WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese




    Middle East
     Aug 15, 2012


Page 2 of 2
SPEAKING FREELY
'Arab Summer' turns messy
By Richard Javad Heydarian

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing.

So obviously, what we should perhaps expect from the 'Arab Summer' is a new order that upgrades as well as combines Arab nationalism (with emphasis on independence and defense of the Palestinian cause), liberal democratic institutions (emphasizing the 'rule of law' and reflecting the secular-pluralistic character of the 'Tahrir' revolutionaries), and a quasi-socialist state, which

 

prioritizes social welfare, employment-generation, poverty-alleviation, and the revival of the heavily-deteriorated industrial and agricultural sectors.

The question is: are the revolutions moving in such direction?

The disorderly transition
Once we gaze beyond the euphoria over the Arab spring, and take a sober look at the trajectory of ongoing uprisings and post-revolutionary government, we find a mixed but generally worrying picture: democratic elections have taken place in countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, and Libya, but the general economic and political situation is far from rosy or encouraging. Practically all Arab states in the throes of the revolution are facing tremendous economic challenges. Most of them are struggling with declining economic output, rising fiscal deficit, steep deterioration in the balance of payments, and rising difficulties with debt-payment and maintenance of strategic subsidy schemes.

The ascent of Islamists, with strong organizational background in welfare-provision (especially in Tunisia, Egypt, and Morocco) has not brought about a significant change - or promise of - in the structure of Arab economies. We are yet to witness a single Islamist government - or any post-revolutionary state for that matter - proposing concrete policies on employment-generation, poverty-alleviation, and disengagement from unfavorable trade-and-investment schemes, which have contributed to the industrial-and-agricultural hollowing in the much of the Arab world.

We are also yet to see a decisive movement towards further regional integration to maximize trade-linkages, economies of scale, and the comparative advantage of individual Arab economies. In absence of major external financing - exacerbated by the world's focus on the eurozone crisis - most post-revolutionary Arab states will continue to struggle. Libya, the only oil-rich revolutionary state, is yet to unfreeze billions of dollars in frozen assets and resolve the growing Tripoli-Benghazi tensions over the division of oil wealth.

The political picture is far from encouraging. Libya is yet to rein in thousands of renegade (former) rebel forces and establish a unified, professional national army. There is also the fear of the disintegration of the Libyan state in face of growing calls for regional independence and devolution, especially by the Benghazi-dominated East. Egypt and Tunisia have been rocked by continuous industrial strikes and political protests, while the ruling Islamists are facing fierce challenge from the (divided) secular opposition and/or struggling to wrist power from the military and remnants of the previous regime.

Among the populace, expectations are running high, but patience is wearing thin. So, one can expect continuing protests and political uncertainty for some time to come - thus, complicating the economic crisis and empowering counter-revolutionary forces.

In terms of foreign policy, even Islamist governments seem to be sticking to the status quo. Wary of Western concerns, circumscribed by the influence of the military as well as the secular forces, and 'bribed' by reactionary monarchies in the Persian Gulf, the Islamist governments have gone to a great extent to ensure that there would be no major shift in relations with either Iran or Israel. The former is to be kept in check, while the latter is to be left untouched.

In Egypt, the military has ensured that the civilian government will have no control over internal security and foreign policy. This was achieved through the introduction of new constitutional amendments just days before the Islamist won the Presidential elections.

However, things have turned even more interesting and yet dangerously uncertain in recent days. Against the backdrop of recent deadly attacks by jihadi elements against border soldiers in Sinai, the Islamist President Mohammad Morsi has upped the ante by directly taking on the ruling junta, or the so-called 'Supreme Council of the Armed Forces': he ended Field Marshal Tantawi's two-decade-long role as a defense minister, while forcing the Chief Army of Staff Sami Anan into retirement and reversing the junta's constitutional amendments - restoring presidential powers. Surely, the uniformed men are not just going to sit idle as the new Islamists chip away at their half-century-long powers and entitlements.

By taking on the country's two most powerful military figures, the Islamist civilian leadership has opened a new front in Egypt's ongoing political civil war: the seculars and Islamists have been fighting over civilian leadership, ideology, and constitutional principles, while the Islamists have taken on the military for the control of the state.

Moreover, unlike the 'lightening' revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt, the uprisings in Bahrain, Libya, Yemen, and Syria have been fraught with violence and sectarian/tribal divide. Salleh and his acolytes continue to threaten the fragile post-revolutionary government in Yemen, while the casualties in Libya and Syria have been in tens of thousands. Bahrain is still rocked by predominantly Shia-led protests, with the monarchy refusing to institute much-needed reforms to remedy the continuous injustices faced by the Shi'ite majority.

Of course, Syria is already experiencing a slow-motion disintegration, with fears of large-scale civil war (even after Assad's prospective downfall) leading to mass atrocities compounding a conflict that is increasingly becoming a 'proxy war' between Arab monarchies, Turkey, and the West on one hand, and China, Iran, and Russia, on the other. The Syrian uprisings is already spilling over into neighboring countries such as Iraq and Lebanon, which have been struggling with festering sectarian conflicts for sometime.

The Arab summer is a clear indication of how revolutions can cruelly defy our most optimistic ideals and hopes. Not only can they fail to bring fundamental structural changes overnight, but also fraught with uncertainty and chaos. Unless Arab states make a decisive move towards democratization, structural economic reforms and a more independent foreign policy, instability will continue to loom on the horizon.

Speaking Freely is an Asia Times Online feature that allows guest writers to have their say. Please click here if you are interested in contributing. Articles submitted for this section allow our readers to express their opinions and do not necessarily meet the same editorial standards of Asia Times Online's regular contributors.

Richard Javad Heydarian is a Phillipines-based foreign affairs analyst specializing on Iran and international security.

(Copyright 2012 Richard Javad Heydarian)

1 2 Back





 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110