South Asia

Musharraf braced for jihadi backlash
By Aijazz Ahmed

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan's President General Pervez Musharraf has taken a firm stand on jihadi organizations and groups promoting extremism, and he is paying a price for it, appearing to be losing out on all fronts.

India is complaining of inadequacies in the efforts of the Pakistan government to curb infiltration into Indian-administered Kashmir, and refuses to engage in any diplomacy or talks until it feels its conditions have been met.

The US has commended Musharraf's efforts, but persistently pressurizes for further measures to reduce the movement of jihadis across the Line of Control (LoC) that divides Kashmir, extending sympathy to India, and even maintaining that it has proof of "current" movements across the LoC.

Musharraf has also left open the sore of religious extremist groups who have been suppressed after more than two decades of active support from Pakistani authorities.

The threat of retaliation by the jihadi outfits has risen, and poses a problem for the internal security of the country. "Musharraf bowed down to the US-Indian nexus, but the jihadis will continue their jihad," remarked Yehya Mujahid, spokesman of the Jamaat-e-Dawa Pakistan, formerly known as the Lashkar-i-Taiba, an Islamic militant group that has been active in Jammu and Kashmir since the early 1990s. "We will remain committed to the Kashmir cause. The government has slipped from its long-standing position on Kashmir. Musharraf has taken a U-turn on the Kashmir policy of the state," said Mujahid.

Musharraf's military government, in a bid to pacify US-Indian pressure, launched a campaign to marginalize jihadi groups, which previously enjoyed support from the Pakistan army as well as its intelligence services. The government attempted to curb infiltration into Indian-administered Kashmir. These efforts were primarily a direct result of international pressure after September 11 and US air strikes on Afghanistan, compounded by India's accusations regarding attacks on its parliament by suspected Pakistan-based militants last December.

Acting on the US demands, the Musharraf-led government arrested Maulana Masood Azhar, head of the Jaish-i-Mohammad, and Hafiz Saeed, chief of the Lashkar-i-Taiba, and took dozens of activists into custody. An official ban was imposed on the groups on January 12 this year.

Pakistan's patronage of armed extremist factions was a result of the Afghan Soviet war, when the US, backed by the international community, promoted them as a buffer against the threatening spread of communism. After the defeat and withdrawal of Soviet troops in 1989, the jihadis were no longer required to continue their struggle in Afghanistan and turned elsewhere to promote their ideologies. Kashmir provided them a base to reframe another "cause", and another battlefield was found in Indian-administered Kashmir.

The Kargil dispute in 1999 brought into world focus Pakistan's role, and its "diplomatic and moral" support for the Kashmir independence movement. The dust of Kargil had hardly settled when as Indian Airlines plane was hijacked, forcing New Delhi to release four alleged terrorists from jail, including Mushtaq Gazdar, a British national and master of explosive devices, Ahmed Omar Saeed, a newly-turned British-born jihadi and recently convicted of masterminding the kidnapping of US journalist Daniel Pearl, and Maulana Masood Azhar, the chief of the Jaish-I-Mohammad, an organization banned by Pakistan.

Being a key ally in the US-led international coalition against terrorism, Pakistan came under tremendous pressure first when the US demanded a ban on the activities of the jihadi groups. The attack on the Indian parliament and then the Kashmir assembly fueled the fires, and the United States demanded the curtailment of infiltration.

How the jihadi groups will respond to Musharraf's policy to cleanse such outfits from society, however, the more important question as their reaction could seriously endanger the internal security of the country. The groups can be divided into two categories.

Jihadis from inside Indian-administered Kashmir: This first category of jihadi organizations belongs to Indian-administered Kashmir, but they have their bases in Pakistan. These groups are said to have about 2,000 active members, with about 5,000 more supporters with links to the the groups. It is widely accepted that they take their instructions from "elsewhere". Analysts fear that if the government foils their bids to slip into the Kashmir Valley, they will spread all over Pakistan and start their fight in the name of jihad against the Pakistani establishment.

"They have to fight and Pakistan could be the next battle ground if they are not allowed to enter Indian the side," one observer commented. Their prime motive was to liberate Kashmir, and not to destroy India. Islam or the destruction of the United States was also not their self-settled mandate, they add. But should they feel a threat from the United States, this might change.

Pakistani Jihadi Groups: The Pakistani jihadi groups are more powerful than the Kashmiri groups. The total number of activists in these groups - fully trained and equipped for jihad - is somewhere between 5,000 an 7,000. They have an additional 50,0000 supporter and likeminded people in the country. They are struggling for Islam as well as for Kashmir. Observers believe that they will act on the government's instructions to lay down their guns. "They were working on the instructions of the military establishment as front line troops and will continue to act like this, but a major problem is the splinter groups that have emerged in these organizations over the years," said an official. This is the real threat as, according to official, the military establishment has lost control of them because of its changing position on Afghanistan (rejection of the Taliban) and militancy in Kashmir.

However, some analysts are not ready to accept the Pakistani jihadi groups as a threat. "Lashkar-i-Taiba and Jaish-i-Mohammad will be footnotes in history very soon," said Niaz A Naik, a former foreign secretary of Pakistan and the man behind the "Track-II" diplomacy between Pakistan and India to defuse tension between the neighbors. He believes that after the withdrawal of state support they will not be in a position to act strongly. "But we cannot rule out the emergence of some splinter groups who may create some security problems, but this would be on a low scale," he opined.

"The US, the European Union, China, ASEAN and of course the Almati Conference on Terrorism will have to act. These players will have to play their role to bring both India and Pakistan to the negotiation table as security of the whole region and the world is at stake. Pakistan might be a victim of more terrorist activities in the near future at the hands of the splinter groups," he admitted.

Contrary to Naik, though, other government sources say that the country should brace for terrorist acts in near future. "They have enough ammunition, they have the will and they have the psyche to be martyred, and this will instigate them to act," said a government official, with the next few weeks expected to be decisive.

Observers are taking Musharraf's recent visits to three Asian countries as a diplomatic initiative against India as he is trying to reach joint defense agreements with China, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. Whether this will help in dealing with possible internal problems caused by the jihadis is another matter though.

(©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)

 
Aug 20, 2002



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.