WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Aug 3, 2012


Page 2 of 2
SPEAKING FREELY
Iran's fate after Assad
By Richard Javad Heydarian

When troops of the Saudi-led Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC - which also includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar) stormed into Bahrain to crush the uprising, Iran valiantly stood by the revolutionaries and warned the Arab monarchs against violating the sovereignty of a neighboring nation and the repression of a popular democratic movement.

The tide turns
However, 2011 would prove to become a rollercoaster year for Iran. By March, Iran's most important regional ally, Syria, emerged as the next victim of a transnational Arab uprising. Initially, confident in the pillars of the Assad regime, Tehran viewed growing pockets of protests as a momentary phenomenon. After all, the Syrian leadership itself failed to notice the depth of

 

discontent amongst the public, thus refusing to contemplate structural democratic reform.

Failing to capitalize on Assad's popularity and charisma, the regime shunned entering into a meaningful dialogue with the broad spectrum of opposition groups - within and outside the country - and institute consequential democratic reforms to appease the legitimate demands of its people for a pluralistic-democratic system.

After years of aggressive economic liberalization, many in Syria noticed the meteoric rise of a cadre of new elites close to the regime who benefited from favorable privatization schemes and preferential business-and-trade contracts.

So, in addition to lingering concerns with the lack of sufficient democratic space within a one-party system, a combination of declining subsidies, growing employment insecurity, a rollback of state-owned enterprises, deteriorating state services, widening inequality, and festering corruption added to the broader popular discontent against the regime.

However, it was ultimately the regime's increasingly indiscriminate use of force to quash the protests that radicalized the opposition and provided hostile Sunni Arab monarchies in the Persian Gulf as well as a myriad of radical Sunni groups - with the prominent participation of al-Qaeda - with a perfect opportunity to "internationalize" the Syrian revolution.

Gradually, as the opposition forces, most especially the Free Syrian Army (FSA), gained growing logistical-financial and diplomatic support from regional powers such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia, the Syrian uprising morphed into a combination of a domestic sectarian "civil war" - between pro-regime Alawite and minority groups, on one hand, and the majority Sunni population, on the other - as well as a broader proxy conflict between two camps: you have Iran, Russia, and China supporting the Assad regime, while Turkey, GCC countries, and the West side with the opposition.

Unlike the "lightning" revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, the Syrian uprising has replicated a "slow-motion disintegration" of the Syrian nation-state. With almost 20,000 civilians killed, and hundreds of thousands of people fleeing the country, there is just so much blood on the hands of opposing parties.

The whole country is practically in a state of war, and the regime has resorted to brutal siege tactics and carpet bombardment to crush opposition strongholds. The opposition - increasingly radicalized and infiltrated by extremist elements such as the al-Qaeda - has been returning the favor by targeting centers of powers, ranging from government offices to individual military units spread across the country.

Former UN secretary general Kofi Annan's six-point plan never stood a chance because neither the opposition - from the Free Syrian Army to the Syrian National Council and its many offshoots - nor the regime was willing to make necessary political concessions. The Syrian uprising has become a "battle to the death".

Recent months have witnessed a decisive turn in the balance of forces. For sometime, the opposition has been particularly strong in the center and south, but it is also beginning to erode the regime's control over the country's most important cities: Aleppo and Damascus.

After the successful assassination of Syria top security officials, defense minister Dawoud Rajha and his deputy, Assef Shawkat (Assad's brother-in-law), the opposition forces are beginning to wrest control of Aleppo from the regime, while clashes in certain neighborhoods of the very capital continue. Meanwhile, the regime is experiencing a flurry of "high-profile" defections, ranging from top diplomats in Baghdad and London to Brigadar Manaf Tlas as well as the Aleppo parliamentarian Ikhlas Badawi.

End game approaching
For years, the Iranian regime's opposition to the West and Israel earned it tremendous popularity on the Arab street. However, its support for the Assad regime has severely undermined this trend. Iran is being accused of not only supporting a brutal dictator responsible for the deaths of thousands of his own citizens, but also acting as an impediment to the democratization of an Arab nation.

Iran's continuous logistical, economic, and political support has been crucial to the survival of the Syrian regime, however as the opposition gains increasing control over the country - and as the international pressure on the regime grows - the imminent downfall of Assad becomes ever more likely.

Either the regime itself will sacrifice Assad to save its own skin (akin to how the Egyptian Army dispensed with Mubarak to retain its own power), or the opposition will continue to benefit from the inflow of increasingly advanced armaments and defections within the regime's ranks to eventually override the regime.

Today, Iran faces the stark choice of letting go of Assad to preserve a friendly regime or desperately stand by him and risk the possibility of confronting a hostile, post-Assad revolutionary state. It might be too late for Iran to reach out to the opposition and win their hearts.

Richard Javad Heydarian is a Phillipines-based foreign affairs analyst specializing on Iran and international security.

(Copyright 2012 Richard Javad Heydarian)

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing. Articles submitted for this section allow our readers to express their opinions and do not necessarily meet the same editorial standards of Asia Times Online's regular contributors.

1 2 Back





 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110