Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
South Asia

Enron's ghost haunts India
By Arun Bhattacharjee

NEW DELHI - With creditors breathing down the government's neck and its reputation as a safe haven for foreign investment at stake, two Indian bureaucrats are trying to salvage what is left of a bust energy plant built by Enron, which went bankrupt spectacularly in 2002 in the United States, leaving behind a cloud of felony charges and outraged creditors.

Once the seventh-largest company in the US, Enron in 1992 was contracted to build a US$2 billion power project on India's western coast, in what was then the largest foreign investment ever made in India. The company had close ties to the administration of President George W Bush, who immediately denied them as Enron collapsed in the US in a welter of charges that it had lied about its profits.

Enron today still stands accused of a range of shady dealings, including concealing debts so they wouldn't appear in the company's accounts. Several company executives have already pleaded guilty and others remain under investigation. When Enron went under, it took Arthur Andersen, one of the world's largest accounting firms, down with it, on charges the accounting firm had condoned or covered up the cooked books.

Today, the Dabhol plant, 320 kilometers south of Mumbai, is nearly 700 hectares of rusting equipment, empty buildings and huge storage tanks bisected and surrounded by deserted roads. It had been projected as the world's largest natural gas-burning energy facility. With its 65 percent equity under a cloud and foreign creditors demanding repayment, India is now involved in a dispute that involves five countries and spans three oceans - the Atlantic, Indian and the Pacific. In addition, India's leading bank, Industrial Development Corporation, is bent under a huge non-performing loan worth $1.3 billion while the country is left holding the can without a single watt of power generated.

In the meantime, India's energy needs are already estimated at 30 percent short of demand - as its economy powers ahead. The country is facing a power crisis. According to a study by the Ohio Supercomputer Center in the US, India's energy consumption grew 7,000 percent from 1950 to 1998. Per capita energy consumption in India in 1997 was 19 million British Thermal Units (BTU), compared to 323 million BTU in the US, against a world average of 65 million BTU. By 2010, per capita energy usage in India is expected to increase to almost 40 million BTU, a two-fold increase in 13 years.

At Dabhol, almost everything went wrong. Dabhol Power Company (DPC), as it was named, was supposed to generate 2,100 megawatts of power, not only to meet the shortage around Mumbai and Maharashtra state, but to partially meet the demand for an increasingly power-starved country. Even before it was built, opposition figures were charging that Enron had got the contract with the aid of bribes, which the company repeatedly denied.

The opposition campaigned in 1994 and 1995 against the then-ruling Congress Party on an anti-Enron platform, charging that the contract was unduly enriching the Texas company. The Maharashtra state government fell in 1995, with the new government appointing a team of ministers to review the project and ultimately recommending the contract be scrapped. Enron entered arbitration and demanded $300 million in compensation. The state government countered with a suit alleging fraud and misrepresentation.

In 1996, when the currently ruling Bharatiya Janata Party had only been in power for 13 days, Dabhol received the green light for construction from Finance Minister Jaswant Singh. He not only cleared the project, but also provided the government's first-ever counter-guarantee to a power project, assuring full payment to the creditors in case of project failure under the Indo-US Bilateral Investment Protection Treaty.

Legal challenges continued, with Enron ultimately renegotiating the agreement amid continuing legal challenges by various Indian groups, although Phase I of the plant began to generate power. After various other legal challenges and squabbles, US Secretary of State Colin Powell entered the fray, raising Enron's problems with the Indian foreign minister. Later, Vice President Dick Cheney would also attempt to intervene with Sonja Gandhi, the president of the now-opposition Congress Party. A provision to benefit Enron's India operations was also included in the White House's so-far stalled energy package.

Then, in May of 2001, with the project 90 percent complete and producing electricity on naphtha instead of natural gas, the price of the fuel went through the roof. Dabhol Power ceased generating power on Phase I and halted construction on Phase II, although it was 90 percent completed. Only a few dozen guards remain on the site today.

Two years later, India woke up and appointed a committee to renegotiate and find ways of oiling and running the machinery, as General Electric, the US-based global energy equipment major providing the software to run the sophisticated power plant, and Bechtel, the consulting US firm, threatened to go to an international tribunal to recover their investment.

A flock of foreign investors from Austria to Australia, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the US also are all asking for payment and demanding comprehensive settlements to avoid international arbitration.

Those creditors are big names - ABN AMRO is asking for $77 million, Credit Suisse First Boston $35.3 million, ANZ $35.2 million, BNP Paribas $14.6 million and Australian Bank is asking for $9.5 million. The US government agency that ensured Dabhol Power against political fallout is asking for another $60 million.

The snowball started rolling as the Bank of America asked the US insurer OPIC for $30 million following a US arbitration panel ruling that international expropriation had taken place. India was required to pay OPIC for $28.5 million each to GE and Bechtel. Encouraged, other creditors simultaneously served notices to the prime minister's office on November 5 demanding settlement.

Indian banks followed, led by the Industrial Development Bank of India, the largest lender. Other Indian investors did not sit idle either as they felt that the government should not be partial only to foreign investors asking for a comprehensive settlement to avoid international arbitration.

India selected two of its experienced bureaucrats, Naresh Chandra and Vijay Kelkar, to attempt to sort out the mess to save money and time without going through the courts. A power ministry official says that GE holds the key to the project, as without its software the first phase - producing 700 MW - can't run. The Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Dabhol Power's buyer, is an equity holder and has come under criticism for conflict of interest as any rate increase may increase its equity value. But as a purchaser and distributor of the power to the consumer, the rate has to be both affordable and reasonable.

Indian negotiators have a government mandate for settling the issue as fast as possible but many suggest that the silence of the US government has encouraged GE to go ahead without taking into account that a revived Dabhol Power would be in the interest of GE shareholders. India consulted Tractebel Energy Engineering, the $15 billion European energy giant, and was told that the value of the plant after settlement would be worth three times the original investment.

Although government officials are tight-lipped on Dabhol Power's future, it is rumored that there are international as well as Indian buyers. Industry circles say that the case was thoroughly mishandled. They point out that the Maharashtra government's takeover sent strong signals abroad that investing in India was politically risky. Since the nationalization of the oil industry by former prime minister Indira Gandhi's government in the early 1970s, India did not take any single step that was not negotiated before or synchronized with the declared government policy, said AC Chatterjee of the Birla group of industries.

Although GE India declines to comment on its haste to settle without taking into account the interests of other investors, India feels that GE and Bechtel are under major pressure from their shareholders, given their $400 million investment.

The two major industry bodies in India, the Confederation of Indian Industry and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, explain that the value of the plant today would be around $1.8 billion (Rs9 billion). That would include the startup of the natural gas-based third plant of the project which, with inflation adjustment, would perhaps be less than what it was two years ago. This is likely to be one of India's arguments. The other would refer to a new commitment by the lenders to start the plant after absorbing minor losses to their shareholders with the hope of a profit in the near future.

For power-hungry India, Dabhol Power is a vital project. But the government is unlikely to buckle under GE or Bechtel's pressure as the interests of Indian investors - around $1.32 billion - has to be taken into consideration for political, as well as economic, reasons.
(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies)
 
Nov 14, 2003



India gets tough with multinationals (Dec 24, '02)

 

     
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong