gas and to a much lesser degree methane from coal beds.

    The importance of natural gas has increased because it is a cleaner fuel than oil (and of course much cleaner than coal where it can be used to produce electricity) and it has in recent years become much more tradable using ships and pipelines.

    The Persian Gulf's share of global conventional gas reserves, at about 40%, is well below its share of oil reserves, but it is still the largest region for gas region, with giant reserves in Iran (16%) and Qatar (14%) and with the reserves of these two countries and the Russian Federation amounting to about 55% of global conventional reserves.

    While shale gas was produced over 100 years ago, its potential importance has dramatically increased over the past 10 or so years because of technological advances and discoveries all around the world, especially in the US, Europe and in China (where it is close to the major end user). Some experts speculate that shale gas may eventually change the global energy outlook, especially if the adverse environmental impact of its production can be minimized. A number of experts argue, however, that hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) and the drilling that goes along with it pose grave environmental dangers.

    Historically, natural gas and crude oil prices have had a reasonably close association, but the association has been broken in recent years, in part because of the availability of shale gas.

    The oil and gas consumption picture is more clear-cut than the reserve-production picture. Gross domestic product (GDP) of countries and oil and gas consumption go hand-in-hand. Some countries rely more heavily on coal, but given environmental concerns, oil and gas are increasingly correlated to economic output, not withstanding that some countries use energy more efficiently in producing $1 of GDP.

    The three biggest consumers of global oil output are the US (21%), the European Union (16%) and China (11%) and the US, Europe, Japan and China are the biggest oil importers. Among exporters, the two leaders are the Middle East (36%) and the former Soviet Union (16%).

    The US (22%) and European Union (16%) also lead the way in consumption of natural gas, followed by the Russian Federation (13%). For trade in natural gas, the US is in rough balance, Europe is the big importer and Russia and Qatar are the major exporters.

    NEXT: The driver of oil prices.

    Note
    1. The 12 members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries are: Algeria, Anglola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Venezuela.

    Hossein Askari is Professor of Business and International Affairs at the George Washington University.

    (Copyright 2012 Hossein Askari)




  •  


    1.
    Ill winds swirl around Pakistani doctor

    2. US hard line in Iran talks driven by Israel

    3. Egypt divides on familiar fault lines

    4. What made Iran's revolution any different?

    5. Unification hint flagged at Ma's speech

    6. Macau casinos face a difficult decade

    7. India plants for energy

    8. Instability spreads

    9. Beijing, Seoul, and Tokyo look to an uncertain future

    10. Mumbai's booksellers face the digital age

    (24 hours to 11:59pm ET, May 29, 2012)

     
     



    All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
    © Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
    Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
    Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110